Sam Raimi to revive Jack Ryan

Sam Raimi

After getting Dragged to Hell, Sam Raimi plans to develop and direct a series of films based on the popular Tom Clancy-created Jack Ryan book series. Paramount is hoping to release the first film in Summer 2010.

Alec Baldwin first took the character to the big screen in John McTiernan’s 1990 The Hunt for Red October. Harrison Ford took over the character for Phillip Noyce’s 1992 film Patriot Games and 1994 film Clear and Present Danger. Ben Affleck played a younger Jack Ryan in Phil Alden Robinson’s 2002 film The Sum of All Fears, which was heavily criticized for deviating from the novel and cannon of the Ryan story in order to insert more action into the plot. From what I understand, the Jack Ryan character in the books is a lot less action orientated, which is somewhat played off due to his age.

Raimi plans to develop a series of new films featuring a younger Ryan at a “more formative point in his career than previously depicted.” I’m sure this new direction will further anger fans of the series. Variety says: “One invention the studio is considering is to set the film in the present, with the action triggered by a global threat.”

“While Clancy is completing another Ryan novel, the studio hasn’t read it and so hasn’t decided if it will use the new book or come up with an original story. Paramount controls rights to the Ryan character, and gets first look at the new novel.”

Discuss: What’s the point of even calling this a Jack Ryan film? It sounds like they’re just looking for a young Bourne or Bond like series, but don’t want to invest in an original concept/story.

  • Matma
    As a fan of Tom Clancy fiction and Sam Raimi I'm very excited to hear about this. Though i think a better movie series would be based on John Clark (Without Remorse, Rainbow Six) as opposed to Jack Ryan.
  • pete
    If they're looking for action ala Bourne/Bond they should look more towards the Rainbow 6 series (now more of a computer game) with John Clark, Ding Chavez
  • fanboy d
    odd move...hardly a franchise the world is clamoring for, not exactly indiana jones or spider-man 4!

    i'm completely confused by this sentence btw: 'a lot less hands off in the book series, which is played off due to his age'
  • Eric
    Bring on the Bruce!
  • Happy_Evil_Dude
    The Sum Of All Fears had a 68 mil budget and made more than 150 mil worldwide... Can someone explain to me why it's taking so long for a new Clancy movie to be made? There were 8 years between Clear And Present Danger & The Sum Of All Fears! 6 years have passed since The Sum... It's not like the movies don't make money, and it's not like they don't have a slew of other books to adapt (Red Rabbit, Debt Of Honor, Executive Orders, The Bear And The Dragon, etc...)
  • JFK
    End of story: They own all the rights to these books and movie made from then sell.

    The real question is why would Sam be so eager to raise somebody elses baby?

    He's got a fortune in the bank. he's got 'street cred' with the Studio for making three of the highest grossing flicks ever... Now he wants to go overtake something that Harrison Ford perfected 20 years ago?

    He needs to pull his head out of these producers asses.
  • I love the books, but ya, Ryan isnt really Bourne, unless Bourne sat behind a desk 18 hours a day thinking. But i will check out the movies anyway
  • Rob
    you can say im getting off topic. but Raimi blows. and any news about him directing anything that was at one time a good move just sucks, because he will fuck it up.
  • Ken
    I wish they would adapt Executive Orders to the big screen. One of my fav books of all time, let alone the Jack Ryan series. No need to make something up when there's still fantastic material that could be used.
  • Jordan
    I can't see this going well. Jack Ryan is not an action hero, he's the guy in the cubicle fitting the pieces together.
  • Dan
    I wonder if Mace Neufeld is going to produce, considering he produced all the the previous Jack Ryan films.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    What's the point indeed. Raimi needs to let the freak flag fly a little longer before he returns to ginormous franchise trilogies. Any movie genre but action, Raimi. Of all the options out there...
  • ruben
    i agree with rob who gives a shit cuz rami sucks ass.
    yea he did a good job with 1 and 2 but fuck i bet a 100 more could have done better,he fuckked up the third more than he did good on the rest .
    but i also agree on a rainbow 6 movie insted
  • I agree with the people calling for more of a Clark lead than a Jack Ryan, but I think a blend would work well. Use Clark and his squads (or just him) as the action part with a good, old fashioned spy thriller running parallel with Jack Ryan. The books where done that way. They could pull the balance to more action if they want, and still keep the books audience happy, without reinventing all the characters.
  • Wisky
    Just make a movie called Rainbow Six and introduce Jack Ryan and Ding Chavez open the movie with a badass entry to kill a druglord in his home, plot then turns to another mission but Chavez is the only one left after his team is brutally killed, Jack Ryan has to "think" of a way to bring down a more serious nuclear threat, also have Ryan's family life etc

    sequel names like R6 : New Order more explosive than the first but make it a to be continued like matrix was movie involves a wackjob who wants to blow up the world then

    R6: New Order ends where the bad guy is getting the nuke ready after failed attempts to catch him and a third closing the franchise

    R6: Redemption , you can have it pickup where the 2nd left off and you could afford to "kill" Chavez ath the end of the third, but what about John Clark as WIlliam DaFoe through all 3? ...

    Id like to see the same Chavez as used in clear and present danger, otherwise let casting pick a newcomer and have Hugh Jackman as Ryan or hell Tom Hanks could do it!
blog comments powered by Disqus