lotl1

It was a little before the half-way mark to Land of the Lost when a little kid started crying in the theater as the Sleestaks opened their reptilian beaks, revealing row after row of neat, razor-sharp teeth. We hadn’t even reached the scene in which Danny McBride’s misogynist, would-be casino maven, Will Stanton, stared directly into the camera while sitting in a swimming pool, tripping his fucking mind out on “narcotic” alien fruit-juice. The swimming pool was randomly parked on an inter-dimensional white sand desert sprinkled with a Viking ship, a broken-down Cessna, and a meta neon sign that blankly spells “Motel.” And as if exiting from Jeff Goldblum’s ear canal during a Jurassic Park hallucination, dinosaurs big and small were roaming the diverse terrain beyond. Land of the Lost is chockful of original, PG-13-hazing moments. And if you’re a parent and bring your kids to see it, you deserve a cool sticker.

For those of us who haven’t yet spawned, this is a rare, unabashed $100 million stoner movie that is just as delightfully weird, at times deranged, and detached as the cult ‘70s kids show from creators/producers Sid and Marty Krofft. This is a comedy in which Will Ferrell and McBride have their voices auto-tuned like T-Pain and duet a Cher song after touching an erect, translucent monolith. The presentation of the monolith manages to conjure Pink Floyd, triangle and pyramid-obsessed posts on tumblr., and 2001 simultaneously. Sizing up the structure like it’s no big deal, McBride deadpans that our ancestors must have been hosting the Latin Grammies. Inspired. Both the marketing and the release date for Land of the Lost (against long-predicted sensation The Hangover) were poorly planned and executed. But in time I think LoTL will achieve the same reverence as Step Brothers; another classic and surreal Will Ferrell comedy to cast memorable shadows on the wall of something I call the Stop Making Sense comedy movement.

lotl2

In a recent blurb, Will Ferrell’s creative partner, Step Brothers director, and buddy, Adam McKay, said of him: “When you look at some of the characters Will creates, it’s bizarre that he’s a huge movie star.” As Rick Marshall, an aloof scientist with a serious munchie-craze who dances between paleontology factoids and summer-vacation daydreaming, Ferrell fully embodies this statement. At this point in his career, even after hitting Broadway paydirt with the scathing You’re Welcome America, Ferrell remains a curious enigma in Hollywood; he’s arguably its biggest comedy star, but viewers seem increasingly perplexed by what makes him tick. Watching him on screen, he constantly blurs the line between what is and what is not funny until all that remains is him standing there in a pose of mock-victory; and oft he stares back at us with the oddest of smirks.

Watching Ferrell, McBride, and an amazingly objectified Anna Friel stumble around in this Land of Random, it’s hard not to place yourself inside the insecure mind of a 2009 movie executive who’s thinking only in dollar-signs. Indeed, many of the early reviews for LoTL seem written from a business-minded perspective, and I find it annoying and remiss. It’s a fair question though: what exactly is the point of remaking Land of the Lost and who is the audience? As the Vulture blog postulates, LoTL seems to exist merely because Will Ferrell hearts, like, really hearts, Sleestaks. That’s it. But it’s reason enough for me to be forever grateful: Ferrell’s man-love for this slow-moving, silent race of ridiculous reptilians is contagious. I’ve been drinking Miller Lites and lapping up the Kroffts’ original, batshit episodes on Hulu, Chiller, and the Sci-Fi Channel all weekend long. To me, this is what the season and the movie itself is all about—eating huge amounts of snow crab legs on vacation and laughing your ass off to Seals and Crofts“Summer Breeze.” Not analyzing box office receipts.

Similar to watching the original series 30 years later, LoTL is an entertainment that is incredibly self-aware. The conventions and beats of the adventure-movie formula are treated like a giant rec-room for realizing surreal ideas and kooky imagery. Just for the hell of it. Want to fight a T.Rex with a tourist-grade bottle rocket? Or slide down a T.Rex’s tail a la Fred Flintstone with the thoughtless ease of an avatar? Want to rationalize stuffing a donut with M&M’s for breakfast? Now’s the time. I’m not sure how many people think giant multi-colored, prophetic holograms are hilarious bliss, or possess an insatiable fetish for cheesy motherboards made from plastic crystals straight out of 1980s fantasy films. But I do.

Again, the trailers for Land of the Lost do nothing to convey how great and magical some of the special effects are;  the “timeless” structures created by production designer, Bo Welch, are charming and obviously expensive, yet purposely radiate with the playground cool of Epic Fail movie sets. Some of the sets could easily serve as an eccentric billionaire’s jungle-themed putt-putt course, or belong to an impossibly ambitious remake of House II: The Second Story. The cinematography by Dion Beebe (Collateral, Chicago) has a beach-like crispness that makes action sequences play like hyper-vivid mirages; it’s a cool split from the original series’ submersion in paranoid, wake-and-bake haze. And director Brad Silberling surprised me by not whoring-out the story to dino-effects and empty poop jokes—exactly what one feared from the trailer and PG-13 rating. He’s up for and committed to the movie’s kamikaze wackiness. Ferrell and team are on an endless hunt for a filthy one-liner and there’s not much of a sugar rush to please the kiddies courtesy of Silberling.

lotl3

Some of the humor not aided by special effects is crass. The spirit of the film—the cheerleader for its bawdy humor—is an unconvincing ape-man named Chak-Ka (SNL writer Jorma Taccone). Chak-Ka is literally a hirsute prince in this Land, and he’s high enough on the evolutionary ladder to play dumb in order to cop countless feels on Friel and Ferrell alike. McBride gets off a joke about “wetness” in the film’s first minutes that is a tell-tale sign that our cinematic trip will be disturbing. I heard parents groan. Another sign of badboy mischief: Ben Best (Clegg on Eastbound and Down) makes a squint-worthy cameo. Near the end of the film, Best is passed out drunk in a plastic lizard-suit in the real world awaiting McBride’s return from a Land where real lizard suits are shed during pungent sexual intercourse.

There are bizarre, politically-incorrect parallels between McBride’s Will and an advanced Altrusian Sleestak named Enik. Will is torn over whether to abandon this exciting, hedonistic fantasy land. In our modern day world, Will is aware that he’s an outdated plebe alphamale. One of his jokes made me do a double-take: When Will first encounters Enik, his instinctive reaction is to stomp on his head simply because Enik is a golden Sleestak and thus “different” from his green brethren. Shudder. But Enik’s villainous motives are fueled by a similar existential anger and frustration. Enik desperately aspires to leave the same world (and arrested intellectual plane) that Will savors. And of course, by having a supporting character named Will (faithful to the TV show) in a Will Ferrell movie, there’s the notion that, as a guy and as an actor, Ferrell aspires to relax atop both of these “planes” as well.

Viewers can choose to fall down a rabbit-hole glimmering in this type of pot-psychology, or choose to soak up the visuals and jokes and leave the pot-psychology alone until a fourth viewing. But if you tilt your head ever so slightly, a scene here can be interpreted as George W. Bush being dared to French-kiss a male missing-link by America’s very own Kenny Powers. Alongside Sam Raimi’s way-way-underseen Drag Me to Hell (also from Universal), Land of the Lost is one of the coolest, most subversive PG-13 movies to knock me over in the last 10 years. And like Will Ferrell tells Matt Lauer in the film: square critics giving LoTL one-star reviews like Rolling Stone’Peter Travers “can suck it!”

/Film Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Hunter Stephenson can be reached at h.attila[at]gmail.com and on Twitter. He recommends staying until after the end credits to glimpse an awesome sequel that will be made in a parallel universe.

About the Author

  • rnl
    I love peter travers and would take his word over yours.
    Sorry.
  • sean
    i love peter travers too, and he is wrong here, i was going to go see the hangover, but it was sold out, so my friend and i went to see this movie. i look at my buddy in the theatre and so how bad do you think this movie going to be, he said bad. it wasn't it was funny, the hole matt latner thing made the movie and it was a good story too. i didn't like one thing and that was the adds placement, at point i thought i was watching a salder movie and not a ferrall movie. if you are going to the movie i would say go see the hangover or up before this movie but its worth seeing
  • MetulMike
    Peter Travers is a dick and has terrible tastes in movies, that whole magazine can suck it
  • his reviews mean more than yours do. do you do reviews?
  • Why do they mean more? So the guy watches movies, I do to. It's not a science to review a movie.

    Step 1. Go watch a movie.
    Step 2. Write about it.

    If you base your opinion on a movie based off someone else's opinion, you're bound to miss something you might really enjoy.
  • Jesus Metul, didn't you know you actually have to review movies in order to criticize other reviewers? God I hate people and their opinions. If only free-thinking was outlawed. *sigh*
  • Zinc
    Does this review represent all of /film or just you, Hunter?
  • Do we write reviews as a group? No... What would the point be? Reviews are subjective. The review is Hunter's opinion. I haven't seen the movie yet.
  • pwnd.
  • Juiceless
    Reviews ARE subjective, you're right. So why is it ok for Hunter to shit all over Peter Travers' review?
  • Sorry, but the movie wasn't good...
  • What the hell? This movie was pretty awful. McBride was the only good part.
  • thankyoufor
    wow Hunter
    i hate to say this....
    but you fail
    this is the worst movie ive seen in a long tme
  • And in other news, Hunter Stephenson continues to be a Danny McBride fanboy.

    Also, Peter Travers sucks.
  • Zinc
    Hey, McBride is fucking awesome. This film, however, is not. Doesn't take away from the fact that he's awesome though.
  • @ Hunter

    Are you high?
  • wha?
    i am.
  • Brad
    "I think LoTL will achieve the same reverence as Step Brothers"

    Wait.... What?!?!
  • me me mem
    lookz like the honeymoon is overr
  • john
    I feel like hunter loves anything that has Mcbride anywhere near it. His reviews often over analyze what hes writing about.
  • ummm... wow. I can't remotely figure what else to say.
  • LOVE THIS MOVIE
    I don't agree with critics. Although this movie was quite adult (and I saw many young kids at this movie) when several people did not expect it to be, I loved it. It was hilarious. I am not at the age to ever watch Land of the Lost on television, so I can't be upset about there being a difference. I'd give it an 8.6/10.
  • egoing
    Adulterated Garbage. Full of potty and vulgar jokes and man-ape humping characters. LOTL was not a comedy or parody, it's a piece of trash to cash in on nostalgia not respect the source material. The TV series from the 70s was a family adventure and if you looked past the budget, it had some interesting concepts. Thankfully this thing bombed.
  • Alex
    Jesus, this is a big blemish, Hunter. Christ.
  • ----
    This article is embarrassing.
  • had some good laughs. not as bad as everyone is making it out to be once you get passed the corniness of the creatures and such. I have seen far worse.
  • STG
    Surprise! Armond White likes it but thinks UP is artificial and formulaic. This should be enough of a tell tale sign.
  • @john

    @john (and @dallegre)

    "I feel like hunter loves anything that has Mcbride anywhere near it."

    Haha. Like what? Eastbound & Down, Observe and Report, and The Foot Fist Way? Guilty as charged. But I hated Tropic Thunder, and I argued over Pineapple Express's faults with the /Filmcast staff. Never got around to watching more than a few minutes of Hot Rod, though people say McBride is "pretty funny" in that too.
  • john
    Your right. I forgot about the pineapple express thing. You were one of the few people who disliked that movie as much as I did. My bad.
  • @john (and @dallegre)

    "I feel like hunter loves anything that has Mcbride anywhere near it."

    Haha. Like what? Eastbound & Down, Observe and Report, and The Foot Fist Way? Guilty as charged. But I hated Tropic Thunder, and I argued over Pineapple Express's faults with the /Filmcast staff. Never got around to watching more than a few minutes of Hot Rod, though people say McBride is "pretty funny" in that too.
  • Brian
    Anything with Ferrell or McBride's name attached to it is an instant epic fail.
  • What do you find funny these days?
  • skywarp
    Step Brothers ain't gonna receive any type of reverence in the future. That movie sucked! Land Of The Lost was a disappointment.
  • For Real
    apparently you have not been anywhere near the college population, because Step Brothers continues to go very strong in these circles as it is hard to go a day without hearing parts from this movie still. Much like Anchorman, Talladega Nights, best of Will ferrel on SNL, and many other movies continue to be heavily drawn upon. These movies are held in high reverence to a lot of people that still have a lot of immature laughs left in their lives. Nice opinion though but honestly I disagree and know a lot of people that would be a lot more upset than I.
  • Jim
    you know if you went to this movie for content or some sort of cinematographic wonder you were living in the land of the lost brain. this we a cute and playful movie based on a kids series in the mid 70's...that is all. not a movie that will change the world as we know it. if you are looking for entertainment this is the place to go. i laughed alot while watching it. becuase that is what it was written to be...funny. but i watched the original show when it came on saturday mornings. so for you 'kids' that don't get it suck ot it. but for the rest of us we will enjoy it.

    oh and please let's face it....maybe one day hollywood will be creative again and not rely on remakes of old shows....but until then i won't base my life or living on anything fake like TV, movies or the internet.

    peace out.
  • hawk
    After the low boxoffice numbers, looks like Universal will be sucking it. Haha.

    BTW, I thought the trailers were dreadful and unfunny so there's no way I'm forking money over to this dud.
  • haven't seen it and won't til its on hbo or whatever has its premium rights... but from the trailer and various looks at the cgi integration..... horrible.
  • dtg
    me and my buddy as well said, how bad do you think this is going to be. we almost didn't see it at all. but from start to finish, this flick is a surprisingly fun stoner flick that has the eye candy to go along with it. maybe the fact i went in there knowing it was going to be bad and being surprised is what made it a better flick. but def worth a watch. esp since most comedies with ferrell seem to be better the second time around anyway (step bros., semi-pro, even reilly's dewey cox) all underated
  • King Ralph
    Why is it a good portion of commenters always have to make up ridiculous reasons for the reviewer to have liked a film and or insult the guy for his view? It's his opinion like it or not and I agree with the guy here
  • ----
    So Hunter can tell Peter Travers to suck it, but we can't do likewise to him?
  • IKNS
    Overall....GREAT, hilarious movie.....And I agree with the review--it's spot on...I too absolutuely did find the sexual one liners crass, unnecessary.... and unfortunately their inclusion a GUARANTEED vehicle to word-of-mouth a "don't see it" review amongst the parents of its ideal (or non- original tv fan) customer base.....teens.
  • HollywoodHills
    /Film Rating: 8.0 out of 10.........W.T.F.? Really? No Really?? I'm never reading another review from this site, and demoting it to all my friends, as, 'A cool site to watch Youtube videos and read about Avatar.'
    A summer popcorn flick starring Ferrell and McBride, two actors who will only achieve presenter status at any award shows (MTV does not count) should never get anything higher than a 6, tops. An 8?? What, is this film looking at Oscar noms or something. Utterly atrocious.
  • You're right, because the only way a movie can be considered good is if it received Oscars. Also, I'm glad you let one disagreeable review taint a whole site.
  • You're right, because the only way a movie can be considered good is if it received Oscars. Also, I'm glad you let one disagreeable review taint a whole site.
    /s
  • wha?
    the oscars are a joke anyhow. does david lynch win oscars? does aronofsky?
    effin oscars. pfffffffffffff.
  • charles
    hahaha what bitches huh?? i did not expect this movie to be great by any means and whenever anyone would talk about being excited for it i was like ehhh idk...but i watched it and it was a fantastic picture. i like the ferrell is in a movie where he isn't playing some sport (or coaching on for that matter) and danny mcbrides character is essentially every other character he plays. yet this was a very fun, exciting and just comedic all around. and how are all of you people going to over-analyze this movie and tell everyone how awful it was? i mean its not like they made the movie to revolutionize the industry did they?? no. its not they were trying to get the audience to find a deep meaning throughout the film to take home and ponder?? its a comedy, and i feel if you laughed then the movie did its job. it doesn't need to be amazing or change the industry as we know it and forever change film. and if you didn't find the movie funny then quite simply its not your type of comedy. so if everyone could shut the fuck up, and quit bitching because hunter posted his true opinion on the movie then that would be fan-fucking-tastic. and to all the haters who simply bitch because it gets their dick-wet take it somewhere else and fuck off. Hunter i thank you for your input on the film.
  • It has always been a /Film commenting policy to not insult the author, and to argue intelligently. If your comment is just "hunter, suck it", the comment will be deleted. Hunter provided 1300 words explaining why he liked the film and why he believes "square critics" are wrong.You are welcome to provide 100 words or more on why hunter is wrong and Peter Tarvers is right. That would be the intelligent way of commenting on this review.
  • So. Hunter can make that comment about Starvingartist is ok?
  • The comment, which was a joke, is no longer on the site, right?
  • So you admit he made said comment, right? And let's face facts, the only reason it was deleted was to save face. It was THE worst insult ever, and we called him out on it.
blog comments powered by Disqus