Incarceron

Fox 2000 has won a bidding war with at least two other studios for the rights to make a big screen adaptation of British author Catherine Fisher’s novel Incarceron. The book, which was released in the UK in 2007, reached stateside just a few weeks back, and is already on New York Times Bestsellers List. A sequel, Sapphique, was released in the UK in 2008, and is due in the U.S. in January 2011. As you might expect, Fox hopes to turn the young-adult dystopian fantasy into a franchise, ala Harry Potter. No directors or writers are yet attached, but the studio is looking.

The book tells the story of a seventeen-year-old boy named Finn, a descendant of the original prisoners, tries to escape an elaborate futuristic prison world. In the outer world, Claudia, daughter of the Warden of Incarceron, is trapped in her own form of prison a futuristic world constructed beautifully to look like a past era, the 17th century, but run by computers.

Incarceron book cover

Here is the official synopsis from the book:

Incarceron is a prison so vast that it contains not only cells, but also metal forests, dilapidated cities, and vast wilderness. Finn, a seventeen-year-old prisoner, has no memory of his childhood and is sure that he came from Outside Incarceron. Very few prisoners believe that there is an Outside, however, which makes escape seems impossible. And then Finn finds a crystal key that allows him to communicate with a girl named Claudia. She claims to live Outside—she is the daughter of the Warden of Incarceron, and doomed to an arranged marriage. Finn is determined to escape the prison and Claudia believes she can help him. But they don’t realize that there is more to Incarceron than meets the eye, and escape will take their greatest courage and cost more than they know. Because Incarceron is alive.

Imagine a living prison so vast that it contains corridors and forests, cities and seas. Imagine a prisoner with no memory, who is sure he came from Outside, even though the prison has been sealed for centuries and only one man, half real, half legend, has ever escaped. Imagine a girl in a manor house in a society where time has been forbidden, where everyone is held in a seventeenth century world run by computers, doomed to an arranged marriage that appals her, tangled in an assassination plot she both dreads and desires. One inside, one outside. But both imprisoned. Imagine a war that has hollowed the moon, seven skullrings that contain souls, a flying ship and a wall at the world’s end. Imagine the unimaginable. Imagine Incarceron.

Kirkus Reviews called the 448-page book, “A far-future thriller combines riveting adventure and masterful world-building with profound undertones… Like the finest chocolate, a rich confection of darkness, subtlety and depth, bittersweet and absolutely satisfying.” You can read an excerpt from chapter one of the book on the publisher’s website. For those interested, you can purchase the book for around $10-11 on Amazon. The publisher has also created a teaser trailer for the book, which can be viewed below:

source: Variety

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • BCS
    The Incarceron book was very good but I don't see anyway it can be adapted to a movie without being mutilated. HP series could be because the story line was basically simple underneath. A story that could be understood by millions. Incarceron seems to have more depth, so far anyway, who knows where the next book in the series will go. The only way it could do great is for Fox to go all out and not just try to stamp out another wannabe HP.
  • Captain Quirk
    This sounds like Superjail, only on less drugs.
  • Because Fox have had such great luck so far finding a workable fantasy franchise.

    Yeah, right...
  • What happened to the last time you guys ran an article about being "maybe the next Harry Potter?" The Alchemyst by Michael Scott? I ended reading all the books (that are published so far) and I really like them. But come on! I don't think we'll be seeing any Harry Potter levels any time soon.
  • Blake
    FMA! FMA! FMA!!

    They need to adapt FMA!!
  • wonka bar
    @Peter
    No, this is not the next Harry Potter...thats laughable. Harry Potter began as a "run-away" hit at the bookstores all over the world before WB bought the rights to adapt the franchise to the big screen. This book has just began to have success and wouldn't have a large enough following right now if they tried to go to the big screen. Let's be honest, if this had a chance of being another Harry Potter i promise Warner Bros. would have destroyed Fox in the bidding war.
  • ERoBB
    Harry Potter, Narnia, Golden Compass, Percy Jackson...

    Quick! Buy another children's book franchise with many sequels!
  • dagreenman18
    i'll have to read the book before i pass judgement on this project, but in the hands of a good visual director, this could be good.
  • Eragon destroyed any chance of me trusting FOX with a book adaptation.
  • Slatters
    Eragon was a terrible book.
  • Drew
    When the source material is shit, the movie won't be much better. Eragon was an awful book.
  • That book sounds really derivative. If people didn't see City of Ember (very good) then they definitely won't go see this.
  • Superstarseven
    Doesn't sound like the same thing at all.
  • Can someone fill me in on "Fox 2000"? Is this simply slang for 20th Century Fox? or is it an offshoot of Fox? A google search comes up with the majority of the results about the contents of this article, the acquiring of Incarceron. There doesn't even seem to be an official website for Fox 2000 or a wikipedia entry or anything.
  • gustavo
    I have the same question.
  • Yeah, it just seemed odd. I'd never heard of it, yet I've heard of Fox Atomic, Fox Searchlight and so on. You'd figure Fox 2000 would have some sort of website or information about it.
  • MarkoP
    Given Fox's track record and how attempts to be "the next Harry Potter-type franchise" usually turn out, I already don't have much hope for this.
  • theJOKer
    Catherine Fisher. Isn't that the girl from The Office?
  • Cyberdyne
    I think that's Jenna Fischer
  • Scruffmcgruff
    seven skullrings that contain souls?
    hello horcruxes...
  • PizpotGargravarr
    7 is a number that often comes up in mystical/mythical/religious mumbo jumbo and the idea of items containing souls isn't exactly novel. I don't know how that concept is represented exactly in this book but I would guess that it bears less in common with the horcrux idea than the 'one ring' from LotR did. Think about it, part of a massively powerful dark wizard's essence is contained in an object and he can't be properly killed unless said object is destroyed. All Rowling did was multiply by 7. And it's only one of many, many plot elements from those books that are similar to LotR/a number of other properties.
    I'm not saying any of this is a problem either. Just because certain concepts are similar, doesn't mean they're ripped off so long as they are presented in a novel (pardon the pun) way.
  • PizpotGargravarr
    The thing that is a somewhat off-putting to me is the name. It just seems a bit, I don't know, cheesy or something, to call a prison word Incarceron. But it sounds intriguing nonetheless, I may look into it further.
  • JesseWhitehead
    Try as they might (Eragon, Percy Jackson, etc.), Fox is never going to recreate that Harry Potter box office magic. They need to learn that the best way to win is to lead the pack, not try to play catch-up.
  • Ar
    Everyone wants to hit the motherload with the next big franchise. Lord of the Rings led to Harry Potter, and HP to Twilight, and so on and so forth. Eragon bombed because it was a poor adaptation, and proof that even big names won't save a film from inminent disaster. The industry has been playing catchup since the beginning, and if you go back, you'll see that very few ideas are original, most of it is recycled story lines with different settings and characters, but the plot remains the same...
  • Marvin3O
    hummm... technically, Harry Potter led the pack! Harry Potter and the Philosopher's stone was released on November 16th, 2001 and LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring was released on December 19th, 2001.

    And about Eragon... as a fan of the books, I was HIGHLY dissapointed by the movie! If I hadn't read the book before, I probably would've liked the movie alright, but they butchered the book, changed plots, characters, EVERYTHING! they are two completely different works! The Harry Potter movies were very successful because they were true to the books!

    This shows us the two sides of the coin... what to do and what not to do
  • JoJo
    Is Fox still doing percy jackson or was that one movie and that's it?
  • rockinrors
    Stop trying to make fantasy series for kids.
    They may be good, but they won't hit box office like HP did.
    How can you not have learnt yet?
  • jspegele
    That depends if they're actually trying to make it good. If they're going to try to raise the bar, then they should go for it. Should everyone stop making sci-fi because Avatar made a crap-ton of money? Should the Godfather have been the last mobster movie because it was so good?
  • Clarence Somerset
    They can still make a decent profit without hitting HP BO levels if they keep the budget low reasonable.
  • Octoberist
    Does Fox ever learn? I mean, if Fox is gonna keep this up, please make the adaptions good. put some real talent and money behind these films.

    i think the main reason why Harry Potter worked a film series was because:

    1. Harry Potter was pretty well known on-going book series. The mainstream probably never read the books back then, but I'm sure they've heard of "Harry Potter" and the basic premise.

    2. WB put down the right resources and money to make it quality films. sure, some of the films were not as good as the others (I think part 3 was the best) but you can tell that there was an effort made to make them not come off as quick cash-ins.
  • You're a little off on the Harry Potter history -- the books were a mainstream phenomenon well before the movies came out. I mean sure, there were plenty of people who got hooked after the movies came out, but Harry Potter made the cover of Time magazine just over two full years before the first movie came out.

    I imagine what they're hoping for here is a Twilight-style effect, where the books get really popular right as the movie's a few months away from release. But that's lightning in a bottle. Still, a dystopian kids' fantasy does sound cool.
blog comments powered by Disqus