ellis_excalibur

Prolific writer Warren Ellis has a post on his site today that mentions a project he didn’t get a chance to talk about while doing press for his Marvel Anime projects at Comic Con. He has penned a draft of an Arthurian movie for Hollywood Gang, the outfit that optioned his graphic novel Ocean and previously co-produced 300. The reason you might be interested (or, some of you may be alarmed) in the project, in case Ellis tackling Arthur wasn’t enough, is after the jump.

Ellis says:

On my desk, the treatment is called Untitled Arthurian Project.

On their desk, the project is called EXCALIBUR.

Except that in the original Ellis post, the word ‘Excalibur’ is in red and links to the Wikipedia page for the 1981 John Boorman film. He doesn’t seem to consider it a remake of the Boorman movie, but evidently Hollywood Gang does; maybe that’s how it has to be packaged to a studio in order to get the thing made? Fortunately, Ellis tells AICN a bit more.

‘Untitled Arthurian Project,’ as I call it (just so I can’t feel John Boorman’s EXCALIBUR looming down at me from my DVD shelf), differs from the prior 751 King Arthur movies in many ways, but perhaps most obviously in that it is very specifically about the gathering of the Knights.

In Excalibur, the main ‘gathering of the knights’ aspect of the story is handled by the long sequence where Arthur meets Lancelot, bests him and ultimately ends up with the knight as his champion. That sets up the romance between Guinevere and Lancelot, which is one of the core story ideas in Boorman’s movie.

I’m not surprised that a remake of Excalibur might eventually happen, and Ellis is a dirty and weird enough writer to make something really interesting out of the material. Boorman’s movie stands out as being one of the more odd, sexy and mystical fantasy movies to hit screens. (The great cast helps.) With Ellis on board I can see this standing alongside it. But I’m curious about using the gathering is the primary plot. If that’s really the case, what is the core dramatic thrust? Boorman’s movie used Arthur and the knights as an extended life-cycle metaphor. What’s this movie really going to be about?

Thanks to Gray for the heads up on this one.

  • Brien
    I'm guessing there will be no mention of Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Film
  • Edvin
    He he he, I see what you did there :)
  • The Boorman film is, in my estimation, the finest King Arthur film ever made.

    They've got a lot to live up to if they're going to claim that title.
  • whsmith
    I'm a fan of Boorman's Excalibur - I had a VHS copy that I watched endlessly, and it was one of the first DVDs I bought back in the day. I like the dark, gritty tone and epic arc of the story - but looking back on it - there is a lot of room for improvement. It was fairly low budget, and Nigel Terry as Arthur wasn't the greatest IMO. Actually, I think a lot of the acting was odd. I wouldn't mind a competent attempt at a remake - if indeed that is what this actually is.
  • freemachine
    Every attempt to adapt the Arthurian legend to the silver screen has failed, with the exception of Boorman's Excalibur. I don't have any hope for this, whether it's a new film or a remake.
  • LeMime
    Sounds a lot more like a remake of 'First Knight', and honestly who would want that?
  • topheavy
    Three shrubberries!?!?
  • Ellis is the man, so the script should at least be good.
  • Warren Ellis is an awesome writer, so I am excited for anything he works on. He's also a nice guy. Met him at the con, out by the pool at Hotel Solamar. He didn't seem nearly the menacing grumpy bastard that he projects in his blogs and tweets.
blog comments powered by Disqus