asingleman

When Harvey Weinstein picked up the $2 million rights to A Single Man, he’s said to have personally guaranteed director (and former Gucci creative director) Tom Ford an Oscar for Best Director or Best Picture. And though a statuette for either category seems unlikely given ’09’s ’stiff competition, especially in light of the Coen Bros.’ fantastic A Serious Man, a nom(s) remains quite possible. Critical response and hip international buzz is equally strong. Today, the official trailer has surfaced, and oddly enough, its classy use of repetitive-as-to-be-thrilling music and imagery sans plot is similar to the ballsy trailer for the Coens’ opus. And not unlike the recent poster (below) for A Single Man, its trailer playfully or curiously omits the lead character’s sexual preference.


Ford adapted the screenplay alongside David Scearce (his first screenplay credit as well) from the same-named 1964 novel by the late, provocative British author Christopher Isherwood. Like the novel, the main character as played to “breakout” notices by Colin Firth (Bridget Jones franchise), is a gay college professor whose BF (Matthew Goode aka Ozymandias in Watchmen) passes away in front of him; the plot follows a day in a life of masked grief throughout a Southern California set in the 1960s. The film is said to be sprinkled with time-specific details like the theatrical run of Psycho and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Julianne Moore, who is a natural compliment for Ford’s style, stars as a London friend and neighbor of Firth’s character, though the marketing clearly implies a less platonic relationship.

Early reviews haven’t specifically compared the film to a style exercise—in contrast, the containment of dark emotions is really the underlying theme—but similarities to the obsessively precise, period aesthetic of Mad Men have been noted by several. There is actually a direct connection: A Single Man’s production designer Dan Bishop has worked as Mad Men’s PD for all three seasons, all of which are set in the early ’60s. Fun fact: Man Mad’s Don Draper, actor Jon Hamm, has an uncredited voice role in the film.

One might even note the equally style-conscious, unrelated production design featured in A Serious Man, which is set in 1967, Minnesota. And thematically and randomly, I guess, an accurate if inappropriate tagline for Ford’s Man could indeed be the Soundgarden lyric, “Looking California, Feeling Minnesota.” So, if a literary adaptation marking the directorial debut of Ford evoking Jim Jarmusch’s meditative appreciation of the odd and ordinary and death and life sounds enticing: check it out.

singlman

  • freemachine
    The photography is beautiful.
  • Tercotta
    That poster looks like it belongs in the 60's for a Truffaut or Godard film.
  • Sketch
    When when when if not where already is this playing!? I'm eager to catch it.
  • erictvoigt
    Most anticipated film of the year now, because of that gorgeous trailer. Looks like a cross between In the Mood for Love and Little Children.
  • Looking forward to seeing this as soon as possible. But after seeing a serious man last night, I don't think anything can top it. It's the best movie I've seen this year, and already one of my favorite movies from the corn brothers.
  • "You'll find that you'll need the ice tea," is one of the best and oddest lines of 2009 alongside Antichrist's "Chaos reigns." A Serious Man is easily one of the best films of the year, and as it stands, probably in my top three of 2009.

    I also find it interesting that "Chaos reigns" is as relevant a quote in describing the underlying theme of A Serious Man, as it would be for the similar yet more violently illustrated theme behind the Coens' No Country for Old Men. Thank you for your comment. I definitely agree and give A Serious Man the highest level of recommendation.
  • yea, i'll be seeing Antichrist for the first time next week, i'm actually a little nervous and that's something I can't remember ever feeling before watching a movie. So in a way it's kind of exciting. I'm also looking forward to seeing how it and A Serious Man might have some parallels. I just realized my phone auto-spellchecked coen brothers and put corn brothers.
  • Ben L.
    His sexual preference, eh? I wish being gay was a preference. Would've spared my parents and I a lot of grief.
  • The word "preference" is not inappropriate or inaccurate per its use in the post (especially when you consider Isherwood's background). Even if one is genetically predisposed to being a homosexual, a preference still exists in having sex with men over women, similar to having a preference to being alive rather than dead.

    The more interesting issue at hand is whether marketing a film without directly revealing the gay aspect of said film is a telling reminder that such an aspect is still seen by a marketing department(s) in 2009 to be a risk, or if society has reached a point where a homosexual male as main character and his relationship with another man is as much a non-issue and as commercially viable as a heterosexual version. The latter is clearly not the case, though, because had the main character in A Single Man been straight, his grief over the loss of his mate would likely be front and center in the marketing, even for a hip indie film such as this.
  • You're exactly right on most fronts here. If 'I Love You Philip Morris' has taught us anything, it's that the industry, even the indie industry, is still afraid of pictures with gay leads.
  • Nick1
    Hunter's right on the money with the marketing. Having seen the film, and seeing the promo materials, it's clear to me they're trying not to quite let people know that Firth's character is gay. It's a shame they feel the need to straight-wash the trailer and poster, and it seems like a stupid mood because, guess what, when the film opens and people see it, it will kinda get out, especially if people are surprised. As unfortunate as it seems I've seen people make decisions about seeing films based on posters alone, and a poster like that in conjunction with a trailer like that make me think Firth and Moore are lovers, which is definitely not the case.
  • sean
    worst trailer ever
  • What a terrible trailer. It tells me absolutely nothing about the movie.

    I do think that anyone who's paying attention can probably pick up on the fact that the character is gay though - or at least struggling with his sexuality. In fact, it seemed to be about the only thing I could figure out from that trailer, except that it looks nice.
  • Booger
    I love these types of trailers, I don't want the plot to be shoved in my face, I want trailers to be more about showing the style of a movie, or a defining quirke. It makes me more excited to see it when I don't know exactly what's going to happen and none of the dialogue is spoiled for me. This trailer does that and I'm very happy.Booger
  • Russ Fischer posted this trailer almost two months ago.

    http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/14/first-trail...
  • Right. To my knowledge, the trailer was taken down and the official one, albeit the same one, was just released by TWC. This post also updates on the film's current marketing, Oscar buzz, and the production design.
  • Ah, gotcha. I didn't see that the trailer had been taken down.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    yeah, looks like they made some nice visuals with the design and photography.

    Anyone know what the trailer music is from?
  • Branden
    It's sexual "orientation," not "preference."
  • The term "sexual preference" isn't meant to imply that one chooses one's sexual orientation. It means a person sexually prefers one gender over the other

    If you were presented with one attractive man and one attractive woman who want to have sex with you, which would you choose? If you picked one instead of the other because of their gender, then you have a preference for one over the other.

    You might like certain foods and hate others, but you didn't choose to like or dislike them. It's a natural reaction. But I wouldn't say, "I have an orientation for this over that." I would say, "I'd prefer to eat such-and-such instead of that."

    "Sexual preference" is only politically incorrect if you're implying that sexual orientation is a choice. Do you think that's what Hunter is doing here?
  • kencosgrove
    I didn't care for how this article was written. "BF", "Fun Fact". It felt like there was a lack of respect toward the material. The last paragraph barely seems to pertain to the news at hand. A trailer has debuted, does more really need to be said? The article seems to be almost as much about A Serious Man or Mad Men as it is about A Single Man.
  • Jeff
    Digital or Film? Anyone know? The exteriors look digital.
  • jillstern
    Saw this last night as a preview. Gorgeous actors throughout the film. Nice bodies though no sex scenes and no male full frontals--which are becoming more and more popular these days!
blog comments powered by Disqus