Avatar

Editor’s Note: Earlier today we published Brendon Connelly’s review. The following is a different take on the film by David Chen.

I can still remember the first time I saw James Cameron’s Terminator 2. I was in elementary school and had tagged along with some of my older relatives to a Los Angeles theater. The atmosphere was electric at the sold-out showing, and that was even before the first reel started rolling. What we, as an audience, bore witness to that day was the fact that Cameron was able to deliver something that we’d never seen before, a special effects extravaganza depicting a benevolent cyborg battling against a man made of liquid metal. When Arnold delivered his “I’ll Be Back” line, the audience erupted into cheers. It was one of the most memorable moviegoing experiences of my life.

We here at /Film have been writing and thinking about Avatar constantly for months and months, and by this point the hype (partially created by sites like ours) is pretty enormous. Industry observers, and to some degree Cameron himself, have claimed that Avatar will not only transform cinema but also the process of how movies are made. The plot details of the film have been covered elsewhere, so I won’t go into them here. My question going into the film was not whether or not Cameron could live up to the impossibly high expectations, but simply whether Cameron could temporarily restore that sense of childlike wonder I once felt at watching his movies years ago.


Let me just start by saying that Avatar is a hugely exciting sci-fi/adventure/thriller/romance/drama/war film that is well-worth your time. It’s a complicated enterprise to build a world, but with his nearly unlimited resources for this film, Cameron seems to have done just that for the planet of Pandora. From the flora and fauna all the way to the language of the Navi, the attention to detail is impressive. More importantly, the look of the world feels unified and believable. It is a remarkable creation and a stunning testament to Cameron’s ability to fully realize his creative impulses.

Two of the film’s most-touted elements are its use of performance capture and the 3-D feature. I actually think it’s to their credit to say that I didn’t really notice either of them after the first few minutes. The fusion of CGI-creatures and real-life actors is relatively seamless and you end up just completely buying the world that Cameron has put you into. The 3-D helped make the experience more immersive, but I was more impressed at the camera work in this film; the way Cameron was able to use technology to change his workflow has resulted in cinematography that feels right at home in your typical action film. It’s subtle, but it goes a long way towards convincing you that Pandora actually exists in this universe.

Undoubtedly the weakest part of Avatar is the script, which I can’t describe as anything other than terrible. Supposedly written by Cameron years ago before the technology existed to bring it to fruition, the dialogue is frequently stilted and occasionally delivered poorly. I felt this dearth of quality more frequently during the scenes with the humans, perhaps since they were in a language I could recognize.

Virtually every single significant character moment feels maddeningly rushed. Turning points in the storyline never really feel like they are given their due, and with the possible exception of Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), none of the characters get enough screen time for you to learn their motivations or develop a significant emotional attachment. Thus, whether a character was making a critical decision or meeting his/her untimely demise, I was often left strangely emotionless. I wanted to be invested, but there just wasn’t enough there for me to connect to.

Despite this, almost everyone does a decent job with what they’ve been given. Standouts include Stephen Lang, who plays Colonel Miles Quaritch with a bitter intensity. Zoe Saldana is great as Neytiri; Saldana’s character experiences the full range of human emotion here, from disdain to love, defeat to triumph. And somehow, underneath all of that CGI blue, she manages to be, dare I say it, sexy? Her relationship with Jake is the one I found the most convincing and compelling, but even then, it hit the standard beats a little too quickly and I felt it needed a little bit more room to breathe.

That being said, what the script lacks in depth, it makes up for in pacing. I never, for one moment, felt bored during the film’s entire 2.5+ hour runtime. Just when you are starting to get a tiny bit restless, Cameron has an thrilling set piece or a gorgeous visual waiting for you around the corner. In fact, I actually wished the film was longer to allow us to spend more time with these people in this amazing world.

The film’s biggest accomplishment is its finale, and here, Cameron completely delivers. While the scenes of war hinted at in the trailers are indeed spectacular, it’s the very last confrontation in the film that I found to be both novel in concept and masterful in execution.

In the end, I found what I was looking for in Avatar, a sense of wonderment at the novel, and a feeling that what I was seeing is the beginning of something exciting in the world of cinema. There were sequences of such intensity that they literally got my heart pumping furiously, and scenes and moments of such beauty in this film that my inner child squealed with glee at seeing them on screen. If you’re looking for an amazing time at the movie theater, there’s more than enough here to thrill you, move you, entertain you, and even provoke you.

Avatar is the reason why people occasionally use the word “epic” to describe movies. Cameron has always been skilled at setting up a clear dichotomy between good and evil, and that ability is on display here, encapsulated in the epic battle between the natives and the invaders of Pandora. I just wish that we’d gotten to know everyone a little bit more before they all headed off to war.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

About the Author

David Chen currently does research and writing for a university in the Boston area. He can be reached at davechensemail(AT)gmail(DOT)com.

  • spock
    I thought avatar absolulty sucked the only thing that was worth watching was the graphics
  • Larry
    Our generation X&Y is lost - someone needs to write a decent script and convince the people with the money to shoot it - but now, I doubt it - James Cameron is a genius for tapping into the collective unconscious of all the ADD reality TV/video-game junkies - earning over $2 billion - but compare this to the emotional realism/suspense of T1/T2, Aliens, The Abyss, even Titanic and True Lies? What a disappointment. This is just a blue pokemon video game script. Biological USB connectors to trees and all the animals? Trees that transfer souls? This movie is an insult to real sci-fi which needs intelligent and at least scientifically plausible scripts.

    It also seems that the reason most people are critical of this movie is because of the dichotomy with the Hurt Locker (pro-US) vs Avatar (supposedly, anti-US). Just goes to show how the US can hijack rational criticism and frame things in a purely pro-anti- US stance. Who cares? The movie is crap, period. I guess that $400 million is a pretty big gamble, but they deserved to lose it. Hurt Locker is ok, lots of tough american guys being tough, taking risks, no intellectual analysis of war whatsoever. They should've made a movie version of Generation Kill.
  • xenon
    Speechless!!!! rilly awesome..... thanx 2 James Cameron & co.
  • Leo
    I've read all the comments from day one, I can't help but notice that all the people who were sadistically claiming the movie was a script failure without watching it, have kept their mouth shuts after 2 weeks. I can't help think the reason is probably most of them decided to go and finally watch it and had to put their tongues up their a**, realizing the movie was much more that the mindless explosion they all discussed here.

    So now that the movie's been out for a month and some weeks I want one of you who claimed the movie was a script failure to tell me how much of a failure it is now(I mean that the movie is not just mindless explosion as you'll said)?
  • mariowilkes
    this is going to be the greatest film of all time there nothing bad about just cos some some dickhead reviewer said its bad and people are like "now im not going to see it" over one line in the film "oh no that will ruin it" its 3 hours long and a half a second sentence is going to change ur jugdement on then ur fucking lame
  • paine 10
    ---If you are over 21 ---and you think 'AVATAR' is anything
    ---anything at all -you are definitely suffering from an acute
    reality deficit --and/or have been worshipping your screensaver
    way tooo long!

    ---Oh ---and BTW -the long rich, five times corrupted and aging
    fast Cameron should really get down on all fours and thank the
    world's most awesomely genocidal regime for their financial assistance
    ---and VAST market favors which will, no doubt, earn this slop
    billions. ---I mean gratitude is gratitude afterall.

    ----Keep buyin' into those pre-digested circle-jerk fantasies kids!
    ---'cause people have died for them ---by the several tens of millions...

    AMEN
  • mariowilkes
    how many films have you made none jc is good at film making and he won lots of awards this film is his legend and no one can match it
  • Jonnybb
    Watch This Movie Online Free at FLY75 .com
  • Seriously
    So, I hate to by that guy, but you guys are ripping everything to shreds. Have any of you ever made major blockbuster films? My guess is no. Some minimalist bull**** does not count. You have no way of knowing how difficult it would be to create a movie with amazing characters, dialogue, graphics, and plot.
  • pepsicola83
    This movie is visually stunning and engrossing in the beautiful world of the Na'vi. Time passes easily even though it is a 2 1/2 hr or so movie. However, the antagonists of the movie are very one dimensional and predictable. And of course there is the overall theme that man is bad and cultures that live off the land and don't harvest its resources are good. It was very much a Dances with Wolves story with the protaganist turning against his own people when he realizes how wonderful the indigenous people of this planet are. I was fascinated by the avatar concept and had many questions that were eventually answered. I wonder how many movies of this type can be made in today's economy with the high cost and technology needed.
  • They already have parodies of Avatar up here: http://tinyurl.com/ye6ktgs
  • Funny Stuff
    Haha there cute. Some are funny, some are good.
  • What do I know.
    WHAT HAPPENED TO THE 12-MINUTE FIRST PERSON CHASE SCENE. DID I FALL ASLEEP? DOES ANYONE KNOW?
  • Eric Tan
    Saw in 3D IMAX (in Hong Kong). The only instance when things look fake is when we first see the avatars outdoors (basketball scene). After a few minutes, you truly are immersed into a new world, and that was indeed amazing. Was wondering, though, any chance the IMAX version is longer than the regular Digital 3D version. The cinema posted an 161 minutes duration for the Digital 3D version and 174 minutes duration for the IMAX version. And, yeah, hated the song at the end, but overall really enjoyed this. Cameron has again set the bar so high that Spielberg/Jackson better deliver with their Tin Tin trilogy. I saw Disney's A Christmas Carol a few weeks back (also in 3D IMAX), and it's like comparing grade school with university. Sorry, Mr Zemeckis...
  • smukie
    Just saw it in 3D IMAX also (Korea). I had no problems with the dialogue, even the Wizard of Oz line many have been complaining about. The lines fit the characters in the story that are executing them, which are marine soldiers.

    The 3D is not a cheap gimmick. It really does help immerse you into the world. It's also amazing how it gets your emotionally attached to these tall blue aliens. Watching the Na'vi interact with each other I had to remind my self that they are not real actors (well-kinda).

    You are not instantly thrown into the world of Pandora either. You are revealed new parts of the world at a time, and somehow they continue to one up each other.

    As others have said, Avatar does raise the bar in film making.
  • ilovecress
    Holy sh*t.

    A professional film reviewer gives his OPINION on the quality of the dialogue in the film, and a bunch of people who haven't seen it yet disagree with him?

    It took me a while to work out whether these were responses to Avatar or twilight.
  • @ScanCase
    I've been reading and reading what you have to say and I see your point but you are missing something. Have you ever gone on a hike and come upon a vista that just takes your breath away? Have you ever longingly looked into a beautiful womans eyes? Have you ever seen an animal get hit by a car and felt the devastation? There is no story there, just emotion through sight and damnit sometimes that's enough!

    For a little over 2.5 hours we will be transported to a world we have never seen before, and you act like that means jack. Why can't it be enough? Why can't exploring this world and its people and its sights and sounds and wonders be worth your money? This man created a world and from what I've seen and read it looks to be a breathtaking one. To me that's worth seeing.
  • Arthur Butterman
    Well somebody got to the bottom of why James Cameron really spent so much energy inventing a new 3d technology.

    http://www.atom.com/funny_videos/avatar_d_boners/
  • hello
    It's weird to read that Cameron doesn't deserve the credit he gets. Few hollywood directors do, why single him out? To be a hollywood director you need to be a smart business man and creator, as well as put butts in the seats. Congrats to anyone who can work there way up to that, but to me hollywood movies just suck. If you want a great film, simple: don't watch hollywood garbage.
    The only director you should be surprised to see in the hollywood scene is Brett Ratner. You all know damn well why Cameron is where he is. He's a technical genius and his movies are huge block busters.
  • Nick
    Yes, because Military Personel use Shakesperian style dialouge, and don't talk in cliches? Give me a break... Have you ever been in bookcamp?
  • Hannibal
    I was in bookcamp. Up at 4:30 every morning to read 5 miles and if there was even a smudge of dirt on any of our pages we were forced to tear out our own indexes.

    Seriously though, nice job with the review David Chen. It's about what I expected (from both the film and the ignorant commenters getting their panties in a twist about a movie they haven't even seen yet). The bottom line is film is a storytelling art and James Cameron comes up short in certain aspects of that. Without compelling characters and relationships to invest in the pretty and detailed world created by SFX is rendered empty and pointless, like a dumb supermodel. Recent superhero films like X-Men, Spiderman and Iron Man, as well as sci-fi like District 9, have proven that blockbuster action epics can be both spectacular in kinetic terms and interesting on character, thematic and story terms. While Cameron is a marvellous talent bordering on genius in terms of the technology of moviemaking his shortcomings on character mean he's not a fully rounded filmmaker and not in the top league with directors like Singer, Nolan and Raimi. Those directors understand how to bring rounded human beings to life on screen, Cameron struggles some way behind them in that department and can only muster caricatures.
  • I always appreciate your pragmatic and level headed reviews, Dave!
  • RosanatorDA
    hey david chen,
    use your investigative reporting skills to find out if im gonna need two eyes to watch avatar in 3D, or whether one working eye will do.
  • rbash
    I wish everyone (reviewers and the pretenders) would stop equating dialogue in a Cameron movie as a script in totality.
    Dialogue, if taken line by line, is only a small fraction of a script. Sure, you may feel the odd spoken line might fall flat, or has been heard before, but Cameron, by his own admission, is a populist filmmaker. He creates lines that may sound familiar, (although I've yet to see someone point out where the "Kansas" line was used in another movie), but also work as a shorthand to get a character's point of view across to the general audience in a memorable fashion.
    A script, especially from an auteur like Cameron, is everything, and I mean everything, you see, hear and feel in his movies.
    Dave writes:
    "Just when you are starting to get a tiny bit restless, Cameron has a thrilling set piece or a gorgeous visual waiting for you around the corner." Those set pieces were first written in the script!
    Also:
    "it’s the very last confrontation in the film that I found to be both novel in concept and masterful in execution." Also first realized in the script!
    and:
    "There were sequences of such intensity that they literally got my heart pumping furiously, and scenes and moments of such beauty in this film that my inner child squealed with glee at seeing them on screen." He made you feel this way because he put on screen what was first written in the script!
    Lord knows that Cameron doesn't need me to defend him but I would bet that his batting average of good vs. poor dialogue is pretty, pretty good.
    It seems to me that if you quote some of his lines from past movies, most people will know what movie you're talking about. I would say that means his writing has struck some sort of chord, so I don't know why Cameron gets such a bad rap while other filmmaker's don't get near this amount of scrutiny for their "scripts".
    Maybe it's because his scripts (again the whole script) are so good, and he's set the bar so high that anything that strikes someone as "off" when it comes out of a character's mouth is magnified. I don't know.
    What I do know is that one of his most maligned "scripts", Titanic, was brilliant. The dialogue turned some off, saying it was stilted, but I think they forget it was a period film and people did speak in a more mannered way back then. But again, that's only part of the script.
    How does a writer set up the plot and narrative and get us to care about these characters and have us on the edge of our seats, with all the action leading up to the very end, even when we already know exactly how the movie is going to turn out? By writing a great script!
    No less an authority than William Goldman (google him if you don't know) thought that Cameron should have won the Oscar for writing that year. Damon and Affleck won, with an assist from Goldman, for Good Will Hunting. Now that script was probably mostly dialogue, but someone please remind me - What really happens over the course of that movie, and have you ever watched that movie again?
    No? It's not your fault. (See what I did there?)
    Just sayin'.
  • You lost me at TITANIC and brilliant...
  • i saw it last night at a special screening in nyc ( they made us hand in our cell phones before the show )
    and i thought it kicked ass.
    the attention to detail was "outstanding"
  • Lawrence
    Cameron makes watchable fast-paced memorable popcorn thrillers, entertaining, nothing more or less - and yeah great eye candy. Michael Bay though along with Roland Emmerich, are so super-awful and yes retarded, that I would rather watch a short 'film' made by my six year old nephew on his mom's cellphone of his pet dog taking a shit than watch anything by Bay and Emmerich for more than 0.5 seconds.

    I do think Aliens though, while good as a popcorn thriller, is still overrated. I think R Scott's Alien is far better and menacing.
  • Has anyone seen this in both 3D and non-3D???
  • JiminyJillikers
    Glenn Kenny's comparison of Jim Cameron to Jack Kirby at the Auteurs this week is sublime, and the rest of his rantings on AVATAR are amusing. Fuck PREMIERE mag for letting this guy go

    http://www.theauteurs.com/notebook/posts/1324
    http://www.theauteurs.com/notebook/posts/1326
  • presto117
    so this'll be like Wolverine, except instead of wanting to rip my eyes out cause of the terrible CG i'll want to plug my ears? good enough, i haven't seen a 3-D movie in a while.
  • Antho42
    Roger Ebert Gave it four stars.
  • I pretty much expect bad dialouge since Cameron wrote it, still looks like a great ride though
  • mchops
    David,

    did they show a trailer of IM2 before the screening of Avatar?
  • I read on Favreau's twitter that we can expect one around xmas. Probably with Sherlock Holmes I would imagine.
  • mchops
    Yeah with Holmes but I was hoping sooner.
  • jmusheno
    So this is why Dave Chen never writes here on Slash Film lol. I think it is completely ridiculous how you people think dialogue is the only aspect in a script... it's unbelievably ignorant. I also wonder what you think of the writing in Titanic because I for one know James Cameron can defend it and has successfully done so. In addition it is a visual medium and 2001's dialogue has been mocked before and you simply don't understand how it serves the medium... I really appreciate the news you guys give but the way you reinforce your opinions makes me cringe because it is so poorly analyzed and constructed.
  • Weenis.
    Agreed. I mean, with all that spectacle, how can you really... well...
    Let's just say.

    DAVID
    (Sarcastically)
    Oh... Look. Giant Flying Dragons with blue catpeople on top.

    SOLDIER
    (V.O.)
    This is the end!

    DAVID
    Oh my god! He said this is the end! That is so done and cliché! How can such awful dialogue take center stage!?
  • jmusheno
    Haha, you're so right and it gets downright irritating. It's like criticizing Indiana Jones for being ridiculous.
  • WalterMitty
    Hey kids- stop arguing and go congratulate the /Film guys on more well-deserved recognition which provides a home for all of your angst and deep thoughts on the industry.

    Now if you will excuse me, I am going to the cinema and watching a movie while simulaneously comparing each aspect of its creative development to every great film ever made. I sure hope I'm not disappointed!
  • bounty-hunter
    Lol, I know, right.
  • mariowilkes
    there not liking the film cos of some lines thats fucking stupid. im seeing it in 3 hours let them miss out on the film everyone is talking about while there in the background of the conversation knowing nothing about this amazing film.
  • Smee
    I disagree. In the Terminator films at least, there are character arcs. In T2, Schwarzenneger gradually becomes more human throughout the film while Sarah Connor becomes more machine-like up until the moment where she has a gun on Dyson at point-blank range with his family on top of him. Then her humanity kicks back in and she realizes how dehumanized she had become. There's a great little moment for example after the main characters have escaped from the mental hospital. John hugs his mother thinking that's what she is about to do but instead he realizes she's just checking for wounds. John had become this object she coldly has to protect, not her son. John likewise has an arc where he starts off as a cynical juvenille delinquent and not only has a healthy relationship to his mother but sees the terminator as a father figure.
  • ScanCase
    I guess we just disagree then. Everything you mention there felt like Cameron had a power point presentation about what the characters learned today. It felt very surface level and served on a nice silver platter.

    Now remove yourself one generation from cameron and yes you loose what little character arc there is and get the big mindless action films of today. Again Cameron isn't bad jut not great. I'm capable of having fun watching his films but if i were a studio exec I would not hand over 500mil
  • Solid
    That's hollywood. It's about making money, lots of it. Like the gladiator games, it's all about keeping people entertained with mindless violence, hence my reference to the film. Cameron though I'd have thought was the last person people would pin as another soulless workman director. Okay then...
  • starscream9289
    I don't think anyone is going to see this movie for the dialogue, acting or even story.

    Just the spectacle.
  • ScanCase
    but shouldn't we expect more from our films? Right now the public is seeing movies that are nothing but spectacle and Hollywood is responding by putting out films that only focus on that. This leaves films that are trying to saying something about humanity and our world in the dust.
  • Smee
    Certainly we should have high standards but not to the point where it just come across as pretentious. There is nothing wrong with spectacle films so long as they are done well. There is a difference between something like Transformers which is nothing but mindless explosions and CGI and Avatar where Cameron is really showing off something new.

    I think it's also unfair to call his films mindless. While not extremely deep, his films feature better-developed characters than the usual blockbuster and does deal with actual ideas (the first two Terminator movies are anti-nuclear messages).
  • ScanCase
    Agreed there is nothing wrong with spectacle films I would just like them to be backed up by something a little deeper. Too spend our hard earned money on CGI festivals like Avatar tells Hollywood that we want more of nothing. Film fans like us are on the front lines of this battle against mediocrity and we are losing. I mentioned District 9 earlier and someone has brought up LOTR, and both are perfect examples of spectacle with something a little deeper (lotr less so admitally).

    Now the point you make about Camerons characters being better developed that average blockbusters I have to disagree. Honestly I believe Cameron is responsible for the one dimensional characterization that we see in Hollywood films. He has been praised as this great director and everyone has been marching in line every since.
  • Solid
    ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED? ARE. YOU. NOT. ENTERTAINED. IS THIS NOT WHY YOU ARE HERE?
  • BrendonConnelly
    If all films could do is entertain I wouldn't have the passion I have for them.
blog comments powered by Disqus