cabin

Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard have done their very best to keep the details of their upcoming “horror movie to end all horror movies” Cabin in the Woods as absolutely under wraps as they can, but there was always going to be some point when the cover would be pulled back and we’d get a good look at what they’re building. For me at least, that point came this evening.

Neither of the two things that most struck me is actually the essential premise of what Whedon and Goddard are brewing up here at all. Rather, I was taken aback how quickly the cat has fled the bag and also, very sadly, how uninspiring the basic idea is. After the break I’ll be truffling in some sort of basic spoiler stuff - so snout on cautiously.

Editor’s Note: While the following contains a review of plot details, no details from after the first 30 or so pages is revealed. Of course, scripts and early plot synopsizes are not an indication of the final product, and as many of you know — a lot of the time the final product turns out much differently than the courier typed highly-formatted pages of one of the possibly many drafts of a screenplay. The following is a review of the concept, and nothing more.

When Kevin Williamson’s Scream first hit, the ripples pulsed quickly through the slasher genre and rapidly redefined the audience’s expectations of boogeymen in creepy masks and their cinematic slaughter sprees. It was a pioneering work and one of the genuinely visionary films of the 90s. The idea with Cabin in the Woods is, I think, to do something similar. The means, however, are not as simple and definitely not as fresh.

The film will begin with the “white collar” characters we’ve already had casting for - Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford as Sitterson and Hadley (though they aren’t necessarily taking the roles in that order - there are still some secrets to unlock). It then cross cuts between these two and a group of five college-agers headed up to a cabin for the typical cabin based shenanigans. A cabin, somewhat unsurprisingly, in a wooded area.

The teenagers are given rather clear and clever introductions, but I won’t go into them here lest I spoil a high point of the movie. Once the “victims” arrive at the Cabin, the full extent of the white-collared ones’ plan comes into focus. They are luring the kids here to have them “transgress” so that they might then be “punished”. They are god-like manipulators, shady business dealers, adults to be suspicious of, aloof yet blood hungry audience and cynical film makers all rolled into one.

The cabin is rigged with carefully selected props, gimmicks and cameras that allow the overseers to both spy on and interfere with the college kids. As things are warming up we are given the idea that there are many different ways in which it could go very wrong for the victims, and that employees of the mysterious organization behind this scheme have held a sweepstakes on just how it’s going to pan out. The various possibilities are shown to include Vampires, Werewolves, Aliens, Clowns, Scarecrows, Zombies and, ho ho, an Angry Molesting Tree.

By the end, Cabin in the Woods goes through a whole gamut of horror cliches in a way not entirely dissimilar to the Scary Movie series, riffing on images and ideas you’ll recognize from any number of recently popular or classic spook flicks. As a result, I think that fifteen or twenty years from now when we have a whole set of cliches to deride, Cabin will probably seem somewhat dated.

Things definitely get busier and more exciting towards the end of the story, but the basic concept is just too simple and easy to digest for this to feel like a real meal. But I do think it’s going to be a nice snack. If this were a feature length Angel or Buffy, and just part of the overall series, it would be dynamite. As a standalone statement it’s just too light and too easy to outrun: the two things that neither horror films or satirical arguments should ever be.

Oh… and definitely try not to see Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon first. It has so many similar ideas that it’s basically a walking spoiler for Cabin’s late, talky explanation scenes.

Is there anywhere new for the deconstructed horror film to go? I think so… but I also thought Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard would take us there. Are our hopes now pinned, with some improbability, on the Scream rehash?

Now… I’m off to enjoy Dollhouse. Good, isn’t it?

  • Meh, sounds kind of disappointingly generic. But I am sure Whedon will make sure it plays out good on screen. Agreed though Brendon, it will probably be good but probably not great. Also Dollhouse has been good so far. The new episode was good, but I didn't know if I was suppose to be laughing at or with that ginger psycho on the show.
  • scream meets cabin fever meets rat race?
  • Jeff L.
    Cabin in the Woods? Zombies? Angry Molesting Tree?

    I think this movie might be 20 years too late.
  • freemachine
    "...an Angry Molesting Tree."

    Reminds me the tree from Evil Dead. I agree that this sounds 20 years too late.
  • devilforhire
    doll house is ok. I like the concept but Eliza Dushku kinda ruins the show. Her flat acting and bad badassyness is so distracting.
  • Yeah I think she is good at playing neutral, Ok at action, but I really don't like her playing the scared character... but overall I think she is fine. The show is good so far, and I can already see hints on where the show is going plot wise that I like.
  • Whedon and Goddard obviously wanted this property kept under wraps -- why, oh why, would you post AS MUCH as you did? Sure, a hint here, a hint there, bring in the hits, but was so much necessary? Looks like /Film won't be privy to Mr. Whedon in the future.
  • devilforhire
    its funny.. when she was playing the scared girl on the run in episode two is the only time I found her remotely tolerable. Everything else thus far has just seemed so fake and forced. I like the new girl from tonights episode (the one that sorta looks like jessica biel) she was awesome. The show has potential to be good and I'm going to stick it out but Joss Whedon and fox don't mix.
  • Brotodeau. He wrote in the post that there were gonna be spoilers. Y
  • Angry Molesting Tree??

    There's only one tree that can take the stage.... and that's the Inappropriate Comedy Tree!
  • All I can do is write the kind of posts I'd want to read and, frankly, if I saw this on a site I'd leap right in, head first.

    And, in the great scheme of things, I've revealed VERY little about what actually happens in the film and gone much, much deeper into my impressions. If Whedon and Goddard don't want me to speak about that, then really they aren't as geek friendly as I thought.
  • Werewolves, vampires, clowns, zombies? I'm on-board. With the team and the whole Horror genre at hand I have high confidence in this project actually becoming something and hope personally, it is a good film. After all, there's only so many times when you can see a generic American horror film at the cinema without descending into madness. 'The Unborn', urgh...
  • wow, sounds strange and unusual, I think this is a must-see film for me.
  • RuvieB
    This seems kinda similar to a movie called My Little Eye...college-aged kids in a house located in the woods, rigged with cameras everywhere, dying off, finding out they're being betted on....yeah : quite similar....definitely not unique hahaha
  • Fartie Lange
    LAME! that sounds so disapointing. lol an Angry Molesting Tree? lol seriously? thats one of the funniest things i have ever read. it makes me think of the kite eating tree from Peanuts. the fact that it draws similaritiies to the Scary Movie franchise is the most disheartening thing about this story
  • It's a rather fun reference to Evil Dead.
  • But that Evil Dead thing was a reference to Snow White and was done again in Evil Dead 2. Which in turn will be refernced yet again when the Evil Dead film gets (shudder) remade. All those trees make a forest of silliness.
  • B.Larry
    I think it's not only uncool to throw this stuff up here like this (reviewing his concept? really? has it come to that?), but also, this is a really cruddy piece of writing. "As things are warming up we are given the idea that there are many different ways in which it could go very wrong for the victims." Honestly, I can't believe you managed to spoil as much as you did when I can barely follow some of your sentences.
  • SuperChuck
    I dont know what you mean about reviewing the concept but I could read the sentences just fine. Brendan just has a funny way sometimes. Dont just be a douche and knock it. Glad we have a different voice sometimes.
  • B.Larry
    What I mean about reviewing the concept is that I think it's a new low in spoiling movies and undermining creators. And I stand by my point that if you're going to spoil so heavily it should at least be clear writing. Guess I was just trying to add a different voice to try and compete with the din of you guys patting one another's backs all the time. But go ahead and call me whatever names you want, dude. Internet talkback; that's where you're a Viking!
  • For my own part, B. Larry, I appreciated your comments.
  • Nick
    So it's Funny Games, Behind The Mask, Evil Dead (Horny tree) and Scream all rolled into one eh? Joss Whedon is a true revolutionary. It's no wonder Dollhouse is such an enormous Friday night success. Get the fuck off this guys nuts already. "But Buffy and Angel were awesome!?!". Yeah, and so were Halloween and The Thing remake for Carpenter, and we all know how that turned out. Another drop in the "I'm really clever. Check this out" horror parody bucket, which, was best done by Behind the Mask and Scream. Hell, maybe even Scary Movie.
  • Nick
    Oh, and throw some 13: Game of Death into the mix as well. Awesome flick, next up on the remake chopping block for the american public.
  • I like Joss Whedon. I'm starting to like Dollhouse after that difficult birth (the second episode was a vast improvement and I'm looking forward to seeing the third). But has he done scary. I don't see how he's the man to make the horror film to end all horror films. I'm sure it'll be fun and there will be some laughs along the way but on the edge of your seats pant wetting horror...? I'm not convinced,

    Also, doesn't it seem that Alias and Dollhouse are, somewhat, cut from the same cloth? Really liked the first two seasons of Alias so it doesn't deter me too much but all the same.
  • It sounds like it could be fun and probably pretty cool. I trust Whedon and goddard. with some more ironing out and what not, it could turn out to be what they're expecting, but as is....we'll have to see.
  • Do you think the Evil Dead tree was a ref to Poltergeist?
  • edc
    meh.
  • Hmm this sounds just like My Little Eye its already been done cant we get something new with the horror genre already? And Behind the Mask was a great film to bad more horror movies cant be as creative or original as this movie was.
  • cib3k
    Dollhouse is mediocre so far. And after checking the ratings on Tv.com it seems I'm not the only one who thinks so. Also, I loved Dushku as Faith, but in Dollhouse - not so much. And having already seen Behind The Mask, I'm not that excited about Cabin in the Woods; it will probably turn out a decent movie, but it just lost all its novelty factor.
  • b.ware
    Go watch Behind the Mask, it was pretty good.
  • Chris
    I'm getting this multi-cut vibe from this post...maybe what they are doing is saying what if you put vampires in 28 days later instead of zombies...so they are going to make different cuts of the film and see if people pay to see it more than once and then we can all debate on which version was the best...i'm voting for clowns, zombies, and tree
  • ericonwheelz
    its a remake of within the woods the original 30 minute evil dead art film its gonna be good
blog comments powered by Disqus