MGM Updates: The Hobbit, Robocop and a Remake of FX

mgm_header

The sell-off situation with MGM right now seems to be the eye of a film news storm, all sorts of other business swirling around it, crashing and smashing and, sometimes, just whizzing by perfectly intact like that darn cow from Twister. Just last night we found out that Bond 23 is being fast-tracked, despite earlier indication that he was being put on ice and today we get updates on Bilbo Baggins, Robocop and Rollie Tyler, FX supremo.

The latest on The Hobbit, via Production Weekly, is that production is set to start in June and continue for 14 months. That of course means a healthy overlap between post production of the first film and production of the second as Del Toro and co. power on to a late 2011 release. Maybe they’re so well prepared with animatics that assembling the basic edit will be a piece of cake, but there’s definitely going to be some hardcore multi-tasking in Guillermo’s future.

As for Robocop, the prognosis is not so good…

The Robocop Archive passed the following along to Moviehole (though don’t seem to have published the update on their own site, curiously):

I’ve spoken with Phoenix Pictures [and] asked them about the status of Robocop… they told me that the project is on hold. The problem is that Mary Parent, Chairperson of MGM, wants a 3D movie for the new Robocop.

And why would that be a problem? Apparently attached director Darren Aronofsky isn’t even keen on using CG effects let alone a “gimmick” like 3D. Really? I’m disappointed in that, I have to say. I want to see more filmmakers of Aronofsky’s calibre to start using stereography and expanding the audience’s awareness of how it works and why it’s good for a film.

Whether or not this hold will be broken, and whether or not that will be through compromise on the part of Parent or Aranofksy, or if it will be through the appointment of a new director waits to be seen.

Moviehole are also suggesting that a jam in the potential remake of FX, the “one’s a cop, the other’s a special effects wizard, together they fight crime” movie. The project appears to have already gotten bogged down while MGM were full steam ahead so I’m not quite sure what the news is beyond an insider quote that says the studio is “still trying” to get a script they’re happy with.

Should an FX do-over go ahead, I’m sure somebody will have the bright idea of approaching Hugh Jackman for the Rollie Tyler role quite quickly. Almost as certain is that they’ll ask Bryan Brown to cameo as his dad.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • [A]
    F**k 3D.
  • TheTrebor
    i would like to see an FX remake i liked those movies because of the effects shown there, i have always been facinated by movie effects and like to see how they are made but i dont know they will probably mess it up lol
  • Rick_Dickulous
    I thought that Arronofsky was already off Robocop.

    I don't know who to side with on this one. Arronofsky would probably turn Robocop into a depressing martyr story. The studio probably wants a PG-13 popcorn reboot. Either way misses what Robocop is about.
  • An FX re-make could be cool if they keep the feel of the original movie. An FX man can't exactly use CGI FX to fight crime while he's being chased by bad guys. The movie could potentially be an interesting return to practical effects.

    Why not just get Bryan Brown to star? Honestly he's not THAT old. You could make the movie a sequel, and cast some younger dude (or woman, why not) to be his protege.
  • Can someone please get me a count of large studio picture Aronofsky kas dropped out of at this point. Kind of ridiculous at this point.
  • matt_od
    note that nowhere in this article does it say that Aronofsky has dropped out. He's having a creative conflict with the studio head. It could still be resolved.
  • StarFox
    Shit, now they are going to remake every movie again, only now in 3D. This sucks.
  • GORT
    Aronofsky is one of the most talented directors working and it saddens me to see him reject this film. His uncompromising attitude while admirable seems to be very naive and counterintuative. Part of working in hollywood is making compromises or atleast making compromises untill you have gained a certain amount of clout, he did the same thing with the Batman film. He has to do one of these big blockbusters which would allow him to make smaller films more easily and get a decent budget for them. Look at Christopher Nolan, the Batman films have given him licence to do pretty much whatever he wants. Without him doing Batman there is no way he could have made something like The Prestige, even if he did he would no way have near the 40-50million budget that it did. My point is, even if he does not agree with the 3d technology he should make the film anyway as it would make it so much easier for him to get financing on his passion projects and he would not have another mess like the production issues of `The Fountain`.
  • It wasn't Aronofsky's "uncompromising attitude" that got him off Batman, it was the fact that he and Frank Miller wrote the wrong damn script. His Batman movie would've been so far out of the Batman mythology that it wouldn't even be recognized as Batman.
  • markintosh
    Shame that Nolan got to make The Prestige. I want those two-odd hours of my life back.

    Oh and p.s.... you're an imbecile re: Aronofsky's attitude.
  • concretelogic
    But Nolan still made Batman how he wanted to, and wasn't forced into some lame gimmick. If they gave Aronofsky the same courtesy there wouldn't be a problem. I think it's disgusting that this 3D craze is now actively getting in the way of film making, and it's nice to see someone not blindly following suit.
  • matt_od
    why should he compromise? He has the artistic integrity and the quality of output to be able to keep working on projects he loves without compromising. I recommend you watch the film The Fountainhead based on Ayan Rand's books of the same name.
  • GORT
    It's great to have artistic integrity but part of working in hollywood is trying to pump out a great product amidst studio interference. And he has had to compromise in his previous projects primarily the fountain which is scaled down from his original vision after the movie's budget was cut by more than 50%. My point is that he would probably not have had to compromise on a personal project like The Fountain had he done a big studio film. Even great Directors like Soderberg, Coens have to make studio films to allow them to make their own movies, I doubt Soderberg is particularly enthusiastic about the Oceans movies but one Ocean movie pays for several of his art films. I would rather Aronofsky make a blockbuster which would allow him to make several indie films without having to worry about financing than for him to stick to the principal, not do robocop and then have a hard time getting personal projects off the ground or have them underfunded.
  • concretelogic
    I love Aronofsky for standing up against the 3D craze. I hope more people follow suit. Every new movie is going to be 3D because they can charge higher ticket prices and it's getting ridiculous.
  • Matthew
    I'm all with Aronofsky here. Till 3D requires glasses to wear it's nothing more than a gimmick.

    In the future when a movie comes out which uses a few 3D effects for certain scenes and then allows us to focus on characters and the plotlines rather than throw one lavish visual after the other with no intention of any storyline, that's the time 3D would have actually come of age and become a genuine tool (like color or sound)
  • thatguyrom
    I wouldn't be surprised if an FX remake featured less latex-inspired effects, and more CG effects up the butt.
  • matt_od
    "I’m disappointed in that, I have to say. I want to see more filmmakers of Aronofsky’s calibre to start using stereography and expanding the audience’s awareness of how it works and why it’s good for a film."

    You're overlooking the fact that Aronofsky obviously doesn't agree that 3D is good for a film. He finds it a distracting gimmick. And besides Avatar and Up, I'd have to agree with him.
  • shane
    Yeah, I'm really happy to see Aronofsky sees past the "gamechanger" that is Avatar.

    I hate 3D. So much. I'm never paying the extra $3-4 again.
  • robear
    Aronofsky directing a 3-d movie?!?! That would be interesting...
  • LW
    yes FX needs a reboot, special effects are still super cool.
  • Mark Landers
    Aronofsky should stay true to his work.
    No cgi, there are plenty other directors for that.
  • evilninjax
    Robocop with all (or nearly all) animatronic would be AWESOME!!!

    And perhaps one of the negative effects of Avatar is now every movie is going to be 3d. Well, i suppose it's ok, if I can watch in 2d...
  • cookie
    yeah, good thing there was no cgi in The Fountain...
  • Brel
    Oh dear.....watch the Cookie crumble
  • matt_od
    Aronofsky used as little cgi as possible to pull of his effects in The Fountain.
    Hence the use of macrophotography of chemical reactions to create the outer space visuals, most notably the dying star.
blog comments powered by Disqus