weinstein_american_werewolf_london

According to Bloody Disgusting, the Weinstein Brothers have purchased the rights to remake An American Werewolf in London from original writer/director John Landis. Dimension Films already has a Hellraiser remake in the works (which can’t seem to keep a director on board) and has the second new Halloween film hitting theatres soon. The news that a cash-strapped Landis has sold rights to the Weinsteins (who have been reported to be equally cash-strapped, ironically) will probably cue the question that has cropped up a lot lately: is nothing sacred? The perpetual answer is: not in Hollywood, no. And that’s OK, because we’ll always have the original.

There’s little argument against An American Werewolf in London being one of the best werewolf films ever made; I don’t think I could argue that there is a better werewolf picture. The film stars David Naughton and Griffin Dunne as American backpackers who are attacked by a creature on the Yorkshire Moors. Dunne is killed, but his ghost appears to tell a recovering Laughton that they were savaged by a werewolf, and that Laughton will become a wolf at the next full moon. Laughton moves into his nurse’s London apartment, and the werewolf curse reveals itself, leading to a string of dead Londoners. Landis keeps the film moving with humor and energy, and the real star of the piece is Rick Baker, whose incredible effects transformed Laughton into a wolf in a way that has yet to be surpassed. The film instigated the creation of the Makeup category at the Oscars.

Despite creating a string of great movies in the early ’80s (The Kentucky Fried Movie, Animal House, The Blues Brothers, American Werewolf and Trading Places) Landis struggled to maintain a viable directing career through the late ’90s, and his last features as a director hit in 1998: Susan’s Plan and Blues Brothers 2000. His recent work has been on television, including a couple episodes of the ambitiously titled Masters of Horror series on Showtime that aired in ‘05 and ‘06. Ironically, Landis has been in the news for other reasons over the last few days: he directed Michael Jackson’s Thriller and Black or White video clips.

Landis did not write or direct the lame, better forgotten sequel An American Werewolf in Paris, but that film goes to show that the original is bulletproof. If the Weinsteins do manage to mount a remake, we can hope that it attracts talent to make it good enough to take seriously. If not, it will be just as quickly and easily forgotten as the sequel, and we can happily continue to pretend that the Landis original is the only one.

UPDATE: Bloody Disgusting got in touch with Landis, and his statement suggests we shouldn’t worry too much just yet:

Yes, Dimension is now in negotiation for the ‘An American Werewolf in London’ remake rights. Perhaps someone will make a brilliant movie out of it. Regardless, my film comes out on Blu-ray this summer and looks amazing. I was afraid the digital cleaning of the negative would result in too clear a picture and hurt Rick Baker’s make-up, when in fact the incredibly crisp detail actually makes Rick stuff look even better!

  • Muffin7
    This is a movie title that the studios should "use" if they want to make money off of a built in audience, which they do. The name is familiar.

    But what do I think about this?

    Don't really care. Original was oK. Werewolf's are kind of cool, I guess. Vampires and Zombies are much more entertaining in my book. Also Frankenstein. Love Frankenstein.
  • quintushalls
    The remakes are starting to hurt.
  • ITHoTMK
    The greater question, for us fans who care, is whether or not they go with live on set makeup or CG for the transformation.

    I guess some of us will change our minds when the Mark Romanek / Joe Johnston directed THE WOLF MAN comes out starring Benicio Del Toro. As rumoured, it was originally supposed to be CG free but the departure of Romanek and pressure from the studio changed all that. In my opinion the only advantage to CG would be the reduction of edits during the transformation.

    AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON and THRILLER as still two of the best transformations done to date courtesy of Rick Baker and team.
  • Captain Awesome
    Rick baker is really the only person to go to for a project like this. Werewolves done in CG today look like utter shit.
  • Ugh. I'm so bloody sick of remakes. Why????? Why can't they just come up with a new goddamned original story? Hollywood, get over yourselves and stop being so desperate.
  • Greggory Bsore
    Because the don't have to.Studios keep doing remakes because they keep making money. As long as people keep paying money to see them studios will keep making them.
  • Is this surprising? No. Am I upset about it? Yes.

    Just the other day I was making a list in my head and I realized that, for the most part, almost every notable horror/science fiction/fantasy film has been shit on by Hollywood via a crappy remake or a crappy sequel(s). Granted sometimes that remake/sequel(s) turns out to be great (The Thing From Another World & The Thing, Alien & Aliens), it's the principle that bugs me. I mean there's a pretty good chance that you'd never hear about plans for a Citizen Kane remake, or a sequel to Taxi Driver, but movies Hollywood big wigs look at stuff like Psycho and 2001 and go "how can we milk this?".
  • Poland626
    I have a better idea. SAVE all that money on remaking the film and instead use it to market a re-release of the original.
  • angrymoor
    Why? Stop with the remakes already! I loved the first movie. The sequel sucked donkey balls.

    The Weinsteins will fuck up this movie. Leave well enough. Let it be.
  • Why remake it, WHY!! Whats wrong with the original, nothing thats what. Its a classic piece of cinema history that should be left well alone. It was bad enough they tarnished American Warewolf in London by making the sequel (the name of which i will not even say). Come on Weinsteins, put it on the shelf and forget you ever purchased it!
  • bglooney
    I understand that remakes have a built in audience that brings a promise in investment return, but for GOD'S sake...I refuse to believe there aren't new ideas out there. I hope for a surge of new ideas to come from independent film, but who knows how long that might take. Big film has to be big business to sustain itself. I just wish they would take some chances.

    I loved the first film. Julie Delpy couldn't even get me to watch the second.
    It's one thing if a inspired idea is what's driving a remake, but I can't help but think of guys like the Weinstein's going down a large list of successful films of the past murmuring, "what can we dust off and make money with?"
  • Meli_V
    I'll stick with the original thank you very much!
  • sitrom
    Me too sir, me too.
  • Okay, I'm upset and enraged but I'll save the rant because it seems a little too obvious ... I'm sure most are equally disappointed. Even if this lingers in limbo for a while, watch the studio rush it like MAD when they see how huge WOLF MAN and NEW MOON are. They'll fall for the false guise that 'werewolf movies are IN" and deliver a lackluster portrayal of what is one of the most original and classic horror films of all time.
  • Octoberist
    I don't think it'll ever happen. The Weinsteins are just desperate for something right now..
  • Colonel_Kurtz
    The original still stands up well 20 some odd years later. All they'll do with a remake is ruin the f/x with cgi and add a pointless twist to make it "new." :(

    And I liked that 1 scene in the Paris movie...you know the 1 I mean. ;)
  • wilberfan
    What with all of the attention on Michael Jackson's death, just yesterday I was thinking, "Gee..I wonder what John Landis is up to these days?".

    Thanks for shedding a little light!
  • sitrom
    I think 'Another American Werewolf In London' is a much better idea.

    Just stay away from the moors.

    Seriously. They did that bit in the first one.
  • D
    I no longer can even generate the energy to care about another remake...


    So I give you the response that frightens Hollywood.


    "Meh."
  • burton
    Instead of complaining about remakes, quit going to them. Remakes are to cash in. It only takes one strong weekend to make a remake a financially sound decision.
  • If they HAVE to satiate their need for remakes, why not remake films that were bad the first time around instead of the ones that were good?

    Plus, what would happen if it were remade? How would the transformation be handled? CGI? I'm not knocking CGI, but one of the reasons the original is so special is because it accomplished a realistic werewolf transformation with make-up. An entire Oscar category was practically made for this film. Bah. I'm not even surprised anymore to get as defensive as I usually do.
  • Gajonka
    Your damn right we've got the original. If they make the fucking thing they better include CCR's "Bad Moon Rising." I don't want any bullshit!!!
  • Wonder if this has anything to do with the uncoming Wolf Man movie. Maybe Weistiens are betting on a surge in the genre.

    As long as it is done better than AW in Paris, I think this film could be ripe for a remake.
  • Alice
    Bullsh*t. Cult films are never "ripe for a remake". Leave this alone. Will I watch it. Of course - I'll get hold of a bootleg copy, as I did with the remakes for "Halloween", "Psycho", "the Amityville Horror", etc. They're not making any money out of me for producing crap!
blog comments powered by Disqus