new_moon_review

Every fifth or sixth word in my notes on The Twilight Saga: New Moon is ‘mope’. If there’s a more listless, disengaged piece of film this year I hope I don’t have to suffer it. (Actually, there is, and I did right after writing this. The guys’ flipside to New Moon: Ninja Assassin.) This second Twilight film is not a dreamy, thorny gothic romance; it is a stereotypical, unimaginative caricature of depressed teens expanded into 120 minutes. By comparison, Catherine Hardwicke’s creaky first film looks like a wise and knowing glimpse into youthful distraction and obsession.

There’s another thread that dominates my notes on New Moon, and which is really the crux of why the movie is so lousy: ‘heroine’ Bella (Kristen Stewart), who in this chapter is reduced to sub-character statues. She’s less substantial than tissue paper, but is featured in nearly every scene. Bella is listless and empty, devoid of any notable characteristic. She has no opinions and nothing interesting to say; her only characteristic is that she wants. But the object of her desire, the vampire Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson, pale and grim), is equally as insubstantial. They’d make a perfect pair, if you were looking for a couple to fill out the deep background of a better film.

We open a short time after the events of the first film. Bella has been generally accepted into the ranks of the vampiric Cullen family. But her status as a human — that is, potential food — is underlined when an innocent paper cut leads to a violent family showdown. It’s one thing when your new girlfriend doesn’t fit in with the fam; quite another when she’d fit all too well on the dinner menu. There’s also the lingering spectre of rival vampire Victoria (the briefly-seen Rachelle Lefevre, to be replaced in the next movie by Bryce Dallas Howard) who, having been defeated in the last film, earnestly want to get her fangs into Bella.

So the Cullens, not to put too fine a point on it, fuck right off. Edward brushes off Bella in the way a confused teenage kid might (ironically making his action one of the few recognizable human moments in the story) and she’s left to mope around for months. Finally her eye lands on the newly beefed up Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner), who hits werewolf puberty just as he and Bella are about to really hook up. Their friendship develops as she uses him to take her mind off Edward; she’s playing him along, and he’s too smitten to see it.

It’s a classic romantic setup, but new director Chris Weitz doesn’t get it. He knows that Bella and Edward represent grand romance to a legion of teens, so he smashes them together in the frame. But there’s no spark. He knows that Bella is meant to be distracted and wooed by werewolf Jacob, so he shoots Jake and his wolfpack brothers with their shirts off and pecs glistening, seemingly unaware of how laughable the crew is. Nothing genuine passes between any of the characters; you could mistake the film for a feature-length parody of the Twilight phenomena if you didn’t already know better.

Melissa Rosenberg wrote the script. She’s already a Twilight vet, having scripted the first film, and has plenty of experience with obsession thanks to her day job on Dexter. I’m told that her script is very much a direct adaptation of the novel, so I’m left pinning the blame for this snoozefest on Weitz’s perfunctory direction. At most, perhaps Rosenberg has to answer a seemingly truncated climactic sequence where Edward tries to end his life at the hands of the Volturi, a clan of bloodsucker royalty. (He basically attempts the vampiric version of suicide by cop.)

The craft in Catherine Hardwicke’s effort was definitely more rickety than what’s on display here; from any technical perspective this is a far more competent film. (Which generally means: more traditional, which is not necessarily better by any means.) OK, the effects here are better, thanks perhaps to extra dollars in the budget that were spent on shirts for the entire cast in the last movie. But when it came to the feel, Hardwicke got it and Weitz doesn’t. In Twilight, scenes between Bella and her father were touching, and Bella’s alienation was easy to understand. It gave her a reason to be drawn to Edward Cullen. In New Moon, there’s no reason at all.

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson both struggle against the content vacuum that sucks the life out of the movie, but neither is even vaguely strong enough to put up the necessary fight. As Jacob, Taylor Lautner is marginally better, but he also gets the best material; he’s the only active, non-depressed character of the core trio. Michael Sheen and Dakota Fanning offer a little juice as Volturi elders, Sheen even channeling a bit of Christoph Waltz energy, but it’s a futile effort. So too with Anna Kendrick, who genuinely earns a laugh or two. But after seeing her sparkle in Up in the Air this is like catching her sneaking in a bored weekend of community theatre.

/Film Rating: 2 out of 10

About the Author

Russ Fischer is a dedicated media nerd living in Atlanta.

  • thanks for the review, i think ill pass on this one now.
  • Did you really need this review to know that passing on this movie was the right thing to do?
  • speed116racer
    that's the problem with teh internetz, most of the time the sarcasm is lost.
  • Grr...
    If you are against twilight, then why are you on this page? Who goes onto the sites of something they dont like?!?!?!?!
  • Never got into the whole Twilight phenomenon, but the movie looks decent.
  • hoth base
    you are a complete tard. thank you very much
  • i laugh my ass off if your robert pattinson :)
  • It's no secret that Robert dislikes Twilight.
  • Dave
    "/Film Rating: 2 out of 10"

    You have my sympathy.
  • keesvd
    I didn't like the first one, but the second one surprised me.
  • hoth base
    you are a super tard. Did this reply surprise you?
  • not cool.
  • Goobity
    Your user name is hoth base, and you are being defensive, on a little-known movie blog message board in response to someone enjoying a movie you don't like. And you call them a 'tard'.

    Wow.
  • Von
    yeah sounds like he should get the hell out of here while he can, with the help of a few shots from the ion cannon.
  • Chris
    Well, this site is fairly known. It was the best blog of the year according to TIME.
  • hoth base
    i know its fun. plus im not being defensive, im just bored
  • Bull
    I'm not sure whose worse: a fan of Twilight or someone who uses the phrase "super tard." I'm pretty sure you are a loser either way.
  • keesvd
    Hey, let's be clear, I'm no fan :P.
  • The worse does not belong to anyone.
  • dont listen to him if you dug this new one its ok man
  • the first one didnt really entertain me, but this actually surprise me. I laugh so much in this movie for its corny dialogue and its moments that tried to be serious, but still entertaining at the same time. The cinematography in this film is the factor that made me like it. To the opening scene,from the fights evolving the wolves knocking the camera down, and other stuff that didnt really happen in the first. Its nothing new in movies, but I'm glad the direction they use in this movie was more of experiment on how to interact with the scene, unlike the first where i felt like they just shot the movie and called it a day. Overall I enjoy this film more then films that I thought I would enjoy like Wolverine and Transformer. Sad, but true.
  • Great review. Made me laugh and you brought up very valid points that I've been TRYING to make to the girls who constantly as me why I don't like this series.

    In semi-related news, Taylor Lautner lives in my town, and one of my friends once saw him at a movie theatre, so he called out, "HEY! SHARKBOY!" Stupid, yes. Did it make me laugh? Yes.
  • Joh
    "Jacob Swan"?

    At least get the freaking NAMES right before going about being an insolent asswhole.
  • Brendan McD
    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Twilight is garbage on the page and on the screen WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :)
  • Blueman
    since you're calling someone out on typing something wrong I will assume you're calling him an ENTIRE ASS and not just the hole.
  • john
    Yes, just as you are. A dumb piece of shit you are, sir.

    Let me throw you some advice:

    1)Buy a gun
    2)Go home
    3)Shoot yourself

    ty
  • mediated
    this coming from a guy who cant spell asshole nor his own name is bitching about mishaps in writng...good job
  • Ben
    If you are going to call someone names for typing something incorrectly, probably should spell the insult right. Hole, not whole.
  • mediated
    hi five ben!
  • John
    OK, Ben, you are an ASSHOLE, not WHOLE. Maybe if the writer wasn't so overly belligerent, I wouldn't have corrected him.

    He is the REVIEWER. It is his JOB to review this piece correctly. Misspelling a character's name evidences his lack of professionalism.
  • so you call people asswholes cause the mix up character (not important)Last Names then continue to curse out everyone else that has pointed out your own contradiction.
  • hoth base
    Russ is an excellent writer, in fact i liked the review he just wrote, he should win a noble peace prize, if obama can, anyone can.
  • Mitchbones
    I hope everyone else finds the irony in "John" (or Joh) calling out the writer for mixing up a name, yet John can't even spell his own name correctly.
  • Congratulations on being the first rabid Twilight fan to comment. Your prize is at the door.
  • mediated
    rock on ! :) @drakerivera
  • :P
  • John
    Congrats on being a film geek that lacks a life.

    I'm not suprised that you have such disdain for something that has to do with the opposite sex. Coincidence? I think not.
  • Karlpilkington
    You think wrong.
  • The Great Cambino
    Twilight Fan. Point/Laugh.
  • hayward
    "Congrats on being a film geek that lacks a life."

    Says the guy who's trippin' out cause they got a characters surname wrong.

    You, sir, are an asswhole!
  • CapeCodder
    Wait.

    You're kidding, right? I can't believe anyone would type that and take himself seriously.

    Also:
    "I'm not suprised that you have such disdain for something that has to do with the opposite sex."
    More like:
    "I'm not surprised that you have such attachment for something that has to do with the opposite sex."

    ...I'm implying you are gay, in case people of your low mentality do not get it.
    You're a Pink Squirrel boy. I can tell.
  • So what you're saying is women can't see past a tired story with shitty dialogue and horrible acting in it?... that's sexist sir, i don't think women would appreciate such condescension.
  • Mitchbones
    There are so many logical fallacies in this post, I don't know where to start!
  • hoth base
    obviously Russ fell asleep during the movie and didnt give a damn about the little girls name.

    His name isnt Jacob Swan, its Jacob Queer anyway.
  • Liam
    Why does he have to be queer? I'm a big ole queer and I would kill a human that looked or acted like that. Most of the queers I hang around with don't act like that either.

    P.s. Queer is offensive, jackass....
  • I take offense to you thinking a word is offensive.
  • hoth base
    well youre never going to find me you fat fag, this is the best part of writing a blog. See you next year when they release the next next fag installment
  • zebrat
    hoth base, you continue to reveal your stupidity in so many ways. you sir, are a disgrace to the star wars universe.
  • hoth base
    and you are a disgrace to reality!!!!!!
  • plagueoftruth
    Reading Hoth Base's idiotic ramblings is like watching the video of that ape drinking it's own piss. Only less entertaining.
blog comments powered by Disqus