tronimaxfixed2

After the Tron Legacy Trailer Premiere Event in Los Angeles (video blogged here), Alex from FirstShowing and I were talking with director Joseph Kosinski and learned a bit of news. After telling Joseph how wonderful I thought it was to see the trailer fill so much of the huge IMAX screen, creating a more immersive 3D experience, Kosinski revealed to me that five action sequences from Tron Legacy will be shown in 1.7:1 aspect ratio, exclusively in IMAX Theatres.

If you’ve ever seen a theatrical 3D film on the IMAX screen, then you know that the movie doesn’t fill the whole screen, leaving huge bars to the top and bottom. With The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan shot a few sequences and establishing shots with IMAX cameras, allowing the screen image to switch aspect ratios and fill the entire huge IMAX screen. If you pay to see Tron Legacy in IMAX, you will see something similar.

Most of the film will be presented in widescreen, 2.35:1 aspect ratio, like it will be in your normal multiplex screen. But in the IMAX presentation, five special action sequences are being rendered at 1.7:1, which means that you will see a lot more on the top and the bottom. This makes a huge difference for a 3D presentation. As you know, an IMAX screen is up to eight stories high and are designed to extend to the edge of your peripheral vision, creating a more immersive experience.

I created the image above to give you an idea of the difference. While not 100% to spec, created using the Tron Legacy poster graphic (allowing me to show more horizontal), the image gives you a good idea of what to expect during these sequences. In the smaller Digital IMAX (”liemax) Theatres, the 1.7:1 ratio image will fill the entire screen (due to the different aspect ratio), but in the larger traditional IMAX theatres, there will be small black bars on the top and the bottom (as seen in the illustration). Again, remember, the whole movie will not be presented in that aspect ratio, and will revert back to the normal 2.39:1 ratio during the rest of the film.

I was also told that Disney would be releasing a special IMAX trailer online to show moviegoers the difference.  Tron Legacy hits theaters on December 17th 2010.

Update:
Some people have been asking me this question, so maybe I wasn’t clear about it in my initial post. The IMAX presentation will not be zoomed in or cropped. Kosinski was very clear to me in saying that IMAX moviegoers would see more of the movie at the top and bottom of the frame.  No, the movie was not shot on IMAX cameras — it was shot using Sony CineAlta Fusion 3D cameras. I know that camera has a native 16:9 frame, which is close to the 1.7:1 frame of the IMAX presentation. So its very possible that the extra hieght was captured in camera during the shoot, and cropped out for the theatrical presentation. Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith was shot on that camera series in 16:9 and cropped to 2.35:1 for the release. But the bottom line is: Its not zoomed in or cropped, you will see more in the IMAX release.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • Cineprog
    why o why don't they come up with a light camera to film a entire film in IMAX instead of just filming up to 3 minits at a time. they should have inprove the IMAX instead of jumping on the 3D gimmick which will be come gone in a flash
  • 3D isn't going anywhere, man. 3D has been efforted by Hollywood 2 times prior, and both failed, but it never succeeded in the way Avatar did. There's a good and bad backlash to Avatar, where it's good that we're advancing the technology and people are starting to progress forward, but bad in the sense that everyone is jumping on it without putting thought into the fact that using 3D is an art form in itself. All of these 3D conversions are an absolute waste of time because they were never filmed with the intention of being in 3D. Having stereoscopic 3D at your fingertips is all about manipulating the visual space on the screen and making you FEEL that on the screen. Avatar succeeded in this respect because of Cameron's unparalleled (so far) knowledge of the technology.

    The perfect example is comparing IMAX in The Dark Knight and TF2. Nolan knew exactly how to properly utilize the format, and how it needed to be shot for editing, and Michael Bay had absolutely no idea. He just thought it would look cool. There's much more behind the psychology of it and the technical craft, and the frightening part of all this is that 95% of the films going into production have no thought behind the medium, they simply want to make money and think slapping 3D on a picture is immersive by default.
  • This will be awesome. I didn't really understand why Avatar didn't do any of this, as I sort of expected as much. Having been at the LA screening and seeing the trailer twice already, I'm still excited as hell to see it again when it's released online later this week and before Alice in Wonderland.
  • frug
    Avatar was actually released in three different aspect ratios: one for 2D, one for 3D and one for 3D IMAX. Cameron noted that he liked extra height for the 3D versions so he cropped it a bit from the 2D presentation which was a more traditional widescreen view.
  • manuel
    Was Avatar filmed with IMAX cameras? Because maybe that's why.
  • Neither was Tron. Tron was shot on the same camera system (Cameron Pace) that Cameron created specifically for Avatar. I think it's about how they output the raw files and they have the capability of putting that sized image on the screen. I'm not totally understanding of why they wouldn't just put it out this way for the entire thing though. Is this a money issue? Anyone know?
  • Yeah I get that part, but at some point someone's gotta take that first step forward to go full IMAX and with the ticket sales from Avatar and The Dark Knight destroying all previous IMAX sales records I feel like it's time a studio goes full force. I'm likely naive in this opinion and can't fathom the actual cost difference, and I totally understand that with the lack of a large number of IMAX screens available it may not be entirely worth the production cost, but I'd still like to see it happen. Hopefully Nolan can bring the IMAX wrath in full force on Batman 3.
  • answer: Special effects cost money. A lot fo the tron world is computer generated. And there is a lot of extra space between 2.35:1 and 1.7:1
  • frug
    No it was not. To date only two Hollywood movies have been filmed with IMAX cameras: Dark Knight and Transformers 2.
  • theJOKer
    Joseph Kosinski. Isn't that the guy from The Office?
  • John Krasinski
    Close, that's John Krasinski.
  • I only go see films in the IMAX that are worth seeing in the IMAX, seeing as its so darn expensive, and occasionally dissapointing (see Watchmen). This will be one of those occasions where i book months in advance to see it opening night. God bless the 1.7:1 ratio.
  • Well, glad to see my suggestions were noticed, and taken.
  • joenostalgia
    *ejaculates*
    The only IMAX nearby is digital... urgh...
  • ezgoo
    great image specs Peter!
  • tarvi
    yeah, like the comparison pic too.
  • Nellus
    Enough with the teasing Disney, get the trailer online...now!
  • starscream9289
    I am ready for my eyes to be raped.
  • jake
    its only rape if they say surprise...


    in other words. i am very much looking 4wrd to seeing this! =D

    huge fan of tron ever since mom and dad said that it was shitty.. i had to rent it to see 4 my self. and i thought it was amazing! so im really lookng forward to the sequel! =D
  • Guest
blog comments powered by Disqus