Avatar

With less than two weeks to go before James Cameron’s Avatar hits the big screen worldwide, 20th Century Fox is definitely full throttle into marketing and promotion. After the jump we have a lot of new Avatar news tidbits, including another early review, this time a bit positive, more big claims from Sigourney Weaver, some quotes from creature designer Neville Page (Cloverfield) on the creatures of Pandora, more speculation on the real budget of the film, and two new featurettes (one of which is a really cool scientific nature documentary about Pandora).

Jeff Wells has spoken to someone who has seen the film, and here is what they said:

“the action scenes delivered everything you’d expect from Cameron, even in this digital form. Visceral, detailed, a ‘first-person shooter’ experience on the biggest game screen ever hoisted. The simple, predictable story was deemed as almost perfunctory, as if adding too much storytelling and exposition would have amounted to a sensory overload. After all, no one discusses 2001: A Space Odyssey in relation to its plot. Star Wars either.” … “despite all the trappings of special effects, blue people and CGI skies, Sigourney Weaver still manages to register strongly with warmth and a commanding presence.”

While most of Fox and the Avatar team are trying to calm down expectations (or at least bring them down to a realistic level), Sigourney Weaver is still making bold claims like “Avatar will change what people want in the cinema”. Weaver tells the Guardian:

“It will pick you up and shake you like a little rag doll. I’m not too much of an emotional creature, but I was weeping by the end. I remember reading the script and thinking, I love this but how can he ever do this. Nothing like this has been done before – floating mountains! I think for a certain generation it will change what they want to happen in the cinema. It is as big as sound. I hope it won’t impact every movie, but for the big movies it raises the bar – it throws the bar away.”

Meanwhile, creature designer Neville Page, best known for creating the Cloverfield monster, talks to Hero Complex about designing the creatures of Pandora:

“We worked on the Na’vi, the plants, the environment… Jim, like few others, is so tuned into the plausibility of organisms. He wanted them to look as real as possible, and work organically as well.” … “”The banshee is what I spent the most time on. We knew it was a flying creature. What made it so incredibly challenging, with a bird you have to design it flying, perching, everything has to work. You can’t just draw it one view at a time… The hardest thing of all was having a Na’vi on top of it and flying it. You had to backwards engineer it. It was like designing and engineering an aircraft. And that’s without the beauty and aesthetics of it.”

And how much did all this cost? You’ve heard speculative numbers ranging as high as $600 million, but whats the truth? The Wrap claims they have the real numbers, which are $237 million, with $150 million for promotion. They conclude that “Presuming Fox’s $387 million compounded figure is accurate, the film should have no problem getting into the black.” But are the numbers accurate? David Poland doesn’t believe so. But then again, Poland doesn’t provide any more accurate numbers.

And a bunch of new featurettes have shown up online. First up is a three and a half minute featurette on the story of Avatar:

CanalPlus has an awesome scientific look at the planet and creatures of Pandora, narrated by Sigourney Weaver. If you’re going to watch one Avatar featurette, this would be it:

And MTV has finally put last week’s live Avatar Q&A with director James Cameron and stars Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana online:

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • I'll definitely go to watch this movie,but in the mean time i'm catching all the related gossips on this is avatar fan site http://avatar-james-cameron.com/
  • lipslikeasukal
    "Floating Mountains", I've seen those in dozens of video games.
  • iec
    the more shit they put on TV and the more featurettes you post, the LESS excited I get.
  • Jonmc123
    Most of these early reviews have been positive, but they've all been from "this guy I know that's seen it". I'm not buying into what these reviews are really saying until I see 100% real one.

    But I won't be reading any main stream reviews until I see it myself to see if the critics have any sense in the first place.
  • iec
    critics never have sense. most of them aren't even qualified to talk about anything. they're really no different than blog commenters or people posting in a forum.
  • Dysthymia83
    Actually, people discuss "Star Wars" in relation to its plot all the time.
  • filmcave
    This still looks like a shitty Playstation 5 game. That said, I hope it's good.
  • Rolland
    Man is PS5 looks like that, then I'll def. buy one on launch!
  • I've already bought my ticket reviews are irrelevant now :(
  • Ryan
    I'm more excited for Avatar more than I have ever been for any other film. Driving two hours to Chicago to see it opening night (have to see it on the IMAX). But after watching that featurette, I feel like the story and plot are secondary and what I'm most looking forward to is the beauty of Pandora.
  • mbellerbrock
    That was 3 minutes and 26 seconds of barely one question from the MTV live interview, where's the rest?
  • Ryan
    "I’m not too much of an emotional creature, but I was weeping by the end."
    Interesting......still excited 17th December better hurry.
  • Han
    So, someone has a positive review and he's a plant? Really..?

    It's sad how stubborn most of you are. Once you set an opinion on something, you won't go back.

    So sad.
  • Sam
    When I see a glowing review without a credible source in the middle of a campaign to increase hype for the movie, I tend to be a bit more suspicious than normal.
  • ...and yet with all Fox's hype no one seems to be talking about this film. Yet everywhere I go, I hear people talking about Sherlock Holmes.
  • JD
    Sherlock will do as poorly as Sweeny.
  • zoey
    wait- no one discusses 2001: A Space Odyssey in relation to its plot?
    when did that happen?
  • concretelogic
    A video game like experience with a perfunctory story. That is exactly what it looks like, and what I expected. I'll definitely see it once in Imax 3D, but I doubt I'll bother with it beyond that. I think it will work best as an experience, like a theme park ride.
  • I wondered how those land masses hovered in mid-air.
  • Sam
    They are suspended by disbelief generators
  • Kyle C.
    I'm sure this film will be a thing of beauty visually, but I have a feeling the actual ploat and story for the film will be very route and uninteresting. The characters better elicit some strong emotions because I don't think anything else in the film will. WOW, that was pretty, seems to be all this movie has going for it.
  • Caca
    For some reason I don't trust da source of the review.
  • sam
    Obvious plant review is obvious
  • Roland21
    Obvious Troll is OBVIOUS.
  • shadow
    I was meh on this movie until I just watched that faux Planet Earth feature. I mean goddamn was that beautiful. This is going to be the best eye candy ever.
  • mbellerbrock
    Yeah, that was impressive, never considered that doing a "Planet Pandora" with Weaver was a good idea.
  • Jeff W.
    -After all, no one discusses 2001: A Space Odyssey in relation to its plot. Star Wars either.”- Uh, really?
  • starscream9289
    2001 had a plot?
  • JJGittes
    It's true. Those two films' plots are very simple. If someone was familiar with Joseph Campbell, Star Wars: A New Hope would be an extremely predictable film. Though I agree 2001's plot is simple, the story itself goes into very complex territory. Though Star Wars is anything but complex.
  • iec
    Joseph Cambell wouldn't know what to do with 2001.

    Star Wars on the other hand is basic, but who said it was written well? It's liked so much because it was really the first to do what it did, and do it well. While it's not that complicated and the characters aren't that deep, it's clever enough.

    Avatar isn't the first of anything. 3D has been done, action has been done, aliens have been done, special effects have been done. It's just doing things really well that have already been done. No one is going to be lining up for this movie like they did for Star Wars. While it will look great, it doesn't have the appeal that Star Wars does.

    Star Wars has a simple plot, but unique characters and a really unique universe. Avatar doesn't have unique characters, and honestly the alien world looks like a generic alien world to me, no matter how much effort was put into it. I don't even care about the plot of this movie at all. I just want to see the cool special effects. I honestly am looking forward to nothing else.
  • Sam
    Plot is the sequence of events that happen in a story. Therefore, I would say 2001's plot is anything but simple, i.e. it is very difficult to determine what is even happening in certain events in that movie.
  • monkeymafia
    "While most of Fox and the Avatar team are trying to calm down expectations (or at least bring them down to a realistic level)"

    I just saw a new commercial yesterday claiming that after Avatar "movies will never be the same".... I don't think that's going to quell any expectations...
  • Yeah, I scrolled down to post the same damn thing.
  • scientist
    unobtainium? really? cool other than that cheesy tidbit
  • adsf
  • RosanatorDA
    touche sir.
  • Roland21
    Nice! This movie looks to be good as expected.
  • Jeff
    ‘first-person shooter’? This is sounding more and more like an extended video game cut scene. But with so many Oscar contenders receiving mixed reviews (Nine, Invictus, Lovely Bones), just the spectacle of Avatar will guarantee it a Best Picture nomination.
blog comments powered by Disqus