Armored

Somebody over at Sony is surely going to get spanked today. At some point yesterday afternoon, Nimrod Antal’s Armored — a film which is still in theaters (and distributed by Sony Pictures) — was released on the Playstation Store in both Playstation 3 and PSP formats. Worst of all, they didn’t even make any money from the blunder — the film was free to download for any sharp-eyed PS3 owner. It was pulled after about five hours, but in that time it was downloaded by many.

Sony has yet to comment on the blunder, but I think it could hint at some of their future plans for digital offerings. Specifically, it reminds me of their plan to offer Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs on Sony televisions and Blu-ray players a month before it’s supposed to hit DVD and Blu-ray.

Sony offered Cloudy for $25.99 — a price which likely kept casual buyers away, but would probably be appealing to parents when compared to the cost of taking their entire family to the theater. We don’t have any statistics from Sony on the film’s digital purchases yet, but I’m eager to see how they fared.

Speaking to the NYT, Sony CEO Howard Stringer had the following to say on why they’re testing out this early digital release:

The process of moving to the next stage of content delivery is as inevitable as night and day. And we’re the only company that can do this because we own hardware and content.

This quote came to mind when I learned of the Armored debacle; the very same article also mentioned that Sony is looking into bringing future early releases to their other devices, including the PS3. Given their desire to explore this space, I’m thinking that Sony was intending to offer Armored as an exclusive Playstation Store offering before  its DVD/Blu-ray release. Why else would they even bother uploading the film to the PS store so soon after its release?

Stringer is also very right when he says that Sony is one of the few media companies that have the capability to tackle exclusive digital offerings on their own — without the likes of Netflix or Amazon distributing content to their devices.

It’s a step in the right direction, but Sony needs to significantly lower the prices for these offerings if they want consumers to actually take advantage of them. In the world of downloadable media content $15 would be considered “high” — $25.99 is just insane. My understanding is that $25.99 is the purchase price for Cloudy, which means they could possibly offer a cheaper rental price down the line.

Discuss: Were you able to take advantage of Armored’s accidental release? Would you buy Cloudy digitally at $25.99? Is the idea of digitally acquiring movies early (legitimately) appealing?

[Via Joystiq, thanks to /Film reader Andrew for the tip!]

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • I can confirm that. I "bought" the Undead Knights demo during the mistake but couldn't download it because I didn't have my PSP with me (getting Media Go on a school computer was quite the challenge). Once the full game was released on the PSN I noticed that it said that I had already purchased it.The movie has very nice picture quality but the movie isn't very good. I'm glad I didn't pay to see it in theaters (actually, I hadn't heard of it until today).
  • bd
    I thought this was some kind of promotion. Downloaded it but I don't have high hopes for the movie.
  • ob
    hey hey bring it on,thank you sony!
  • gergreo
    its removed now those lucky people got to download the movie for free have a feeling it was like a new years gift also have a feeling it will be all over the internet by tommorow or today
  • xego
    Greetings \film
  • thatguyrom
    I remember hearing about the "accident" when I was making my rounds on the internet. After hearing about it, I quickly signed on to PSN and took advantage. After I was done downloading it, I kept checking every now and then to see when the PSN people realized their mistake. I can't believe it took them 5 hours to notice it.

    With that said, I haven't watched the movie yet, but after watching a few seconds of it, the quality looks good on the PS3. It was the first, and probably last, movie I'll buy on the movie store.
  • T.S.F.G.
    In my opinion, this sounds like an experiment to see how many people would
    1. Notice that the film was up
    2. Track how many times the film would be downloaded

    Also keep in mind:
    1. The film is not doing so well theatrically (but might break even)
    2. Coincidentally, it's the very end of the 2009 Fourth Quarter
    3. And hey the film was released by "Sony" films for "Sony" PS3

    I'm calling Shenanigans on this one...
  • Raey
    i hadn't even noticed this film till this happened... is the trailer even worth checking out?
  • doctorfumanchu
    The trailer gives away all the twists and turns of the film so I'd just wait and rent it on a whim one day.
  • sauce_1
    Huh, I wonder if they'll pull a Kindle on this and revoke whatever license this came with.
    If you remember Amazon was selling 1984 without the rights and deleted the book from off owners kindles. It was crazy and Amazon's CEO had to issue an apology for the Snafu. Hope Sony learned from their mistakes.
    But I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't and people find their file not working or magically gone from their PS3 within the week.

    You could have titled this: How Hollywood screws up it's own attempt at streaming and will probably blame the customers for the loss of money.
  • freemachine
    Sony has no one to blame but themselves for this movie not making money. Armored has only earned three-quarters of its production budget while in theaters...because it sucked! Sony should worry about promoting some of its better films, such as Moon---which it has apparently decided to abandon for this Oscar season (see /film article).
  • sauce_1
    lol, agreed. But these companies like spinning blame onto other people.

    Also, Go Moon Go!
    Would it hurt or harm the chances if sent bootleg copies of Moon to the voters? Dress em up to look fancy? Gah, it's one of my favorites of the year and it gets no love. Le sigh.
  • just to clarify, only one format of Armored was put on PSN: the PSP digital copy. it just so happens you can play said file on your PSP or PS3.

    that being said, i was pretty astounded when a friend told me Armored was free on PSN. i thought he must've meant some sort of game, but then he insisted it was the movie. the file is 1+ gigs, but it definitely came at the price i wanted.

    i don't think buying anything digitally is worth that much, even if it's early. if anything, it should be just below the DVD/BD price even with the earliness because part of what i'm paying for are the special features, which i wouldn't be getting.

    in terms of digital copies in general, i feel they should never cost as much as the DVD's/BD's because, from a purely psychological standpoint, i'm not owning anything. i am paying to have the movie on a physical disc, not just as intangible information that could be deleted or whose permissions could be change somewhere down the line.

    it's probably the collector in me, but that's why i don't think BD will be killed by digital distribution and streaming. people want to own things. BD will die because of whatever physical format comes next.
  • The PSP copy is over a gig? That seems a bit much :P Did the quality look good on your TV at least? Less than DVD, or comparable?
  • movies purchased from iTunes are usually over a gig so it seems logical that one for psp would be around the same.
  • haven't watched anything on my PSP, so i'm not sure what the usual size is, but it's explicitly labeled digital copy for PSP.

    the quality looked good enough on my HDTV, probably on par with a mediocre DVD transfer, maybe. definitely watchable.

    well, i hope it's watchable.
  • I think they *have* to go below $25 when Cloudy's out on DVD, but I applaud them for trying this out anyways. There's nothing stopping them from constantly iterating and finding the right formula.

    Content exclusively on Sony hardware might get me to buy Sony hardware, but just Sony content? Less exciting, esp. if it costs more than a DVD per film anyways.
blog comments powered by Disqus