Movie Review: The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus

parnassus_review_header

It’s no secret that I’m a huge admirer of Terry Gilliam’s work so it will come without surprise that I love The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus. More likely to catch you off guard, however, as it did me I must admit, is how this film might not only redeem the director in the eyes of his detractors it should also create a whole new generation of fans.

It never takes long for me to come across someone who tells me that The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, Brazil or Time Bandits is their favourite film, and I predict it won’t be long before I meet folks who name The Imaginarium as theirs. If the cinema is a place we go to dream or to see sights we could never imagine ourselves, then this film might be the perfect expression of the form. Dreamers are going to flock to this picture in droves.

To set the scene, Dr. Parnassus is an ancient and mysterious traveling showman whose horse-drawn theatre presents something like a Medieval Mystery Play by way of the Commedia dell’arte. Setting up in unexpected areas, from shopping malls to housing estates, Parnassus performs routinely to an audience that doesn’t want to care and seems barely equipped to understand. Among his band of players are his beguiling young daughter Valentina, Anton, who fosters romantic feelings for her, and Percy, Parnasssus’ coachman, dwarf and holy fool. Very soon a fifth joins the troupe, in the handsome, charming and mysterious, character of Tony.

Indebted to Dr. Parnassus and company for saving his life, and with little or no recollection of what that life was anyway, Tony becomes the sideshow’s champion barker. By this time, though, Dr. Parnassus is on his third stakes-raising bet with the devilish Mr. Nick, and the fate of Valentina herself is hanging in the balance. It seems that maybe Tony may be the only one able to save her.

However quite atypically, especially for a fantasy film with a large number of special effects as this one, the lead character of Parnassus, played by Christopher Plummer, is an older man. Imagine a Lord of the Rings with the Fellowship relegated to supporting roles in a story that focuses closely on Gandalf’s exploits and you’ll get some idea. Going further than that, however, Dr. Parnassus is shown to make some serious mistakes, moral missteps and grave errors of judgment that Gandalf would never have been permitted to commit. He’s a most unlikely hero and is just what we need more of at the arrowhead of our narratives: a complex character that doesn’t simply come straight off the peg.

Despite Plummer’s being the star of the film, the names above the title are those of the four actors called upon to play Tony. The late Heath Ledger, who initially had been set to play the role entirely, completed all of the film’s scenes set outside of the Imaginarium’s magic mirror. To enable Gilliam to finish the film it was decided that Tony would show a new face each time he passed through the mirror into the realms of imagination. Gilliam seems reluctant to take the credit, but his ingenious solutions are what made completing the film after Ledger’s untimely passing possible while still maintaining the integrity of the film and its themes absolutely. This changing face of Tony’s has become a keystone in the overall construction of the film, which belies how hard the reconfiguration must have been for everyone involved in finishing the film.

The first transformation and the briefest of these ‘guest star’ scenes calls upon Gilliam’s friend Johnny Depp to play Tony at his most endearing and lovely. Jude Law appears shortly afterwards as an aspirational Tony climbing for the clouds, before the longest of the sequences employs Colin Farrell to finally show us the character’s true colours.

The casting throughout shows a similarly sure shot, hitting bullseye after bullseye, each of them perhaps more perfectly chosen than the last: Lily Cole as a stroppy and bored yet coy young beauty, Christopher Plummer exhausted past the reach of his own wisdom, and Tom Waits wearing the bowler hat and smoking the cigars of the Devil. Smaller roles are also well cast with some of the best screen talent in Britain today, including my favourites Mark Benton and Montserrat Lombard, each popping up for just a moment.

However the film’s secret weapon is newcomer Andrew Garfield as Anton, Parnassus’ young showman who vies with Tony for Valentina’s affections. His is a serious role and one of considerable size but far from being a part of the film’s public persona or marketing. Garfield is all but absent from the one trailer released so far yet in the actual picture, he’s a shining star capable of stealing scenes left, right and centre, even right from under Ledger’s nose. The two have one particularly wonderful scene together in which Anton teases and taunts Tony, with Anton for the first time winning the upper hand over his rival. Gilliam has revealed that this scene came at the exact point during filming when an intimidated Garfield finally found the confidence to go toe to toe with the big star on set.

Like Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander, Allen’s Radio Days or Fellini’s Amarcord, this feels like a deeply reflective and personal film for the director, infused with the images and obsessions not only of a career in the cinema but of a lifetime. As well as reprising of some of the motifs that Gilliam fans have come to know and love, there are even sequences here inspired by abandoned or lost moments from films that he has never gotten to make (yet). For a long-time Gilliam fan, this is a return to his off-the-wall Wonderlands, and for newbies it’s the perfect primer.

In each of Gilliam’s three fully self-initiated projects so far – Time Bandits, Brazil and this one – the story plays out across two different realities. One is the ‘real’ reality, or at least reality as perceived by the characters of the film, while the other is a realm of fantasy lurking below or behind. In Time Bandits this is The Time of Legends, in Brazil it is Sam’s dreamscape and here it is the incredible, changing terrain of the mind as accessed through the Imaginarium’s magic mirror. Depending on who passes through and how their imagination transforms this other world, we might be taken into a dark quagmire littered with abandoned beer bottles, a candy-coloured fantasia of designer-labeled excess or a cartoon vista of Looney Tunes ladders stretching impossibly into the sky. All of this is realized with Gilliam’s unerring sense of design and unique eye for visual tweaks, twists and turns that elevate every composition in the film. There are plenty of things out of place, but they’re deliberately, strikingly and effectively so.

Once again Gilliam’s key co-conspirator is cinematographer Nicola Pecorini who through a vast array of varied sets and locations, and the appropriate styles necessary to render them, maintains a remarkably high standard of lighting and camerawork. Rarely has a film looked this wonderful without sacrificing its visual storytelling to stylization. Every colour, texture and pool of light is as integrally woven into the overall storytelling as in a painstakingly designed Pixar film. Live action films usually don’t boast this degree of aesthetic density and coherence all at once, though you can see Pecorini’s previous collaborations with Gilliam for more examples, particularly the similarly extraordinary colourscapes of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Gilliam’s choice of locations often recalls the beautiful entropy he regularly tapped into earlier in his career, from the power stations featured in Brazil and Twelve Monkeys to his vistas of historical chaos in Jabberwocky and Time Bandits. This cinematic world is further expanded by the subtle, rich soundscapes and the splendid score by Jeff and Michael Danna, not to mention the fragments of a couple of surprise songs co-written by the director himself. The creation of new worlds is absolute, both visually and aurally.

Towards the end as Tony’s forgotten past begins to come to light, the film starts to take on a number of cultural and political resonances. Not for nothing is this character called Tony, for example, and an appearance of the Sun newspaper and a familiar front page headline will ring bells with UK audiences. It is to Gilliam and McKeown’s credit that these references remain subtle and don’t have to be unpicked by the viewer for their effect to be felt. Though the script is referring, if only obscurely, to some particular individuals and events, the fiction has been bent into something more universal. The concerns here are the underlying ideas, themes and – it’s a fairy tale, so why not – morals, and not the specific shadows cast by these notions that Gilliam took as inspiration.

I’m going out on a short limb and call this the best film of the year right now. It’s also the most ambitious, richly orchestrated and sophisticated film, and on top of that it will grab you and not let go. As the film reminds us, our bodies may turn to dust, but it’s the stories that are worth telling that will outlast us. The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus is definitely one for the ages.

About the Author

  • BlackManJew
    It's good to see Heath Ledger back into a good role. Last years Dark Knight was my movie of the year!
  • jackdurden
    Can't wait for October 16th!

    This, WTWTA, and The Road all in the same weekend, gonna be sweet.
  • brou
    Watch out : october 16th isn't the release date in the USA, it's for the UK (in the US, the release date is Christmas day).
  • jackdurden
    In reply to brou

    I know, and October 16 is when we get it in Canada BOOYAKASHA
  • jackdurden
    ......and it looks like thats not happening anymore shoot

    It was the 16th a few days ago when I last checked
  • A Canadian Friend
    Sadly, the Canadian date has been changed to Dec. 25 in line with the USA release date. It was announced over the weekend.
  • papaalkhiughk
    Do you post about anything other than Terry Gilliam? Christ. Fanny and Alexander and Amaracord are nostalgia pieces steeped with realism from the director's childhoods. This hardly looks the case. Your comparisons are moot.
  • K.B.
    I thought the comparisons were in place... This movie is very personal because in a sense, Dr Parnassus IS Gilliam: an old storyteller who still has magics and wonders to share with his crowd, only the people are no longer interested in listening his stories.

    Fortunately, a lot of people - including Brendon Connelly, apparently - are still very much interested in what this storyteller has to tell them. I think it's a fantastic review!
  • papaalkhiughk
    Brandon what are your excuses for how bad The Brothers Grimm and Tideland were?
  • Oh Please Not Again
    papaalkhiughk

    Have you seen this film? I do not believe you have. So why are you on here bashing Gilliam? Tideland was pure theater at it's best. And, I personally enjoyed Brothers Grimm. What exactly is it that your comments have to do with this film and this review.

    "Fanny and Alexander and Amaracord are nostalgia pieces steeped with realism from the director's childhoods. This hardly looks the case. Your comparisons are moot." I it my opinion that your comment is moot since you have not even seen this film to make such a comment have teeth. It's very hard to take such an uninformed comment seriously. It's just one more person judging without having concrete proof. Not proof regarding other films, proof regarding THIS film. "looks like"? In your opinion, maybe. The rest of us intend to SEE the film and form our own opinions.

    As for Brendon Connelly and Slash Film covering Gilliam. Thank God. It just shows they are head and shoulders above the rest!
  • papaalkhiughk
    This review is written with an obvious bias. It is the ramblings of a fanboy which completely discredits the legitimacy and credibility of the review. It's not Brendon Connelly and Slash Film covering Gilliam it's just the former. When he can write an unbiased informative review rather than wearing Terry Gilliam shaded glasses then maybe he will transcend the level of a rambling film blog nerd.
  • iec
    Wow, you are incredibly pissed off about this. Why is that? He reviewed the film pretty objectively, since he just talks about things that actually occur ON THE SCREEN. It's not as if he's just crying from the rooftops how great Terry Gilliam is. The quality of the review is higher than "rambling film blog nerd," and is much better than any of the bullshit you'd see on Rotten Tomatoes, which is always biased and slanderous to the point of exaggerating every flaw in the most critically verbose manner. Though I may end up not agreeing with everything he said, he expresses the same kind of opinions that anyone else might -- the OPINIONATED kind.

    Who do you expect to review a new Terry Gilliam film? Someone on the staff who DOESN'T like him? Everyone has a "bias" no matter what. There's no such thing as objective film review. Nothing that comes out of a human being can be objective.

    Your comments have an obvious bias. That of an asshole. Why are you even on here writing anything? What do you hope to achieve? The same could be said of me, but I'll admit, I just like to tell off assholes. You obviously just like to be one. Well, awesome. Glad we're all following our dreams here.
  • Merciful_budah
    So by an "unbiased, informative review" you mean you just want the plot breakdown and criticism with no reference to the director's previous work? I think you may be on the wrong type of website. There's a pretty good one called IMDB you may want to check out...


    And by the gods sir, where do you get off calling Mr. Connelly a rambling film blog nerd? I'm gonna take a wild guess in assuming you don't have a movie website where you write reviews or else you wouldn't be leaving comments here.

    It's pretty clear to me that, had you been the one writing this review, you would have made a pretty big point about Tideland and Brothers Grimm and Gilliams need to recover from that. Can't say as I disagree, and had you seen this movie and found it also bad, I suppose that would be the right tone to write the review in. Brendon found the movie rather well (called it best of the year not two weeks after Inglourious Basterds' release, now that's ballsy), so he referenced Gilliam's good work.
  • tidalWave
    Would you prefer to join the circle jerk over at the Jurassic Park rehash?
  • i honestly cannot take your review of anything terry gilliam seriously.. you have an obvious bias.
  • Name
    Since when is the fact that this guy liked a good movie bias?
  • brou
    Yeah, I don't understand... You will only read the reviews from people who stated that they hate Gilliam's films ?
  • Tom
    The fact of the matter is that Brendon might well like a lot of other Gilliam films as well as this one, but that's not exactly going against the tide which is that Gilliam is a visionary director, Brendon is probably completely correct in his review of the film, the fact that he adores certain Gilliam films wouldn't stop him from criticising this if it was a stinker, he's a solid film reviewer in my opinion.
  • good to hear, the wait to see this movie has been getting harder and harder for me everyday.
  • I just can't wait too see this movie to be released in my country, a five hundred years old nation called Brazil.
  • Jodelle
    Brendon,

    Thanks for this review. I love everything you have to say about Gilliam's aesthetic and artistic sensibilities. Can't wait for this film.
  • robertpine
    I enjoyed this review, Mr. Connelly. As a Ledger fan I found the paragraph about Andrew Garfield summoning the confidence to square off with him interesting, because it really wasn't that long ago that Heath was the one intimidated by established and talented actors, finding the courage to share a stage with them, and in just a short few years establishing himself as an equal. I'm not going to make any comments about a torch being passed or anything (whups I just did, I guess) but that paragraph did make me sigh wistfully.

    Looking forward to this movie very much, and hoping to see it playing in smaller citiies in the US.
  • What?
    Jesus Christ that has got to be single most douchey comment I've ever read on here.
  • iec
    how is this comment douchey?
  • BlackManJew
    yea man, ur a douche
  • Dr_Gonzo
    Heath Ledger's awesome. Wonder what he'll do next?
  • wiggle
    your mother?
  • Your mother
    Your making 'your mother' about the deceased? lame
  • Though I wasn't too excited for this film originally this in-depth review with astounding care to detail and [seemingly] deep care for the movie has gotten me interested. It isn't on my siren list yet but it's getting there and at this rate, with such reviews (great job Brendon) and such a star cast - it may even make the top of my list.
  • Keren
    This is a fascinating review and I can't wait to see the movie.

    I don't understand people here who say that the writer is biased. If Brendon Connelly saw the movie and loved it, what's the problem with that? Do you have to hate things and write nasty things about them in order to be considered "objective"?
  • katnowlin
    Why omit analysis on Baron Munchausen? I would think with Charles McKeown's involvement as writer on both Munchausen and Parnassus there would be more mention of his writing and aesthetic. I'm excited they've collaborated again (how can you forget him in Brazil?), and I picture Munchausen to be a similar film in theme and aesthetic. Tideland was a bitter yet tasty pill to swallow, but I'm eager to see Gilliam where he belongs - with a bigger imagination and a budget to match.
  • I saw the trailer of this movie and heared lot about this movie. I want to watch this movie. Heath Ledger is coming back from this movie. I hope the movie will go good.
  • ptek
    I'm psyched for this...my one fear being that trademark Gilliam wonder may be a little too CG, as was the main problem with Brothers Grimm. Anyone know what the practical to digital FX ratio is???
  • Colonel_Kurtz
    I need all you film geeks in LA and NY to do me a HUGE favor. Pack those 4 (FOUR!) theaters showing this movie in the US until the studio decides that maybe just maybe someone NOT in LA or NY might want to watch this damn movie!
blog comments powered by Disqus