Old Dogs Kills Wild Hogs 2

old_dogs

Another movie bites the dust at Disney. At this point the studio is 2 for 3 when it comes to killing off projects that sound utterly lousy. This is a trend I could get to like if I wasn’t certain it’ll eventually affect something good. After preemptively striking down both Wedding Banned and the new 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (maybe making the score 3 for 3, depending on your taste for underwater adventure) Disney has taken Wild Hogs 2: Bachelor Ride out behind the woodshed and shot it. What happened?

As Variety has it, Old Dogs is the culprit. (You may not be able to view that link now without a paid Variety password, but I’ll source it anyway.) See, Wild Hogs was an unexpected smash in 2007, hitting with older audiences and opening to $40m, then going on to amass almost $170m domestic and $252m worldwide. Despite overwhelmingly negative reviews it raked in the cash and slaughtered David Fincher’s Zodiac. A sequel was naturally greenlit.

But there was an unexpected speedbump: Old Dogs. Directed by Wild Hogs helmer Walt Becker, the film featured Robin Williams and John Travolta playing middle-aged men learning to deal with kids as wacky hijinks ensue. It looked to be aimed at the same demographic as Wild Hogs. But as we’ve said, manufacturing unexpected success like that of Wild Hogs is next to impossible. Critics hated Old Dogs even more than Becker’s previous movie, and audiences seemed to feel the same. Last month it opened to about $17m, and has taken three weeks to make what Wild Hogs made in the first weekend.

See that flash of light in the corner of your eye? That’s the axe falling on Becker’s sequel to his massive hit. It’s really starting to sound like in the Rich Ross Disney, the only thing is a sure thing. But if the sequel to a massive hit like Wild Hogs isn’t a sure thing, what is? What will be the next to fall? (Not going to lie — kinda hoping that it is Pirates of the Caribbean 4. Will any Dick Cook film survive in this regime?)

In the meantime, who knew a movie like Old Dogs could deliver two great gifts? First there was Faces of Old Dogs, and now this. Thanks!

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • BikerDoc
    Do any of you ride a motorcycle? Are any of you a professional with responsibilities? Are any of you middle aged and remember what it felt like to be young and free?

    I would wager that the answer to most of my questions is no. If you have never ridden or have a passion for motorcycles I can see why you just don't get the movie. Moreover, who puts that much stock into any movie, it is entertainment, if you were entertained for 1.5 - 2 hours what more do you want? Hollywood is not saving lives with their multimillion dollar projects...
  • bob villa
    I totally agree, the demographic for the movie, isn't old guys that want to just see a softball family disney flick with aging comedians.
    Wild Hogs did well because there is a lot of middle aged guys out here that have always wanted to buy a motorcycle and ride free on the open road!
    There's a lot of us also that are very new riders, that can have a good laugh at these guys learning to ride, guys our age, who's lives aren't perfect yet but we're working on it.
    The draw was the motorcycles, the inspiration to try it and get out there on a motorcycle trip... not necessarily the softball family comedy about anything.
    That's why Wild Hogs 2 would have made money and Old Dogs didn't
  • 52 in Kansas
    not everyone wants to see avatar. I WAS lloking forward too Wild Hogs 2 ...Evidently I am too old to cater to anymore.......
  • mbellerbrock
    I sure hope the ax falls on Pirates 4 too. But I doubt it will. What type of movie would Pirates 4 be riding on, Prince of Persia? I hope not, I want Prince to be good and successful, we need a good videogame adaptation.
  • Slatters
    When I saw the trailer for "Old Dogs" for the first time, I couldn't believe what I was watching. It felt like I had been teleported back the nineties.

    I felt this way when I saw "Get Smart" as well. The humor was just so... contrived ugh.
  • Matt
    depressingly humorless*

    Also, I'm sad to see that Old Dogs represents yet another low point in John Travolta's career.
  • Matt
    At least Old Dogs was useful for something. Otherwise, it was an embarrassing "comedy" and undoubtedly one of the worst films of the year. I was watching some of the old skits between Hugh Laurie/Stephen Fry, and then I was dragged off to see Old Dogs with a friend the next evening. It made me think about how depressing humorless these family comedies are. It appeals to the lowest common denominator, in which jokes about piss and farts are somehow witty.
  • Poland626
    I thought Wild Hogs only got the $40 million because teens were buying tickets to that and then sneaking into 300. At least that's what I've thought about that.
  • Josh
    This has got to be the best news I've heard in awhile. Wild Hogs and Old Dogs need to somehow be deleted from ever existing. That can be done these days, right??
  • okayflint
    That's kind of awesome but at the same time a bit confusing. I gotta respect them for making this decision because it has to deal more with the fact that it was going to be crap and they knew it. Wild Hogs was surprisingly huge (i have NO idea why) and the name alone would allow it to sell. It comes off as if they legitimately want to put out less crap even if it'll bring in cash. I know it's a business but it seems like someone who can make these decisions made that decision.
  • "Another one bites the dust at Disney."

    I didn't read the headline and with light of Roy Disney's death, you scared me. Thank god it was just a lousy sequel.

    Well,it seems Wild Hogs 2 was put down faster then an Old Dog, no pun intended. Actually the pun was completly intended. Sorry.
  • Perry
    I agree with the first commenter. Since Wild Hogs had success, it was almost certain that Wild Hogs 2 would have had success as well. I probably would have seen it, because I didn't think Wild Hogs was the worst movie of all time. Old Dogs, on the other hand, was terrible. But I don't think it gave Disney a reason to give Wild Hogs 2 the axe.
  • Bryan Lynch says hi!
  • This is great and as a Disney fan I'm very happy to see it. But I am a little worried that something different but equally bad or only marginally better will replace it :-/. That said Go Rich Ross!
  • dagreenman18
    Thanks for the christmas gift Disney.
  • CRASHkennedy
    lulz
  • moviefan
    well that sucks i would have loved to see wild hogs 2.
  • freemachine
    The real shame here is that after Tarantino managed to resurrect Travolta's career, Travolta is back to making the same old shitty family comedies again. Don't fret John, Wild Hogs 2 may be dead, but there's always Look Who's Talking 4...
  • There was a 3?
  • starscream9289
    Can it be?

    Disney has finally come to its senses!
  • Disney, gave me an earlier Christmas present, i hated, i mean hated Wild Hogs, and was force to see Old Dogs, and it made me never wanting to watch another Robin Williams movie ever again. Disney is actually doing something right for once.
  • I'm confused... They axed Wild Hogs 2 because some other film aimed at the same demographic failed hard? Even though I know a lot of people who'd go and see Wild Hogs 2 soley because its the sequel to Wild Hogs?
  • Octoberist
    I think they want to finally clean house with their live action pictures. Not that I don't like family films, I do. I think I would like to have some decent family movies though. Hell, Honey I Shrunk the Kids quality at least.
blog comments powered by Disqus