We last reported on the grassroots campaign to earn Sam Rockwell an Oscar nomination for his… er… role in Moon back in October. “Sony Pictures Classics isn’t likely to put money into an awards campaign” said Peter at the time.

Today, Duncan Jones has been all of a Twitter about the matter and it seems there’s one big problem in particular with Sony’s plans for the picture. Unfortunately, it seems that Sony won’t send out screener copies as, according to a Tweet by Jones, “they say it costs too much for our little film as they would need to be water-marked copies as our DVD isn’t out yet in the US.”

A ludicrous argument, really, as the UK BD is region free and in plentiful supply, besides, they wouldn’t benefit from making watermarked copies where there’s already perfectly good non-watermarked copies out there to be pirated. Copyright thieves know no borders and will rob Jones, Sony and everybody else associated with the film from any source. It’s not like they’re waiting for an R1 NTSC copy.

So, what is Duncan Jones planning to do himself?

There’s still an ongoing petition, designed simply to get attention from the Academy. At the time of writing it stands at 2,151 signatures, with many of them being famous names. Matt Berry, who appears in the film, is perhaps not a fully surprising signatory, but how about, say, Jim Jarmusch or Jon Favreau?

I’m not sure what good this petition might do, but for three seconds work surely it can’t hurt? If nothing else it could lead to more articles, like this one you’re reading now, or The Hollywood Reporter’s blog post “Twitter storm stirring over missing screeners for Duncan Jones’ Moon

I suggested Academy screenings in NY an LA, as did Neil Gaiman apparently, which prompted Jones to tweet:

@brendonconnelly @neilhimself Great minds! well, we tried once, without much luck, but we can try again!

No indication that Sony would be paying for these screenings, of course. Surely they can afford that?

Beyond recognition for Rockwell’s performance it really would seem that the film has a shout at a nomination for Clint Mansell’s incredible score. I’d like to see nominations for screenplay and director too but I know better than to expect such things from a big old, slow turtle like the Academy.

The question now is, really, what can we do? Is there anything the film fans can do to support Moon, Duncan Jones and by extension, similarly impressive yet under supported films and directors?

Well, signing that petition won’t hurt; telling people about the film won’t hurt either; better still, blogging, tweeting and Facebooking about Sony’s decision to not issue screeners would keep the issue in people’s minds and might just carry the campaign to critical mass. A real sharp solution, though, would be somehow contriving means by which members of the Academy could get to see the movie and that, unfortunately, would be the sort of thing Sony could do easily and folks like you and I would have no way to carry off.

Here are some suggested solutions for Sony:

  • Non watermarked copies of the disc. Some UK BD discs would be a good start.
  • A password protected streaming version of the film, online only for a limited period of time.
  • Academy screenings that are properly promoted and easily accessible.
  • Sharing the details of where Mansell’s soundtrack can already be legally streamed. Here in the UK I can listen to the whole thing, for free and with all due royalties paid, via Spotify. Putting the album on a MySpace page that can be listened to globally isn’t a bad idea either.

I think the resonances of a success here would be good for low-budget and independent film, genre film and smart sci-fi in particular. Can’t you see the headlines now? Of course, by success I don’t even mean a nomination for Rockwell or Mansell, but the wide availability of the film to members of the Academy. If they then decide that, actually, they’d rather nominate some other actor, some other soundtrack, then I can’t see Jones, or even fans of Moon like myself, would have any complaints. A fair shot on goal is all that can be reasonably asked for.

And, with a performance and a soundtrack like these, a fair shot on goal is probably all that is needed.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • akaxxx
    Who cares? A movie doesn't need an oscar to still be considered great? Just cause a group of people choose their so called best movie it doesn't mean it has to be your favorite movie...with that said MOON was tight
  • This is really getting upsetting. I want to see the film, but it wasn't playing in my area. Now they're even stopping screening for the academy. This movie is getting stone walled by it's own profiteers.
  • Let's not forget that Rockwell was snubbed already for Confessions of a Dangerous Mind...
  • OL
    u know what we need - connections in the Academy camp. someone MUST know someone, and that person could mention the whole situation to the board or wahetevr they are called, and then - we could have some sort of a public Moon trust which would collect donations from fans to buy the UK BDs and send them to the judges...
  • norbert
    Sony classics seems like the worst distribution company ever. All their movies get limited release for almost no time. I also haven't seen any of them screened in my country (Poland) and even getting a dvd by other means than the net is hard. Bastards
  • justrobby
    Moon was over rated, but Sam was awesome in it.
  • Rockie
    just pay someone to read the wrong name at the oscars. easy.
  • Colonel_Kurtz
    /signed

    This could be a job for a pirate with a heart of gold (and a few bucks to spend on CDRs and stamps) to anonymously provide the academy voters with some unauthorized FYC screeners. I'm not saying, I'm just saying...
  • Gary
    I think Robert Pattinson should win the oscar! His performance of gay vampire being stalked by a depresed horney chic ,whos trying to turn him straight is the best performance of the year! He is even better than Heath Ledger in Brokeback Mountain.
  • lucascott
    He got the Oscar. You must have missed it. It was for Best Hair (it never moves. seriously).
    that said, Robert has potential, but those movies are not the best written fare. I saw Little Ashes and he was good. Not great. but good. I'm watching him (and now that chick that was in Up in the Air cause she was pretty good also) to see what happens. Just like the Harry Potter kids (the bad boy, little sister and the fat kid included). Perhaps in another 10 years one of those kids from those packs will be Oscar worthy. and not just for his hair
  • Well they got my name.
  • Mr Coats
    Nobody really cares do they? The oscars very rarely represent the best film/actors of the year.
  • evilninjax
    WHen the Oscars expanded the number of Best Pic Nominees to 10, did they modify the number of best actors/actresses at all?

    I'm surprised by Sony not pushing this at all as this is a year that a lesser known film might get put into Best Pic status.

    I'm thinking even if Sony put its backing behind Rockwell, that he doesn't have enough "Academy cred" to get nom'd.
  • Phinor
    To people saying it got it's share of publicity, I can only say Moon wasn't even publicly available or shown in many, many countries. I personally had no chance to see it before the DVD/Blu-Ray came out. But I guess that's irrelevant when it comes to Oscars.

    What I do hate is the fact you need a huge machinery behind your movie if you want to have a shot at an Oscar. Sending out DVDs all over the place because the voters want freebies instead of actually going to the movies? Spending millions to get publicity that should have no effect whatsoever on the quality of the movie or the performances? That's just not right. Kick all the academy members and think of a better system is all I have to say.

    I don't think Moon has a shot at any of the Oscars whether Sony supports it or not, but I could see a nomination or two for sure in a better world. It's a great movie and hopefully inspires people to create more original sci-fi regardless of budget.
  • lucascott
    the no DVDs came up cause they were being used to pirate movies. It was deemed too hard to watermark individual codes in every disk to trace the source so they just dumped them.
    at one point, screener rips (from awards and even just review copies) were THE source on bittorrent sites, limewire etc.
    no wonder the studios won't consider removing DRM from places like itunes. or even allowing 1080p quality files (cause someone will find a way to remove the DRM if they haven't already)
  • Spike
    I am surprised by the lack of comments mentioning the hilarity of Sam Rockwell trapped in an Academy Award.
  • Rockme
    This movie was interesting and boring at the same time
  • zamarov
    Renner doesn't even come close to Rockwell
    Renner's performance is one note
    Rockwell's is the real deal
  • BenJamin
    I don't understand the whole point of sending films to the Academy or having movies come out in an awards season. Why aren't these people watching films all year round?
  • lucascott
    most of the important folks are watching movies all year around. but if something comes out in January by the end of the year it is only faintly in the mind. You might not even remember that it came out in that year and not the year before. thus the campaigns and such.
    that said, I think this whole thing is much like the TimeWarnerCable and Fox Networks tiff. An indication that the Academy and Studios are not embracing modern culture and technology.
    I mean really. How about online streaming via a private system where they have passwords, etc. why not gift free itunes or Amazon downloads (tagged to the movie in question so you can't use the credit to get whatever). or simply why not set up group screenings or free passes if you bring something back to the theatres. there are dozens of ways to handle the issue without sending out DVDs.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Because they're old and lazy and don't really like movies?
  • freemachine
    Come on Sony, I paid for the movie and loved it, so the least you could do is support Rockwell this Oscar season. Sam's performance was outstanding.
  • I think Jones should get his dad involved. I just want to hear David's voice again on TV... I miss it.
  • yeah this movie was OK, but oscars? you gotta be kidding me.

    to even put this in the same category as Inglorious Basterds, Avatar, and some of these other is ridiculous.
  • scaughty
    Seeing that comment just makes me sick. So you're saying that Avatar is of more quality than Moon? Avatar is just a 2 and a half hour piece of crap movie with a terribly mediocre story line, shrouded in the mess that James Cameron calls "revolutionary film making." Avatar is EASILY the most over-rated movie this year and it's in no way, shape or form better than Moon.
  • Slatters
    Moon was a messy film that had a lot of technical and narrative problems, as well as a very hackneyed "Twilight Zone" story (minus the suspense, conflict, and interest). Rockwell was enjoyable, but its far from his best work.
  • Big fan of the film, but it seems like most critics have forgotten it already, anyhow. I've seen it on a grand total of 2 "best of 2009" lists. No chance it gets any consideration from the Academy, which is a shame.
  • Nick
    "The question now is, really, what can we do? Is there anything the film fans can do to support Moon, Duncan Jones and by extension, similarly impressive yet under supported films and directors?"

    Under supported? The film was released in hundreds of theaters by a major studio. The film wasn't made by a struggling artist, it was a big budget production filmed in one of the most famous studios in the world, with two famous actors, directed by the son of David Bowie.

    You wanna champion films? Fine, but don't go the "this is a small little movie and boo hoo Sony won't give an Oscar push."

    How about writing about the dozens of great films IFC buys a year and then dumps on VOD or gives a one week run in Brooklyn before a completely unpromoted release on DVD a year later. How about writing about movies that are truly independently released, like Munyurangabo, or Rumba, Goodby Solo, or The Beaches of Agnes.

    I get that you really love the film, fine, but don't use this a platform to whine about it not getting Oscar campaigning. All you're doing in this instance in extending he narcissism of a director on Twitter. If you really do love the film, throw up some commentary, throw up some interviews, make your case for the damn thing instead of continuing this Oscar campaign crap.
  • Don't forget that Moon had a $5 mil budget, which is minimal compared to that of Transformers, Avatar, etc. Also, this was shot independently and then purchased and distributed by a big studio, so get your facts right. But nobody is trying to take anything away from true independent or no budget filmmaking.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Funny you should mention Rumba... watch this space.

    The point is, really, that Moon is a hugely beloved film of not only myself, but also a large proportion of the /Film audience. I would love to write about how IFC dumps pictures onto VOD but I'm not sure how it meets the site's mandate... I guess that's for Peter to guide me on.
  • Nick
    You know, a day later and I feel I overstated it. Just today the site has stories on Skolimowski, a new BFI book and the continued Sundance previews. My ire at this piece was misguided.
  • Andrew
    This just isn't fair. Sam Rockwell was phenomenal in Moon, and it's insulting that Sony isn't even bothering with a campaign of any kind, especially with the excuses you mentioned. Come on, someone do the right thing!
  • hmmm
    If it wasn't for sam's performance this film is so plain. And the twist that shows up that you could spot a mile away.
    Nicely shot, but the story tries and goes no where fast. An oscar for acting-yep. An oscar for directing-no way.
  • wait, what twist?

    ***SPOILERS AHEAD***

    that he's a clone? that he's been cloned from someone still alive on earth and that his wife is dead?

    i don't think they're so much twists as they are where the story goes, a revelation. the film (and the directing) doesn't rely on those things, and both those things as well as the acting are excellent.
  • I'd agree, this wasn't about twists. it was about the emotional and philosophical, let alone ethical, implications of what is occurring on Serang.
  • macateb
    Sony are probably thinking that if they interfere and pay money to promote Sam/Duncan/Moon etc... then the *FREE* PR campaign they've had so far from the people (including Duncan) on Twitter, Facebook and various blogs, could come to an end or at the very least drastically reduced.

    I like the idea that Brendon mentions about having an online streaming viewing option. Something like that could be set up within a day (plus a few hours to encode 'for your consideration' on screen every few minutes) erm... not that I've ever seen that before of course.. cough cough! ;)
  • starscream9289
    I bet Cameron payed the studio so that Avatar would have a better chance of taking all the awards home.

    IT'S A CONSPIRACY!
  • Retired
    Just watched this again last night...its slow but if your a Sam Rockwell fan it doesnt get much better...I was really hoping it was going to get some Oscar noms and wins...I still think she has a chance!
  • JesseWhitehead
    Can't say I'm surprised. Sony Pictures Classics seems incapable of getting anyone to see their movies at all. I'm disappointed that they will be distributing The Imaginarium Of Dr. Parnassus in the US as that probably means it won't play anywhere near me. I had to drive 20 miles just to see Moon. SAM ROCKWELL FOR BEST ACTOR!
  • Wickedrebel
    20 miles is nothing. That's like 15 minutes on the highway. Haha, but I agree, Sony Pictures Classics suck at distribution.
  • Poland626
    I loved moon and it's in my fav. of the year. Signed this a while ago (#10, :P) Been trying to get people to see it but they say it's too slow for them *shrugs*
  • I am sad to say that I saw this coming. The two greatest performances of the year, in my mind were from Sam Rockwell for Moon and Tom Hardy from Bronson. I realize that neither of these will probably be nominated which shows me once again what a farce the Academy Awards really are. I signed the petition online a while ago and I would gladly sign again. Sam Rockwell has been a great actor who is often underrated for years now. I thought maybe Moon would finally be the film to show the world how great he really is, I believe this would have happened if anyone had seen it.
  • lucascott
    I pretty much gave up on the Oscars and this kind of thing is why. it's not really about the movies but about who puts up the best campaign. At least in terms of the nominations. The only 'campaign' should be a list of all the movies released and the appropriate parties for the various awards. Let all the movies duke it out fairly. Not just the ones that wanna pay a lot of money to remind folks they exist. Or the ones with big studio backing who can afford to remind folks they exist
  • what a load of bull.. moon is is easily in my top 3 best films of 2009 along with alot of other people

    sony sucks
  • Signed it back in October -- hope some good comes of this. Duncan Jones and MOON deserve more, Sony. Back it up.
  • Ricky
    I really didn't enjoy it. I can appreciate what they did with a small budget but I thought the movie was boring and predicable.
  • bingo.
  • OL
    i can see where u r coming from, but try and watch it from a psychological and philosophycal points of view, and of course, the amazing actor's performance.
  • ttheaters
    great movie!
  • Xaeinovis
    I support this petition!

    Y'all should too!
blog comments powered by Disqus