Did not like this Editord version no continuite.

Can't spell 'edited' or 'continuity' but got 'Projectionist' right. Fascinating.

Captain Howdy for the win.

21 likes, shit, lol.

Oh wow...

Internet sarcasm ftw. You'll never get me i'm hiding behind 7 boxxys.

hahaha, i love the surprise ending!!!

wonderful!! Absolutely wonderful.

Keyboard cat!

Everytime someone says "NO, NO, NO, NOOOOO!" I'll forever think of Shia Labeouf.

Haha, same here. =D

Epic twist ending! I love it.

Everyone likes a good tweest.

Made my day.

My dad watched that clip when we were watching tv. He was really in too it. I was like he cant be for real. It does look like the effects are finale catching up to where they should be in these kinda movies. I don't care if movies have alot of CG its just that it looks like crap compared to movies that do it in more practical effects. Like lord of the rings or 300 or sin city. The one thing I can harp on is the effects in. Is I am Legend everything was stellar but the effects of the monsters. If they had gone Practical on that it would have been even better.

I apologize if I'm misreading what you wrote, but are you saying that The Lord of the Rings, 300 and SinCity had more Pratical Effects than Visual Effects (VFX)?

Because if you are, and again, pardon me if you are not. But if you are saying that, I think you are very far from the truth. All three of those films were mostly shot in blue/green screens, as far as I'm concern. Actually they are VFX heavy movies.

Though I have to admit I kind of agree with you on the sense that I think that movies that have a lot of VFX deviate from the story/plot/character development to concentrate more in the VFX part of it. I love Chris Nolan's point of view on effects in general, they are aids to help tell a story, if they're irrelevant, they should not be there (that's my interpretation). You don't do a story after the VFX (ahem, Michael Bay). I go to movies to see a story of human emotions and interactions, not to see pretty things flying by.

Though ironic, I'm a CG Artist. But still that does not keep me from appreciating movies for what they are, stories told by a group of artists.

Yah, I have to second that motion. 300 and Sin City were basically shot entirely in front of green screen, maybe he was being sarcastic?

Bahahaha.

I can't wait until the movie comes out so it can fail already..

You kidding? It's gonna haul in some serious scrilla. General audiences eat this stuff up.

I would watch the entire movie done like this.

It would be about 12 minutes long.

is this including or excluding the end credits..?

It'd would actually be cool to have an entire sequence like this where we never leave the car, Children of Men-style - a lot more intense, character driven, and overall cheaper to make

That would require creativity and good acting. We're talking about Roland "How many times can I make the same movie?" Emmerich and John "How many times can I play the same character?" Cussack, here.

FRICK! There's ALWAYS some huge caveat!

you motherfuckers and your fucking bullshit

Oh wow...that ending is fantastic!

does john cusack have any lines that are not yelled?

if 1:26 is just acting in that clip, that means around 4:34, is cgi.

I just lost my shit. lol!

and the academy award for best supporting actor goes to.......KEYBOARD CAT for playing the doomed city of los angeles as it crumbles into the sea in "2012"

john cusack is a good actor. but this was shameful.

I love how all of your are film aficionados now. Too cool to enjoy a stupid popcorn movie? Christ..

Looked like a really low-budget production!

AHahaHAh lol KEYBOARD CAT!

Entertaining... but it was soooo much better WITH the CG effects... they freaking ROCK!!! That's a big reason why me & my friends will go see this... to see the incredible, outlandish and utterly insane destruction and mayhem!!!

John Cusack is too good for this dreck. Too bad we never got that "Grosse Pointe Blank" sequel...

...or that Serendipity sequel

... or that America's Sweethearts sequel.

This was GREAT!!! This is why story and acting are the most important elements of a film. No matter how impressive the special effects are, they can never make a movie great.

Wait.. Your implying that the acting wasnt top notch in this?

oo my gosh , the movie 2012 is great like you sad but the special effects make it great ! and you said not ? i don't get it , the movie is great and that's just the reason of the special effects . also the story , but most of all the effects . i think you've to learn what makes a movie great . bastard ! shut up about 2012 , you have to say good things about it , not negatives ! Kate Curtis is my friend 'nd John Curtis is my dad . believe it or not , i don't care what you think . I have a lot of family who's playing in the movie , so if you say one negative word about 2012 , i swear you , i call the cops !

Um...the cat at the end ruined it.

Yeah I know. That giant cat is such a jerk for destroying LA

Was like 5 Seconds Movie meets Keyboard Cat, brilliant!

John Cusack is one hell of a driver!!! that piolot is pretty good also

Did he say, "Take the freeway. It's half the time"? When was the last time the writer drove in LA?

2012+Keyboard cat=Huge Box Office
2012+No keyboard cat=Cat Poo

Sure is a little cheesy. I don't know but most special effects look cheesy 10-20 years after the fact. That's what they are using at the time....

the movie was great . you see a lot of special effects , it's not fake, it looks real ! i was happy at the end , it was a good idea to do that with the arks . you can see the movie free and online with very good Quality ! on www.freefullmovies.net ! there are no subtitles but don't worry , it's not difficult to understand them .