zz40d2da1a

Paramount Pictures has released a new featurette for Jason Reitman’s Up in the Air focusing on the filmmaker’s vision. In the video, Jason explains that he aims for authenticity, not comedy, in the performances and stories of his films… and if he achieves that, the comedy will follow:

“Everywhere I look, I see comedy… often where it is inappropriate. For me that’s the best way to talk about things. If we can open up and laugh about things, then we can have a honest conversation.”

You can watch the video now on Apple.com. Also, Anne Thompson has a wonderful 20 question interview with Reitman on indiewire. I’ve excerpted one of the answers after the jump, because it is the only time I’ve ever seen Jason talk in detail about the ending of the film, and what his intentions were. If you haven’t seen the movie, do not read that question and answer below. Again, don’t — experience it first, check back later. But if you have seen the movie, I recommend you hit after the jump.

SPOILER WARNING!!!!!

Question: The ending of the movie has produced some debate. Why did you not give everybody a happy, romantic ending?

Jason Reitman: There are millions available on DVD if you want to feel good. No, honestly, look; there are plenty of movies that inspire companionship through romance on screen. You see two people in love and you go, you know what, I want that too. I did not want to make that movie. I wanted a film that inspired companionship through loss. It’s not when George and Vera are dancing at the wedding that you go ‘oh, this man is truly in need of somebody in his life,’ it’s right after he shows up at her door in Chicago and realizes that she’s unavailable, that’s the moment you go: ‘Oh, this man actually wants something else.’ And hopefully it’s the moment that the audience feels it so hard, you get hit so hard in the gut that you want it yourself as well. So I thought somehow that would actually be more impactful than simply watching two people in love. Then the ending of the movie, it’s a movie about an epiphany rather than a decision. We get to the end of the movie, we know that he’s come to some sort of realization, and from there he can do anything. He can get on a plane and live the same way for the rest of his life, he can get a plane and settle down somewhere and meet someone and share his life with somebody. That actually doesn’t matter. I’ll tell you why; he’s a fictitious character. He doesn’t exist. However, the movie doesn’t end there, and then just cut to clouds and sit on clouds for a few seconds. And I don’t mean to be pretentious, but I hope that moment is a moment of silence for the audience to think about what they want in their life, because in reality that’s much more important than whatever Ryan Bingham decides to do.

  • Ben Nadler
    I met Jason at a screening of the film at the Mill Valley Film Festival, and I have to say, he is an amazing, incredibly talented, and just a nice guy. The Festival gave him an award for his work, which is definitely deserved.

    But they did one thing which irked me: they constantly kept referring to his father. Jason told a story about how he was going to be (if my memory serves me) a doctor until his father, Ivan Reitman (director of Ghostbusters) told him to just do what made him happy. And he became a film maker (arguable a better one than his father, in terms of endearing stories). And they just kept talking about his father, and how it must be to follow in his footsteps...and it seemed unfair. We were there to honor Jason's accomplishments, and I didn't like the fact that they really brought up his father at all.

    Jason gave me some great advice, which I'll pass onto you: Read and write as much as humanely possible.

    Even though I'm going into animation for games and film, this is still important. I've taken his advice to heart, because you can't really design a good environment if you can't write out how it looks. Same goes for a character or an action.

    More on topic, that's just a great snippet there. I really loved this movie and I hope everyone sees it when they get the chance, it should definitely be up there for Best Picture.
  • Well, Jason has distinguished himself as a film-maker. His films are markedly different than his fathers. We are lucky that one of the brightest mainstream film-makers is also a satirist, as it is a very difficult subject to create in cinematographic form. UITA is a very beautiful satirical movie.
  • I also read another interview in which he talks about doing the firing scenes. He actually went to Detroit and St. Louis and put ads in the paper for a 'documentary'. He got (real) people to talk about their reactions to being fired, and for some, he got them to admit how they felt they should have reacted to the news. He ended up using 22 of the 60 that he did.

    Here's a link to the article; http://is.gd/57khW
  • MickJ
    Just read that, never heard of a director doing that before. Talk about authenticity. All the features and interviews for this have been great so far. Big fan of Reitman's just from hearing his thoughts.
  • Thanks for the spoiler alert, Peter - I've actually put in effort to avoid a lot of this film before actually seeing it - reading the indiewire article would've ruined it all lol
  • Did you give Jason any dramamine before the interview……?
    Actually, great interview!!! Very funny and informative.
    Very tweet.
  • Think the ending was very much in line with Ryan Bingham's nature. In this very narrow, obscure selective way he had achieved this remarkable elite fliers status. The two most powerful lines about Ryan Bingham as a fictional being, comes from his sister and the woman he thought he fell in love with. From his sister; "You do not exist to us", from the woman he fell deeply in love with "Its just some lost person".

    The ending leaves everything up in the air as to the audiences expectations just as it does the continuance of Ryan Bingham's journey's up in the air, now with his ten million elite fliers status. Really understand and am fascinated by Jason's choice to not answer the questions of the audience about Ryan's fate, but instead to create a revelatory reflective conclusion for audiences to relate to and think about. I loved this movie. Watching Ryan with his little black suitcase reminds me of a very happy afternoon on the set of UITA. I love this movie and I can't wait to see it again this weekend. Penultimately, Jason Reitman has created a very beautiful existential satire with subversive watershed moral messages, and an incredibly fascinating drama cum recessionary period piece. The aerial footage was breathtaking and left me in a state of total awe.
  • Brown
    Just saw it and came away with the feeling of Ryan Bingham being the Angel of Death, just hope his plane passes over your town.
  • Craig
    "And I don’t mean to be pretentious, but I hope that moment is a moment of silence for the audience to think about what they want in their life, because in reality that’s much more important than whatever Ryan Bingham decides to do." Guess what? That is pretentious. And if he doesn't matter because he is fictious, then why did you make a MOVIE and not a documentary about some of the real fired people?
blog comments powered by Disqus