Tony Scott’s Unstoppable Getting Dumped?

scott_epic

Could a new collaboration between Tony Scott and Denzel Washington be about to get Moneyballed? According to The Hollywood Reporter, there’s every chance that Unstoppable will be in fact stopped, and dead in its tracks. The issue, of course, is financial. Let’s not pretend for one second that a Tony Scott/Denzel Washington picture would run into studio problems on any kind of artistic basis. Apparently, neither Scott nor Washington’s contracts are signed yet, nor is that of second-fiddle star Chris Pine.

The Taking of Pelham 123 was hardly a blast of dynamite down the box office goldmine, so Star Trekker Pine would seem to be, on the surface of things, a rather valuable player in this new endeavor. Let’s wildly speculate that he will then be able to command a respectable sum and perhaps, in relation, drive up the asking prices of Washington and Scott. Even if that absolutely unfounded guess is far off the mark, it’s not hard to imagine how the above the line price tags on this picture could be horrendous.

According to the Reporter, however, it is the budget set aside for actually producing the thing that’s causing the cold feet. It’s apparently the film’s requirement for big action set pieces that will break the bank, which is at least a more defensible position than it being salaries for superstars sucking up the funds.

I’d advise Hollywood action filmmakers to steer well clear of films with the word “stop” in the title. Jan de Bont’s Stopping Power was derailed in similar circumstances, with a backer backing down shortly before production was due to begin. That film was going to offer a 51-minute chase sequence on a $40 million budget - cheap stuff, compared to Scott’s spend. For every million dollars of Domino, we got little more than a months worth of migraine.

The film would not only have been more cost effective with Martin Campbell directing, as once he was scheduled to, but I’d think Campbell would be just more likely to serve up a better picture.

Don’t be surprised to see this movie go into production with all stars attached and all salaries intact, but action sequences and production budget slashed.

  • Bon Champion
    I like the term "moneyballed" good ring to it.
  • oh the humanity
    Tony Scott's Pelham 123 remake was a blast of diarrhea all over the faces of the audience. Watching Inside Man again last night drove home the fact that Spike Lee should have been the only director that was even considered for that remake. That this Scott/Washington train-based follow-up to their previous train-based epic fail has derailed is poetic justice.
  • Spike Lee really? He's not a great action pic director, by his own admission. No, for a flashy nonsense summer movie, I can't think of anyone more qualified than Tony Scott.
  • StoolSniffer
    So sick of Tony Scott, his films, his cigar, baseball cap and "directing vest".
  • shatner
    I'm sick of the Scott brothers and their callaborations with denzel! Use a new actor stupid heads! And I don't mean Russell Crowe Ridley
  • RocknRolla
    This bit of news isn't surprising. I mean, Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 was a disaster and tanked at the box office. While Tony hasn't made a decent flick in over a decade, Washington's star continues to die. Sad, but true. These guys are becoming liabilities and costing studios money.
  • SgtZim
    What the hell is it with that hat?! Good luck charm? I wonder if looking under it would melt my face like the Ark of the Covenant....
  • Oh, the sweet, sweet irony.
  • Good news, Tony Scott has made three good films in the last fifteen years (in my own personal opinion of course), those are 'Crimson Tide', 'Beat The Devil' and 'Man On Fire', a part from that he has done nothing and keeps hiring Denzel Washington on-board to be his cash-cow/saving grace. Drop 'The Warriors' remake Tony, drop Denzel from a project for once and try and be like your brother - add a little originality - for once.
blog comments powered by Disqus