Michael Moore’s Capitalism: A Love Story

michael moore bailout

Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore has finally announced the title of his new film, Capitalism: A Love Story. I have to admit, I like it a lot more than the previously proposed “Save The CEOs”, which came from the clever and nontraditional teaser trailer Moore released in June. Others had speculated that the doc would be titled “Bailout,” which I also liked. But Capitalism: A Love Story hits the perfect note. In the announcement, Moore calls the film “the perfect date movie.” Moore recently joked that people could call the film “A Michael Moore Comedy About the End of the World as We Know It.”

It’s got it all — lust, passion, romance and 14,000 jobs being eliminated every day. It’s a forbidden love, one that dare not speak its name. Heck, let’s just say it: It’s capitalism.

Overture Films will release Capitalism: A Love Story on October 2nd 2009, a year and a day after the United States Senate voted to approve the $700 billion bailout. It is also the same week that Moore’s feature debut Roger & Me made its U.S. Premiere 20 years ago. And this new film comes full circle, with Moore returning to the issue that began his career: “the disastrous impact that corporate dominance and out-of-control profit motives have on the lives of Americans and citizens of the world. But this time the culprit is much bigger than General Motors, and the crime scene far wider than Flint, Michigan.”

The film will “explore the root causes of the global economic meltdown and take a comical look at the corporate and political shenanigans that culminated in what Moore has described as “the biggest robbery in the history of this country” – the massive transfer of U.S. taxpayer money to private financial institutions.”

Moore has made three of the top six highest-grossing documentaries of all time, but I’m wondering if people will come out for his latest in these bad economic times.

source: Variety

  • Jeff
    Go Michael!
  • Mike
    Absolutely. Obviously if you're not a liberal or democrat, you won't be so inclined to see this movie, but I think his movies are worth seeing regardless of your political views. They're damn fine made movies.
  • Really because I think his recent films are terribly constructed documentaries.

    After Bowling for Columbine his films have become increasingly works of leftist propaganda. He is the left's Bill O'Reilly. He misrepresents facts and fails to provide a proper look at the side he is arguing for. He blatantly breaks documentary ethics left, right and centre.

    Bowling for Columbine is his only truly good documentary but Canadian Bacon is still my favorite Moore film.

    And all this from a leftist Canadian who agrees with what he is saying, just not how he says it.
  • GreatBigLion
    Agreed. Although "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Sicko" are well-made, the former being especially superb, Moore jumps to conclusions that I disagree with that use misrepresented facts as their logic, the Bin Laden/Bush families ties to 9/11 coming to mind. I hope he makes another "Bowling for Columbine" with this one.
  • Anrkist
    No love for Rodger & Me?
  • moogity-moogity
    Right, because the "liberals" and "democrats" (including Obama) were/are all so opposed to the bailout.

    Troglodyte.
  • Erik U
    In what world does near trillion dollar financial bailouts have anything to do with capitalism?
  • Bon Champion
    I think his movie is a love story about capitalism and how the corruption of capitalism and the bending of its rules have brought down this country. I may be horribly wrong, but that's how I see it.
  • Erik U
    Somehow I doubt that the movie will be about the merits of a deregulated free market economy.
  • quintushalls
    I think you will find other people have different views on the definition of Capitalism, the same way that other people have different views on the definition of Socialism.
  • Erik U
    capitalism |ˈkapətlˌizəm|
    noun
    an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

    This definition, from my computer, summed up a very complex idea, the merits of which have been debated for centuries, into one sentence focused around the idea that the economy is controlled by people rather than the state. So again, in whose definition does a near $1 trillion government bail out have anything to do with capitalism?
  • quintushalls
    my point was not the actual definition, but perception. Some people mistake socialism for something out of 1984, and some people perceive capitalism as a corporate autocracy over a corrupt government. Both are skewed far away from the truth. Some people believe that Moore will skew the definition and be fairly biased.
  • RNL
    The real world, libertarian.
  • With that title people are going to think it is advocating socialism/communism. And nothing sells better to Americans than socialism!
  • Meh! (That's right, a 'meh' with exclamation behind it, I'm 100% indifferent about this film.)
  • David
    I truly despise this moronic, lying fat guy. Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Idiot, I think.
  • skaught
    no lies involved in his sodombile (his tv era). moronic is anything but what describes him. same with big, fat (which mean nothing in regard to his intellect) idiot. i appreciate your "i think", nice way out.
  • David
    Obviously, skaught, you missed the Big Fat Idiot reference -- it was the title of a book written by a left-wing stooge who is now a United States Senator, but he used it in reference to Rush Limbaugh. Truth is, at least as far as I can see it, that Limbaugh and Moore are of a kind. They really care little for the truth, manipulate "facts" to support a predetermined conclusion, and present their material as non-fiction (despite the fact that it is mostly fiction). And, yes, if artful lying in order to promote an agenda and in the meantime make big bucks is a sign of intelligence, he is no moron. But, I think for those who are willing to look closely, his misrepresentations, omissions, and distortions are not terribly sophisticated. I find them, personally, moronic. But, perhaps more to the point, I find him repulsive as a person, setting aside his haystack physique. His work has more in common with The Will To Power than an honest documentary.
  • Drew
    Moore puts more FACTS into 5 minutes of film than Limbaugh does in 5 years of talk radio and Coulter in a lifetime of lifetimes of whatever she does. Now you may not like facts, but they are hard to ignore.
  • I think the guy makes incredibly entertaining films. I'm glad he's increased the exposure for documentaries and even one a certifiable blockbuster. It may never happen again, but he'll forever be relevant. Pretty cool title, too.
  • Drago
    His films are not documentaries at all, in fact, they are examples of how not to make documentaries. He brings up some facts, completely dismisses others, they are completely one-sided. It's kind of like saying cloverfield is a documentary because a lot of it is filmed with shaky camera.
  • CyT
    The term "the only dangerous thing for religion is apathy" comes to mind. The best thing Michael Moore has done is fuel the debate so people who might be inclined to doing these bad deeds he claims people are doing and tries to investigate, might be swayed into not doing them, for fear of being exposed. For that its worth putting up with his bad filmmaking/documentary techniques.
  • David
    Quite the contrary. Since he broadly makes things up, I doubt there's any deterrent effect at all. What he generates, instead, is smug backslapping among those inclined to believe both the false premises and false conclusions he presents.
  • rapistwerewolves
    to call his films documentaries is a bit misleading...the people who believe the crap in his film are probably the same people that think MSNBC is a credible news source.
  • jackie/B
    His films are great! He is not afraid to say what some are not willing to say. Rather you like him should not be the judge for his movies. And to say that MSNBC is not credible news source, has anyone heard of FOX News?!?!?! Come on is there any other network out there that is more hateful and one sided besides Fox News!!!
  • David
    I don't consider myself Republican or Democrat, and I did vote for Obama. I felt I had to put that on the table in saying that, on the pure news programs (as opposed to the yelling morons like O'Reilly and Olbermann), Fox News appears to me to be way more even-handed and straightforward than NBC (and MSNBC, although I'm not sure how much "straight news" is even left on MSNBC). Fox gets a bad rap because they're opinion folks, like Sean Hannity, are loud, repetitive, and ham-handed blowhards, and they get the lion's share of attention. But Keith Olbermann is no better. In fact, I happen to think Olbermann may be truly insane -- that it isn't an act.
  • Drago
    David, I completely agree, I despise extremists on both sides, people like Olbermann, Moore, and Maher annoy me a lot more than someone like Limbaugh.
  • David
    We've become so propagandized as a society, that the "left" only sees blowhards on the right, and the "right" only sees blowhards on the left. I think both parties have gone off a cliff and taken a lot of ostensibly intelligent and well-meaning folks with them. Ironically, in the end, Obama is not much different than Bush in almost all material respects -- same position on gay rights issues, same position on Iraq, in favor of a bigger military presence in Afghanistan, health reform focused on finance, but not cost, government bailouts, and profligate spending. About the only point of differentiation is government funding of stem cell research, which involves very little money anyway -- at least compared to the money now being tossed and pig olfactory research. War is peace, black is white, freedom is slavery. Nothing matters.
  • Bob
    Between "Save the CEOs" and "Capitalism: A Love Story," I actually prefer the first title. Although I'm not enthusiastic about either title, the second one is too generic, in my opinion.
  • quintushalls
    While Libertarians and Moore will agree on the fault of the government's actions, they will disagree on the cause for the recession. Whatever your viewpoint, the film should be entertaining.
  • I have written To Michael quite a few time in the last four years quoting my blog on Deep conscious capitalism...wonder how he pulls out the 'Love' part of the story...intriguing. Love his persistence and poise
  • I really like his documentaries and I'm sure I'll like this one as well. However, lately people seem to zone out whenever they come across anything related to the economy. Still a good title though.
  • dagreenman18
    love the title, hate the fact that it now can't be used for an actual love story about Capitalism.
  • Benjamin
    This dude's sense of humor is terrible.
  • mkgmkg32001
    Moore's movies are always quality fiction.
  • mtnrunner2
    Like his other films, I'm sure it will be long on emotion and short on causality. In Sicko, he displayed just how myopic and un-analytical he is: people are like caged animals, who either have medical benefits magically dropped in front of them by a benevolent government, or they don't, which makes them sad :( There was utterly no attention paid to the real workings of economics, politics, morality and the devastating costs of the type of oppressive policies he advocates. Universal (i.e. forced) medical care is morally wrong, and I'm sure his idea of economic justice (i.e. brute force applied to commerce) will be just as bad, and his "analysis" just as lacking. Prepare to weep, but not to learn.
  • DryQuLa
    People might not come out to see a movie exploring the root causes of the bad economy because of "these bad economic times?" Is that irony?
  • less
    Michael Moore wants to tax multi-millionaires to the point where universal health care can be offered to the poor masses for free, even if this means no more rich people, period.

    Fine.

    Anyone remember when the owner of the anti-Moore site, Moorewatch, was almost forced to shut it down due to - ironically enough - an expensive medical emergency, but Mike donated a few grand to the cause and life went on? (The site is still up, but comatose.)

    I, too, am over way my head in medical debt through no fault of my own, and repeatedly tried to contact multi-millionaire Michael Moore to see if he would reprise his paradigm of the rich (regardless of race, creed, color, political affiliation) giving to the poor (regardless of their race, creed, color, political affiliation) with no strings attached.

    Nothing. So I asked said site owner if he could perhaps reach out, but he, too, basically told me to "get f-cked, a--hole."

    It may be too late for many of the sick and disabled to wait for President Obama, whom Michael campaigned and likely voted for, to confiscate Michael Moore's upcoming "Captialism" payday, much less distribute it fairly. It seems the masses need to remind Michael of this serious problem, ask him to remember his roots and convictions by donating, again, freely, now.
  • gochargers
    Its socialism ... trillions to the banks, billions for the auto companies and their unions and don't forget all that pork included in both bailouts.

    Socialism refers to any one of various theories of economic organization advocating government or whole community ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with a more egalitarian method of compensation.[1][2][3] Modern socialism originated in the late 18th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticized the effects of industrialization and private ownership on society, however, socialism itself is not a political system or ideology; it is a way of distributing goods and services. Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution and become the transitional stage from capitalism to communism
  • xinunus
    OMG!!

    Michael Moore is transforming into a TORTUS right before our eyes!!

    Where did his neck go?

    OMG!!
  • ingeborgm
    I am a great fan from MM-Action, but when comes the movie to Germany?
    I can not found the start of movie. Know anybody ???
  • parker1227
    So Michael Moore has gifted us with yet another anti-capitalist screed - whose production is made possible by free-market capitalist supplied cameras, computers, software, trucks and airplanes. And whose distribution and advertisement is similarly and COMPLETELY dependent on free-market capitalism.

    Hypocrisy - thy name is Michael Moore.

    All anti-capitalists should have their capitalist possessions confiscated and then get air-dropped into the wilderness for one year without any goods or provisions created by free-market capitalists.

    That would cure about 99% of them of their stupidity.
  • Scott
    ZZZZzzzzzz...
  • steve
    I guess it kind of ironic that Moore is charging $9 + to see a "documentary" about ripping people off,
  • Drew
    The theaters and the film distribution companies need to charge for their services. The above comments about Moore remind me of the comments made about Gore -- completely missing what is relevant. Gore is called a hypocrite because he uses a lot of electricity. Gore never said that using electricity was bad. His argument was their was a planetary cost on the way electricity was being produced. It is the same with Moore, he isn't saying that capitalism is bad, he is commenting on the way it has been carried out by the leaders of our financial system who buy the politicians we put in office. He is only trying to put a spotlight on the Wall Street fiefdoms that promotes excess and greed as something to be proud of and on those smug CEOs who gamble away a societies wealth without having to be accountable.
  • Clint650
    i thought Bowling for Colombine was well done, but ultimately, Moore's films try to scare and sadden you until you feel helpless (like he does). If he targets the Obama adminstration in any future films i will believe him to be a truth seeker, otherwise i feel he is full of it.
blog comments powered by Disqus