TIFF Review: Spike Lee’s Miracle At St. Anna

Spike Lee’s Miracle at St. Anna

Spike Lee’s Miracle At St. Anna is definitely not the type of movie you want to see tired, in the early morning hours. But that was my experience. I’ve seen many World War II films over the years, and Anna is distinctly a Spike Lee Joint. It has the obvious race perspective war story you expect, mix one part combined murder mystery (which is used as a framing device), and the obtrusive bass-y grandiose score (ala Inside Man).

If you’ve seen the trailer then you know that it all begins with a random murder at the post office, with a teller who kills a customer with a German Luger. Joseph Gordon Levitt plays an eager fast talking reporter, who along with a murder detective (John Turturro), wants to get to the bottom of the mystery. Burried in the teller’s closet is the head of a 450 year old statue, which has been lost since WWII and said to be worth more than $5 million if sold on the black market. And that’s just where the story begins. We flash back to 1944, and we are told the story of four black Buffalo soldiers (Derek Luke, Michael Ealy, Laz Alonso, Omar Benson Miller) who are led to slaughter by a newly appointed dimwitted Caucasian leader (of course).

They come across a slightly traumatized 9-year-old Italian boy named Angelo, who has been hiding in a barn during an attack. He talks to an imaginary friend and bonds with one of the soldiers, who he calls “the chocolate giant”. They bring the sick child to a nearby Italian village, where they are taken in by an Italian family. I won’t go much further because you must experience the rest of the story yourself.

The film drags greatly at 166 minutes, and some of the race discrimination scenes seemed forced, out of place, and sometime dispensable (for example one flashback which shows the group being told to leave an Ice Cream parlor), even if they might be historically accurate. The action sequences are both gritty and violent, everything you expect from a post-Private Ryan war film. But it is the smaller character moments which make up Anna’s strength. I think I need to see the film again outside of the film festival, hopefully later in the day when I’ve had more rest. I’m going to reserve giving my usual /film rating until then.

About the Author

Peter Sciretta is a film geek and popcultured fanboy living in San Francisco. He created /Film in 2005.

  • orange cinema
    the plot actually sounds very intriguing. and i agree that sometimes lee can keep racially powered scenes, when leaving them on the cutting room floor would better serve the intended message - and the film as well.

    and i'm keeping a close eye on levitt's career, his choice of roles, and execution, is exciting to watch. in short, the kid's a badass.
  • YoungZe
    "some of the race discrimination scenes seemed forced, out of place, and sometime dispensable" Yepp, sounds like a Spike Lee film.
  • moviegoer
    I watched Miracle at St. Anna at the Toronto Film Festival. The film does drag a lot. Not only is the movie long, it feels long. The movie gets tiresome and tedious after awhile. It's a pretty mediocre film.
  • At least it seems that people now have realized that this entire tale is a work of fiction. But has anyone told Lee yet?
  • Cajungirl00
    I was really intrigued when I saw the trailer. I am really curious to see how that initial murder scene and that little boy tie into the movie. I loved Spike Lee's "Inside Job", so I have high hopes for this film too! The cast is pretty impressive too, in my opinion.
  • J.D.
    Murder mystery? Lemme guess... The white man did it.
  • NotSurprised
    I find all the sarcasm about the 'unnecessary use of racism; to be quite typical of white America, which is like 'we get it, blacks had it bad', without fully investing in it and giving it the attention it truly deserves. It wasn't just racism, it was systematically issued and governmentally(yes i realize i made up a word, but it works) enforced. Let that sink in. So if Lee chooses to include it in his films, then he has the right and history is on his side. It wasn't that long ago and racism STILL exists in this country today, it's interwoven in the very fabric of our society.

    Funny how people don't give Lee flack when his movie involves primarily white characters, but let the man have story focusing on African American and he has a lagging story where 'some of the race discrimination scenes seemed forced, out of place, and sometime dispensable (for example one flashback which shows the group being told to leave an Ice Cream parlor), even if they might be historically accurate.'.....yeah...not surprised at this response at all.
  • kfizz
    If you think hard anuf you know who the guy is he kills. So you could save your self the time and money and dont see the film. I think any one who has agenda like this is pretty racist . Because that is the reason the middle east is so fucked up they cant let an thing go. It is getting better its only because the younger are wondering why the old ways have so much hate. Even thou It was not about hate from the start. Plus race relations take both sides working on it. One thing in my town is that the black community look at cops and think they are bad. But that is they see people they know getting arrested. But there are alot of white meth heads who do stupid shit more then blacks. Plus when I lived in LA most of my friends were black or Mexican. They marched for letting boarders be more open like back in 2006 or 2005. When they went down town. They closed down a whole street I forget which one.
  • I agree with NotSurprised. I'm very interested in this film, I've been a fan of Spike Lee from day one. The movie does seem long (166 minutes is pretty long - Even There Will Be Blood got me restless a few times and I loved that flick). Hopefully they will cut it down for a theatrical release, or maybe just release it in December for Awards Season. Still, if its historically accurate (supposed) how can it seem forced? (I'm asking out of curiosity, not bickering.) I don't find the subject hating on any race, as its merely painting a picture of how things were back then. If it fits in the film and sets up the mood, how is it forced?
  • Crusher Creel: The Livin' Mace
    Agree with NotSurprised and MosesMonster. If it was 2 1/2 hours of some Rogen/Apatow/Smith stoner/dork bull****, people would be doing somersaults. The Dark Knight was 2 1/2 hours and it's supposedly the greatest film of all time if you believe the internet. When Lee did 25th Hour (Norton and Hoffman), or Summer of Sam (Adrien Brody), no problem, but when the principals are black, it's "forced" and it "drags." Typical.
  • tw
    Spike is a racist so theres no way im seeing this.
  • Unforgivableblackness
    Notsuprised I whole heartedly agree with you.

    The writer should be ashamed of himself, that qoute comes off as a meaningless and lazy critique.
  • j-Man
    How about putting away your ax and bothering to mention that the movie is based on the novel by James McBride? Get it.... "novel" .... so save your "Spike hates white people and makes movies where they are the heavy" ...for the writer of the source material.
  • Tony
    Hello All Americans, black white brown yellow, and green. all of our story's must come to light and believe me its over 400 years worth of untold story's so as Americans we have to get over it and embrace them all. American History isn't just White America its for all of America, and yeah sometimes it hurts when the truth comes out but its our history for good and bad. So I encourage all of us to embrace American history !!!!
  • Vanni
    Have u heard on the reactions caused by the film in Italy? Lee has been accused by historians and WWII survivors of portraying a false version of the history, as the film "suggests that antiFascist partisans indirectly caused the atrocity by taking refuge in the village and then abandoning the residents to their fate". "It even shows a partisan named Rodolfo collaborating with the Nazis. This runs directly counter to the accepted Italian version of events, which is that the slaughter was not a reprisal but an unprovoked act of brutality and that the hunt for partisans was a pretext". I think it is rather ironic that for Lee the film was an occasion to present a more impartial version of WWII history with American blacks as fighters and doing so he becomes responsible of a more vicious form of representation of the reality, as people fighting the Nazis are accused to share some responsibilities for the Nazi massacre itself. What do you think?
    Quotes from:
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/eur...
  • Andrew M.
    Unfortunately, Spike Lee needs to converse with someone that has a historical wartime background before embarking upon such an ambitious - and clearly inaccurate endeavor. Basic oversight's such as the observance of the Blackout and conversation cannot be ignored. Spike Lee cannot be allowed rewrite history just because it "appears so" in a Hollywood movie. While "Buffalo Soldiers" were often confronted with racial prejudice from other members of the U.S. Army, the confrontations outlined in the movie were painfully overstretched - showing Spike Lee's anger and racism to be the enemy - and not the German forces they were supposed to be fighting. "The best war movie since Saving Private Ryan"? Nope. Not even. You have a long way to go before claiming that accolade. RT gave this 33% - I personally wouldn't be so kind.
blog comments powered by Disqus