Have you ever wondered how many computers it takes for Pixar to render their big screen 3d animated films or ILM to render giant transforming robotic aliens? I understand this area of filmmaking might not be interesting to everyone, but I find it fascinating. Besides being a huge film geek, I’m somewhat of a techie as well. The first time I had the opportunity to visit LucasFilm, they actually showed me the company’s huge renderfarm, a room in the basement housing all the computer servers used for all the LucasFilm, LucasArts and ILM productions. I took the photo above.

A few videos have been circulating the interwebs this week giving us a glimpse at the tech behind LucasFilm and Pixar, the San Francisco Bay Area’s two big film companies. Watch them now, after the jump.

First up is CNet’s video tour of LucasFilm’s Renderfarm:

The campus has a 13,500-square-foot data center, which houses a render farm, file servers and storage systems. The set-up includes more than 3,000 AMD processors, proprietary render-management tools, allowing desktop workstations to be added to the render farm pool after hours, expanding the processing capacity to more than 5,000 processors.

Here is some more information about the impressive tech employed at LucasFilm’s Letterman Digital Arts Center:

  • A state-of-the-art high-performance data network with more than 300 10-gigabyte ports and 1,500 1-gigabyte ports — the largest in the entertainment industry
  • Fiber-optics cable pulled to every artist desktop, enabling Lucasfilm to deliver high-resolution images to each digital artist
  • 600 miles of cable throughout the four buildings on the campus
  • Raised floors throughout the building, opening the layout of the studio and enabling the workspace to be reconfigured with each new project
  • Data storage (at opening) of more than 100 terabytes
  • A Media Data Center to host custom-designed media servers to deliver high-resolution images to the on-campus digital theaters, screening rooms and desktops
    Systems for image and sound editing, color management and correction, and high-speed compositing
  • A Media Control Room that manages media input, output, format conversions and duplication

One thing is for sure, I wouldn’t want to be flipping through this book if something went wrong.

Next up is a look at Pixar’s render farm. This video is a bit more interesting to tech geeks than it will be to non tech geeks. Cold Aisle Containment presented a case study at the Silicon Valley Leadership Group’s Data Center Energy Efficiency Summit about Pizar’s server set-up. The case study features a lot of numbers and information, but little in the form of photos or video. Because of that, I’ve also included some photos of Pixar’s set-up below:

The first photo of Pixar’s renderfarm comes from Rotten Tomatoes:

zz4097552b

The second photo of Pixar’s renderfarm comes from milomix:

zz4fcadb7a

And here is a close-up of the neon sign by the company that created it, Aargon Neon:

zz6bd857c7

via: twitter

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • The Techno alien
    They use AMD CPUs?! I thought Intel Xeon's where for workstations, that makes me change my mind about building a render farm with W3520 Xeon CPUs...Hm... I am not sure though, maybe they were trying to save some money, Quantity Vs Performance...or Performance vs Quantity. Hm, I am confused...
    They always show the AMD as a bad 3D renderer, maybe if a buy 3000 of those...
    Any sugestions?
  • I like the "shop on wheels" concept. Change the working environment to fit your needs.
    That's a very interesting article, but it's worth noting how many things Pixar do still to keep their times as low as possible.
  • Establishment contains over 3000 AMD, rendering tools-property-management workstation, which added to the farm to expand the pool after hours of processing capacity, more than 5000 processors.
  • Anonymous
    Impressive. You should see Amazon's server farm. I'm under a non-disclosure agreement. So, I can't discuss details. Even the location is a secret. Needless to say, it was amazing. Massive beyond belief.
  • Words may not be enough but numbers can tell and sometimes makes us confuse lol. This is an amazing share. Thanks.
  • Wow... words cannot describe the level of cool those render farms are at. XD
  • Edvin
    The best thing about them naming their storage Deathstars is that at one time IBM gave out a HDD called the deskstar. It had a bad tendency to have a complete Head crash. People then affectionately called it a Deathstar.
    I wonder if that is some kind of internal IT joke of theirs.
  • p00piez
    I have seen WETA'a render farm and it is pretty damn spectacular
  • Not to nitpick, but I am pretty sure you mean 300 10-gigabit ports and 1,500 1-gigabit ports. So its gigabit, not gigabyte. ;)
  • Cineprog
    Like the Lucas Data Centre video that center will be Rendering Iron Man 2 now and what about the Last Airbender.
  • Sky Bluu
    Haha love the names of the processing units "Deathstar586"...*renames my HDDs Deathstar1"
  • guywhiteycorngood
    Peter, don't worry if some people might not like a certain story like this. It was fascinating. You've got good taste! That's why we all come here!
  • Imagine the frag parties they could hold.
  • filmbuffrich
    I love that Pixar has a funky neon sign for their render farm. I think that speaks volumes about their corporate attitude. (As if we didn't already know...)
  • Last thing he said in the cnet video: "One shot was 4,000 frames, and took up to 23 hours per frame." At 23 hours a frame, that's a 3 minute shot taking over 10 years to render. hmmm... perhaps a slight exaggeration.
  • Aaron
    At my animation studio it's not rare to have 100+ hour per frame render times. You throw a lot of processors on it and it finishes in a few days. Or for particularly bad frame you can have dozens rendering one frame at once, all working on different scanlines.
  • goldfarb
    I'm always amazed that numbers like this impress people...23 hours/frame is BAD...since the average is still somewhere around an hour...
    must have been simulation...
  • sakulmada
    do you really think they're rendering one frame at a time? they're probably rendering around 4,000 frames at once, so it probably took... a day.
  • Guest
    "up to" being the key operative phrase.
  • Mike
    How does Weta "smoke" ILM? I don't understand.
  • Did
    Great post! I love to learn about the actual involved tech behind film-making.
  • Cory
    Weta hardly smokes ILM in effects quality. Let's not get crazy with that assessment.
  • gibbelin
    I saw Jurassic Park on a huge theatrical screen a few years ago. Trust me, the CGI does not hold up anymore when it's blown up that big. The animatronics, yes, but not the CGI. The textures and resolution on the brachiosaurs were more comparable to modern video games than to Avatar.

    It was still a great experience seeing it in theaters again though.
  • Yes, well of course the cgi doesn't look as good as Avatar right now. But how will Avatar look in 2027 ? I'm curious. Because for a moment, Avatar fooled me.
  • gibbelin
    Dammit, I meant that to be to moviedoc.
  • Exactly.

    Jurassic Park vs Avatar. Who will stand the test of time ? Hard to say, but one movie still looks good after nearly two decades.
  • starscream9289
    Didn't both WETA and ILM work on Avatar, though?
  • JURASSIC PARK still look amazing and works as well as it did when it was released.

    In five years AVATAR will not because the story is so flimsy.
  • I'd like to see WETA's rendering facility, seeing as thought they now smoke ILM in effects quality.
  • goldfarb
    what?
    you're basing this on Avatar?
    so bigger render farm means better quality VFX? or better VFX must mean a bigger/better render farm?
    that's really not how it works.

    oh and 100 terabytes isn't that much when you're actually using it. :)
  • gibbelin
    I thought there's be way more than 100 terabytes. I have 3 terabytes on my PC and sometimes feel that that's not enough. I figured they'd have at least 1.21 jiggawatts.
  • sdsd
    u cant have 3 tera bytes on a normal pc atm
  • Sally
    He said 300 Tb not 100. Dunno why the notes say 100.
  • Kwangs
    Can you make it so the videos don't auto play on the RSS feeds? That shit is really fucking annoying.
  • Steelo
    egad man...
  • I don't understand a word of this... but it's quite interesting.
  • williebillie12
    This is WAY cool! Thank you so much for posting!
  • Osmao
    Really cool. Thanks for posting this Peter!
blog comments powered by Disqus