denzel_washington_pelham

A couple of weeks ago, when we covered the possibility that Fox would kill Tony Scott’s upcoming Unstoppable, starring Denzel Washington and Chris Pine, Brendon speculated that we might see a final version of the film go into production that had stars attached but a slashed budget. Now it’s looking like we’ll see it, if at all, with a slashed budget and at least one star gone. Variety reports that Denzel Washington has backed away from the film.

As previously reported, money is the factor here. The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, that other Denzel/Scott train movie, has only brought in about $60m so far on a $100m+ budget. So Fox is concerned, and understandably so. As it stands now, Unstoppable would be another $100m+ train movie. And while Chris Pine has heat coming off Star Trek, he won’t carry the film. Fox asked Denzel to shave a couple million off his $20m asking price and he’s reportedly refused. Likely because he knows that if anyone will carry the film, it’ll be him.

So what happens now? I’d like to see Scott make the movie for a lot less — get him to do a down and dirty thriller. But that’s not his style. He could walk, and put this back into development at Fox, which has been working on the film for a while. (Robert Schwentke and Martin Campbell were both attached at one point.) The plot is solid enough — a vet engineer works with a young conductor to stop a runaway train filled with toxins — that there’s definitely a solid thriller to be made.

In all of this, the trade reports that Denzel and Scott are still negotiating as they do European press for The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, and that he could end up in the film after all. But at this point, I wouldn’t hold your breath.

  • Just dump it.
  • TheStrangerGuy
    What, Scott is directing "Speed 3?"?
    I thought Pelham 123 was a movie that started out okay then just lost all the momentum and by the end I could care less who was left standing. If Scott and Washington even come close to a repeat of this I hope it does straight to DVD.
    And $20 million... not in this economy.
    I'd rather see less $20m starpower in Hollywood and more well thought out, origional, creative stories. Some of the greatest movies I have ever seen were done on very modest Hollywood budgets without the actors demending such high figures... not every movie can be their 'payday'.
  • jimmytwo2
    what is this movie all about? the metro north??
  • dignified dog
    NOOOOOOO. THIS ISN'T RIGHT. MY CAPS LOCK HAS BECOME STUCK! DENZEL WASHINGTON WITHOUT TONY SCOTT IS LIKE ROMEO WITHOUT MERCUTIO, LIKE PEANUT BUTTER WITHOUT JELLY, LIKE MARLON WAYANS WITHOUT SHAWN WAYANS, LIKE PETE WITHOUT PETE. DENZEL, YOU HOP BACK ON THAT TRAIN AND YOU RIDE IT. RIDE IT LIKE MAJOR T.J. "KING" KONG TO THE END.
  • Alex
    $20m per film? Wow, who's this guy's agent? A quick glance over at box office mojo, and you can see his average film grosses b/n $60-80m and he's not even a sure thing overseas like other $20m men like your Pitts and Dicaprios.
  • FINALLY, It is time for Tony to become king again. Thank you Denzel for walking away. Denzel is horrible, hi only good film with Tony was Crimson Tide, after that its been all junky. Dude made True Romance, Top Gun, Last Boy Scout, and Days of Thunder. Let's Go Tony.

    People cannot honestly still like Denzel. IF you do you are probably the same person who hats on Nick Cage.

    Bye
blog comments powered by Disqus