Latest News

Commenting Rules: Keep the conversation civil and on topic. If your comment does not add to the conversation, it will be removed. Debate intelligently. Insulting the author, /Film, or other commenters will result in comment removal and possible ban. If you want to point out a typo, correction, suggestion or criticism for /Film, please email us instead. Please use your name or nickname and not your business name (ie Discount Car Parts) as we might confuse and mark it as spam. If you would like to have your own Avatar show up with your comment, sign-up for a free Disqus account. Any Links will go into moderation before being approved. Anything we deem as spam will not be approved.

/Filmcast Ep. 67 - Shane Acker’s 9 (GUEST: Christopher Stipp from Quick Stop Entertainment)

Posted on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009 by David Chen

slashfilmcast550

In this week’s /Filmcast, Dave Chen, Devindra Hardawar and Adam Quigley, get blown away by the trailer for Jason Reitman’s Up in the Air, reflect on the creative bankruptcy of the first Hancock, and share a few remembrances of the great Patrick Swayze.

You can always e-mail us at slashfilmcast(AT)gmail(DOT)com, or call and leave a voicemail at 781-583-1993. Join us next Monday at 9 PM EST / 6 PM PST at Slashfilm’s live page as we review Jennifer’s Body.

Download or Play Now in your Browser:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Subscribe to the /Filmcast:

Shownotes

Introduction

(00:55) Christopher Stipp from Quick Stop Entertainment

What We’ve Been Watching

Devindra (3:58): Avatar, Swingers
Christopher Stipp (9:19): Triumph of the Will, Kids in the Hall, Wilco
Adam (12:58): Whiteout

News Discussion

(19:08) Patrick Swayze Passes Away
(24:23) Pirates of the Caribbean 4 gets a subtitle: On Stranger Tides
(29:00) Up in the Air Teaser Trailer
(36:30) Charlize Theron, Will Smith confirmed for Hancock 2
(41:10) Christoph Waltz Cast as Green Hornet Villain
(46:40) Trick R Treat Movie Trailer
(52:35) Park Chan Wook’s Next Film is The Ax?

Featured Review

(55:35) 9

Credits

The Scene Unseen Podcast is great! Check out their website and listen in!
A big thanks to our sponsor, Bonaroo.co.uk (use the code “filmcast” for free shipping to the U.S.!)
Our music comes from Point 22 courtesy of the Podsafe Network, and Brad Sucks
If you’d like advertise with us or sponsor us, please e-mail slashfilmcast@gmail.com.
Contact us at our new voicemail number: 781-583-1993
You can donate and support the /Filmcast by going to www.slashfilmcast.com and clicking on the left-hand side “Donate” links! Thanks to all our donors this week!

Comments

drchicago

It is kind of a downward spiral for that director of Whiteout, he did do that pretty good thriller with Brad Pitt named Kalifornia. So its a shame how bad his career has gotten.
Also, I think you guys were way too hard on 9. All your complaints could perfectly be applied to say Star Trek. Paper thin story, underdeveloped characters only known by one characteristic (the comic relief Scotsman and wise cracking doctor)- if you weren't Kirk or Spock then you had no development, plot holes, and some hammy dialogue. I'm sure this comment on Trek will be blasted, I actually really enjoy it but it seems like that movie gets a pass for a lot of stuff. I actually found 9 to be pretty good- I liked the voice acting, the action was great- took full advantage of animation the same way Kung Fu Panda's action sequences did, and yes it had a great style.

Devindra Hardawar

You could honestly boil down many films like you just did. Star Trek was a *fun* blockbuster that certainly had flaws, but they were never big enough to distract from my overall enjoyment of the film.

9 never really knows what it wants to be, and it ends up being a frustrating experience. If we're harder on this than other bad films, it's probably because it's so easy to see how it could have been great, especially with Acker's eye for visuals. That sense of missed opportunity is often more painful to me than a movie that just plain sucks.

drchicago

Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the hell out of Trek. I guess it just kind of bothers me where there's a film I like but it gets crapped on by others for reasons that they give other films a pass for. But yeah you're definitely in the right if you found 9 frustrating. The problems that you guys brought up with 9 I think were pretty much my exact problems with Trek- its a better movie than 9 but I think they're both pretty similar when it comes to their faults. I honestly was impressed with a good part of 9 to really enjoy it. The story is definitely murky and I won't excuse it. It definitely could have been great instead of simply good, but I just didn't share the same problems with you guys- most notably the voice casting.

vegabro

9 looked horribly pretentious and obligatorily dark and tacky

vegabro

And totally lol'd at the Neal Stephenson ref

jank

you guys ever wonder why the machine didn't start becoming good after it started consuming the souls? I mean the scientist did say the reason why it was evil was because it lacked a soul. so now that it sucked up 5, wouldn't it only need the remaining 4 for it to become good, and POSSIBLY rebuild the world's beauty. in that logic, 9 and the remaining numbers should have sacrificed themselves. sure, there would still be no human life, but at least we wouldn't be subjected to believe the ending we were given.

icko

i think im one of the minorities that 9 is a terrible movie. it was bad and annoying (specially the sounds of rusty metal), i was falling asleep and the only things that prevented me too is the loud noises and the orchestra score which is out of place for me.

Frederik

No.

Check the Rotten Tomatoes rating.

Frederik

Can you guys link to the podcast with Christoph Waltz?

Stipp

Here you go...It's wicked good:

http://www.adamcarolla.com/ACPBlog/2009/08/24/a...

nickperusse

Is there any chance you guys could have an rss feed with just the main podcasts? I love the after dark and extra stuff, but I just don't have the time for them, and I'd rather just have the main episodes appear in my client.

Keep up the great work!

Devindra Hardawar

Doing so would mess with iTunes and our rankings all over the place, so it's unlikely we'll be able to do that. I recommend using Yahoo Pipes (http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/) to filter out the stuff from our feeds you don't want to hear, then subscribe to that Pipe as a podcast :)

Weyland_Yutani

Sorry to break out the geek dictionary, but Snow Crash is most definitely NOT steampunk (but cyberpunk). You could argue that Stephenson uses the Victorian idealism of steampunk in The Diamond Age, however, that flips the idea around a bit by placing that story in the future.

C'mon guys, get your "punks" cleared up. :)

oh, and "9" most definitely had no idea what it was or wanted to be. Agree with you on all points. Really they just should have abandoned the whole idea of it being a post apocolyptic story and just resolved to tell a fairy tale from stitch world. Stitch Men vs. the Rogue Sewing Machines. Maybe they could have found a simple, weird-but-clever story out of that. Maybe they could have been in a fierce struggle for the last spool of thread....err...something....with a thimble king and a needle gun.

Also, Kerry Conran deserved a second chance. He's the only director that has ever truly had a pulse for the pulp adventure genre. Just too bad they expected so much from that first foray into green screen filmmaking. A future installment could have been tighter, better, and cheaper. Sadly, we'll never see it.

David Kovacs

My friend works for Jerry Bruckheimer, and says that the new Pirates movie is based on the book and everyone in the building was reading the book over summer. He also said he doesn't know how much it's based on the book.

/Film

Blogging the Reel World