Early Buzz: Frost/Nixon Gets Mixed Response

Ron Howard’s Frost/Nixon premiered at the London Film Festival to cold and mixed reviews. Lets take a look at the early buzz.

Variety’s Todd McCarthy: “Perhaps needlessly adopting a cinematic equivalent of the play’s direct-to-audience address, Howard “interviews” several of the characters, witness-style, about the events, which only serves to make the film feel somewhat choppy, half like a documentary at first. Approach also imposes an overly predictable editing style on the whole film, one in which the cuts come precisely on the expected beats, when a fleet, syncopated rhythm would have moved the exposition along with more flair. It might even be that the film could have done without the talking heads altogether.”


In Contention
: “It’s a tall order, and with Morgan’s script hewing closely to its source, Howard responds to it in the manner he knows best: with the most prosaic of visual aesthetics to hand, a doggedly linear approach to storytelling and the spotlight thrust squarely on a reliable pair of actors. The approach only gets him so far. Howard’s hands-off direction makes for an oddly bloodless viewing experience, with a lot of talk standing in for any fresh perspective (or frankly, much of a perspective at all) on the events.” … “Howard is left adrift, particularly in a sluggish first hour where, with the crucial interviews yet to begin, the historical context is painted in broad, CliffsNotes fashion, with a gallery of reconstructed talking-head interviews and distracting lookalike cameos (There’s Diane Sawyer! There’s Swifty Lazar!) in place of significant internal character development.”

Film Detail: “To the film’s great credit that director Ron Howard and Morgan (who wrote the screenplay) have not only preserved the insight and charm of the play but made it work in a different medium.” … “It is this surreal mix of the personal and political that lies at the heart of why the play and this film version work so well.”

Guardian: “But transferring this small-screen drama to the stage was a more interesting medium-shift than moving it to the big screen.”

  • Philsauce
    ha
  • fanboy d
    i was at that press screening and everyone was laughing their asses off at the jokes, which no reviews seem to be mentioning...
  • Ian
    Howard was always a third rate director.
  • Ian
    Howard always was a third rate director.
  • James Flyte
    How come all these early reviews were cold, and now there's lots of pre-Oscar buzz about it - has the Howards press machine silenced the critics?
  • C Brincat
    Far from being a celluloid genius, Michael Sheen gives does some decidedly stock mugging for the camera - like in the Teaser, he's on the phone and hears bad news, so Sheen sticks the middle of his tongue out of his mouth, turn the corners of his mouth down to give the stock "Oh shit, my hubris has been punctured" face. Really bad cod acting, but no doubt he'll pull another rabbit out of the bag and get nominated for a frigging Oscar. Ridiculous.
blog comments powered by Disqus