Screenwriter Talks Ideas For Prequel to The Thing

the-thing_prequel

The forthcoming prequel/remake of John Carpenter’s The Thing, one of the best sci-fi horror pictures to come out of the ’80s, has caused no small amount of consternation. Ronald D. Moore (Battlestar Galactica) wrote a script which is currently being rewritten by Eric Heisserer, who also worked on a rewrite of the upcoming A Nightmare on Elm Street reboot. We haven’t known much about Moore and Heisserer’s approach to the story. Bloody Disgusting got a few comments about the approach and how Heisserer is ‘reverse engineering’ the story of the doomed Norwegian camp that dug up the shape-shifting alien that eventually battled Kurt Russell & Co.

From what we’re reading here, it looks like the prequel approach is still going forward. That means we’ll see the Norwegian research camp that dug up a crashed spaceship and the alien it once contained, and we’ll see that alien decimate the camp in much the same way it did an American outpost in John Carpenter’s movie.

It’s a really fascinating way to construct a story because were doing it by autopsy, by examining very, very closely everything we know about the Norwegian camp and about the events that happened there from photos and video footage that’s recovered. From a visit to the base, the director, producer and I have gone through it countless times marking, you know, there’s a fire axe in the door, we have to account for that…we’re having to reverse engineer it, so those details all matter to us ‘cause it all has to make sense.

That may be a fascinating approach as a technical exercise, but it sounds like a lousy way to make a film, especially as the outcome is pre-ordained. If Moore and Heisserer don’t have characters that are interesting, and if director Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. doesn’t cast with the same ear for tone and personality as Carpenter did, it just won’t matter.

What about the rumor that Moore’s script featured the brother of Kurt Russell’s RJ MacReady? “That was certainly a character in Ronald Moore’s draft; I can’t comment on whether or not we’re going to keep that going forward.” If I may, here’s a humble and heartfelt suggestion: don’t.

  • My dream-cast:
    Sam Worthington, Gerard Butler, Kurt Russel, Jessica Biel (in a fat-suit)
  • no
  • Private_Hudson
    Original Ideas...? Hello....Anybody....Come on!! Somebody must have one..(--_--)
  • Truth be told, original ideas are a dime a dozen... problem is, Hollywood doesn't want original.
  • SnarkSmarm
    Funny comment considering the Carpenter film was a remake of a 1950's film that was based on a short story from the 30's...
  • Private_Hudson
    Shit! you got me there...lol! (--_--)
    I suppose i'm just trying to say that I'm tired of all the remakes lately, most of them seeming to be greedy attempts to replace or usurp the originals.
    When the 50's movie 'The Blob' was remade by Chuck Russel in 1988 there was an obvious love of the original. As is the case with Carpenter's 'Thing'
  • existenz
    The Thing is, in my mind, one of the greatest remakes ever. Far superior to the original with a great ensemble cast. So it's a bit unfair to put it down as "just another remake". It sets the standard for what a remake should be. The 1970s "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" with Donald Sutherland was another fabulous remake.
  • Private_Hudson
    If you read my reply again I think you'll find that I didn't say that 'The Thing' was 'Just another remake'......I said that Carpenter obviously had a lot of love for the original movie.
  • The Great Cambino
    Which itself was heavily inspired by a novella by HP Lovecraft...

    The Thing series is awesome, but definitely not 'original!' ha ha.
  • Private_Hudson
    I would say 'loosely' inspired by Lovecraft's 'At The Mountains of Madness'.
  • cookie
    at the end of the movie it will be reveiled that they're all angels
  • DB
    Yeah, this doesn't sound very compelling. One of the implicit and ironic horrors of Carpenter's movie is that the American scientists knew the Norwegians' fate, yet were doomed to repeat it, because they were at the mercy of this alien's predatory nature. Carpenter's movie in essence tells not one but two stories, and so making this movie would serve no cinematic purpose. These guys are making it to trade on the Thing brand, whatever that is.
  • spinster
    This would be a good prequel becuz in John Carpenter's The Thing the crew finds a big block of ice and that abandoned station, i just didn't like how that alien was, it was like a disease or something, that thing should be more like a monster.
  • FailedFilms
    ur an idiot
  • John
    Carpenter's The Thing is more of a sequel to the 1951 original, so if this is a prequel to Carpenter's then they're just remaking the original 1951 version. LOL Why don't they just make a sequel or a remake and leave all this prequel BS out of it. Better yet, just re-release Carpenter's version because nothing they do will top it.
  • clockworkpi
    How is Carpenter's film in anyway a sequel to the original Hawks version? By the way I completely second the notion of eliminating the MacCready brother character. That's just dumb.
  • John
    Carpenter has said it himself. At the beginning they show the destroyed Swedish camp that was supposed be taken as the camp from the original movie.
  • spinster
    How when the alien was killed at the end
  • existenz
    It wasn't completely killed, part of it infected a single dog.

    But seriously dude, it's obviously not a real sequel. In the first movie they weren't speaking Norwegian. But in a way, the Howard Hawkes version showed them finding the alien ship and pulling the alien from the ice, whereas in Carpenter's version it was already out of the ice.
  • existenz
    I've read a script by David Leslie Johnson that was part of an aborted two night made-for-TV sequel to the Thing. It took place in the present day and involved the Thing alien getting loose in New Mexico. Ultimately the US government tried to nuke the place to stop it. It was a terrible script and terrible idea; basically a bad alien movie ala EIGHT LEGGED FREAKS or a subpar BODY SNATCHERS movie.

    If I was going to make a sequel, it would start with Kurt Russell and Keith David being rescued, and the corpse of Wilford Brimley being found as well. Then the shit would go down at another Antarctic base. Kurt Russell and Keith David don't look any older than they did then (neither does Wilford Brimley, really) so you could set the movie in 1983 and it would be all good.
  • clockworkpi
    We should never see what happened to Childs and MacCready after the ending of The Thing, that would ruin what is probably one of the best endings of all time.
  • beardedm
    Fuck these people. I hate them.
    Long live Kurt Russell.
  • I read the words of the article, but all I saw was "Rock salt" again and again.
  • I hate giving away ideas for free, but here you go:

    Tell the Norwegian story - that's a good approach. To avoid the completely preordained outcome problem, keep one, or two of the Norwegians alive beyond the end of the original movie's timeline. Got that?!

    Kurt Russell and co couldn't have been certain that they'd discovered all of the Norwegian's. When the Norwegian chopper chases the dog ['thing'], one, or two fellow Norwegians follow on foot. They aren't seen by Russell's chopper and become lost in the snow.

    They're saved by the sight of Russell's base blowing up over the horizon. They get there and find a half frozen Russell and Keith David still watching one another and we finally find out which one of them was the Thing.

    N.B Russell didn't know it, but he was the Thing; clue is the bottle of whiskey he's drinking - that same bottle was shared by one of his infected dead colleagues.

    Long shot, but as a struggling screenwriter it'd be nice to get a credit if anyone uses this little gift. Cheers.
  • nic1
    Seriously Hollywood just needs to get some NEW ideas. Stop remaking classic movies and fucking them up. I recently watched the two Hitcher movies and god the remake was appalling! Missing everything that made the original an exceptional film. I say leave The Thing alone. If they have to remake it, as long as Platinum Dunes don't have anything to do with it. Freddy fans - prepare to be disappointed, like Jason fans were (and Leatherface fans). This is a bad idea.
  • Rockie
    could care less either way

    i still have my carpenter dvd so i'm happy
  • Seb
    There is no God
  • Oboq
    There was actually a pretty decent game which was a sequel to The Thing that had you visit the Norwegian camp the alien came from.
  • Such pointless tampering with what seems like an idea that is hardly solid. It's just insulting to think we're supposed to swallow this. And you know what? We will. People will plod along to the cinema, the studio will make its coin and onward we go. We're just too damn interested in seeing what they do with the stories and characters we love, so they're gonna keep making them.
  • bomberman
    I thought this reboot was fucking dead. This will not be better than John Carpenter's REMAKE.
  • why?
  • freemachine
    As long as they get Ennio Morricone back to score the film, and Rob Bottin to do the FX, I'd be all for it. Please God, no CG!!! The make up and animatronic effects in The Thing rival some of the CG crap I've seen in recent years.
  • Enigmatic Warrior
    Good points - reverse engineering and a well developed plot with characters who click. What I'd also got to have is an update to The Thing. There were a few questions that left us hanging. There has to be a way to defeat this Thing!
  • Enigmatic Warrior
    Good points - reverse engineering and a great plot with well developed characters who click. I also want to see a sequel. There were questions unanswered. We were left hanging!
blog comments powered by Disqus