APTOPIX ITALY FASHION

Let’s get one thing clear to begin with: there’s nothing wrong with the MPAA giving Bruno an NC-17 rating, but everything wrong with Universal then deciding to cut the film instead of release it intact and also, crucially, with cinema chains (and even adult audiences) turning a cold shoulder to NC-17 rated films.

Sharon Waxman has reported on the MPAA’s decision, and detailed a few bits and pieces from the film that may have convinced them. She also tells us what Sacha Baron Cohen and Co are currently doing, and what the likely outcome will be - in case we couldn’t guess.

Apparently, Bruno’s team are at once preparing a new edit to try out for an R and winding up an appeal against this initial MPAA decision. Of course, neither would be necessary in an ideal world and the NC-17 rating would stick, cinema chains would still book it into countless screens and adults would book their babysitters and turn out in huge numbers. America is not an ideal world, however.

Waxman references some specific scenes that she believes to be “objectionable,” at least to the MPAA. These include a sex scene between Bruno and another character and some of the “documentary” material featuring Bruno, stripped naked, making an unexpected visit to the tent of a hunter while out on an expedition. The whole enterprise is devised, of course, to challenge bigotry and the big ol’ bigoted bigots who practice it and, frankly, I’m overjoyed that there are filmmakers out there like Cohen and his collaborators pushing, and prodding and provoking. Bruno is likely to be the funniest film of the year; I have no doubt it will also be one of the most worthwhile.

Here’s some more to whet your appetite. Waxman describes a sequence that was previewed at SXSW:

In one scene showed at the festival, Bruno auditioned children for a subversive movie with a number of offensive acts. Clueless stage moms agreed to the increasingly absurd requirements set forth by the actor, including one woman admitting that her infant daughter could lose seven pounds in a week to fit the part. Finally, Bruno told her about the scene, in which the child had to dress as a Nazi pushing someone into an oven.

I’d expect the BBFC to pass the film completely uncut for an 18 rating in the UK. Should Universal end up releasing an R rated cut in the US, however, it is likely to be that version they submit to censorship and classification boards and therefore release elsewhere around the globe. We all suffer, and the filmmakers’ intentions are smoothed-off worldwide, just because of the corporate interests and narrow minds prevalent in big-money US cinema. Sickening.

Ultimately, there’s every chance of an unrated Bruno DVD with all of this material intact and who-knows-what in the special features. Again, in the UK that full package would most likely get an 18 with no cuts; in the US, it would technically not carry any advice, and no legal restriction upon the screening of the film to children. Surely anybody can see the hypocrisy in this?

Bruno isn’t due until July so there’s plenty of time for a political revolution that will put all of this right. Ahem.

  • WTF. Cohen has proved to be very popular, with Borat. Why is Universal taking a huge risk for wanting to slap this movie with a NC-17? Don't they know that this movie will bring back a huge audience fan base? They are idiots.
  • I'm angry as a broomstick right now. SMH while saying FML.
  • Nan
    Just to explain this, AB, Uni has no choice - it must submit every theatrical film to the MPAA, which decides the rating. Uni then gives it back to Larry Charles & Cohen to make some cuts, because those two will have 'final cut', but they are also obligated to give Universal a film to put in theaters which receives no more than an R rating. This is all very standard and by contract.

    This exact same thing happened with 'Borat' too, but it wasn't publicized. This time, its being publicized - MPAA reports are usually kept confidential, but this one was 'leaked' within a day to Waxman - for a specific reason. Charles & Cohen's deal on Borat gave them a fairly weak cut of the dvd sales. Sales were very good, but not phenomenal. They have a much better deal for DVD on Bruno, and they also realistically know that a film with these themes won't play as wide theatrically or do as well as Borat, so this time they'll do a real 'unrated' dvd release with all of the cut scenes that couldn't be seen an theaters, which will have a lot more extra features and content than the Borat dvd did. This 'leak' was done to already goose the dvd sales.
  • NC17=Death Financially.. Only +17 allowed, meaning parents cant bring in someone younger which is allowed in an R, A lot of theaters refuse to show NC17 films and most malls do not allow the theaters occupying them to show NC17.. Plus added to that is a few large chains u may have heard of like WalMart, Target, Toys'r'us refuse to sell NC17 movies.
  • Rorschach
    Funny story. Sounds unbelievable. Probably true.
  • burt
    yes. Yes. YES. YES!

    BRING ON THE MUTHA FUCKIN' NC-17!
  • I would be much more likely to see an uncut or NC-17-rated Bruno three times than a MPAA-censored, piss-me-off R-rated cut one time, but maybe that's just me.
  • Now, let the great internets go wild and change absolutely nothing! It is our way.
  • edc
    your ideas intrigue me, I wish to subscrib to your newsletter.
  • luke_test
    Sex and the City movie (Yes, I saw it) got a 15 rating in the UK with two sex scenes. i guess it depends on how hardcore and graphic they are.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the studio are happy to make the cuts for it to be R rated. As you say, they could flog the DVD as the uncut version. Kerching!
  • O'RLY
    waaaaah! the big bad distributors want to maximise the money-making potential of a film with an already limited audience. waah! Come on. Are you really, REALLY serious?

    Newsflash: the movie industry is a for-profit business. "art>$" might be a noble cause in film school, but in the big bad world of hollywood, it just doesn't wash. Capitalism's not perfect, but it's the only system we've got, and it's the only one that works.

    So spare me the pity-a-bugger-me "we all suffer" bollocks just because this tiresome 'Jackass'-style prank-fest POS is going to have a few cuts here and there. It's not like it's "Brazil" or "Heaven's Gate", FFS.
  • NC-17 is a dead rating, without looking it up, name the last NC17 movie to be released...exactly. up until this post, i didnt even realize that nc-17 was still a possibility, but seriously, how bad could bruno be?
    and dont they realize its easier for youngins to get their hands on a DVD then it is to get into a NC-17 movie.
  • Jake
    Lust Caution comes to mind and that's recent.
  • someone call Kevin Smith. he knows how to deal with the MPAA.
  • He says it's all luck
  • Justin
    No, no, keep it at NC-17. Since this is a summer movie, and essentially the follow up to a HUGE box office hit, this will generate a lot of press and will no doubt gross 100M+.

    I have faith in this movie no matter what.
  • az abyss
    No matter the cut, America takes another giant step towards retarded arsehole nation. Edit it to 120 secs & put it on youtube with the rest of the idiots
  • The naked fight scene in the first movie was probably NC-17 in the first MPAA review, and all they did was blur out a little bit and they got R, so if there's a nude scene again in this film why don't they do the same thing again. I don't think it loses its comedic value at all. I'm sure the sex scene can be trimmed too and still be just as shocking and have the intended comedic punch.
  • Agreed. This is not about a moral victory or art versus money. I understand the studios wanting their movie to be shown in as many theaters as possible with an R rating instead of it not being shown with an NC-17 rating.

    The creators can just edit the movie for an R rating and release a special edition that's unrated. Sure, it sucks that it has to come to this, but I'd rather have a shot at watching the movie in a packed theater than waiting for a DVD release.
  • So let me get this straight, the comic homosexual sex scenes in Bruno warrant an NC-17, but the horrific rape scene (full disclosure, so I've heard, I haven't seen the movie) in Last House on the Left warrants an R.

    You stay classy MPAA.
  • yep, Americans are homophobic when it comes to gay males, but they LOVE two stupid, slutty fake lesbian-wannabes kissing. and that with the rape scene, too.
  • freemachine
    Watch a documentary called "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" and you'll get the whole scoop on how the MPAA works. In a nutshell, they love on screen violence but fear anything related to sex.
  • Bull
    What are you blabbering about?
  • Wish they could keep it this way because it would be so much funnier, but they will dial it down and edit it to make it R for a wide audience.
  • lol, so funny
  • freemachine
    FUCK THE MPAA AND FUCK UNIVERSAL!
  • Branden
    I cannot believe that. We need to loosen the fuck up and enjoy art as it is. Untouched. Unedited. Uncensored.
  • Jake
    Also Requiem for A Dream
  • Yeah but that got an R cut aswell.
  • Your mother is an American.
  • Yeah. basically.
  • Ben
    I'm shocked that people think that an R rated Bruno will be "tame" I'm sure it won't be as hardcore but i'm still sure it'll have some bite.
  • MPAA Hateraid
    I don't understand the stigma attached to NC-17. What this means to me is that the movie is probably going to better/more funny. It's all bullshit.
  • It's not stigma, per se, but NC-17 movies are usually financially doomed at the box office. Some cinemas will refuse to show NC-17 movies on moral grounds.
  • What moral grounds? The morals of their protestant customers? (Protestant by nature, not necessarily by denomination)
  • I saw the movie at a test screening and am not suprised the least it got an NC-17.
    I am worried at what they are going to cut because it was probably one of the funniest movies I have seen in a long time.
  • Yes, lets release it as an NC-17, a rating that half of you will be mad at because you won't see it in theaters.

    Seriously, think about it! If the movie is NC-17, how many theaters will actually play the film. On these here internets, it's easy to say "KEEP IT UNCUT!!!1!", but once it's all said and done, those same people will whine that the movie plays nowhere near them. It'll have an uncut DVD, so why freak out?
  • Then point a finger of blame at the cinemas that won't screen NC-17 films. Here in the UK, 18 cert. films are released as widely as, say, PG films.
  • In Sweden the hardest rating a film can get is 15 which means you have to be 15 or older to get in, we don't have anything like NC-17 or 18 cert. I think the last film that had to be cut was Casino and that was for the violence not lovemaking...

    Borat was in fact "barntillåten" that is, anyone was allowed in the cinema.
  • WokaWoka
    The problem with this argument is that Heaven's Gate sucked.
  • O'RLY
    well, you and I think so, but there are plenty of film bores and insiders who disagree. but the point i was making was that studio interference on Brazil and Heaven's Gate ravaged both movies to a state beyond recognition, whereas this SBC movie will be cut by less than two minutes, and the author was whining about it like Hollywood just ran over his puppy with their stretch hummers.
  • Release two cuts. Let the people decide. Best way to make more money and keep everypone happy. I'd prefer to see it without a bunch of under 17s anyway. Actually living in the UK means that I won't have to. Just sparing a thought for my American cousins.
  • That's amazing. A lot of revenue would be lost if this is true. Seems most unfair and strange.
  • Joe
    Our culture calls for mandates and restrictions on violent movies and video games, and when we create a perfectly good label for those games to be labeled under (AO or NC-17), the same culture leaders shoot down the possibility of said ratings holding sway with public opinion.

    Honestly, an NC-17 Bruno movie would only help the film, as there would be no idiot 15-year-olds sneaking in or idiot parents taking little children. Its target audience could still go see it. I see no problems other than our media's rampant labeling of anything "adult" as unacceptable.
  • I know... right.. witchyflickchic you're not kidding!
  • I agree with Sitrom, let the people choose.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    I just want to say that, only reading the description of the child-casting session had me near tears. Stage parents. ha.
  • It's wierd right. We know homophobia is wrong, we are told it is wrong and yet we see it all the time. A hetro sex scene would be acceptable but a gay one? How does this damage or harm anyone? Whats wrong with this world of ours?

    I blame God.
  • WokaWoka
    Makes sense.
  • Jon
    Could this be a Team America-style ploy where Cohen and Charles have submitted a much stronger cut to the MPAA in order to get the R-rated cut they really want? Just a thought...
blog comments powered by Disqus