moneyball casting

Demetri Martin is on a roll. First he landed the lead role in Ang Lee’s comedy Taking Woodstock, and now he has signed to star alongside Brad Pitt in Steven Soderbergh’s Moneyball. If it was announced next week that Martin had been cast in Scorsese’s next film, I wouldn’t be shocked at all (okay, maybe I would a little…)

Moneyball is an adaptation of the book by Michael Lewis (Moneyball: The Art to Winning an Unfair Game), which tells the story of ballplayer-turned-Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane (Pitt) who tried to create a competitive baseball team on a budget payroll. Martin will play a Harvard graduate named Paul De Podesta, who turned down jobs on Wall Street  to use his statistical skills, a system known as “Earned Run Value,” to change baseball scouting tactics.

Columbia Pictures has also signed Oakland A’s team members David Justice and Scott Hatteberg to play themselves in the film. Schindler’s List and American Gangster scribe Steve Zaillian is doing a polish on the script, which was originally penned by Stan Chervin and Rachael Horovitz.

The plot description from the book:

Moneyball is a quest for something as elusive as the Holy Grail, something that money apparently can’t buy: the secret of success in baseball. The logical places to look would be the front offices of major league teams, and the dugouts, perhaps even in the minds of the players themselves. Lewis mines all these possibilities—his intimate and original portraits of big league ballplayers are alone worth the price of admission—but the real jackpot is a cache of numbers—numbers!—collected over the years by a strange brotherhood of amateur baseball enthusiasts: software engineers, statisticians, Wall Street analysts, lawyers and physics professors.

What these geek numbers show—no, prove—is that the traditional yardsticks of success for players and teams are fatally flawed. Even the box score misleads us by ignoring the crucial importance of the humble base-on-balls. This information has been around for years, and nobody inside Major League Baseball paid it any mind. And then came Billy Beane, General Manager of the Oakland Athletics.

Billy paid attention to those numbers —with the second lowest payroll in baseball at his disposal he had to—and this book records his astonishing experiment in finding and fielding a team that nobody else wanted. Moneyball is a roller coaster ride: before the 2002 season opens, Oakland must relinquish its three most prominent (and expensive) players, is written off by just about everyone, and then comes roaring back to challenge the American League record for consecutive wins.

In a narrative full of fabulous characters and brilliant excursions into the unexpected, Michael Lewis shows us how and why the new baseball knowledge works. He also sets up a sly and hilarious morality tale: Big Money, like Goliath, is always supposed to win…how can we not cheer for David?

source: Variety

  • Infrafan
    He deserves it. He's a talented guy and one of the greatest stand up comics period.
  • jason B
    every year we are among the teams that have the lowest payroll...and almost every year we are a force to be reckoned with!! i loved this book, and the a's are my team!! this news is fun as hell!
  • Read this one - pretty good. Even for a former baseball guy, like, myself, it can get boring. Will Conte be playing Conete ( the stst guy - Boston?)

    Not sure how exciting the script is... hence, the re-write. I mean, the A's improve their record.. whoa, watch out.... is that worth it?

    At least Hwood is lightening up on the sequel and going to goosd source material.
  • mikeyclt
    One of the best non fiction sports book ever. I am stoked they are making this into a movie. Billy Beane is a genius. No he hasn't won a championship but he has continued to be competative in an unfair market. Should be interesting. Last Night of the Yankees Dynasty is a good read too. Wouldnt make a bad movie either....
  • I know - yes, agree - its a good book. Very very good. movie though?
  • mikeyclt
    Maybe they will try and steal Steinbrenners World Series Trophies from New Yankee Stadium... Worked for Soderbergh before
  • Brian
    The Devil Rays have a lower payroll than the A' s and made it to the World Series last year - much farther than the A's have gotten under Beane.

    I agree the market is unfair, but Billy Beane is NOT the only person to become successful in baseball with a low payroll.
  • mikeyclt
    I never said that. And I give credit to your point but BB has done it year in and year out. Not to mention he was a freak Derek Jeter play away from the World Series. Now if the Rays (they are no longer the Devil Rays remember) continue to be competative in that devision with that payroll I will be impressed but I bet they might have picked up a pointer or two from Moneyball....
  • Looking forward to Soderbergh's take on this, and I always enjoy Martin. Seems like he has the tools to be a good actor.
  • Brian
    I can't stand his humor. From the looks of the Ang Lee trailer it seems like he may turn in a decent dramatic performance, but man, I just find him and his show to be terribly unfunny.
  • I've never even heard of this guy, but I saw him in Taking Woodstock trailer and he seems okay.

    I will gladly watch any soderbergh film, however, so I have faith in the director's casting choices.
  • mikeyclt
    He has a really different style of stand up. He is more of an underground niche comic. So you will either really like him or not care for him at all, kind of like a Todd Barry, Mitch Hedburg, or Arj Barker.
  • Soderbergh solid and gettinf STRONGER!!!!
  • Soderbergh solid and getting STRONGER!!!!
  • I wonder if Damon and Giambi will play themselves in the movie.
  • Until I see Taking Woodstock, I'm holding my opinions on Martin as an actor.
    Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly love his stand-up (seen him many times in NYC), but I think his show falls flat and his character work isn't the best. But maybe? We'll see.
  • Goro
    One of the greatest parts of book was Beane's near fanatical focus on a college player that he wanted to draft; the guy pegged Beane's statistical measure charts and he was sure the guy was going to be a sure-fire stud in the majors. Kevin Youkilis was his name.
  • John Guard
    Martin..is not funny.
  • SomeGuy
    One of the least funny humans on the planet.
  • Bull
    Did the same guy really need to change his name and post this twice? Loser.
  • mikeyclt
    Chris Rock is still original. Dave Chapelle. Sarah Silverman. Brian Regan. Louis CK. Ill give you ZG. Lewis Black. And I am just thinking of people that are currently touring. If you want to go historical Eddie Murphy Martin Lawerence Richard Pryor George Carlin Jerry Seinfeld Sam Kinison Rodney Dangerfield. Hell Bob Sagets stand up is better. Just because he is original and weird does not mean he is great. Dont get me wrong i think he is funny but just because he is weird and original by no means makes him great.
  • Infrafan
    And whatever good Eddie Murphy done has been erased by his sandstorm of crap.
  • guillermo frijoles
    David Justice and Scott Hatteberg are going to be playing 10-year-younger versions of themselves? I hope they've stayed in shape. And Brad Pitt as Billy Beane? Did they confuse Billy Beane with Billy Bean?

    Anyway, I loved the book and will probably see this.
  • Bull
    Bob Saget's stand-up is pathetic. Don't ever say he is a better comedian than anyone.
  • mikeyclt
    One of the greatest is a stretch.... dont even think he would make a top 15. Especially since he kind of has an obsurdist view on stage.
  • Infrafan
    His hilarious originality alone merits that kind of praise. Stand up has went to crap these last several years, and he's one of the few, including Zack Galifianakis, and formerly Mitch Hedberg that is keeping it alive and fresh.
  • mikeyclt
    No one? Have you never seen Comic View late night on BET? I like Bob Sagets stand up personally. I think its dark and witty. I also believe that people who go see him unfairly judge him because of Danny Tanner....
  • Bull
    I do not hold Danny Tanner against him. The reason I dislike him as a comedian is that I was looking forward to his HBO special . . . I turned it off after 10 minutes.

    Just playing the "Full House guy saying outrageous things" gets old real fast, especially when you are not invoking any laughs.
  • mikeyclt
    In my defense I saw him in an intimate club setting and he did an hour and a half and he referenced Danny Tanner maybe twice? It was dark and cutting but overall very funny...I think when cameras are rolling he must change his MO and be what he thinks people are expecting....
  • mikeyclt
    I can still watch Coming to America and laugh my ass off though...
  • Infrafan
    True.
  • Sounds like a hit and miss if you ask me. I really don't care too much to see Demetri Martin in alot of films for some reason. The only good thing about this movie is Brad Pitt.
blog comments powered by Disqus