James Bond 23 Put On Hold

craig_bond

Hurry up and put your bid in for MGM will you, because it seems that whole situation will have to be settled before the next Bond film makes any more progress. According to producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli, “Well, our timeline’s a little up in the air what with the situation at MGM, so we have to be flexible. We just don’t know enough about the situation to comment, but we know it’s uncertain.”

Scary. And I suppose it follows that if Bond 23 can be up-ended like this, so could The Hobbit, another MGM picture…?

Wilson and Broccoli were speaking to Total Film for an interview in the new print issue, and the quotes appeared on the Bond-crazy MI6 site. A slightly less clear indication of the same bad news came from Peter Morgan a couple of weeks back, when he suggested pre-production on the movie wouldn’t start until February. Of course, while Morgan gave a firm date like that he could have had no way of knowing if the sale would be completed in time, suggesting he was speaking from then-current assumptions or a speculative timeline he’d been given rather than anything 100% solid.

The Total Film interview can’t have happened just yesterday - lead times on print publications are fairly long and the issue has been on shelf for days at the very least - but the specific timing is not as important as the understanding that work on Bond 23 is going to be frozen until MGM has new owners.

The plan, once pre-production begins again, will probably be to get everything lined up for a shoot at the end of the year. I assume this because both Dame Judi Dench and Daniel Craig have suggested that’s when production would kick off, almost certainly scheduled to coincide with suitably large spaces in their schedules. It doesn’t matter what’s happening at MGM; should Craig and Dench have to go on to other pictures they’re contracted to, they could well have to go on in a timely manner. Missing those gaps could, dependent on their schedules, lead to a significant delay in production.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • DoctorControversy
    It's interesting how the one thing that could probably prolong MGM's death is being put on hold until MGM's fate is decided. Personally, I think they should bring United Artists and Columbia back into the fold, so as to mitigate the financial "risk" of making a Bond picture.

    It's hard because for as much as a Bond movie costs, you know they'll make the money back and then some; but the only problem is that it wouldn't make enough money on its own to save the studio. Even when Brosnan pretty much singlehandedly saved them back in '99, he had The Thomas Crown Affair to sweeten the pot. Either they need a wildly successful vehicle for Craig to work on in concert with a Bond picture, or they need to start diversifying their business model better. (A remake of Fame is not going to cut it.)
  • freemachine
    Quantum of Solace wasn't very good. It felt way too rushed. Hopefully this will give them time to come up with a decent script.
  • Agent J
    I think this is a turrble mistake. The last two Bonds were the only two I've enjoyed in the last sixty two years.

    I do think QOS was pretty weak in the story department, so if they take a little more time to make that suck less, I'm in I spose.
  • Regardless of how bad or how good the previous two films in the Daniel Craig re-boot franchise have been, they were both profitable. Eventually Bond 23 will get made because, good or bad, it too will be profitable. The fate of MGM may delay it, but I'd bet that we'll see a late 2011 release.
  • Whenever it happens (and it's seeming more and more innevitable) it'll be a sad day when MGM shuts down.
  • Relax. They just want Martin Campbell to do it. And he's determined to do Green Lantern first. So there.
  • Andrew
    Good God, MGM was supposed to have died 5 years ago. Put the poor dog out of its misery and sell Bond to Sony already (since they distributed Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace- however, Fox already owns much of MGM's back catalogue, including the previous 20 Bond films, so they'll have a stake in the franchise as well).
    Regarding QoS, I thought it was great script-wise, but the next film needs a more experienced action director, as Marc Forester's rapid cutting approach took time to get used to.
  • moviefan
    i am sure in the end production will get under way in a few months. I doubt the film would be dropped for long. We will probably just have to wait and see what happens with MGM in the coming weeks an all that.
  • Starfox
    More time to really polish the script. So there's that.
  • Sorry, but it's less time....

    It's only more time to polish the script if the release date moves back along with the start date moving back.

    Sadly, Eon seem to stay with a release date once its chosen, so any delays means less time to make the movie. In this case it'll mean less time to write the film.

    Less writing time was the problem with QoS:
    Because of the writer's strike the script was unfinished when shooting began (Haggis said so).

    I loved QoS, but it's flaws were in the script, which certainly seemed like it needed another pass to finesse the gaffs here and there.

    The boat chase definitely hadn't been mapped out adequately and i imagine it was a bitch to edit and giving it a confusing lack of geography.

    When parts of a film's action or plot seem confusing, or rushed-through, it's not because the filmmakers are trying to convey the 'confusion' of the situation, it's because they got it wrong. And that's usually because it was rushed in the script - unfinished.

    COMPLEX in a script is good. COMPLICATED is bad. Not giving adequtae time to finish the script makes complex into complicated. The flaws in QoS are complicated and it seems the delays to Bond23 will make it very complicated.

    Ironic, since after QoS they announced a longer wait to Bond23 so they could spend more time on the script. Eon aren't the luckiest of producers.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Assuming the writers will be kept on during the freeze. I'm assuming they won't be.
  • Chris
    I found Casino Royale and Quantum to be two parts of a whole, though I preferred Quantum. This really sucks, but at least it won't hurt the actual production with changing ownership midstream.
  • robear
    I really dug QoS, and yes it wasn't as good as Casino Royale. I really hope this gets sorted out cause I really dig the newer Bond films
  • Jimmy B.
    There's a rumor that the next villain will be a comment moderator.
  • richCie
    brilliant :)
  • The David Chen
    You just won the entire internet
  • I doubt The Hobbit will be in too much danger. The LotR series did great, so there's a lot of faith in The Hobbit. As for Quantum of Solace, it wasn't as good as Casino Royale, so they want to make sure Bond 23 is better.
  • shane
    well, QoS WAS the second highest grossing Bond film ever....
  • nindie
    Yeah but that's cause everyone thought it was gonna be "Casino Royale Part 2" and it turned out to be " Tomorrow Never Dies Part 2" ;)
  • Slatters
    Plus hasn't The Hobbit more or less gone into production at this point? I remember seeing images of Hobbiton being rebuilt months ago.

    Not exactly the same situation as the next James Bond film.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Jackson and Del Toro have stressed many times that the film hasn't even been given a green light yet.
  • BrendonConnelly
    I can't reply to Slatters comment below, so here goes up above.

    The reconstruction of the set indicates the following: Jackson's certainty that he'll get that investment back when the picture IS greenlighted.
  • Slatters
    Yeah, I suppose the reconstruction of a major outdoor set piece doesn't qualify for much.
blog comments powered by Disqus