nightmare-on-elm3.jpg

This is what happens when you get the sniffles and ignore the beat for a couple of hours: the world of Hollywood deals starts exploding with awfulness. Something in the Elm Street-verse started feeling askew a few weeks ago when Freddy Krueger himself, Robert Englund, said he thought it was a good idea to remake Wes Craven’s A Nightmare on Elm Street and perhaps pass his claw on to someone else. Word arrives today that production house Platinum Dunes (of which Michael Bay is a partner) and New Line Cinema are setting a plan into motion to completely revamp the franchise, just like they’re doing with Friday the 13th and Jason Voorhees, which starts filming in early May. Platinum Dunes have previously set their signature glossy and tan paws on The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Eric Red’s The Hitcher and the upcoming Hitchcock-remake The Birds.

A writer will not be hired for the project until after the strike, and no director is attached. Like I said, Englund probably won’t be back. Platinum Dunes can have Jason, fine. Those films are addictive T&A crowd-pleasers and I’m sure they’ll make Crystal Lake shimmer and pop like an airbrushed painting on the side of a stoner van. But ANOES needs a visionary director that will keep the 10-year-old kids who sneak into the remake up in sheer fright for years. This is real deal psychological horror, complete with dream logic, and not simply “caller’s in the house” cliche after cliche, though Craven’s film did that well, as well. I mean, can you imagine the ghostly girls jumping rope singing “3, 4 better lock your door” in Bay-protege-o-vision? Why not just ring up Larry Flynt to do the casting and work the water hose?

The blame here really goes to New Line, though. Freddy Krueger saved that studio’s arse several times throughout its history, and while a ANOES remake is never going to compete with The Hobbit for box office, is it too much to ask to hand the franchise over to a director who will leave the throbbing hormones to the other schlock that passes for horror these days? Johnny Depp might have even done a cameo if it was up to snuff. As for Englund, if he’s okay with ending his contribution with Freddy vs. Jason, who can argue? He’s not right for a water hose reimagining anyhow.

  • David
    noooooooooooooooooooooo..... I'm getting a little annoyed with all the remakes going on. I don't care about jason, michael myers or anyone, but Freddy can NOT be played by anyone else than Robert Englund. He IS Freddy.

    And why all the remakes anyway? Get a good movie, remake it, probably mess it up and ruin the franchise? why do that?
  • jj gonzo
    i agree with david,one or two horror remakes are cool,but don't ruin the classics!!! robert englund IS freddy !!! don't HATCHET the franchise with another dude playing FK...
  • monkee
    Let me be the first to suggest Crispin Glover for the Freddy role.
  • Goro
    eh. could it really be any worse than the last 3 or 4 Freddy movies? I mean, Elm St 1 and 2 were excellent; 3 was good but already starting to get silly (Dokken doing the soundtrack was a clue!) and it was downhill from there.

    I'm hoping that Michael Bay will have no say in this movie; lord help us if HE directs it...
  • Meli
    NO! -cries- First they screw up TCM and then it was The Hitcher and we know The Birds will be awful (sorry, I cannot condone a Hitchcock remake) and now this?? I hate hate hate the idea of remaking NMOES oh wait ..."rebooting" "reimagining" -sigh- My Wed is ruined.
  • Bano
    NOOOOOO !!!! Please don't make that movie !! if you make another nightmare please let Robert Englund be in it !! he's a legendary figure !!! the other horror guys do not speak and stuff !! freddy is funny and scary shit !!!
  • Captain Awesome
    Great. They're going to "MTV" this franchise too. Just like every other horror, teal-blue-tinted, remake.
  • Cinemaniac1979
    I'd like to re-boot my foot up Michael Bay's ass.

    That being said, the first one is campy and I wouldn't mind a GOOD remake-- I just don't think Platinum Dunes is up to the task.

    Crispin Glover might make a good Freddy. But someone else suggested to me that Ben Foster would be a good pick. While I find him interesting, I personally would like to see the role go to Sam Rockwell. Better yet, how about Daniel-Day Lewis? Just because I'd like to see his cult of fanboys digitally felate him for such a role.

    If Englund steps aside, he should at least take John Saxon's role as Nancy's father.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    @Goro

    Sure, some of the ANOES sequels were laughable and Freddy's Dead was inexcusably bad, but that doesn't give Michael Bay's company the right to redo every horror franchise that still has life in it.
    All of Platinum Dunes's movies look the same, from the aesthetic to the casting to the marketing to the disposable quality. Say what you will about Rob Zombie's Halloween, but he brought a different vision and tone to the franchise that was exponentially better and more interesting than PD's remake of The Hitcher or TCM.

    Also, Zombie's film was a one-off and was always planned so. PD is talking about rebooting the franchise, so we can look forward to sub-par Freddy movies with zero imagination (a popular sequel like Dream Warriors had creative merit) for the next 10 years.

    In 2020, I wonder how the next 8 Freddy films will compare to the 8 that preceded it starting in the early '80s? The difference might exemplify more about the current shallow state of cinema, horror or otherwise, than many would care to analyze.

    Also, PD taking on both F13 and ANOES (not to mention TCM) will lessen the longstanding, rather awesome rivalry between those two franchises. Imagine if Capcom made Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat, or if Marvel took Batman and Superman.

    Just a damn shame, innit.
  • A.J.
    A remake cannot be any worse than the second Nightmare.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    @A.J.

    Freddy's Revenge arguably still has the second best school bus scene after Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
  • Jeff Nyman
    This could be interesting, but the idea of "re-makes" and "re-imaginings" have a very hit or miss history. That said, I always get a kick out of people calling any of the Nightmare series a "classic." We're talking about movies regarding a serial killer and child moster who wears knives on his hand and comes back and kills people in their dreams.

    I know taste is a variable thing ... but is this classic!? (If it is, we're in more trouble than I thought.)

    I personally like a good re-make and/or re-imagining and I've never really understood the fan aversion to them. If nothing else it gives you another person's idea on the theme. After all, you could argue most monster movies or zombie movies or alien invasion movies are really "re-makes" of each other. They all pretty much start to look alike after awhile. But what we like is to see a different take on the same old idea. That's what Rob Zombie's "Halloween" was for me and that's what the new "The Birds" will be for me.

    This being said, I can see the argument about how jarring it might be to not have Robert Englund as Freddy, mainly because Freddy is more personable. You can get by with a different Michael Myers or a different Jason Vorhees. (Although, even there, I would argue the absence of a Dick Warlock or Kane Hodder is very noticeable.) But Freddy has largely been defined by Robert Englund. Like most things, we'll have to see. The smart thing is to just wait and judge when it gets here rather than proclaim that everything will suck.

    One thing, though. Calling any film in the Nightmare series "real deal psychological horror" is truly mis-characterizing what horror is. If you want to see true psychological horror, check out the underrated "Joshua", which shows you what a true, real "monster" can be. The kid in that film will always be scarier to me than a guy who comes back in films that rehash the "if you die in a dream, you die in real life" concept.
  • Hana
    blarg. Want to buy original filmmaking.
  • thefan
    This movie will absolutely not sell if England is not in it. I wonder if it's Robert who dosen't want to be in it or if it's New Line making the move for somone else. I wonder.............
  • thefan
    This is the same problem Hellraiser is going to face if Doug Bradley is passed upon for the lead role.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    @the fan

    Englund has been quoted recently as saying he thinks a remake without him might be best for the franchise. If he wanted to star as Freddy, I don't think New Line would deny him, whether Plat Dunes was doing it or not.
  • Nesstar
    NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! BAD! SOMEBODY SHOOT PLATINUM DUNES BEFORE THEY GO TOO FAR! NOBODY SEEMS TO HAVE THE BALLS TO DO ANYTHING ORIGINAL ANYMORE!!!

    Instead they take a classic. A golden oldy. Slap some CGI and terribly bad WB actors in it. It's like getting a plat of warmed over shit for dinner and finding out the center is still cold. I'd rather drink a mug of chilled vomit!
  • Agreed. It was the first Nightmare that actually put New Line on the map in the first place and enticed Turner to purchase the company.
  • Eugene
    "In 2020, I wonder how the next 8 Freddy films will compare to the 8 that preceded it starting in the early ’80s?" - Hunter S.

    They won't, because the franchise won't make it past number 2, which will be straight-to-DVD and bomb. Just like TCM. Because you can only fool moviegoers with total shit once. (unless they're Scary Movie fans. Then you can go on forever)

    And there is no question this will be total shit. Hopefully, in five years or so, they'll attempt a RE-reboot with an actual, competent horror director, and give Nightmare the facelift it deserves.
blog comments powered by Disqus