Francis Lawrence Takes Sgt. Rock Into…the Future!

sgt_rock

Looks like not all of Joel Silver’s long-simmering DC Comics projects (er, sorry — DC Entertainment) have been recalled. He’s been moving veerrrryyy slowly on a Sgt. Rock adaptation, with a few scripts written over the years, but now finally has some forward momentum. If things go well, we might soon have a Sgt. Rock film written by Chad St. John and directed by Francis Lawrence (I Am Legend, Constantine).

The character has been battling through the DC Universe since the late ’50s, and became popular enough that his book Our Army at War was renamed Sgt. Rock in the late ’70s. Appropriately enough, he was a WWII character, serving to shepherd a young reader’s gestating image of US soldiers in the aftermath of the Korean War, as Vietnam raged, and through the ugly fallout of the latter. Did Rambo and other mid to late ’80s war figures make the character obsolete? In comics, perhaps, as the book was canceled in ‘88. But in a different world that would have been a transition point to film, since that’s around when Silver began trying to mount a production.

Now things are happening, but not as a WWII picture. THR says that the story is being moved to an unspecified point in the future, to get over the hump of trying to mount a big WWII film without spending an insane amount of money. Kind of difficult to see how a movie depicting a war set in the future is going to cost any less, but until someone gets a hold of St. John’s script we’ll wait and see. Seems like a fairly ridiculous move, despite the fact that Rock has appeared in some Earth 2 stories; he’s really and truly a WWII character, and if I remember correctly the core version of the character was said to have been killed by the last bullet fired in the war.

This probably won’t be going any time soon; the trade mentions that Lawrence is likely to do Water For Elephants next, and if he and Will Smith can come up with an I Am Legend prequel/sequel that everyone likes, that could also take precedence over Sgt. Rock. But the soldier has waited a few decades already, so another couple years won’t hurt.

  • will1138
    Just set the damn movie in WW2 and do it right!
  • Palmer
    Wow, what a way to alienate (Hmmmm possible pun?) fans of Sgt. Rock.
  • Octoberist
    i can see maybe having a small but loyal fanbase for pulpy or obscure characters, like The Phantom or Iron Fist, or indie comics like Scott Pilgrim but I can't for Sgt. Rock.
  • Octoberist
    I still don't understand why WB is pushing so hard for this movie.
  • Militarism.
    Sells like hot bread.
  • fanboy_d
    woah. fans are gonna be PISSED.
  • mangoshakes
    that seems wrong.
  • I wonder if they will rethink this after The First Avenger: Captain America comes out, since the movie is suppose to be a period piece. My father who was in the air force loves the character. I can just hear him now complaining about why the hell they changed it.
  • greggorybasore
    Exactly my first thought upon finishing the article. By the way Brian I assume the OR in your name refers to Oregon, nice to see a fellow Oregonian here.
  • yes the OR is for Oregon. Glad you caught the reference.
  • Bob
    No, i want to see him make Cowboy Bebop!
  • Guest
    what is wrong with Joel Silver and Co. changing all DC characters. making a Lobo movie into a PG-13 movie instead of R-Rated movie and now Sgt Rock is set in the future. WTF Joel, follow the damn source material instead of changing things to suit yourself.
  • Booooooooo!
  • greggorybasore
    Well if it's set in the NEAR future (say in Iran circa 2013) then it probably would be cheaper than a WWII period piece... and if that's the only reason that they want to transplant a character who never had any function beyond world war 2 stories then it's a movie doomed for disaster... not failure mind you but disaster.
  • Keep it set in W.W.II...Cast Bruce Willis in the lead...Sgt. Rock...Easy Co...Fighting Nazis...Doesn't have to be a riff on Inglourious Basterds and it may not make Dark Knight level $$$ but by casting Bruce Willis and staying true to the Robert Kanigher/Joe Kubert source material, it could have possibilities. It's a W.W.II epic and if Warner Bros./D.C. Ent./ and The Joel Silver Co. don't wake up and realize what they're doing is a bad idea?
    Well, it may flop harder than G.I. Joe (which I'm fearing they are possibly going to base this flick on to an extent)!
    If this even gets off of the ground...which I'm doubting if The First Avenger: Captain America succeeds as it's set during W.W.II...I'm calling it now...DISASTER AND FAILIURE!

    Warner/D.C.E./Silver Co...Quit dropping the ball here.

    You may think that a majority of comments on internet sites like this one and many others are just militant opinion, but aside from the obvious trolls that invade the 'net, even the most articulate and well thought out postings and comments aren't taking too kindly to this news.

    Quit trying to improve it with Hollywood magic and stick to the source material and do othe flick in that spirit and heart.

    Want a good version...no...A GREAT VERSION OF SGT. ROCK TO ADAPT TO THE BIG-SCREEN (Besides the obvious pick of the Kanigher/Kubert stories)?

    The D.C. Comic entitled Sgt. Rock: The Lost Battalion by Billy Tucci (Shi).

    Also: Sgt. Rock: Prophecy.

    P.S.
    Here's a link to a great article by Tucci over at Newsarama about his Sgt. Rock book which is based upon true accounts and is a labor of love for the guy. Great article, especially in light of Veteran's Day...

    http://www.newsarama.com/comics/091110-Billy-Tu...
blog comments powered by Disqus