Let’s hope Mark Millar sticks around the movie business for many years, and not only because the guy gives great quotes. With the adaptation of his Wanted comics raking in considerable bank and an adaptation of Kick-Ass on the way from director Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake), Millar is not allowing a Superman Returns revamp to vanish from his broadening Hollywood map. In fact, in this latest candid interview with the Daily Record, Millar sounds as if he’s setting a dunkirk into action that would see Bryan Singer relieved of his directorial duties…

“Since I was a kid I’ve always wanted to reinvent Superman for the 21st century,” said Millar. “I’ve been planning this my entire life. I’ve got my director and producer set up, and it’ll be 2011. This is how far ahead you have to think. The Superman brand is toxic after that last movie lost [a good chunk of change], but in 2011 we’re hoping to restart it. Sadly I can’t say who the director is, but we may make it official by Christmas.”

Ding Ding. Just back in March, Singer confirmed he was meeting with writers with the intention to direct a more action-oriented and less nostalgic sequel. In April, Legendary Pictures chairman, Thomas Tull, cryptically pitched the sequel, tentatively entitled, Superman: The Man of Steel, as “Superman as more of an angry god.”

We speculated then that Tull wasn’t referring to an adaptation of Millar’s Superman: Red Son, his celebrated 2003 comic book that reimagined Supes originally landing to Earth in the Soviet Union rather than in America. “Superman meets Stalin Summer 2011,” yeah, that would pack in the U.S. Crocs set. But Millar seems to have a “detox” vision all worked out. Also, note that while his latest announcement seems incredibly assured, he added…

“But fingers crossed [a Superman revamp] could work out, that would be my lifetime’s dream.”

Did the guy speak too soon about announcing a director then? Before he could convert Wanted’s success into industry muscle, Millar was making similar comments in 2007, when he announced his Superman “remake” pitch to Warner Bros

“This has to be Superman for the 21st Century, keeping everything we adore, but starting from scratch and making the kids love it as much as the 30-somethings. I would honestly write this thing for free.”

Personally, I hope Millar gets his wish from the Zoltar machine. Take for instance, the The Incredible Hulk, which has come to be viewed as a success in the eyes of most geeks, but didn’t rack up enough grosses or pop culture clout to overshadow Ang Lee’s prior film. In the end, the new Hulk was not an obvious-enough departure. They didn’t exploit the fact, directly or indirectly, that most people felt burned by the earlier version. There was never an “oh shit!” defining moment in the many trailers, so Web attention once again diverted to the Hulk’s tweaked CGI. A new Superman is even trickier.

Bryan Singer was allowed to make his dreamy passion project using one of the most commercial characters ever. That overpriced mush just didn’t fly. Let’s move on. Singer and another $250 millon isn’t going to solve the problem. That’s like Ang Lee remaking Hulk at the demands of fans. To be frank, Millar knows a lot about “oh shit!” moments and what gets people chattering in this day and age, and he clearly loves the character’s mythology as much as Singer. Why not have him in the driver’s seat for the entire process? More on this as it develops—somebody from WB has to refute/confirm Millar’s latest info, right? Man, what do you think Brandon Routh is thinking about all of this back and forth? It’s neverending.

Oh and you gotta love Millar’s fight for his right to live in Scotland and not relocate to Los Angeles….

“If I lived in LA I’d just write like everyone else. My pals over there are all on their second wives and do drugs. It’s a world I don’t want my kid to grow up in. I’ve been married since I was 23. I have a really normal set up.”

UPLATE UPDATE: Monster post! Millar posted an update regarding his comments above on his site’s message boards (a thanks to Obsessed with Film)

“PS: That Superman news is interesting, isn’t it? In the interests of clarity (because I’m sure this will be picked up somewhere) a very well known American action director heard about my love of Superman, approached my and asked me to team up with he and his producer to make a pitch for this. We’ve been talking for several weeks now and, if this is going to happen, we’ll know by Christmas. He has huge pull at WB so fingers crossed. But this is nothing more than a huge US name pulling me into his fold and making me part of a package.”

Hmmm, a big name American action director with conecs at Warner Bros. George Miller is a no. I think we can mark through Michael Bay, Gore Verbinski, James Cameron, Robert Rodriguez and Brett Ratner. Tony Scott’s British.

Discuss: Any guesses as to what director Millar is referring to? Should Millar get a shot at a Superman Returns “detox” or would you rather see Singer fired up for a sequel? Who’s your ideal choice, if not Singer? Purely hypothetical: would you like to see Timur Bekmambetov’s take on the iconic ‘S’ after Wanted? We’re not endorsing, but it would be interesting.

  • Ariez
    I have all the faith in the world that Singer can deliver us a "true" Superman film. Afterall X2 was one of the best comic film to date; the opening white house scene is the most amazing opening in any film...EVER.
  • orange cinema
    i too will support another singer/routh superman, though i can't agree that the x2 opening is the best in any film ever.

    however - millar is on f-ing fire. this months wizard mag goes into detail about his new logan/wolverine story and i'm starting to think millar is the charlie kaufman of comics. i just don't know how he keeps hitting ORIGINAL BULLSEYE AFTER ORIGINAL BULLSEYE. so if they let him run with this reboot he's been dying to do, i'm pretty sure it'll be top notch.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    @ Ariez

    But Singer already made---at least in his mind---a "true" Superman film and the film he dreamed of making, so what's the point? Is his sequel going to be "truer" or, um, less "true"? It will feel like something he made on good faith to the fans and the studio. I'd much rather see Millar go for broke and see the press/public not get hung up again about Superman's package and his "underwear" and all that b.s. that Singer could have avoided.

    Brandon Routh was fine, but everything else with Superman Returns went in a wrong, bloated and selfish direction, from the suit to the tone to Lex. Singer would essentially be remaking his own movie. How/why does one remake his dream project? His talent and effort is better spent elsewhere.
  • jimbo stewart
    Brandon/Singer worked, the problem was sticking too close to Donner's beloved take on it.

    I would rather use cyanide as mouthwash than see Timur whatever-his-name is direct ANYTHING.

    Night Watch was horrible.

    Wanted was nothing but a 13 year old Wii nerd's wet dream.

    I love hardcore violence as much as the next guy, but not at the sacrifice of good acting, a logical story or any sense of plausibility. Walking out of Wanted might have been the most gratifying part of it.
  • nitroslick
    SUPERMAN RETURNS was a phenomenal Superman film!
    People don't realize that, with Superman, the film MUST be a character story. Superman has a lot of power and an action packed film wouldn't work for the character. It would become dull and repetitive. I would personally love Bryan Singer to continue working on the Superman film series because he A) is taking the character to a different place from the comics and B) loves the character.
    As for Mark Millar, as a comics reader, he's a hack when it comes to superhero stories. He almost ruined Marvel's most beloved character, Spider-Man, in his "Civil War" series. Fans were, and still are, outraged. And his only Superman story is "Superman: Red Son", which was an Elseworlds title!
    Hopefully, this is just another one of his stupid vocal publicity stunts that he is very well known for.
  • Pete (original)
    "Night Watch was horrible." -TAKE. IT. BACK.

    Brandon Routh was a good Superman.

    it's weird to think that they are talking about remaking Superman Returns when it was way better than the first Hulk.
    I saw the new Incredible Hulk and it was pretty good, but I still don't think they should have remade it so soon. Are we gonna get a remake of the remake or what?

    Build on the last Superman, don't just redo it.

    How many remakes are we gonna get before everyone's satisfied?
  • Matthew
    You really thought Nightwatch was horrible? I thought it was fun. Wanted I didn't care for too much.

    Superman Returns was a legit good movie. Everyone bitches that there wasn't enough action but it did an amazing job telling a story and being clean about it. There wasn't any action thrown in there just for the sake of action. It all made sense according to the plot.
  • Mando
    As I was reading this article I really thought I was guna get burned for defending SR. I'm glad to see a lot of supporters though. Superman Returns was a beautiful film, it had some flaws sure, but I trust Singer in making a sequel. If Millar is really considering this "21st Century Superman" it could be weird. Superman is iconic, and his story is too, if they changed his character around a lot it might not work. But as a huge Superman fan, I dont tire of new Superman, is it possible for Singer to make his next Supes film, and have Millar make his revamp? lol
  • razor1000
    i didnt really love the last superman but i didnt hate it either, i think adding the kid was a mistake though because that basically and fundamentally changes things, so i'm expecting that if singer does supes again his kid should get killed to send him off into the dark supes storyline or something so that they can make the movie more vicious and bring in some real villains. i think they could pull a star trek and use time travel on this one to make everything reboot but thats just me.
  • Honestly? This sounds like it could totally be Wolfgang Peterson, who we all know was once attached to a Superman vs. Batman film and who releases almost all of his films through Warner Bros. Pictures.

    Watch out...
  • Deadth
    I have said to alot of people that if there is a superman story to be made it is The Death and Life of Superman storyline. I mean out of all you, who would not want to see the battle between superman and doomsday and the pretender supermen that follow his death and his return to life?
  • Floppy
    @ Deadth

    As dramatic as the Superman Doomsday cartoon movie was, a live action adaptation would be pretty awesome. The actual fight would be pretty epic too.

    I had no serious problem with Superman Returns so between the two, no matter who makes the next Superman movie, I'm sure I will be seeing it..
  • EDC
    mcteirnan.
    millar is hacky, but it could be a fun movie.

    just get rid of the underwear on the out side.
  • EDC
    caviezel as \S/
    rose byrne as lois
    arnold vosloo as luthor.
  • Actually, Petersen is German. But it could be anyone: Time Burton, Zack Snyder, Francis Lawrence, McG, etc. Here are my thoughts:

    http://www.incontention.com/?p=661
  • Rob
    I personally would love to see them go in a different direction and oust both Singer and Routh. Routh pissed me off because he wasn't playing Superman. He was playing Christopher Reeves playing Superman. How about bringing something original to the table?!? If I want to see Christopher Reeves playing Superman, I'll watch the original or the first sequel.

    I think Singer tried to emulate Richard Donner's movie far too much. That movie was a classic in the 1970s, but I don't think the tone and style works well in the 21st century.

    Also, too many miscast or unneccessary characters. Kevin Spacey is a great actor, but isn't a proper Lex Luthor. Kate Bosworth is no Lois Lane. Kumar and the kid?!? Really? I know Ned Betty was in the original for comic relief, but I always thought he was the worst part of the original movie. Same with Kumar.

    I would like to see a more moderized Superman. The Richard Donner Superman (or his Bryan Singer clone) is too straight laced and white bread for these times. I would like to see a Superman movie with an edge. In recent decades, people have been bringing that edge to Superman comic books and graphic novels. Why not bring it to the movie. This franchise is in desperate need of a reboot.
  • Rob
    Also, people say they want to see Bryan Singer's true vision. Apparently, his true vision is Richard Donner's. I liked Singer's X-Men movies and his other movies (The Usual Suspects would be in my top 50 All Time), but I felt he didn't so much want to bring himself and his own vision to the table for Superman, but rather pay homage to Donner's classic original. Everything copied or emulated Donner's movie right down to (as I said before) Routh's mannerisms and vocal inflection. Too bad, he couldn't get an actress who could copy Margot Kidder's brashness.

    If I thought Singer would put aside his desire to emulate the original movie and bring something of himself to the table, I would be all for keeping him. But I think his love for the original movie has destroyed any hope of that.
  • Dark Donnie
    Big name action director from the US.....the obvious first choices would be John McTiernan and Cameron, what about Doug Liman, or Peter Berg(not relly big name)
  • Derek
    Eh. Wanted was no where as fun as the original comic series and there was really no way to make it translate to film without admitting it's a DC Comics Elseworld story. If you haven't read Wanted the comic series I highly recommend it!

    I like Millar's comics work but he tends to fall back on the "What If" style of story so I'd rather avoid him doing Superman.
  • RyeGuy54
    I am tired of all the people who hate Superman Returns. After nearly two decades on the shelf, and all everyone wanted was all out warfare.

    If your attention span was too low to see that the reboot Singer made was a balanced story that emulated the original, then that is truly sad. What's worse is that Mark Millar can't appreciate it either.

    Singer is an elite film maker. I am not sure I have ever seen a truly bad film that he has helmed. I am also with the X2 crowd when they say that movie is one of the best comic adaptations ever made. So if all of you little ADD "I need action every second" can just take a vhill pill, I am sure Man of Steel will deliver. That goes for you to Millar...
  • Yoda
    Are you kidding me X2 the best opening scene ever??? What are you like 10 years old?

    Raiders of the Lost Ark is the only movie that can hold that honor.
  • Albert Brodsky
    I'd rather see a General Zod movie than another Superman reboot. When it came to making a Superman movie that all audiences could embrace, Singer blew it.
    He had the chance to make it his own... a chance many would kill for, and instead he went off of a crappy storyline from a mediocre, pre-existing Superman movie. Believe it or not, many people didn't like Supe's giving up his powers to bop Lois Lane. It was pretty lame, and when I watch those old movies now, they are CHEEEEESY.

    I didn't hate "Returns", but it's the issues that we all seem to agree on (bad casting, bastard son) that just didn't fly.
    I'm sure that a sequel done by Singer could be great, I just don't think audiences will be willing to fork out $15 a piece to find out.
  • brett
    I can't believe this guy...I mean does anyone else think its lame for him to try to poach this project from Singer because of Wanted?!? Please....Wanted was entertaining, but it was just mindless 15 year old videogame nonsense, and i know that I don't want that for Superman.

    Returns was a good movie, not the greatest super hero movie, but if singer comes back with the equivalent of X2 in the Superman Franchise, can anyone possibly imagine not wanting to see that?!?
  • Stan
    I liked SR as well, but I never felt that anyone was in the grips of a nefarious, complex and manipulative plot by the signature bad guy. It seemed like the first EMP thingee was an accident of the experiment, and that Lex capturing Lois was completely by accident because she stumbled aboard his boat. Even Parker Posey driving erratically was pretty weak from a criminal mastermind. And when they did reveal his big plan (LAND!), it seemed pretty short-sighted and out of context. I'd like for them to build on the key themes, add a more focused enemy, and drop the super-kid angle altogether.

    Not sure what the comics are doing these days, but the thing I see lacking is a place for Supes to voice his displeasure. I want a wounded side to this guy, but all he gets to do is stalk his ex. At least have a few pints and smash some mirrors with a bowl of peanuts. :)
  • jomama
    I feel like singer was trying to hard to recreate what donner did. I'd like to see a different version of superman.
  • Albert Brodsky
    I forgot about the stalking scene. What next, he's gonna use his x-ray vision and go to Hooters?
  • Thankyoufor
    Superman needs to be directed by Fincher
  • Mouse
    Big name + action + WB = Zack Snyder for me, but he has way too much on his plate to do something like this. Besides, Superman doesn't seem his style.
  • Reboot! Superman Returns was a 2 hour stalker film that did NOTHING but rehash every major plot point from the first 2 Superman films. I took my young cousins to see it,a nd they were bored out of their mind....at a Superman film! That shouldn't happen!!!

    Let Millar take it on, along with a new team that actually has something NEW to contribute....other than Super-illegitimate-Boy.

    Oh yeah, keep Routh. He looks the part, and his performance was the only decent part of the film. Also, let's have Superman do something besides fight a plane and a rock.
  • I think the main complaints with "Superman Returns" were:

    * Too much an homage to the original, and Brandon Routh too much relied on Christopher Reeve's mannerisms. But I disagree on the fact that it was an emo Superman. It felt like Richard Donner's earlier works, but it became slow and heart-sinking at the end (rather than touching).

    * Kate Bosworth - In any light, she can be a reliable actress ("Win a Date with Tad Hamilton"), but she came off as a poor man's Katie Holmes from "Batman Begins". And if they were trying to emulate Margot Kidder's Lois Lane, they should've used Parker Posey instead. I think Bosworth did it as a favor for Kevin Spacey (both appeared in two movies before and after "Returns"). If they rebooth the film, cast her as Supergirl (she needs a hero role of her own, IMHO)

    * The kid issue - In my theory, in "Superman 2", Superman undid all the events after Lois Lane found out his secret identity, down to the point that they already had intercourse. Neither Superman nor Lois knew about the kid's biological father, so let's not call Supes a deadbeat dad.

    * Lex Luthor - Stop bitchin' about this guy. Lex Luthor has been and will be Superman's primary villain. Both Gene Hackman and Kevin Spacey both did an excellent job. Heck, even in the animated tie-in movie, "Superman: Brainiac Attacks", Lex was like the Richard Donner version. I would like to see the next film team Lex and Brainiac against the Man of Steel, then Brainiac rebel and then two arch-nemeses must team up to destroy the robot.
  • bill murphy
    Superman returns was a masterpiece! the music, performances (routh and spacey are spot on) the magnificent effects, the sense of wonder and awe and even humour. On top of this he saves a falling jet in one of the most spectacularly realised action sequences in film history, has a bullet bounce off his eye, and lifts an entire cryptonite continent out of the ocean and into space, and it also made just shy of 400 milliion worldwide, i know it cost alot but still. So to hell with you mark miller and all you moany naysayers who bizzarly dismissed the best most reverent and beautiful superman film any of us could have hoped for. Superman returns was a triumph.
  • Captain Awesome
    It's amazing how fickle people are these days. They don't like something, "REBOOT IT! REBOOT IT!"...

    SR was good and solid. The only thing that really bothered me about the film were the special effects. Some parts were passable, while other parts were horrible. Better lighting and cg animation should be integral to a film like this. Not second rate.

    I can see why Singer did in the first film. He was trying to reconnect people to the original Donner films. And introduce you to the new film, it made sense. Routh was also the perfect Clark/Supes. He invoked the Reeves "Clark" so well that it was eerie at times.

    Get Routh/Singer again. Make Superman a total badass now that Lois is out of the way. And have him take on some giant threat. I want to see major destruction and "one" guy trying to put the world back together again.
  • Rob
    Why is it when people don't like a movie certain people love, those certain people want to attack the intelligence of the people who don't like it. I consider myself a fairly intelligent person and my attention span is just fine. I just didn't want a carbon copy of Richard Donner's film. Donner is Donner. Singer is Singer.

    I didn't want Singer to be Donner and Routh to be Christopher Reeves. Others did. Good for them. They got the movie they wanted. Personally, I feel that Singer has a the talent to make Superman his own if he wanted to, but he didn't. That was his choice.

    I never get the people who have elitist views on movies and think they are better than people who don't like movies they like. We are talking about a comic book movie, not an Igmar Bergman film here. I am sure a large portion of the people who did not like the movie did not like movie got exactly what Singer was trying to do, but just didn't like the execution. I consider myself in that category.
  • Chris Nolan
    Let me take a crack at it and if it's successful.. a B vs. S film in the future with the RIGHT Supes?
  • Hell yeah! This is what needs to be done for the next Superman film, Millar knows Superman, all of his Superman stories in the old Superman Adventures comic that I read as a kid were excellent, I think he would make a great Superman film. If he gets to do this, I'm all for it. I know his script would be good, but I'd want him to have control over the film, the director should listen to him and not shit on his material like most directors do in the "writer VS director" scenario. Millar is a big Superman fan, I wish him the best. :)

    However, I liked Brandon Routh as Superman, he's a great guy, it wasn't his fault SR had problems. If you listen to him or read his interviews, he seems to have to have a descent handle on the Superman character and knows what should be in a Superman film. They should let him make the movies lol. I hope he gets a chance to play Superman again, and this time I'd want to see more of Routh and less of Reeve, I'd like to see Routh play the JLU/Byrne era Superman in terms of attitude/personality, I want to see him kick ass. :D Routh is awesome, I wish him the best. :)

    My main hopes for the next Superman film are this, no matter what happens, whether Singer comes back or not:

    No reference to previous films (SR, the Reeve films, etc), this means no bastard child/super-dead-beat-dad, no Richard, no Brando Jor El, no Hackman-esque Luthor, you get the point. If it isn't a complete reboot per sa this is what I'd want; a semi sequel or "requel". The only thing that should be in the new film that was in any previous film should be the awesome/iconic John Williams Superman theme, at the beginning of the film and/or just used as Superman's leitmotiff (FYI for the people unfamiliar with the term, a "leitmotiff" is a particular music associated with a particular character, like the "DaDaDaDaDaDaDaDaDa" played whenever Darth Vader enters the scene in Star Wars (the Darth Vader theme)).

    LOTS of action. I want to see lots of Superman doing stuff, punching things, throwing things, everything he didn't do in SR. I want to see him be tough and kick some villain's ass, Metallo, Brainiac, Parasite, Doomsday, Mongul, etc.

    I want to see a villain other than Luthor. Preferably Brainiac. If they can work other villains into the film that's cool too, but Luthor should not be the main villain, he can be there, in the shadows with his little schemes, preferably the business man version, but he shouldn't be the main villain.

    Also, Clark Kent should be the "real person", more or less, like the Superman: the animated series version. Superman is something he does. There are 3 personas for Superman, there's the public hero Superman, the Daily Planet reporter Clark Kent, and then the real person, the Smallville Clark Kent, where he's with his folks and can be "honest" (for lack of a better word) about who he is, he's just Clark Kent with superpowers. That's who Superman is. When he's at the Daily Planet, being a reporter, he's Clark Kent without superpowers and a little bumbling, when he's Superman, he's the Smallville Clark Kent with superpowers as the alien costumed public hero. Superman and reporter CK are the facades, however Clark Kent in Smallville is the real person.

    Just keep in mind that Superman doesn't have a bastard child/isn't a dead-beat-dad.
    1) It's out of character for him. No way would he f*ck Lois, mind wipe her, and then fly off for 5 years while she's pregnant with his superkid, and then return and try and "woo" her when she's engaged or "involved" with some other man. Also, he wouldn't be stalking Lois, WTF was up with that? For mister truth, justice, and the AMERICAN WAY, this is pretty out of character.
    2) It's physically impossible for Supes and Lois to have a kid. He's kryptonian and she's human! It'd be like a dog and a cat "doing it", they're 2 different species. Even if the film is in "vague continuity" with the Richard Lester cut of Superman 2 it would still be impossible, matter of fact, even more so impossible, because before they "did it" Superman was exposed to red sun radiation, which causes him to lose his powers, making him an ordinary KRYPTONIAN, as kryptonians never had superpowers because they lived under a red sun. So he wasn't turned "human" as some numb nuts have suggested, he was in fact turned even more KRYPTONIAN, he would still not be able to have a child with Lois. And even if he could, he and Lois "did it" when he was depowered, right? Then there is no f***ing way that Jason woul be able to throw a piano, he would not be a "superkid", he'd eiteher be a bazarre mutant or an ordinary human being.

    Look, it's simple. Superman loves Lois. Lois loves Superman. There is no bastard child or significant other in the form of Perry White's nephew involved, dammit!!! So, makers of the next Superman film, PLEASE be aware of this and TRY to keep the status quo of any Superman comic book story, m'kay?
  • Rob
    As for the Reboot stuff. Personally, I wouldn't be upset if they never do another Superman. The first two were great and the rest were either crap (III and IV) or disapointing to me (Superman Returns). We all know with the latest superhero craze, this film is going to get made.

    I didn't like Singer "homage" to Donner's Superman. Why would I want them to stay the course? How is that fickle? Should I want them to continue making Superman movies in a direction I don't care for?
  • Tendrillar
    Mark Millar is a horrible, gimmicky, hack comic writer, who attempts to be edgy, and "original" by injecting pop culture references and vulgarity into his books. More often than not his work is just in poor taste.

    ANd Superman Returns would have been great if it was about Superman at all.

    Ok i'm gonna look for something positive here. The effects in Superman Returns were great, the flying was perfect and I thin Brandon Routh is a great Superman.


    I'm sick of all the reboots these days though.

    "whoops, we wanted it this way not that way, sorry." Fuck you. You had your chance. Let it go.
  • Nightwatch was a great idea that was poorly executed. The most overated flick in recent memory. We don't need a reboot-but maybe recast Lois (say Courtney Cox?). I'd prefer to see a movie called Metropolis: After Smallville with Tom Welling reprising his Smallville role as the Man of Steel. I think most folks would rather see this than another reboot, or another entry by Singer.
  • JLunch
    I don't really want to see another reboot, remake, and defiantly not another origin movie. While I loved Batman begins, I think the distinct Batman universe that Tim Burton created and the terrible direction it had took after he left, had to be r eimagined for many reasons. Hulk, by Ang Lee was generally seen as terrible and deserved a reboot. I think The Incredible Hulk handled this well too because it isn’t really an origin story, where as Banner becoming the Hulk happens in the opening credits. Superman is different though. The original movies created a world that was praised and loved by many and even the recent Superman Returns wasn’t greatly received but it wasn’t hated but seen as an OK superman film. I think the best choice for the superman franchise would to go in a new direction. Not telling an origin story again, or remaking, but to hire a different top notch director and great actors (like the recent Iron Man, Hulk, and Batman movies) and just tell an exciting Superman story that somewhat fits into the world established by the previous movies but not directly and has its own style. The character or Superman is so well established today that everyone knows his origin and many of his tales that I think you could re imagine the tone and style of the movies without revamping the entire series.
  • Greg
    I like Millar (Kick-Ass is GREAT, as is his new Wolverine run) but I think Singer needs to stay with the franchise. He really does understand the character extremely well. Superman isn't a dark character; he is the embodiment of greatness, a man who holds himself to a higher standard and is basically a do-gooder geek who is strong as hell. I don't like the idea of Superman taking on an edge, or getting darker. It just doesn't fit the character at all. Batman is a dark character (hence the moniker Dark Knight), Superman is pretty much cookie-cutter boy scout, and it should stay that way. There is no need to change the all-American Man of Steel. Bring back Routh! He was AWESOME as Supes.
  • Mel
    I'd loooooove a remake so long as Brandon Roth remains as Supes.
  • MAlex
    SR was not a flop unless 400mil in ticket sales and another 100mil in DVD sales is considered a flop.
  • Rob
    Well, Superman Return wasnt a flop, but it was a disapointment. It had a $270 million production budget and probably spent another $50-100 million in advertising. The opening weekend was only $52 million (not great for a summer blockbuster). It was 6th in domestic revenue and 9th worldwide. People expected more from it. The Pirates of the Caribean movie that summer grossed over a billion dollars worldwide.
  • Frank
    Miller sounds retarded! "If I lived in LA I’d just write like everyone else. My pals over there are all on their second wives and do drugs. It’s a world I don’t want my kid to grow up in. I’ve been married since I was 23. I have a really normal set up.”" Loser! Bring Singer back!
  • T-man
    I would rather see a sequel. We had the re-introduction to Supes coming back, and now the stage is set to have a truly action-packed film that doesn't need to establish characters as much.

    Then again, some people didn't like Spacey or Bosworth as much, but I think they are both capable of putting in good performances.

    I personally keep Routh. I thought he did a fairly decent job, as Superman isn't really an easy character despite the rather stoic Supes/goofy Kent combo. Seems like a straighforward role, but you really can't go out there and ham it up like I imagine some actors would.

    I think the two big issues with a sequel would the be Supermans kid, and a quality villian. There are plenty of good villians in the canon, I think Luthor/Kryptonite combo was simply the easy way out. Him having a child was obviously a sensitive issue that some people didn't agree with. To me I didn't mind it, but I can certainly see how it would bother some who are more devoted to the actual Superman storyline.
  • jason
    From a non comic book fan, Superman Returns sucked, just like all the X-Men movies sucked. say ditch Singer and go with someone who has real passion for the character. If they want to translate these characters and stories into good movies they need to do a lot better than they have done in the past.
  • I agree with alot of comments made here. Bryan Singer truly missed the boat with "Superman Returns".

    He had an opportunity to pay homage to Donners classic while incorporating many elements from the comics (Lex as a business savvy entrepreneur, a modern metropolis aka city of tomorrow, perhaps even the cadmus project thus setting up a Superman vs Doomsday storyline for eventual sequels). Instead he, and his lazy writers, simply rehashed many, many elements from Superman: The Movie. Such a terrible waste.

    I'm not too sure about Mark Millar's take though I admit I am curious.

    Who could this big name director be? The only one, or rather ones, I can think of are the Wachowski brothers but they're more of Joel Silvers personal minions and after the box-office dud that was Speed Racer I doubt WB will hand over the reins to one of their most valuable icons.
  • Dee
    Hearing a reboot is on tap would cause fans worldwide to break out the party hats. Singer must be doing too much blow, because between this and Valkyrie is a one-two punch of staggering ineptitude.

    We got Singer's vision in Superman Returns, where he had complete creative freedom. Now he's got fans clutching at straws with his promise to deliver something other than his vision. WTF? That's his best promise? That he'll ditch his vision and ape someone else's vision so as to appease WB brass and disenchanted audiences? So Singer has become a pathetic hollow hack now? What happened to the artist of old? If it isn't his vision, why not turn things over to Millar, or somebody else, whose vision it truly is?

    It's better for everybody. Spare Singer the indignity of turning into a studio hack, yes-man, Bret Ratner aper. Let him act on his authentic vision in some other project.
  • Geezy
    I think Bay should take it!

    Sent from my mobile using FeedM8
  • pat
    Back up a second... didn't his name pop up as connected with this project several months ago but the end result was that Warner (who owns DC Comics) couldn't/wouldn't hire Millar because he works for Marvel Comics? I'm pretty sure that was the case so what exactly is different now?
blog comments powered by Disqus