Nine

UPDATE: Now The Weintein Company says they won’t be cutting theatres from Nine’s release. A rep insists that it will remain on 1400 screens this week. Let’s see what happens next week… Original article follows.

When it comes to year-end releases, Harvey Weinstein likes to bet on awards contenders. This year his horse was Nine, the Rob Marshall-directed adaptation of the stage musical. There was a lot of pedigree to back his pick: Marshall’s previous musical, Chicago, did well with critics, audiences and award balloting. The stage version of Nine won awards. And there’s the cast: Daniel Day-Lewis and a bevy of notable women: Kate Hudson, Judi Dench, Nicole Kidman, Sophia Loren, Marion Cotillard and Penélope Cruz. (And Fergie who, ironically, turned out to be the selling point.)

But Nine’s reviews have been dismal and the business worse. When it went wide last week it was only the eighth-highest earner, with a $5.5m tally against a budget over $60m; the film has made about $9m globally. If the Weinstein Company was hoping the film would offset the studio’s widely-reported financial woes, then this has been a season of disappointment. The film is already scaling back from the wide 1,400 theatre release. But Harvey has a plan to keep going into 2010.

Reuters reports that in the next couple weeks Nine will scale back to 800-900 screens. That’s a blow, considering that the hope was that Nine would repeat the success of Chicago. But between the better-than-expected success of Inglourious Basterds and a new financial plan, the company isn’t even close to mortally wounded.

The New York Post reports that there are several possible deals in motion to repay TWC’s creditors. The key one is that Goldman Sachs, to which TWC owes $500m, and Ambac Financial, which is insuring the debt, are agreeing to give the company a chance “to figure out a way to have the studio go forward in a healthy manner.” (Basically replicating the deal MGM made earlier this year, on a much smaller scale.) There may be another cash infusion from a different fund, as well.

TWC has Youth in Revolt opening soon, so expect to see a lot of eyes trained on the performance of that film as an indicator for 2010.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • It wasn't boring. I had to be dragged to it basically since the last musical I liked was Chicago (only one actually unless you count Little Shop of Horrors), and this thing was incredible. Don't miss it, rent it, go buy a ticket and help them. My hat's off to Daniel Day-Lewis... he has me stunned what with his performance in There Will be Blood, you can't miss this performance... he's astounding. Plus you don't want to miss Kate's number.. wow!
  • Rick_Dickulous
    Here's a free tip for the Weinsteins:

    Try not to release a boring ass movie smack dab between Avatar and Sherlock Holmes.
  • sgtzim
    Wow, $500million in debt?! They should've funded Avatar, at least they'd be raking in the dough. Seriously, these guys have had the shittiest luck since they started up.
  • Zinc
    The Weinsteins always rely on these crappy Oscar bait movies that are usually crap. Make something that's actually good on a consistent basis, damn it.
  • Harvey will bounce back. There's no getting rid of him.
  • Joe
    If they hadn't gone for an overblown feature with 9 (ha) famous actors, the budget wouldn't have been $60 million, and this wouldn't be a hit.

    I've got my eyes on Youth In Revolt, which seems like it could ignite an early-2010 box office. I can see it pulling a 15-20 million opening weekend with some decent legs (due to January's wasteland of films and potential positive word of mouth) to be a major success for TWC.
  • JasonSearcy
    From every preview I've seen of this movie, I have to say it looks terrible. Throwing a bunch of 'name' actors into a movie will not sell it to the general public.
  • RickJM
    Is it me or are the Weinstein's horrible at marketing their movies?
  • Ray
    they should have cast Sacha Baron Cohen instead of Daniel Day Lewis, and Kristen Wiig instead of Kate Hudson. that's the only way they could get the budget under 9m...
  • ttheaters
    They put there movies any were .No thought as to best theaters..They have left the art market for chains that dont gross on these type of films.
  • Just say nein.
  • Jawmuncher
    I never even heard about nine until this article.
    No wonder it failed.

    Also what is with all the 9's this year?
    District 9
    9
    Nine

    2009 the year of 9
  • Poland626
    Sad since I loved Nine and know that a lot of people wanted to see Nine but other films this past weekend kept them from seeing it
blog comments powered by Disqus