Logan’s Run Finally Finds a Director

Logan's Run PosterCommercial director Joseph Kosinski has signed on to make his feature film debut with a big screen remake of Logan’s Run. Bryan Singer was originally attached to the project, and even got as far as to pre-visualize (think moving 3d storyboards) the project before he got pulled away to make Superman Returns.

Logan’s Run is one of those 1970’s sci-fi movies that clearly wasn’t afraid to be a sci-fi film. Nowadays, there seems to be a lack of movies willing to go all out in the sci-fi department (and the ones that do usually are made for low budgets with crappy scripts for cable networks like the Sci-Fi channel). We live in the Lost and Heroes generation, where high concept sci-fi and fantasy are thought of as the high concept catch for the low concept character stories. Not that this is a bad thing. I’m always the first one to stick up for Lost when the topic comes up. And sure, Logan’s Run had a very human story, but it made little to no concessions in order to reach a more mainstream demographic.

The 1976 film is actually based on a 1967 novel by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson. The plot involved a dystopian future society in which population and the consumption of resources is managed and maintained in equilibrium by the simple expediency of killing everyone who reaches the age of thirty, thus neatly (and inhumanely) avoiding the issue of overpopulation which was of growing concern at the time. Those who try to escape their destiny are known as a “Runners”, and is hunted down by operatives known as Sandmen. The main character of the story is a Sandman named Logan who makes a run for it.

When Singer was attached to the film, I had hoped that they would go with a full-on sci-fi approach. The Hollywood Reporter is saying that the project will take on a low-tech science fiction future closer to the book than the 1976 movie:

“The new film will tackle idea of the “greater good” and people devoting themselves to an ideology blindly, while keeping the novel’s concepts of runners, Sanctuary and gangs outside the system. Kosinski came into Warners with a presentation that included graphic art and animated previsualization that set the look, color, tone and style of the movie he wanted to make.”

I’m still hoping for the best. Check out some of Joseph Kosinski’s commercial work at this link.

  • Michael Gordon
    30? Wasn't it 21 in the book and first movie?
  • kkirkpatrick
    The book's biggest difference from the movie to me was the reason for the killing. In the book's past, population had grown so fast that there reached a point at which children under 21 were the largest segment of the population. They got tired of adults running things, and had a war where they killed the adults and set up a new society with the population limit. People WANTED this limit, and most people willingly accepted euthenasia (there was no Carrousel in the book.) All this was to postulate: what would a society be like that was made by and for children?

    Some of the most powerful parts in the book are descriptions of a society in decay, because no one lives long to learn how to fix things, or even realize they are broken. The characters are surrounded by grandiose buildings and artworks that are unfinished, and forever to remain so, because the designers died before they could complete the works.

    The movie completely ditched this. I love the movie (until they leave the city, after which it kind of loses power.) In the remake, I hope they will choose to keep that aspect of the book. The Singer version ditched it as well. I really didn't care for the treatment I read, and am not really sorry it won't get made (maybe.)
blog comments powered by Disqus