Harold Ramis Dishes On Groundhog Day Musical

Bill Murray in Groundhog Day

Groundhog Day is one of those films that just gets better every time I watch it, but I can honestly say that I’ve never imagined the time-skipping antics of  Phil Connors as a musical. Apparently, acclaimed Broadway composer Stephen Sondheim (Sweeney Todd) fancied the idea a few years ago, but nothing came of that. Now the MTV Movies blog is reporting that the musical is actually closer to reality than we think.

In a conversation with the film’s co-writer/director Harold Ramis, he mentioned that Danny Rubin, co-writer of Groundhog Day, is working on a book for a musical. On Sondheim’s potential involvement, he says the following:

Stephen Sondheim was asked what film he would turn into a musical and he said ‘Groundhog Day… And I said, ‘Wow, that’s pretty cool.’ James Lapine, who directed a lot of Sondheim, actually contacted me and asked if I’d thought about a ‘Groundhog Day’ musical.

Ramis goes on to say that he’s just glad Sondheim took the idea seriously. He has no clue if he’ll actually get involved with the musical.

My biggest concern with this project is Rubin, whose initial Groundhog Day script was heavily rewritten by Ramis. Rubin’s other screenwriting endeavours were far from successful, and at this point it looks like he’s just attempting to revisit his past glory. Like MTV, I’d feel a helluva lot better if Ramis was involved in this production as well.

Even if this project doesn’t end up happening (or ends up being terrible), it’s still worthwhile to consider what a good Groundhog Day musical would be like. I’d be very interested to see the film’s themes and iconic scenes translated to the stage, I just hope that this doesn’t give anyone the idea that it’s ripe for a modern film remake as well. As we’ve learned these past few years, nothing is sacred when it comes to remakes.

And for those new to /Film and our undying love for Groundhog Day, consider the following:

Discuss: Do you think the notion of a Groundhog Day musical is a good one? What other great movies would you like to see redone in musical form?

  • Goobity
    Is April Fool's day over yet?

    However, it would be great if they just wrote one song and sang it over and over again for two hours.

    Meh.
  • Get Tobolowsky to sing and I'm there! Bing, the song!
  • freemachine
    ROTFLMAO!
  • Well, the good part is you can come in for the last 20 minutes and not miss a thing!

    I mean, how many times can one listen to "I've Got You Babe" in an evening?
  • Musicals being turned into movies is tolerable and has worked in the past. I'm never interested in movies being turned into stage musicals. It just seems so pointless and feels like the point of a musical is being misinterpreted.
  • George
    I wondered if it was an April Fools day prank. But according to MTV movie blog. It was Posted March 31 at 11am. Which means it was posted BEFORE April Fools. So.. Who knows. But I'm interested fo sho!
  • I will admit that would be fun. It's a pretty great concept and done in musical form could be better than the easy garbage like legally blonde and shrek. if done right i don't think it would take away from the original. it's a classic no matter what.
  • ::clears throat:: "STOP TURNING NON-MUSICAL MOVIES INTO MUSICALS!!!" ::bangs head against the wall:: I love musicals, but I'm so done with all of this. 'Legally Blonde' was my breaking point. At least 'Young Frankenstein' had a musical number in the film.
  • James Lapine is also working on a musical adaptation of Little Miss Sunshine.
  • jlec
    I don't think its intrinsically bad to turn a non-musical movie into a stage musical. A musical can be equally good or bad, whatever its inspiration.
    What matters is the people involved in writing/directing/producing it.
    You put together a creative team comprised of people with no experience in musical theatre, and you get something like The Color Purple.
    On the other hand, with a good team you can end up with Billy Elliot, The Lion King, The Full Monty, The Producers, or Nine (albeit based on a play, which was, in turn, based on the movie 8 1/2)
    The problem is that Broadway over the past decade or so turned very big budget and became very lucrative. And everyone wants to cash in the easy way by using a story/title that's already well known. It's so much easier than writing/producing something original or based on something more obscure, and hoping it'll be good enough to sell tickets just based on merit.

    Regarding Sonheim getting involved directly, I doubt it. He hasn't done much composing/writing lately, and I think i've seen interviews where he has said he's reluctant to write any more shows. And, honestly, when you're almost 80 and have a resume like his, that's more than enough laurels to retire upon. Although, his involvement on some level, should the project go forward, could only serve to better it.
blog comments powered by Disqus