let-me-in

More than a year ago, we ran a story explaining why Cloverfield director Matt Reeves wanted to remake the beloved Swedish horror film, Let the Right One In. His personal take on the material led me to believe that perhaps Let Me In could actually end up being a worthwhile American take on the material. Reeves recently spoke to MTV, and offered more insight into his personal connection with the story. He also offered up some thoughts on the inevitable comparisons to other vampire properties like Twilight.

When asked if he considers Let Me In a remake or a reimagining, Reeves replies:

It’s very much an Americanization of the tale that John Ajvide Lindqvist tells. The film touched me. And I read the book, which he also wrote, and it moved me too. It reminded me so much of my own childhood in certain ways. It’s so much about that period of preadolescence, that feeling of being a child and of being bullied, the difficulties of growing up. It’s such a beautiful coming-of-age story, in addition to being such a terrific genre story. One of the things I really wanted to do was find my own way into the story while still being very, very reverent to the beautiful film and to the wonderful story that they created.

I think part of why Let the Right One In grabbed audiences so well was the universality of its themes. The film could have really been set anywhere, which makes transplanting it to another country not so difficult. That Reeves connects so well with the material doesn’t mean that Let Me In will definitely be good, but it’s a much more preferable directorial approach than doing it just for  a paycheck.

To the Twilight comparison, Reeves says:

To me, the thing about genre stories that is the most interesting thing is what you do with the metaphor of the genre. You can do a grand, sweeping love story, like “Twilight,” and use that metaphor of the two people that are just being torn apart and the aching-ness of it, and that’s a great fantasy. I think that what people respond to in “Twilight” is the fantasy of it. It’s such a grand, romantic fantasy, and in a way, the reason why I think there is room for a film like ours is, though it’s a vampire film, it uses it in such a different way. Whereas “Twilight” is kind of a fantasy, this will be a darker, scarier kind of journey.

“Darker” and “scarier” are the key words there, because those were the elements of the original film that I think audiences enjoyed the most. It remains to be seen how dark Reeves will be allowed to go with a film about adolescents, but at least we know the leads (The Road’s Kodi Smit-Mcphee and Chloe Moretz from Kick-Ass) are up to the task.

Read the full interview over at MTV.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • ET
    A remake of a perfect film is so absurd that I want to puke. Not only that it's only two years old! Somebody roll down the window, I'm about to hurl!
  • : (
    Oh dear, oh dear. Who does this guy think he is? The film was clearly Swedish, and not something that could be translated. 1980's Sweden is a very specific setting. The cultural overtones, and the underexposed-on the verge of the future-town is key to the film. The post-punk 7"'s subtle influence, the bleak setting and attitude, all key features to the film sprawling from the location and time period. And why Reeves think American films, especially REMAKES(for god sakes, what American film isn't a remake these days) have any credibility beyond a dollar sign is beyond me. I see no way this film could possibly be any good.
  • riget2
    Hiring a brilliant DOP is a step in the right direction. Check out Greig Fraser's work on Bright Star and Last Ride - you can see it working for the story in the best way.
  • Lux
    A United Front Against Hollywood Remakes must be formed.
  • : (
    I second that. I haven't seen an original movie in ages.
  • There are some solid actors in this such as Jenkins. Which leads me to believe the script is at the very least good. Is it going to be the visual masterpiece that LTROI is? No. But it could be quite solid on its own right. Especially the further it resembles the book and not the other film.
  • LA2000
    Actually, I think you may be wrong about the "visual masterpiece" part. Reeves hired the DP from "Bright Star" whose work on that movie is absolutely stunning. I have no doubt that the US remake will, at the very least, look incredible.
  • Your information has helped raise my hopes. But it still won't have the single most effective shot of all-time in my opinion (you know full well what I am talking about).
  • freemachine
    If you're talking about the swimming pool scene, OMFG, that blew me away. My imagination ran wild with thoughts of how that bloodbath went down, which I assume was partially the intent (besides it looking cool).
  • nerdgurl
    To me the big question is if they will go with the whole phedophile thing that the book portrayed. I understand why they originally found it to be too uncomfortable, but I think it would really help this movie to show a side of the original story, not seen on film before.

    It's not a remake. The american version was announced before swedish movie was finished.
  • you know Americans are gonna cut paedophilia out of the film. They always cut out everything "uncomfortable" out of movies and try to make it as Christian-friendly as possible.
  • Dan
    But it is a remake and it was wasn't announced before the Let the Right One In was finished. The Swedish film was finished before the rights to remake it were bought while it was playing at film festivals.
  • topheavy
    Hold on tight boys, this is going to suck more than an hooker from nevada.
  • grendelsdad
    Whaddaya expect, it's a vampire movie:P
  • grendelsdad
    Could be worse. Of course it could also be better (if Americans stopped to be such nancies and started to watch foreign films), but as long as the trailer wont include either Jaden Smith or any person associated with Twilight, I have faith that it will be watchable due to the source material alone.
  • you make a solid point about the American apprehension to watch foreign films, and not just foreign films, but films that are not exposited from second-one.

    The beauty of Let the Right One In is the minimal dialog and the emotions that are conveyed by steady, patient camera work as opposed to the recent wave of frantic, hand-held, Cloverfield-style cinematography.
  • grendelsdad
    Those are some excellent point. It just occurred to me that, if they tried to recreate some of the atmosphere of Let the Right One In through similar means, they could pretty much drive away the audience they make this for.

    It just seems a bit pointless: They might create something that is very much like Let the Right One In. It will have minimal dialog and steady camera-work and be pretty minimalistic overall. But the general public, the one they are trying to attract by making an Americanized version, is not too keen on this kind of movie, and the part of the audience that is keen on it wouldn't have minded if it were from Finnland, Switzerland or Kamtschatka. So what is the point?
  • bug
    Interesting all this talk about the film being so universal ... for me one of the great pleasures of the film (and much more so the book) is the description of my childhoods Stockholm suburbia. My favorite part was always that of the alcoholic group of friends in the cheap china restaurant. I wonder how that transfers to the US.
  • saad
    yet again the American machine goes and shits on anything original...LONG LIVE THE EUROPEAN AUTEUR!!!
  • Weatherman
    Fuck Europe.
  • A-FUCKING-MEN!!!!!!
  • musicsoup
    Really, the problem for me isn't Reeves and his intentions... it's Chloe Moretz. I'm know I'm in the minority here, but I don't really like her. She hasn't done anything to impress me, and Kick-Ass looks more self-conscious than any movie I've seen in a long time, and not in a way I'm cool with. It's just trying too hard to be cool. Moretz is probably hoping for Twilight-esque success, not financially, but in the idea of becoming the next Kristen Stewart, as if that's something to strive for. The beauty of the original, is that I had no idea who these kids were, as actors. So I just believed them in their roles, much like Sharlto with District 9. But that's because they are foreign actors, and Americans don't really watch foreign movies. We, the /Film audience, are not the majority of Americans. Ultimately, the problem with American remakes, is them stuffing the movies with known or up-and-coming faces. Just takes me right out of it. But whatever, let's not forget that Cloverfield isn't Reeve's only movie... but upon further inspection, let's just pretend that it is. Just callin it as I see it, folks.
  • So you don't like Chloe Moretz because the ads for Kick-Ass look self-conscious and you made up a story in your head about how she's actually only doing this to become the next Kristen Stewart?

    She impressed me in 500 Days of Summer. That's the only thing I've seen her in so far.
  • musicsoup
    Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. I make up stories in my head all the time. This one just feels a little more believable than most.
  • I still don't think Reeves gets the material. His analysis of Twilight was spot on, while the words he used for Let the Right One In were "bullied", "coming of age", "dark" and "scary". Very general and un-insightful and frankly, troubling. I also like that he had to declare he had read the book when nobody asked him.

    Maybe he would be better off directing the next Twilight movie. He could read that book too.
  • MoonDog
    What words would you have preferred he used other than "bullied", "coming of age", "dark" and "scary"? In a little, shallow soundbite interview, those sound pretty spot on to me... at least "teen", "slick" and "reimagining" weren't part of his vocabulary.
  • If you click on my name actually, it will bring you to my review blog where I have a very comprehensive analysis of the film.

    I use some of the words he uses, but there is so much more the movie is about.
  • The book included those themes but it wasn't really a coming-of-age story in a traditional, positive sense. The book is much darker than the Swedish film, in many aspects, especially in the character of Oskar. (Spoilers about the book after this point, so don't read if you're not into that sort of thing.) Oskar was a troubled kid. He didn't just fantasize about revenge like he did in the movie, he was fascinated by murder and mayhem in the book. He, quite literally, would have become a serial killer in his adult years. But he fit the bill just perfectly for Eli, who is looking for someone like that to manipulate and control. Above all else, Oskar is just a generally troubled kid: pisses himself a lot, binge eats, is a thief, and more. In the book, even though you feel for Oskar, he's not as likable of a character as he is in the Swedish adaptation. In all actuality, Oskar would end up just another caretaker for Eli, like Håkan was.

    (End spoilers.)

    I enjoy and adore the movie, without a doubt. I see it as a soft, almost candy-coated take on the story, but it's still a solid movie in a dwindling subgrene of horror/drama. I'm interested in what Matt Reeves will do, though I was much more hopeful before I read his take on what the story was about.
  • Still have doubts on this one. The original works because of its subtlety, the atmosphere, the acting, the kids.. It is all authentic. But none of this will translate in a remake, much less when your goal is to "Americanize" it. You can love the movie, you can take the exact same script, but you cannot replicate the emotion that is distinctly unique in the original. It will feel manufactured. Hollywood is not capable of producing something like this.
  • It's not Hollywood or Americanization, but I have serious doubts as to this guy's abilities as a director to elicit a subtle, real performance out of little kids. His previous movie was nothing but great monster effects and screaming drowning out goofy shitty performances.
  • freemachine
    Reeves can wax poetic all he wants. It won't change the fact that this remake is bullshit. He should go and make Cloverfield 2, or whatever, and leave this one alone.
  • capawesome
    Nice way of softening some of criticism by saying you went through what most children went through. I still think this film should have never been remade no matter how much he tries to bullshit about being so "touched" by the story.

    Also saying this will be darker and or scarier than Twilight is hilarious.
  • thatsheavydoc
    "Also saying this will be darker and or scarier than Twilight is hilarious."

    See? He's setting himself an easy goal.
  • Dan P.
    Even though Reeves clearly has a strong love of the source material, that doesn't necessarily (and probably won't) translate into a good final movie. For proof of this you only need to look at Terminator Salvation, which turned out sub-par even though McG obviously loved the material.
  • I tend to agree completely. Another question would be, why remake a film that was released one year ago? A remake should re-imagine the film and add something to it.

    Mostly, I don't think Reeves is capable of recreating the minimalistic feel of the original, which is what differentiates Let the Right One In from the recent glut of vampire flicks.
  • If he would have strong love for the source material he wouldn't do an americanized version, he wouldn't touch the material at all.
  • JesseWhitehead
    I think this just might end up being good. Statistically speaking, eventually a remake of a foreign film is bound to end up being decent. But if this and Dinner For Shmucks are both successful, it could trigger a new wave of foreign remakes. Damn! It's a Catch-22.
  • freemachine
    "Statistically speaking..."

    It's probability, not statistics. Learn the difference.
  • tinaturnerstampons
    Oh my God, who even cares.

    I love that it some how turned into a big circle jerk.

    Freemachine I`ve seen you mock typo's before, so stop being such a hypocrite.

    I thought we were suppose to talk about movies on here, not polish egos.

    @JesseWhitehead All remakes of foreign films aren`t necessarily bad, for example The Departed, Some Like It Hot, and Fist Full Of Dollars

    But I do agree that most are loathsome :P
  • tinaturnerstampons
    Freemachine you sit on a throne of lies.
    --------------------------------------------

    The article is titled:

    Ron Howard’s Favorite Movies of 2009 and David Wain’s Best So-So Movies of the Decade

    You wrote:

    freemachine 3 weeks ago in reply to Bryan

    It's "YOU'RE", not "YOUR", as in you're both a couple of idiots!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    What do you call that you worthless hypocrite?

    In the words of vegabro:

    "Freemachine. And really every moron out there who has recently been incontrovertibly owned in public:

    Just accept that you fucked up and apologize; or better yet, sweep up the last bit of dignity you have and clear out of the conversation."
  • neildorman
    my dick your mouth freemachine
  • freemachine
    "Freemachine I`ve seen you mock typo's before, so stop being such a hypocrite."

    I dare you to find a SINGLE instance where I've done that! You won't, because I never have. I dare you!
  • tinaturnerstampon
    Dear God, the circle jerk continues.
  • LEAVE FREEMACHINE ALONE!!!! *raises a clenched fist*
  • JesseWhitehead
    Oh. Excuse the fuck out of me.
  • neildorman
    freemachine go fuck yourself, my dick your mouth
  • Jesse. And really every moron out there who has recently been incontrovertibly owned in public:

    Just accept that you fucked up and apologize; or better yet, sweep up the last bit of dignity you have and clear out of the conversation.

    This pathetic sarcastic defensive mechanism is really immature gets really really irritating. So cut it out and fuck off.
  • JesseWhitehead
    You're right. The sarcasm thing is irritating. I normally try not to be this snarky, but it's late and I've been feeling a little punchy. That's just an explanation, not an excuse. So to freemachine and anyonelse who found me annoying on this thread, I apologize. Peace?
  • freemachine
    No hay problema, amigo. (I make a shitload of typos BTW).
  • freemachine
    Think about that the next time you go correcting someone's English, as you did this afternoon in a feeble attempt to be cute. You're no genius either.

    Q.E.D.
blog comments powered by Disqus