JJ Abrams chatting Star Trek

On Friday afternoon, JJ Abrams and the cast and crew of Star Trek sat down with TrekMovie.com to field questions from the fans. Here are the informational highlights:

  • The first movie trailer first will “hopefully be in theaters early to mid summer.”
  • Production is scheduled to wrap the beginning of April 2008.
  • Long time JJ Abrams’s collaborator and fried Greg Grunberg WAS gonna be in Star Trek, but had to bow out because he is attached to another movie. JJ jokes “Who knows, maybe he’ll be a tribble.”
  • They are anticipating about 1000 visual effects shots.

JJ Abrams Chats Star TrekBut the most interesting bit of the chat was JJ Abrams talking about how he wants the film not to look effects heavy:

“My goal is to make Trek REAL - that is to say, not have it be camp - not have it be phony - not have it look like a scrap of green screen was used anywhere,” says Star Trek director JJ Abrams. “Of course, this is Star Trek. We’re using every trick in the book. But WHEREVER WE CAN, we are shooting on sets - either built on sound stages or expanding upon found locations. This is important. What this means is that the movie won’t have that ‘actors performing in a blue or green void then placed in front of a spaceship set’ feeling that makes me insane.”

“One of our really talented designers recently commented online how we shot on a green screen set and what a shame that was, since we could have built something incredible. And she was right - for that one scene, which will last for maybe thirty seconds on screen, we built only pieces and were surrounded by green. But that is the exception. We can’t build EVERYTHING, and need to make this film on a budget (partly because that’s the $ we have, and partly because I want the studio to see Trek as viable!). The Enterprise will be a combo of the physical and the virtual. A photo is forthcoming!”

Read the full shat on TrekMovie.

  • Jerry Butler
    So......some shots of the ship are going to be a model??

    Good ole abrams, having to save a buck and use visual effect technology pre-1995, and trying to spin it as somehow better.
  • Kyle
    He did say that it won't "look" like a green screen movie.
  • Devon
    Jerry Butler - In all honesty, the film has a MASSIVE budget, over twice that over Nemesis.

    One of the big complaints fans had was the studios have been veering away from actual physical models in favor of CGI. If there are physical parts, perhaps an entire physical model for the Enterprise, this would probably be what many fans have wanted for several years now. ILM is handling the visual effects here.
  • Jerry Butler
    Yeah, apparently they had a large budget going in, but from those abrams quotes above, seems like he's trying to cut corners and bring this baby in under projected numbers to appease and impress the studio brass.

    It seems like it comes down to keeping a few men in ties who fund your movies happy by saving them money, or keeping the fans happy by delivering the best movie possible and not scrimping on a cent.

    ILM is only a tool. Depending at who is at the helm in the director's chair telling them what to create and how, you can have a varying degrees of win or fail.
  • Devon
    "Yeah, apparently they had a large budget going in, but from those abrams quotes above, seems like he’s trying to cut corners and bring this baby in under projected numbers to appease and impress the studio brass."

    Can't say I blame him just to impress them though. It's just good business is all. However, having both a physical and CGI model, that would take up a bit of money. I don't know if he's really saving the money that way!
  • Jerry Butler
    Fair enough. Being a Trekker myself, I'm hoping this thing is good and does the franchise justice.

    I'm just not a fan of Abrams apparent preoccupation with impressing the execs first and foremost. Seems like a pretty shallow approach to film making.

    If history has proven anything, it's that the studio ties have no idea what in the hell makes a good movie, which is why they entrust the project to a director and/or producer. If he's just looking to make these number crunchers happy, we are going to wind up with one sucky trek.
  • Although I've never seen anything Star-Trek related before, it won't suck. It's J.J. Abrams here, people.
  • VernT
    I am a long time TREK FAN along with tens of thousands of Vietnam era Vets (USAF, Enlisted)...I hope that Mr. Abrams has determined this new STAR TREK incarnation won't be boring or lacking in beautiful Starfleet crew women. Exotic ladies from Vulcan as well as unusual Human types (I loved Spice Williams in paced in STAR TREK #5). Even more exotic and erotic was the seething portrayal Jolene Blaylock gave in the short lie ENTERPRISE TV show. Beautiful, tough competent female crewmen couldn't hurt.

    If J.J. reads this...please don't screw us with a damned monster that ate NEW YORK movie. I hated his new version of GODZILLA when the U.S. military has weapons that could have blown his behemouth to hell in thirty seconds...but the plot of that movie was to have a victim run around with a camera and take "BLAIR WITCH" scenes. I hated BLAIR WITCH...I don't like High School quality movies when I have to pay $ 7.00 yto $ 10.00 to see them.

    Please ask J.J. to check out the third and fourth season of "FARSCAPE" paying attention to the character ERYN SUNE and JOHN CRITON. A little seething "Love-hate" relationships did wonders for the storyline of that show. He might want to also take a look at a fine scifi movie called "SERENITY" which has the second of the two most interesting females who are un-alike but both exude heat and sexually without trying. If you see GINA TORRES you will immediately fire your casting of UHURA ...and it you are really smart..cast GINA TORRES and CLAUDIA BLACK as important crew on the ship..Maybe enven hire the beautiful JOLENE BLAYLOCK.
blog comments powered by Disqus