JJ Abrams’s Earthquake Disaster Movie

Universal has announced that JJ Abrams (Lost, Star Trek) is developing an Earthquake disaster film with Omen screenwriter David Seltzer. As with any project Abrams is involved with, details are being kept under wraps. What we do know is that it isn’t a remake of Universal’s 1974 film Earthquake, and that it will focus more on the relationships between people caught in the disaster. We’re not even clear if this is a potential directing vehicle for Abrams, as the trades only mention that he is collaborating with Seltzer and producing the project.

I’ve always loved disaster movies, but the contemporary attempts have done a very poor job of making you care about the characters. Instead it’s all about the big budget special effects. Imagine how much better a film like The Day After Tomorrow would be if you actually cared if Dennis Quaid’s character would reach his son (Jake Gyllenhaal). Relationships, and character are something JJ Abrams brings to the table. It’s also worth nothing that this is the second film (that I know of) that is now in production with a backdrop of an Earthquake. The other film is Brad Bird’s live action adaptation of 1906. But I’m pretty sure that both will be very different films, and we won’t suffer a repeat of dueling films like Deep Impact / Armageddon.

source: THR

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER SOURCES ARE OFF!! JJ ABRAMS WOULD NEVER WORK WITH SHERRYL CLARK!! JJ ABRAMS ISN'T DOING THIS FILM!!!

    (website link fixed)
  • The Hollywood Reporter didn't do their homework properly! JJ Abrams isn't doing this!
  • Dave
    Agreed. Abrams sucks.
  • Bob
    Love the line "It’s also worth nothing..." and i completely agree.
  • -JjEEe-R;;,RRYB----UT-Le_R
    JJ Abrams = most overrated director in hollywood


    he's like what seth rogen is to comedians.
  • Disaster films are my favorite genre so I really am glad to hear this news! Still waiting for Warner Bros to release an extended cut of POSEIDON on DVD!
  • Jim
    "and that it will focus more on the relationships between people caught in the disaster. "


    Uh that is every disaster movie. And it is something that needs to stop. Seriously. I am so tired of the introduce 5 unrelated characters, disaster starts, they come together, disaster continues, someone dies, they resolve whatever trivial conflict they each had at the beginning, disaster ends, they are all changed/better for it. It is pure shit and has always been pure shit. You don't have time to develop that many characters without changing the amount of time devoted to the destruction. And its not like they are going to skimp on the destruction.
  • Rion
    Does anyone find it a tad Ironic that Abrams got someone called Seltzer to write a 'disaster' movie?
  • T-1337
    Me too. That asteroid had a heart. And we blew it up. I mean, even in Cloverfield, no one who played the ARG felt sad for the monster- as it was a baby, looking for it's mother.

    This should be interesting.
  • Forget characters, I want to care about the inanimate objects. Sure the asteroid in Armageddon is going to destroy earth, but nowhere do they explain its motivations for doing so. Tsk tsk.
  • Oh Blair
    Cloverfield 2? I loved that first one and i wonder where that monster is now!

    Two bad NYC was attached by that monster, but i cant believe they released that government footage in theaters!

    LOL
blog comments powered by Disqus