Early Buzz: Clint Eastwood’s Invictus

Invictus

The first reviews of Clint Eastwood’s new film Invictus have begun to appear online. The story tells the “inspiring true story” of how the newly elected President Nelson Mandela (Morgan Freeman) joined forces with the captain of South Africa’s underdog rugby team, Francois Pienaar (Matt Damon), as they make an unlikely run to the 1995 World Cup Championship match, to help unite their country. But will Invictus be in the running come awards season? Lets take a look at some quotes from the first reviews.

The Hollywood Reporter: “A temperate, evenhanded perhaps overly timid film about an intemperate time in South Africa.” … “for those who do buy tickets, it will be a pleasure for them to encounter a movie that’s actually about something.” … “It’s a film about a nation’s psyche, not its individuals. Where you would love a vigorous portrayal of two larger-than-life personalities, the film tiptoes through polite scenes where everyone speaks and acts with political correctness.” … “The game scenes are skillfully done — the sound of the body hits lets you know why rugby is an orthopedist’s delight. CGI shots and other effects seamlessly fill the stands with thousands and convert contemporary South African locations back 14 years.”

More after the jump.

Variety: “Invictus is a very good story very well told.” … “Inspirational on the face of it, Clint Eastwood’s film has a predictable trajectory, but every scene brims with surprising details that accumulate into a rich fabric of history, cultural impressions and emotion.” … “Directed by Eastwood with straightforward confidence, the film is marbled with innumerable instances of Mandela disarming his presumed opponents while giving pause to those among his natural constituency who might be looking for some payback rather than intelligent restraint. Freeman, a beautiful fit for the part even if he doesn’t go all the way with the accent, takes a little while to shake off the man’s saintlike image, and admittedly, the role of such a hallowed contemporary figure does not invite too much complexity, inner exploration or actorly elaboration. That said, Freeman is a constant delight; gradually, one comes to grasp Mandela’s political calculations, certitudes and risks, the troubled personal life he keeps mostly out of sight, and his extraordinary talent for bringing people around to his point of view.”

Newsweek: “Clint Eastwood’s Invictus is not your ordinary sports movie” … “Invictus is not a biopic; nor does it take us deep inside any of its characters—Eastwood views Mandela from a respectful middle distance. It’s about strategic inspiration. We witness a politician at the top of his game: Freeman’s wily Mandela is a master of charm and soft-spoken gravitas. Anthony Peckham’s sturdy, functional screenplay, based on John Carlin’s book Playing the Enemy, can be a bit on the nose (and the message songs Eastwood adds are overkill). Yet the lapses fade in the face of such a soul-stirring story—one that would be hard to believe if it were fiction. The wonder of Invictus is that it actually went down this way.”

The Huffington Post: “Invictus isn’t a great movie but it’s got great moments.” … “On a scale of one to 10, one being “don’t see,” and 10 being “go see, even if you have to hire a sitter,” I’d say, Invictus is a six: add it to your Netflix queue or watch it on pay-per-view. Those lucky enough to be on a trans-Atlantic flight next year will probably have a chance to see Invictus on the plane, since its political theme and World Cup rugby depictions will undoubtedly make the film more popular abroad than it is here.”

Invictus hits theaters on December 11th 2009.

via: The Wrap

  • Sam
    Hopefully its not as formulaic as these reviews suggest. Gran Torino and Changeling were both pretty dull. He really needs to get out of this rut and start making interesting movies again, instead of just going after Oscars.
  • vader182
    Really? I actually enjoyed Gran Torino a good amount. A solid 8.5 for me. Glad to see this is getting fairly positive reviews.
  • omarswarez
    and I thought was Changeling was pretty solid as well. Not dull at all
  • Sam
    Yeah they weren't bad, but I didn't feel they were anything special either. I guess I feel like there wasn't much to distinguish them. But yeah I did enjoy them both as well.
  • Matt
    I actually liked Changeling better than Gran Torino, personally.
  • [A]
    I liked Gran Torino a lot. Too bad Clint used an amateur supporting cast. Bah, the only real bad acting came from the kid, especially in the "let me outta here!!" scene. The kid, and his own son, were the weakest performances in the movie. But as a whole, it worked really well. I haven't seen The Changeling yet..
  • cant wait to see it!
  • JiminyJillikers
    The great Glenn Kenny himself has already added it to his list for top 70 of the decade?
    http://somecamerunning.typepad.com/some_came_ru...
  • [A]
    Decent trailer.
  • Scott
    Really looking forward to this one, especially as it is about RUGBY. American audiences will wake up and understand that American Football is not the hardest game on the planet. Also, it will be a huge promotion for the 2011 Rugby World Cup, which is being played in New Zealand.
  • Steve
    As a rugby player, I approve. (b'.')b

    And Nelson Mandela's the bomb, plus Clint's directing this movie. Could I ask for more?
  • I adore Eastwood's body of work, but something about this had me hesitant before reading about the buzz. I'm not sure if it's Damon's slightly-off South African accent (as heard in the trailer) or the fact that you generally know where it's heading... At least with Eastwood you are guaranteed to get your money's worth.
  • Rockie
    dear captain howdy,

    every word you typed was plucked straight from my brain. cheers.
  • Bruce
    I bet the movie covers up the fact the All Blacks were poisoned before the final,but played on for heartbreaking loss in extra time(players were chucking up on the sideline at half time).The South Africans blamed it on a waitress(Susie)but no one ever saw her again .IN the trailer they say they must win it at all cost ,yeah i wonder and don't get me started on the ref who was paid well.
  • southafricanguy
    let me guess bruce, you are from new zealand? Get over it dude. You guys lost, end of the damn story. Stop blaming it on the ridiculous food poisining.
    We won again in 2007, does that piss you off too that South Africa has won twice and and you guys are still struggling to win since 87? If you dont win in 2011 I wonder what your excuse will be then?
  • doomspray
    i know dude! since this movie was announced, any mention of it online HAS to have at least one sour kiwi crying over spilled milk.

    if only there was a world championship in "making excuses"... at least NZ might have a chance at not choking!
  • southafricanguy
    Hey doomspray....geez dude, tell me about it. The Kiwis just cant stop whining about that final in 95. As you say if there is ever a world cup for making excuses New Zealand would win hands down.

    They always have to have some dumb excuse to cover up the fact that they have been unable to win a second time since wininng the first in 87. its pathetic...Dont hate us because we kick ass at rugby..lol...
  • Rhino
    Invictus: A lily white South African rugby team takes on a deliberately POISONED multi-racial New Zealand team in front of an 80k racist flag waving South African crowd, at high altitude and wins - barely, in extra time. What a movie!

    The truth: Rory Steyn - author of One Step Behind Mandela. Mandela's former bodyguard gives an excellent eyewitness account of the entire New Zealand team, except 4 players, who escaped the fateful lunch, being poisoned 2 days before the final. The following year these same two teams met in South Africa, and New Zealand crushed the Saffas 3 games in a row. This was hardly fair, as New Zealand took great care not to be poisoned this time.
  • John
    Southafricanguy, NZ were poisoned in 95. Ask yourself this. NZ won in 92, when SA re-entered international rugby, they won the series against them in 94 (didn't play each other in 93) and also won in 96 and 97 (the Tri Nations). So before, and after 95, NZ dominated SA. Since professionalism began in 95 NZ has won the Tri Nations 9 times, SA just three times....NZ has also won the Super 14 10 times, SA just three times.... See a trend here? NZ lost to France fair and square in 2007, no excuse, but in 95, they were not fit to play (look at the replays of the players throwing up). The game should've been played a few days later. The fact they held SA to extra time was an achievement in itself. End of the day NZ has been the dominating force in rugby for many years. Did SA go onto dominate after 95? No. Have they dominated after winning in 2007? No. They were last in the Tri Nations in 2008. And there are already cracks after their awful northern hemisphere tour just gone.
  • MarkoP
    Hey look! Orange and blue!
  • Cineprog
    if you are not into south African politics this film will probley be slow but i think it will get a few oscar nominations anyway. :D
  • Maybe he makes it look easier than it seems, but I almost feel like Clint Eastwood hardly has to think the same way as the rest when he makes a film - he just seems so skilled and in the zone all the time
  • Rhino
    Invictus: A lily white South African rugby team takes on a deliberately POISONED multi-racial New Zealand team in front of an 80k racist flag waving South African crowd, at high altitude and wins - barely, in extra time. What a movie!

    The truth: Rory Steyn - author of One Step Behind Mandela. Mandela's former bodyguard gives an excellent eyewitness account of the entire New Zealand team, except 4 players, who escaped the fateful lunch, being poisoned 2 days before the final. The following year these same two teams met in South Africa, and New Zealand crushed the Saffas 3 games in a row. This was hardly fair, as New Zealand took great care not to be poisoned this time.
  • Responder.
    Rhino is lying as the Springboks had a non White player named Chester Williams playing in that famous 1995 match. Let's get over this "lily White" bullshit because the White Afrikaans speakers are 7 - 10 % of non White [ Indian / Malay & Khoi ] origin as you can even see with one of the White Afrikaans players. Castigating them as "lily White" therefore does not even pas the laugh test. Those folks are not even of Dutch decent but that is another topic.

    Next. No. The old South African flag was not a "racist" flag as it was adopted in 1927 as a COMPROMISE flag between the 3 main cultural groups that inherited the new British created macro State created with the South Africa Act of 1909. That old flag was called the UNION flag & was adopted in the spirit of reconciliation between antagonistic groups. The Cape based Afrikaners / The Boers / & the English speakers. The Apartheid era Republic of South Africa NEVER adopted its own flag as they simply inherited the old Union flag when the State became a nominal Republic. The Afrikaner Nationalists wanted to adopted a flag for the Republic & there was even a design set for approval but this was put on hold after the assassination of the Prime Minister who was working to adopt a new flag.

    How ironic that the Reconciliation flag of 1927 came to be viewed as a "racist" flag simply because it remain the country's flag throughout the tumultuous Apartheid decades. How further ironic when considering that the flag symbolized the Afrikaner domination of the Boers & English speakers. Therefore is not a "racist" flag but a culturalist [ excuse the neologism ] flag.

    Now also bear in mind that the 1995 match occurred just ONE year after the adoption of the new flag therefore one could excuse the fact that many were still attached to the old flag. How would YOU reacted if they suddenly changed YOUR country's flag overnight? I bet YOU would cling to YOUR old "racist" [ there is a Union Jack in it after all just like South Africa's old flag ] flag too.

    What I liked most about this movie was that it demonstrated the prominence of the French Huguenot heritage as Francois Pienaar [ from the French Pinard ] are both French names as well as André Joubert as well as De Villiers. Hell even former State President F W De Klerk [ from the French Le Clerc ] also has a French name as well.
  • Rhino
    Invictus: An almost completely lily white South African rugby team takes on a deliberately POISONED multi-racial New Zealand team in front of 80,000 South Africans waving apartheid era flags, at high altitude, and wins - barely, in extra time. What a movie!

    The truth: Rory Steyn - author of "One Step Behind Mandela." Nelson Mandela's former bodyguard gives an excellent eyewitness account of the entire New Zealand team plus management, except 4 players, being deliberately poisoned 2 days before the final. The following year these same two teams met in South Africa, and New Zealand crushed the South Africans 3 matches in a row. However this was hardly fair, as New Zealand took great care not to be poisoned this time by taking their own chefs on tour. Whereas they were denied their own chef prior to the '95 final in the final week only. Suspiciously they were allowed their own
    New Zealand chef prior to that final week.

    It all points to a politically motivated poisoning.
blog comments powered by Disqus