At tonight’s Kevin Smith Comic Con panel, Smith spoke publicly about the ratings trouble plaguing his new film, Zack and Miri Make a Porno. For those who are unfamiliar, the film chronicles a pair of friends’ attempt at making a porno film in order to squash some financial woes, and how their relationship develops in the process. Given the raunchy premise, the potential for edgy sexual content was great, and indeed, in the eyes of the MPAA, apparently too great. The film was initially given an NC-17. Smith took the film, made some edits, and resubmitted it to the MPAA, where it was given an NC-17 rating yet again. The film was resubmitted once more and received one final NC-17, so Smith concluded, “I’ve gone as far as I can go,” and appealed the rating.

There are two specific scenes that the MPAA wants cut, one of which involves “thrusting” and the other of which involves acts that are “unspeakable.” The appeal will occur on August 4th, after which, if an NC-17 rating is decided, Smith will be contractually obligated to deliver an R-rated film. He does not intend to fight the system on this one and he will make an R-rated cut, although he has said that he would rather make the R-rated film edit himself, since “my R would be a little better” than the studio’s R-rated version of the film.

In the past, we’ve written about how the MPAA gave Smith a difficult time with his teaser trailer. It seems more and more as though the entire process of getting Zack and Miri Make a Porno will serve as an unfortunate and depressing window into not only the MPAA’s sexual prudeness but also its increasing desire to have more control over every aspect of a film’s marketing materials (especially those on the internet). We at Slashfilm wish Smith the best of luck in getting his new film approved for the mass audience.

  • Tom
    With all do respect. FUCK YOU MPAA. FUCK YOU RIGHT UP THE ASS!!!!!

    You are everything that is wrong with America.
  • Tom
    Screw political correctness!!!
  • josh
    all i can say is what a bunch of fuking no dicks, no vaginas and no tits blinded by their own god damn ignorance. clearlly members of the mpaa are made like barbies and ken dolls. because they've never obvioulsy seen them selves naked or have had sex whaaa whhaaaa wha. everyone has seen what he's trying to put on screen its nothing new.
  • andy
    FUCK death to the MPAA no not really, i dont wish to carry that out but FUCK YOU PEOPLE AT THE MPAA good luck kev. youll need it.
  • Travis Mcgee
    It's funny that the MPAA has this much power, they don't even have a set guideline to determine what makes a film G, PG, PG13, R, or NC-17.

    If I were the head of a major film studio, I would tell Kevin Smith to make the film the way he intended it to be, and release it as NC-17 to as many theaters as possible.

    I bet then with all the media hype and publicity that would follow a move like that, that it would gross over $100 million.

    That would stick it to the MPAA, whoever the hell they are...
  • Alex
    Heck, I can't wait for the unrated Director's Cut DVD. :)
  • YoungZe
    Why don't they release it in europe already? I bet it get's a +16 rating or something in germany. All that fuzz around this movie makes me want to watch it. I want to know what's so "unspeakable" about this movie.
  • FB
    They won't let me have the scene in the flick where Zack flicks his dick. In most flicks, scenes like these are just flicked onto the editing room floor but I wanted to flick this right back in the face of those mother flickin dick flickers. (drag on cigarette)....what was I talking about? Oh yeah, how creatively oppressed I am. Flick.
  • Father Bradley
    Man can't wait for this flick. Scorcese went through the same drama on Temptation Of Christ. He and Smith are oppressed artists of the highest caliber.

    (burp)
  • Kip
    You can't show thrusting, but you can show some guy cutting someones face off? You can't show thrusting, but you can show someone being eaten by zombies? I think as a country we have some fucked up morals about what is and what isn't acceptable.
  • If you ever want to see how absurd censorship can be I recommend reading Akira Kurosawa's 'Something like an Autobiography'. Some things never change.

    I still don't understand what unspeakable acts they speaking of. What about thrusting into a mule in Clerks 2. They were Ok with that then? Could it be worse than Shortbus(which had real sex) or Young People *%$#ing? Or is it ok because they are 'artsy fartsy'?
  • Matt
    Arbitrary nonsense. If the MPAA was competing with another organizations it would do this industry a lot of good.
  • Billy TwoRivers
    While I cannot but disparage the MPAA's stupid prudishness, the language here re: Kevin Smith makes me wonder if /Film has lost some of its objectivity, and that they are being co-opted a la Harry at Aintitcool, being friends or intimates with filmmakers and studio types. I wonder. Peter? Comments?
  • kingdarius
    All of this controversy and the main chick i wanna see naked in it isn't gonna be naked in it which makes me not really care so whatever i'll wait for the dvd
  • bob
    funny seeing as though i just watch an R rated trailer for the PUNISHER where like 100 people where graphically mutilated by gun fire. im pretty sure he punched trough a guys face at one point also. an thats R haha. we are a fucking messed up culture.
  • andy
    It really does boggle the mind how a film like War Zone can get the thumbs-up -- including the red-band trailer -- yet something involving just copious amounts of sex (and a teaser trailer that doesn't even SHOW anything happening) cannot.

    Obviously I haven't seen either movie but something sounds a little out-of-balance here.
  • th1nk
    I just cannot express how ass-backwards this country is about sex. It.. It just boggles my mind.
  • Captain Awesome
    andy,

    Watch "This Film Is Not Yet Rated". It explains the MPAA's useless and archaic rating system. I loved when they did the side-by-side comparisons of films that got different ratings while they showed the same amount of sexual content.

    Violence is A-OK in the US. The naked body is the "devil".

    When The Passion was out in theatres. I saw parents taking children from the ages of 5 on upwards to 10 to see this film. But you flash anything that resembles sex or some sort of homosexual act within the context of the film? Forget it. Those same parents that subjected their kid to Jesus getting tortured for 2 hours will protest, as would the MPAA. By having the director cut it a certain way.

    While Kevin Smith is hit or miss with me. It's childish and a waste of a directors time to work so hard to get his/her own film cleared with this group. You don't see artists having to go through such lengths to get their work in galleries or museums. If distributors were more comfortable with moving NC-17 film. We probably wouldn't have so many of these editing problems.
  • Eric
    I bet that the MPAA jackass that gave the film an NC-17 is a total hypocrite and probably goes home and downloads the most fucked up quadruple peeing-in-butts-with-funnels porn he can find. what a dick.
blog comments powered by Disqus