There Will Be Blood Movie Reviews

There Will Be Blood

Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood premiered as a super secret film at Fantastic Fest in Austin Texas this week, and most people are calling it the best movie of both the year and Anderson’s career. We weren’t there to see the film itself (you can check out a trailer at this link), so we bring you a gathering of some of the journalists and bloggers who were in attendance.

Harry at Aintitcool: “It is a legendary performance. Iconic and powerful. It is his absolute best work, which is saying something as he has never ever been anything other than great.”

Marjorie Baumgarten at Variety: “Certain to be rewarded with year-end accolades, Anderson’s film is a true American saga - one that rivals “Giant” and “Citizen Kane” in our popular lore as origin stories about how we came to be the people we are.”"[Radiohead guitarist and BBC composer in residence Johnny] Greenwood’s astonishing score is sure to be one of the most remarked-on aspects of the movie.”

Hollywood Elsewhere reader Dan Brown: “The film really belongs to Lewis. He commands every frame he’s in and is a pleasure to watch. It’s a great character and he really sinks his teeth into it. The film is an awesome achievement, and a great step forward for Anderson. A lot of the criticism being directed at Wes Anderson lately does not apply to this Anderson, who is clearly moving in different directions with each new film but still has a strong visual style. I know the film won’t be well received by everyone. The two and a half-hour running time might be off-putting for Middle American styrofoams but I was really into the movie right from the start.” The most interesting sounding aspect, he adds, is that “the first 15 to 18 minutes of the film are dialogue-free.”

Scott Weinberg at Cinematical: “Easily one of the year’s best films (so far), There Will Be Blood presents a side of Paul Thomas Anderson that we haven’t really seen yet — but it’s proof positive that he’s still one of the finest directors out there right now. You probably won’t believe that this film came from the same man who directed (the awesome) Boogie Nights, and I mean that as a big compliment. It’s just that different — and just that damned good.” “This is a dark, compelling and effortlessly engrossing film, one bolstered by a lead performance that ranks among the very best of Mr. Day-Lewis’ impressive career.”

John DeFore in The Hollywood Reporter: “Director Anderson’s critics might not know what to do with this picture, which has none of the attention-grabbing flourishes of earlier films — no hailstorms of frogs or deus ex machina pianos here. The closest it gets to self-conscious showiness is its closing scene, a confrontation as memorably strange as the fireworks-popping, Jessie’s Girl-belting drug deal in Boogie Nights.”

Peter Martin at Twitch: “Paul Thomas Anderson has demonstrated tremendous instincts as a filmmaker in his previous four features, but, for me, he’s always been more of a promising director with great potential than a master. There Will Be Blood shows that he has absorbed the lessons of those directors that have inspired him-notably Robert Altman-and found something new to say, and a new way to say it. He’s built on everything he’s done before and surpassed his previous achievements. It’s definitely not perfect, but it is sweeping and majestic as it moves down a lonely, powerful path.”

Matt Dentler of SXSW on IndieWire: “There Will Be Blood is one of the best films of the year. Daniel Day-Lewis is obviously a major component of it, but Anderson’s poetic treatment of the material cannot be dismissed. Plus, in a pleasant turn of events, co-star Paul Dano delivers a delicious and demented performance that could earn some serious award consideration a few months from now. God Bless P.T. Anderson, for making his fifth consecutive slam dunk. I’m just so stunned and impressed and shaken by this film.”"There are flourishes of Stanley Kubrick, Terrence Malick, and Robert Altman (to whom the film is dedicated) but Anderson steps up his game as a master filmmaker beautifully telling a very scary story.”

  • joe
    Everything Daniel Day Lewis does is amazing... I cannot wait to see this
  • I think the critics have been fooled by this movie. Sure, Daniel Day-Lewis is good and holds the screen well considering how thin the part is, but the movie itself is a mess. However, it is the kind of mess that critics soak up because it is Paul Thomas Anderson and is shot in a pretentious, faux-artsy style.

    I try to explain the whole critical acclaim surrounding this movie here:
    http://cinemoose.com/there-will-be-blood-and-th...
  • Tessy
    Well that was a nice review of the film. I think it's a bit of a stretch to compare this film with the works of S. Kubrick but it does indeed attempt to approach it. I must clearly state however, that it's attempted style-copy fails in each attempt. I'm going to blame its failure on the editing and mismatched musical soundtrack.

    The editing of the film usually done these days under strict control of the director, almost seemed to intend on lengthening the runtime just for the sake of being able to add the word "epic" to the list of adjectives used for it's description.

    The scoring for the film I contend was an attempt to rip off the production company by producing "loops" of percussion and noise that didn't sync to anything other than the composer's mood or "feeling" established at the beginning 3 or 5 seconds of each scene. That there are many 2 to 4 minute scenes speaks to the amount nauseating repetition within each scene and occasionally these "loop-tracks" would span several scenes without any changes. So the composer spent about one one-hundredth of the time and effort that would normally be required to produce a typically "good" scoring of a film of this length.

    As is I can produce all these scores myself on my computer at home in a $5,000 studio in about 2 weeks time. Many of the "loops" additionally contained recognizable sound effects from very inexpensive instrument and effects CDs available on the web for well under $100.

    Either problem if remedied would bring the quality of this film indeed much closer to a Kubrick level of standards. If the scenes were edited down to a more reasonable length the soundtrack would require less repair as a result and if even only the soundtrack were scored professionally the scenes might not cause the tedium that had me wanting to walk out of the theater on many occasions.

    Additionally, reviewers of this film could add interest and intrigue by mentioning the real world counterpart that the Daniel Plainfield character was indeed based on. Of course that would require them to do a bit of research - gawd forbid.
  • M.O.ZAGHMOUT
    AMAZING MOVIE EPIC IN ALL ASPECTS, BUT STILL I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE PHILOSOPHY BEHIND KEEPIN SHOUTIN " GOD IS A SUPERSTITION ...GOD IS A SUPERSTITION ... GOD IS A SUPERSTITION G..IS..A SUP.. GOD...IS A SUPER..."
    THEN WHAT ,IS IT SO FANTASTIC TO SAY THIS ON A MOVIE THAT IS TRADED TO A BILLIONS AROUND THE WORLS? IS IT A GREAT DISCOVERY BY THE WRITER , OR IS IT AN EXPRESSION OF BEING EXPRESSING -THE WRITER-:" I AM A GENIUS , AND I JUST DISCOVERED THE AMAZING FACT JUST NOW WHILE ALL OF YOU MANKIND ARE IN DEEP SLEEP AND TAKEN BY A FALSE MYTH ...GOD IS TRUE AND GREAT ".
    CONGRATULATION FOR THIS AMAZING AND GALAXIAL DISCOVERY
    OF ALL TIMES .
    PLEASE NO ONE TELLS ME THAT THIS WAS JUST REPRESENTING A CRY OF ANGER, IT COULD BE DONE IN ANTHER HUNDRED WAYS , I AM A POET, PHILOSOPHER ,PHYSICIAN AND ON TO OF ALL THE ABOVE A MOVIE FAN SINCE 45 YEARS.
    DR.M.O.ZAGHMOUT.
  • Alex
    Daniel Plainview is driven by the fact that he thinks that no one understands how good he is. He forces people to see that he is right throughout the movie, each time this happens, he holds back less and less. He talks over people, and forces people to admit out loud their mistakes. This peaks at the end of the movie as he forces Eli to declare that he was a false prophet.

    Plainview saw how obviously right he was, but that alone isn't enough, he was going to force Eli to back down. Even after Plainview knocks Eli down over and over again he still wont break. Thus pissing Plainview off and leading to the only way this confrontation could end ... with blood.
blog comments powered by Disqus