cabin-in-the-woods

Word has been trickling out about the Joss Whedon/Drew Goddard co-written project Cabin in the Woods for some time now, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t getting psyched for the film’s release this February (on my birthday, no less!). Now according to our friends over at ShockTillYouDrop, we’ll have to wait a lot longer to see the finished product: Word is that the film, which is also being directed by Goddard, is being delayed until January 11, 2011 while MGM converts it to 3-D.

Apparently, it’s not a punishing delay—MGM reports that it’s actually tracking quite well—but for some reason they’ve deemed a 3-D conversion necessary. I suppose with the box office success of recent 3-D horror films like My Bloody Valentine 3-D and The Final Destination, not to mention animated features like Monsters vs. Aliens and Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, studios are beginning to see the attraction of 3-D as a way to lure customers back into theaters.

Quite honestly, I’m all for the new wave of 3-D—the tech can be used to great effect today as a subtle way to increase screen depth, and it still has value for more gimmicky uses (read: Cheesy horror films). What I can’t get behind is the notion of holding back what seems to be a completed film to add 3-D as an afterthought. The technology works best when films are made with it in mind, and while I’m sure we’ll see our fair share of 3-D converted classics soon enough (Toy Story 1 & 2 are just the beginning), we’ve yet to see this process successfully work on a live action film. It seems to be a calculated move to get the movie into higher-priced 3-D screens rather than anything artistic. Then again, I wonder how much a 3-D gloss over would have helped Drag Me to Hell at the box office.

I’m sure we’ll eventually find ways to convert films to 3-D that won’t take six months (and they’ll also probably look quite good), but I’m irked that this particular film is getting such a hefty delay for what seems to be a trivial upgrade.

Discuss: Were you anticipating Cabin in the Woods? How do you feel about future films being converted to 3-D?

  • Mike
    2011??? Nooooo!!!!
  • Keith
    I call bullshit on the rumour. MGM barely has enough cash to make interest payments on loans, let alone wait another year to release a movie for a couple more bucks. As it is, MGM has a lot riding or releasing this and Hot Tub Time Machine asap - namely funding the Hobbit.
  • Keith
    Looks like I was wrong...
  • thorofthunder
    To me, up-converting films into 3D is like putting nails into a coffin. That is, the studio is telling me the movie will suck on its own and by adding a 3D element then they can sucker in extra customers that negative reviews would normally scare away.

    Despite my original excitement for this film, converting it into 3D has raised a rather large red flag.
  • Drag me to he'll was a modern horror classic without 3D and it bombed. My bloody valentine was a fantastic film and did great in 3D. So let's just wait until the finished project before saying they are converting to hide a bad film.
  • I couldn't disagree more. The only reason to see My bloody Valentine was for the 3D. Drag Me To Hell was genuinely good alone.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    Count me in as one film fan that prefers great cinematography and composition over anything 3D. I look for those films.

    As far as DMtH is concerned, the film had a throwback-Raimi feel for me. 3D would have killed that vibe and potentially killed how that film holds up. Raimi made a film that will last.
  • Exactly. I think drag me to hell was masterful. But we live in a world of moronic studio heads. They look at DMTH's numbers and say " well it must have been the 2D that ruined the box office" they need to open their eyes. Besides most classic horror finds it's real life on home video anyway.
  • Drag Me To Hell Made $80 million World Wide the budget was $30million. That's not bad.
  • Wow I need to learn how to use this comment system...
  • BrendonConnelly
    WHAT?!?!?

    Bizarre. Let's get some quotes from Goddard on this, can we? Who knows where he lives and can doorstep the poor soul?
  • graham7x
    3d didn't stick in the 50's the 80's and its not going to work now hopefully they will still release in 2d.
  • richmcleod
    This is terrible news for two reasons.
  • Henrik
    This is terrible news!!! This is the movie i was looking forward to the most next year (next to Paul).
  • Nazz
    Well that will kill any buzz the fil has
  • Raey
    everytime i see a 3D film nowadays i feel like i'm watching a tele-movie with completely dated cgi special effects... it used to be cool to like 3D, isn't it about time we all begin to officially hate it... the only way i think 3D can redeem itself is if this time around it actually puts some of the major studios out of business before the fad is over...
  • Ruiyo
    Well, I will tell you this, Devindra. I don't have a son... but if I ever do, I'm either going to take him to the cabin in the woods or I'm going to promise to take him and then not take him. But the one thing that I will never do is not tell him that I'm taking him to a cabin in the woods and then not take him.
  • Mark
    This is extremly uneccesary and I'm not saying that cause I don't like 3D vecause that simply isn't the case. I just feel that it is just not needed at all
  • Itri12
    Almost a whole year?! Studios have NO respect for filmmakers at all.
  • is 3-d really all that great yet? I don't really know because the last 3-d i saw in a movie theater was spy kids 3-d. And the 3-d just made a bad movie worse.
  • I have to say that I was indeed curious about the film and I wish that MGM just gave it a chance instead of doing a completely unnecessary 3D conversion.
  • Benway
    One bad thing that will come out of this is, with the year wait the movie (good or not) will be subjected to hype and anticipation that it will most likely not live up to.
  • joker47
    Drag Me to Hell didn't need 3D to be awesome....and Cabin sounds like it doesn't need 3D either...but it must be one of those movies that will use the 3D to poke fun at the gimmickyness of 3D.
  • Speaking of cabins in woods, might go re-watch The Evil Dead. No amount of 3D can match the magic that film has.
  • The_Kid
    All I care about is I hope that I'll be able to see the ones that are converted like Cabin in the woods without 3D, not all people enjoy it and movie studios I hope know that.
  • The_Kid
    All I care about is I hope that I'll be able to see the ones that are converted like Cabin in the woods without 3D, not all people enjoy it and movie studios I hope know that.
  • lelandbrungardt
    3-D or not, who cares. It's a Joss Whedon scribed horror movie. I'm sold.
  • I know a bunch of people who are excited about everything going 3D now. But to me, it's never not a gimmick. You ooh and ahh for five minutes, and then you get used to it and watch the movie exactly as you would a 2D movie.

    That's animated movies. For live action it's downright distracting: I watched the Avatar footage, and everybody just seemed like a cardboard pop-up. It looked less realistic than 2D, not more.

    Look, I know it's making them more money now, but this is Hollywood: soon they'll be overusing it, it'll get diminishing returns at the box office, and the fad will fade away. Again.
blog comments powered by Disqus