Last week we broke the news that the original screenwriters of Eagle Eye were working on a big screen sequel to Blade Runner. We attempted to contact screenwriter Travis Wright for a few days before we ran the story, but were not met with a response (as it turns out he was in France location scouting for a film). We were however able to speak with three separate people who were in attendance at the Creative Screenwriting special screening of Eagle Eye where Travis revealed his intentions to script Blade Runner 2, and talked about his past history on the project. Within hours of reporting the story, Travis’ former writing partner John Glenn wrote in to clear up some of the story. Apparently he is no longer involved in the project, but he did confirm that he had worked with Travis in developing a sequel for Blade Runner producer Bud Yorkin years earlier.

I was on my way to my press screening of Ridley Scott’s Body of Lies (how ironic) when I received this detailed e-mail from Wright, explaining the entire story, clearing up some of the misconceptions (previs), and discussing his intentions in wanting to script a Blade Runner sequel. With Wright’s permission, I have included most of that email below.

——————————-

First off, let me just state a few facts. John Glenn and I were paid to explore a potential secret sequel from 03-05 and wrote several BR sequel approaches working with Bud Yorkin. We never went to script — a fact I mentioned at the q and a — and it wasn’t meant to be some big announcement. I’m proud of my work on Eagle Eye and I was there talking about screenwriting to an audience of aspiring writers about my experiences. Having worked on BR is no bs, as I have the contract and pay stubs to prove it. And since Jg and I were paid to write a script, I plan to write one at some point solo with or without anyone’s blessings. Whether anyone ever reads it or even cares remains to be seen.

I probably should’ve never mentioned BR, actually, but it was the day before my first produced credit opened, I just had my first baby Sept 3rd (three weeks before), and I was talking openly about former projects and it came out in that context. I know jg isn’t interested now in even being associated with the idea of a BR sequel, so please have your readers devote any hate mail at me –> as I certainly am.

I am a geek. I am a total fan boy. I have toys all over my office that JG has always made fun of (we’ve been friends since third grade). But I’d sooner cut out my heart than give up the relics of so many hours of imaginative play. My toys are like my dreams — they sustain me.

My single mom (a paralegal, like the ‘Rachel’ character in Eagle Eye, whose name is a nod to the BR character) couldn’t afford to take my brother and I to the movies. So I was a paperboy in Phoenix from 4 grade through 8th grade to afford to see movies every friday and saturday night.

After my paper route, here’s how i supported my film addiction: busboy and then front desk clerk in Kansas City; a sales associate at Kay Bee Toy store in Phoenix; laying adobe roof tiles in the Arizona heat; a maitre de at the restaurant in the Space Needle; a tour guide at Pitzer College; a writing tutor for the Claremont Colleges; a deli employee at Bristol Farms in South Pasadena; a temp at Disney in publicity and marketing; volunteer driver at Sundance for three festivals; a tough desk for a sr. vice president of production at Walt Disney Pictures and Universal Pictures; received a MFA from UCLA’s School of Theater, Film, TV, and New Media; and even worked as a handyman for Winona Ryder because my former girlfriend (Sibi Blazic, now Batman’s wife) was her assistant and I’m handy with a hammer.

In short, I paid my dues. Again and again and again.

My only intention as a writer, in pursuing this project, is to help explore some of the questions Blade Runner raises that were the fodder for endless debate among my friends for two decades now.

What does it mean to be human? That’s the central question in life and the paramount question in Science Fiction. More pointedly: Is or isn’t Deckard a replicant? What happens to Rachel? What are the off world colonies like? What happens to replicants once Tyrell is killed by one of his creations? These are some of the questions we explored with Bud Yorkin for a few years and I believe are a great basis for a story many fans like me are dying to see. Working on them has been a dream.

A few more facts. Unrelated to BR, I’ve been developing an original Star Wars-level space epic that I’ve spoken to The Third Floor (the best previsualization team in the business) about ‘prevising’ some of my sequences like they did for Lucas on Star Wars III. As part of those discussions, I’ve taken Bud Yorkin to see what these genuises do in helping filmmakers achieve their visions in a way previous generations of storytellers never imagined. Seeing the techniques TTF are using is like taking acid and seeing a vision of the future of this business. It’s like seeing an iphone when the world is using rotary dials. Astounding.

Side note: TTF even work with dj caruso in ‘prevising’ the opening sequence of Eagle Eye, btw, as well as the tunnel sequence with the unmanned fighter in EE’s third act.

Bud and I have discussed informally about developing a ‘previs’ loosely based on one of my former BR treatments that’s set off world and explores the questions above. No deal is in place. Let me repeat, no deal is in place. JG may end up with a story credit depending on how much of any story work we did previously remains in the final approach. But that is years away and there are many hurdles between now and then, any one of which could kill the project moving forward. So far just keeping the conversation alive is like shark-fishing with dental floss. My fingers are bloody, but i’m convinced someday i’ll succeed. In the meantime, I’ve developed my own slate of original films that you’ll hear more about in the future. And that’s about as clear as I can be at two am in an old abbey outside of Paris on my iTouch.

I’m very proud of my work with John on RED WORLD, JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH, THE WARRIORS, CLASH OF THE TITANS, RADIANT, THE HEAVEN PROJECT (JG wrote and directed and I was one of five producers) and EAGLE EYE (which we did three official drafts for and I for one am very proud that the finished shooting script is scene for scene, character for character, our note cards from our initial pitch).

I know there will be haters in regards to ever continuing Deckard’s story, but in my lifetime I’d love to sit in the theater on a friday night of its opening weekend and watch as Deckard sees attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. Who wants to be there with me?!? Geek on.

  • scott
    hmmm... I still think they should leave Blade Runner alone. I don't care how obsessed the writers might be with the original film, a sequel would be absolutely destroyed by studio big wigs.
  • skaught
    wow, was that a resume, an advertisement, an apology, an appeasement or i dont even know?
  • christopher t
    yeah, fuck this. leave blade runner alone. eagle eye sucked anyways, especially the writing.
  • Obso1337
    While I can certainly sympathize with his sentiments of being a screenwriter who in love with certain fictions, the thought of someone responsible for something as silly, and frankly god-awful, as Eagle Eye touching something as beloved as Blade Runner makes me ill.
    Even with Scott's blessing it would seem silly to enter the BR universe with the intent to follow Deckard again. His story was told, and told beautifully. I can see more stories to be told, like fallout of Tyrol's death, the future of Replicant technology, and the staple Colonization story as a New West. These are things I wouldn't be entirely averse to seeing played out, but you have to know when to let characters go.
  • mk
    Not me. Go screw.
  • I hope a street person stab's him in the neck with a crack pipe.
  • Allynd D
    Wow.. someone is melodramatic.
  • MrCavanagh
    Nobody should ever end anything with "Geek on". Ever.
  • thomas040
    MrCavanagh.. you said it! :)
  • dlb
    There is no press, no blessing, no director that can make this idea sound sane. Nothing short of a magic spell to make the entire world forget about the film "Blade Runner".

    Say what you will as a struggling screenwriter, but you can't talk about 'blood, sweat and tears' and 'paying your dues' just to turn around and do something completely unoriginal.

    If you want a sequel to "Blade Runner", you just don't get it.
  • Some of you folks keep throwing the word "original" in Travis's face...I don't think any of you clowns know what the word "original" means, and it looks very doubtful that ANY of you read P.K. Dick's ORIGINAL story...as good (but not all that ORIGINAL) as " ...Androids Dream..." was, I'll choose the Fancher/Peoples take on the "original" OVER the "original"; BR is vastly different and far more powerful in scope than Dick's "original" story, which again, was good, but NOT "original" to the SciFi genre...
  • Batman
    I can just imagine him nudging his glasses as he typed this. It's the nerdiest thing I've ever read in my life. It made me re-evaluate my whole path in life, and has possibly given me new perspective on geekdom, which I previously thought to be all kinds of hip and cool.
  • ...yeah...and YOU need to do more than "re-evaluate (your) whole path in life" if you're still flapping around & calling yourself "Batman"...@#??#&#...
  • Ed
    It's not a terrible idea. But to make it into a film is. Go for a novel, or even a comic book series. We're talking about Blade Runner here. No matter how interesting a follow-up film may seem it can only fail horribly in comparison.
  • Moviola
    The reason this is a terrible idea is the "offscreen movie" concept of screenwriting. There's a theory that in film, what happens off screen must be as interesting as what happens on screen. This allows the audience a place to set their own imaginations. Think about the end of every great movie, what happens next is the off screen movie. They never close a good movie without a place to lead your imagination.

    All of the stuff he mentioned exploring is better in all of our imaginations than any writer could create. The offscreen movie for Blade Runner is unmined, and it should stay that way.
  • orange cinema
    seems like i'm alone here, but travis wright just gained a new fan. i completely feel his 'paying dues' experiences. this guy sounds legit & dedicated to me.

    i'm still not sure about blade runner, but if it happens, maybe these are the hands it belongs in. maybe just the universe should be explored, and not deckard. it's such a beloved character, i just would hate to see his legacy tarnished - even if the intentions were noble, which it sounds like they are.

    this whole thing has reminded me of terminators 1 & 2. 2 was perfect, and 1 was not. however that is not the case for BR, which makes this a difficult task. then again, godfather 1 & 2...but i dunno.

    either way, i like what the guy had to say, eagle eye was cool too. the reveal was kind of weak, but overall a solid flick.
  • Jamie
    Exploring what happens to Deckard and Rachel is an awful beginning to a sequel.

    No one cares what happened to them. We already know. They lived. They died. Away from the realities of being a replicant or human. You can't do better than that. I mean, who the fuck wants to know what happened to Bogey and Bergman after Casablanca?

    If you want to do a sequel to a Blade Runner, I'd start with Edward James Olmos' character. There's more story to mine there. Maybe.
  • Michael
    I would hate to see a sequel.

    I might, however, be interested in a collection of animated shorts (similar to Animatrix, Gotham Knight) from different people's visions and stories within the Blade Runner mythos. That way it can be up to the fans to consider it as cannon, or dismiss it if they don't like it.

    I bet Phil Dick is rolling over at the thought of this though. The written sequel was enough proof that you should just leave it well enough alone.
  • ..."animated shorts' ??!!...are you on drugs ??!!...No !...Let's do "Animated shorts" on Shakespeare !!...What a moron !!
  • Allynd D
    Again, lets make this clear:

    Anyone who claims to be a fan of Blade Runner and is actively seeking to create a sequel is not a "real" fan. Blade Runner, for better or worse has no viable sequel options as it'd ruin any sense of mystery about the film, if its with Harrison Ford anyway, that alone would prove that Deckard isn't a replicant and thats what is great about the movie as a whole. The question of humanity, is a man really a man just because he thinks like one or is there something extra to it? Can a replicant be "human" if it shares the same emotional responses we do? Any sequel would just fall into the category of money/desire over storytelling or retaining the merit of the original story.


    Also, if they do want to do something related to Blade Runner why not just adapt the original book, title and all? That'd be a viable option I guess but the screen writer would have to be spectacular, I don't want the guy who essential rewrote WarGames into an assassination movie to write it.


    /rant.
  • I was going to give Travis a bunch of shit for his typos, being a screenwriter and all, but then he noted that he wrote his email on an iTouch. If he can tap 1,000+ words on one of those things, I'm pretty sure he can do anything in the whole world.
  • ...besides...all "writers" have replicant slaves, underappreeesheeaided ; otherwise known as "editors"...
  • gocitizen
    I can't really say it better than Allynd D just did.

    I stand by my comments in the previous thread, Travis. Quit wasting your time and current opportunity. You are now in a position to decide if you are going to be an artist or a sellout. It's an easy choice if you don't allow yourself to be consumed by the proper noun dropping of Hollywood.
  • Albert Brodsky
    Criticism can sometimes be a harsh reality, but it's a necessary one.

    There's been times I've wanted to rewrite or add on to the Star Wars crap of late (mostly out of anger), but then I realize, hey, those aren't my characters and I didn't really create anything about it, even if my story would be original and new. Quite honestly it would just be hacky for lack of a better (or even real) word.

    Blade Runner is a favorite of the science/fiction community that just can't be messed with. To bastardize an original work by such an acclaimed artist almost seems like plagiarism, even if at heart it's an homage.

    That said, I'm currently writing a sequel to Moby Dick all written from the perspective of the whale. I'm having trouble with the title, but I'm leaning towards Moby Dick II: Biggest Dick of the Ocean.
  • ...there somebody goes again with that word "original"...but at least you're owning up to it and unnerstand where to what for who I am & how it all comes together from ...right...and I'm do'in a sequel to all of Shakespeare's plays & I been wait'in by my phone-machine for Speeelburgger or Diddlelly-Ridley-Bop himself to give me a call and dang if I ain't heard a word from nigh a one of 'em...'magine that !!
  • R_McCall
    WTF! This is beyond retarded it's like ubertarded. I hope this dudes career tanks and his mother spits in his eye and calls him a whore... you have been warned sir! You have been warned!!!!
  • Rob
    "What does it mean to be human? That’s the central question in life and the paramount question in Science Fiction. More pointedly: Is or isn’t Deckard a replicant? What happens to Rachel? What are the off world colonies like? What happens to replicants once Tyrell is killed by one of his creations? These are some of the questions we explored with Bud Yorkin for a few years and I believe are a great basis for a story many fans like me are dying to see."

    Talking about entirely missing the point of both the original story and the film. We don't all need some hack to fill in the offscreen story, or create sequel no-one needs... As Wright would know, if he engaged brain while reading the story or watching the film, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep isn't about Deckard, or Tyrell, or Replicants... it's about people, and what constitutes humanity, it is about QUESTIONS - and it ISN'T about spelling answers out for people in some pathetic unoriginal cash-in for people too lazy to think.

    Blade Runner, Part Deux. Not merely a bad idea, a wholly unneccesary one. Next.
  • ..opps..thar..they done did it agin...sho 'nuf...they done used thet word "original" agin ta konfuze me...I'll say it one mo time folks : "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" do not, I say do not = "Blade Runner". 1st Hominid that descovered fyre did not, repeet. did not envent the gas stove...As for "hack" writers...Travis is in good company. Shakespeare was the greatest hack writer of all time; Beethoven's first symphony was pure immitation Haydn and Rachmaninof's 1st was the worst symphony 'ere writ !!
  • "...Androids..." ain't about what Travis is talking about, he's talking about "Blade Runner" ...and "Blade Runner" moves way way BEYOND "...Androids..." and is NOT about people, IT is about what it means to be human WITH THE OBVIOUS SUBTEXT of the problem of human consciousness AND do we equate "replicant" consciousness with human...that's why in the ending Deckard voice over was so important, because it bought home the central core of the whole damn film folks...get with the program !! ..."Who am I...Where am I going...How long have I got ?...Ridley made a grievous mistake dropping his voice over, (again, not the first time an artist screws up his own work !!)... but of course he didn't have the benefit of our counsel...Wright's questions clearly demonstrate HE DOES GET IT, and you don't...!!!
  • fex
    "I’d love to sit in the theater on a friday night of its opening weekend and watch as Deckard sees attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. Who wants to be there with me?!?"

    I think that image will forever call forth memories of Roy Batty. I don't really wanna see it so much as I wanna know that he's seen it. It's, well its the whole f***ing point of the conversation y'know? The thing that I think alot of people take away from it is that it's a beautiful dream, something fleeting and painfully familiar. I could be wrong. Some fan's probably feel like your marginalizing a masterpiece with a sequel.
  • ...not if it's followed by an equally masterful treatment...that's the challenge, and the point !!...
  • Roberto
    No. Just no.
  • REAL6
    "I am a geek. I am a total fan boy."

    That line alone is where he and the movie FUCKING FAILS!!!
  • Dac
    I sympathise with Travis attitude to movies, Im very similar minded when it comes to Toys on display, but I just cant grasp why a Blade Runner sequel is needed. Yes, seeing attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion could be amazing, but I dont want Deckard to see it. I dont want to see Deckard spend his life with Rachel. As far as Im concernred, that story ended when they left their lives behind.

    Having said that though, I would love to hear of Travis' Star Wars like epic...Ive got an idea of my own Sci Fi epic in my head thats been knocking around for a long time, so i'd love to see one come to realisation.

    Bottom line, forget about continuing Blade Runner, try to make your own movie better than Blade Runner could ever be and your on to a winner.
  • funny how no one seems to be aware of the THREE authorized sequels to Blade Runner:
    Blade Runner 2: The Edge of Human (1995)
    Blade Runner 3: Replicant Night (1996)
    Blade Runner 4: Eye and Talon (2000)
    by K.W. Jeter

    the desirability of these novels or a sequel to the film is arguable...for myself I wouldn't mind more films set in that /world/...just leave Deckard and Rachel alone.
  • Mikey M
    Leave it alone.
    We dont need another Indiana Jones type sequel.
  • ..."Indianna Jones"... sucked when it was made. "Indianna Jones" and all it's derivatives still suck...shouldn't even mention BR and IJ in the same breath, unless all you neurotransmitters are glued together, which is probably the case in a majority of these here blogs !
  • Roy Batty
    What a fuckin' wimp and a loser. If I were Sir Ridley,
    I wouldn't let that weenie get within a ten-mile radius
    of my next sci-fi epic. Toys and crying your eyes out
    have nothing to do with writing the sequel to the friggin'
    most awesome sci-fi movie of all time, bar none.
  • Roy Batty...you need a good slapp'in around...and I'll help Travis do it...too bad yer jest jeolous 'cause ya cain't be rezzurected 'an have a viabul seqwell...and you ain't never gonna top Blade Runner so's you jest keep own keep'in own bask'in in yer glory...an be satisfyed it was a good bank roll !!
  • Allynd D
    @Goldfarb:

    Yeah, I'm aware of the "sequels", but they contain so many canon mistakes and are just poorly written.

    One such mistake:
    tyrell is alive.
  • ...oh really !!...Really...??...Well now, let's see how that worked...Ole motor mouth Roy Batty (see above) pokes out Tyrell's eyes to the back of his brain, crushes his skull between his more-than-human replicant hands...and still...Tyrell is alive...OK...all this means is we sure as hell don't want those clowns writing BR 2; doesn't translate that Wright would be as stupid !!
  • FAIL.

    Come on crybaby, stop whining and go "geek on" somemovie else.
  • john
    damnit. can't anyone just be a little fucking original?

    and ps, even seeing eagle eye high on imax did nothing for me
  • ...opps..not again...thet word "original" keeps own konfuz'in me...remind me NOT to take the same drug....
  • Ben
    I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he says the finished Eagle Eye is note for note just like his initial draft. With that in mind, I suggest he goes back to fixing Winona Ryder's storm drains and leaves the writing of Blade Runner 2 to......

    No-one because it is truly a shitty idea.

    Geek on everyone.
  • Travis Wright
    I love the internet. Thanks, Orange Cinema. I'm sure if the roles were reversed, I'd be slamming me, too. So I appreciate your sanity. And I get how protective people feel over this material because I feel it more than anyone. Maybe in the next decade or so I'll prove them wrong.

    Travis
  • ...(2/23/09)...just DO IT, Travis. Ignore these clowns...!!!
  • the old man
    Dear Mr. Wright;

    I hope you come back and visit from time to time. As you can see, the majority of the people who have nothing to do with manufacturing pictures, have a different outlook than those who do.
    I think it would also behoove you to pick up a book called "Microworlds." Moviola kinda touches on points made in the book. The book goes much further However, in explaining why fleshing out every possible point of a story, drives it to mediocrity and kitsch, and why it's deadly for the genre.
  • ...spot on your 1st point...but kitsch ? Kitsch ?!!...Thomas-Asshole-Kinkade is kitsch...BR could never be made kitsch, no matter how many bad sequels followed it...
  • the junkman
    Why?
    Why would you do this? Please for the love of god don't.... One of the coolest aspects of BR is all the completely new/foreign tech and places that is mentioned and not explained. A perfect example of this being Gaffs street speak and what not.

    The whole point of Blade Runner and Do Androids Dream Of Electric sheep is to raise questions. Ambiguity is what makes this film so fun to watch over and over and study. To destroy this ambiguity just shits all over the first film.

    That and..... HAVE FUN TRYING TO MAKE A SEQUEL TO BLADE RUNNER?? LOLOLOLOL TEH INTERWEBZ WILL EATz YOU ALIVE!!!11!!one

    That sums it all up.
    Please please please stop...
blog comments powered by Disqus