With more than a dozen digital 3D releases coming out this year (including James Cameron’s sure-to-be-megahit Avatar in December 2009), studios have a vested interest in making sure films can be viewed by the audience in the way they were intended. According to Variety, Paramount is now offering to pay “virtual” print fees directly to theater owners who convert at least 50% of their screens to digital, with a higher fee offered for screens converted to 3D. Jeffrey Katzenberg of Dreamworks Animation wants there to be more than 2,000 3D-enabled theater screens in the country when their Monsters vs. Aliens is released on March 27. Currently, there are only 1,250 digital screens (out of 5,620) that have 3D capability.

Despite the fact that 3D is experiencing a lucrative resurgence in popularity, it’s hard out there for theater owners. Last year, a consortium representing AMC, Cinemark, and Regal tried to secure a $1.1 billion line of credit to finance the conversion of their screens to digital and 3D format. However, the economic recession and its ensuing credit freeze has made that money difficult to obtain.

Thus, we have a situation now where studios are willing to pay potentially hundreds or thousands of individual theater-owners directly. This is unorthodox compared to its normal process of dealing with consortia, but at this point in time, theater-owners might have more capability to finance the conversions themselves. Although there’s maybe a slight hint of urgency and anxiety in Paramount’s attitude here, I have a feeling that these investments in America’s theatrical infrastructure will lead to a better theater-going experience for us all (and for a long time to come, too). For that, we can all be grateful, especially come Avatar-time.

  • Man, if I had a theather this would be a great push for me to convert.
  • Avatar-Shmavatar. I think Cameron probably has the biggest ego in Hollywood, so its very characteristic of him to over hype his movie to the point that it's going to be the second coming or something. I have no doubt that Avatar will look cool, but will it forever change the way we watch and make movies? I highly doubt it.

    Who knows? Come next December I may be eating my words, but I since we've seen NOTHING, not even a teaser, it's hard for me to jump on the Avatar bandwagon.
  • Jamers Cameron Ego? WHERE!! Please show accounts of ego or we shall just thumbs down you:)

    All the ego in hollywood has bene sucked up by collin farrel
  • 3D is great. It is at least one D better than 2D.

    Seriously, though, it is a great step forward for cinema. The potential is stereo-optic cinema is huge. It opens things up just like colour did, and just like synchronised sound did before that.
  • the only 3D screens I know of here in the UK are the iMax ones and I'd rather not travel miles to view a 3D film.

    hope more chains over here start to get 3D or even Hi-Res screens.
  • There's quite a few in the UK. I can think of a good handful in London, and my nearest is in High Wycombe.

    What do you mean by Hi-Res screens? Do you mean digital projection?
  • Odeon have said they are starting to convert their screens, although it's a long term thing from now till 2012. so it may be a while before a 3D screen appears near you.
  • Colonel Glen Manning
    I'm really sick of this Cameron hating based on some concept of the size of his ego. These people obviously had overbearing fathers or something and are projecting childish resentment onto a man they've never even met. He either makes good movies or he doesn't - what the fuck does his ego have to do with that? Or with you?
  • djglsdjglsjg
    3d this all sounds like the same crap they tried back in the past and failed only with better technology. If Cameron wants to impress me I wanna see a 3d hologram film where I can literally walk around the set myself and view the pic 360 degrees.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    just make more IMAX theaters, please
  • Hmm there certainly is a desperation in Paramount's suggestion/wanting of this. Can't blame them, but really 3D? I have not yet read an article to convince... will these new digital technologies allow for no silly red/blue glasses... They would just be clear glasses that address the optics differently, yes? Or when will they ditch the glasses all together?

    I really can't care personally because I'm legally blind in my left eye, which means any 3D up to this point does not work for me.
  • I havent seen a 3D film that didnt hurt and disctract my eyes! i heard that new technology has been made for it!
blog comments powered by Disqus