Benjamin Button Olympic TV Spot and Early Buzz


A new television spot for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button aired during the Olympics on Sunday night. A crappy version has shown up online and is embedded below.

I’m excited to see this movie, but I’ve been hearing all sorts of troubling things coming out of the post production of the project. Most movie journalists are afraid to report on what is going on behid the scenes, because it’s very gossipy. You’ll see little slips like, Anne Thompson writes “The early word on The Curious Case of Benjamin Button: again, David Fincher has handed in a movie to Paramount that is quite long. That hurt his last pic for Paramount, Zodiac.” The film has begun screening to test audiences. One review that appeared on AICN read:

“The film starts out amazingly. The story itself won’t have any trouble reeling people in because Fincher is a great storyteller and the source material is top notch. However, I felt this film suffers from the same mistake Zodiac suffered from: things fell apart toward the end. The film is somewhere near three hours. By an hour and a half/forty five, the audience was getting restless. I could hear them squirming in their seats in front and behind me. The last hour is ultimately weighed down by a lot of repetition that has to do with the romance between Pitt and Blanchett. The film is truly great up until the final hour where things begin to feel muddled and unnecessary.”

There is a bigger story going on behind the scenes…

  • Christopher Edwards
    This film is going to be brillant, from when i first heard this film way back last year i couldnt wait to see it.
  • jomama
    gosh i hope it is good... i've been anticipating this one for a while now
  • Anyone who thinks Zodiac suffered due to its length is just dumb.
  • Wall-E Plays Pong
    I'm interested in this film too, and saw that commercial which made me more interested. I didn't know there were "problems" behind the scenes. Hoping it turns out to be a good film.
  • Aqualeo
    This will win Best Picture.
  • NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!! I want to see the movie so bad and I DON'T want any of the studio big-wigs to ruin this film. It looks like a masterpiece, for cryin out loud!!!
  • Arch Stanton
    If there is a "bigger story going on behind the scenes," do your job and tell us what it is, don't throw an ellipsis at us.
  • A Better Class of Criminal
    I am looking forward to this movie.

    Anyone who thinks a movie can suffer simply because of it's leangth shouldn't even go to see movies.
  • Anonymous who's read this scri
    It's an ambitious project, requiring longhand storytelling mode...Studio distribution is afraid of offending theater owners with anything that is "too long" (ie, creates a situation that cuts down the number of possible showtimes in one day)...Studio marketing worries that anything over 2 & 1/2 hours will lose some mysterious chunk of what they call "mainstream audience," people that just want to be distracted for a bit after dinner.

    Then you have Fincher, who probably doesn't give a damn about either of these issues.

    I can only imagine what's going on behind the curtains on this one.
  • BA
    This just goes to show that some go to the every movie
    with intentions of being hand-held through the feature with an
    "I'm the audience, amuse me!" mentality. While
    others know when to go in expecting an experience that
    requires them to continually connect the dots while thinking
    their way through complex material and multi-dimensional
    plot points.

    I don't think it's tough to see which side this cat falls on.
  • Captain Awesome
    Zodiac was awesome. Horribly overlooked when it came out.

    I'm very excited about this new film of his.
  • Nathaniel
    Zodiac was amazing. Damn the studios!
  • Kokushi
    What is with people complaining about every movie that is more than 2hrs, TDK (OMG it was too long), Begins was 2hrs and 20, maybe people want movies like Hancock that was 92min, go watch a short then lol.

    Btw, Zodiac was awesome.
  • ?
    Zodiac was good, not awesome...it wasn't a memorable film, in my opinion. This movie LOOKS good...but i can understand how it being 3 hrs long would tend to piss people off...especially since the story in which this movie is based off of is very, very short.
  • Captain Awesome
    Zodiac is awesome. Don't fucking argue with me.


    END.
  • Dan
    Directed by David Fincher = This film will suck hard.
  • Zinc
    I hope it does suck. It seemed like one of the few movies of 2008 that would do great at the Academy Awards, and we need as few as those as possible.
  • 790
    This trailer looked horrible, I dont get the postive buzz on this at all.
    Story does nothing for me.
    Guy ages backwards. Ok uh huh. Lets see his adventure. Weeeee
  • gocitizen
    It's an interesting premise, but it's not exactly stable "genre" ground for Fincher. Fans of films like Seven, Fight Club, and even Zodiac are hoping Fincher succeeds in telling an engaging story based on that premise, but I wouldn't absolutely bank on it.

    It looks like a difficult film and it needs a lot more than the one line idea to make it work. Three hours? That better be one charming pig.
  • TheMarquis
    What's up with the Elipsis? If i wanted a clffhanger ending, i'd watch Empire Strikes Back.

    Tell us, pretty please.



    [Zodiac FTW]
  • charles
    I hope it works.
blog comments powered by Disqus