submarine_logo

This weekend, the 28th and 29th of November, there’s a huge Beatles convention taking place in Stamford, Connecticut. Amongst all of the merchandise sales and other such typical expo shenanigans, there’s also set to be an open audition for Beatlemaniacs wanting to try out for casting in what they’re calling “The Fab Four.” Of course, that the film “will be shot as a motion-capture feature like the current Disney release of A Christmas Carol” tells us everything we need to know - this is Robert Zemeckis‘ remake of Yellow Submarine.

There’s already some suspicion, though, that this casting call is nothing more than a publicity stunt. Zemeckis has already talked about the possibility of Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr playing themselves in the film, there’s been a number of previous auditions, and even stories of name actors being up for the roles, perhaps even cast in them already.

Jim Hill had the details on the Stamford Event, including a link to the Showfax page where one can purchase audition sides from the film. The sides have been given interesting titles - Buckingham Palace Scene, Help - Bar Scene and John, Paul, George and Ringo. There’s no Buckingham Palace Scene per se in the original film, though the building does make a brief cameo appearance. Infamously, John Lennon claimed The Beatles smoked a joint in the Buck House bathrooms when collecting their MBEs, though I’m pretty sure Zemeckis isn’t dramatising that, unless rather obliquely.

Neither is there a bar scene in the original Yellow Submarine, nor any use of the song Help. It’s now pretty clear that Zemeckis’ remake is taking some liberties with the original material, and I’m thinking that’s a really good thing. We already have the old Yellow Submarine, now it’s time for something new.

The only other scene we can pretty much lock down so far is a press conference. There’s a whole host of video reference supplied on a blogspot page set up to promote the auditions, including one headed JOHN LENNON - #1 VIDEO REFERENCE FOR NEWS CONFERENCE SCENE.

Also note that the mannerism references are clips from Richard Lester’s A Hard Day’s Night in which the Beatles played versions of themselves. I guess that they didn’t suggest clips from the more psychotronic Help indicates a slightly less “wacky” tone for this new project.

Frankly, I’m excited to see Zemeckis formulating something fresh here and am rather intrigued to know who is writing the screenplay. I’ll be grateful to anybody out there who auditions, or has maybe already auditioned, and wants to drop me a line with what they know.

A report on The Examiner claimed that auditions, for the John Lennon role in particular, took place on October 12th. These do not appear to have been publicly announced, suggesting that they were peopled with jobbing actors and not mo-topped hopefuls from the great unwashed.

A new story from the UK’s Sun newspaper, who I’d reckon to have an accuracy rate of about only 60% when it comes to showbiz stories, claimed that Stephen Graham had been given the role of Ringo. Again, this is a far from routinely dependable source but this rumour seems esoteric enough to bear some consideration. I for one wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Graham confirmed eventually, though I know better than to expect it.

Here’s an image of Graham, should you not know the name. Of course, he doesn’t need to look the first bit like Ringo as the film will be motion captured.

stephen-graham

The same story alleges that John Simm and Ralf Little also auditioned. Again, I find this more than plausible, though if just part of this story is made-up filler, it’s likely to be this bit.

I wouldn’t expect any official casting announcements this side of the open casting call, even if (or perhaps especially if) it is just a PR stunt, though with Yellow Submarine scheduled for a 2012 bow, the actors - whoever they are - are likely to be stepping into Zemeckis’ big motion capture volume very soon.

  • Unfortunately far away, otherwise would attend.
  • Gennaro Gattuso
    God, Zemeckis is a genius, isn't he? A real Renaissance man. Where DOES he get his ideas?

    Sarcasm aside, we're long past the point where he should have had his career taken round the back and shot like Old Yeller. Now it's just sad. Give it up, Bob - nobody cares.
  • Jay
    Stephen Graham is from Liverpool so the accent will work - authentic Liverpool accents please!
  • gigaherc
    Ok, I have got a serious question -

    What has happened with Zemeckis? Where's his creativity?

    THE GUY MADE BACK TO THE FUTURE!!!!!!!
    and Forrest Gump, but since Polar Express which was a imo complete trainwreck he's going straight downhill. Who even cares for a 3d Beatles movie today?!?! Is it so wide audience that will guarantee him success? Don't think so.
  • Hasn't this joke gone on too long? This was just a prank, right?
  • Patatoa
    The two sides used for the audition sound like scenes from the movie Help!, rather than the original Yellow Submarine.
  • Patatoa
    The two sides for the auditions sound like scenes from the movie Help! rather than the original Yellow Submarine.
  • BrendonConnelly
    That may be the case. I'm trying to get the sides to confirm.
  • shadow
    Zemeckis, I don't care it you keep doing 3D, but for god's sake man make it about something we haven't seen before!
  • Rolland
    This is a Nightmare. Please tell me this isn't happening. That picture of the Submarine is horrendous. Someone please, please stop this. What demon possessed Zemeckis that he's now all gaga over fugly motion capute?

    There's absolutely no need to this. None whatsoever.
  • cactus
    Looking forward to him recasting the title...
    "Robert Zemeckis' the Beatles Yellow Submarine 3D: A New Abomination".
  • fanboy_d
    "Zemeckis formulating something fresh"

    wat
  • Dan W
    It's never time to ave a new yellow submarine. There's THE Yellow Submarine. There is absolutely no need for a remake or reimagining or any of that. This is shameful
  • DB
    This is just wrong. The Yellow Submarine is a series of artistic works. Zemeckis is a major ass-hole for thinking he has the right to "remake" something that can't possibly be remade. He's going to do some computer-animated bullshit or whatever and that's just fucking retarded.
  • When I attended the "New Monkees" audition in the 80s, someone told me the same thing - that the "audition" was just a publicity stunt, and the actors were selected through more conventional means. Now that I've mock-auditioned for 'Yellow Submarine', I can proudly claim to have failed TWO Beatles-related auditions that no one could have passed to begin with.
  • ididntencouragethatwink
    Have faith, all. Zemeckis and the Beatles go wayyyyy back (I Want To Hold Your Hand, 1979). In anyone else's hands, I'd be concerned for the worse. Not so, with Bob. To the Rev, I auditioned in Stamford last weekend as well last Saturday. The casting director was Victoria Burrows (Lord of The Rings, Contact, Polar Express) and she spent considerable time with me, allowing readings for several scripts and all four Beatles. There was no inkling that a casting director as busy as she would spend an entire two days in a hotel conference room with all types of non-actors AND legit actors, coaching them through scenes with yards of paper work and resumes in front of her...for the sake of a "publicity stunt". A Disney backed film about the Beatles directed by Robert Zemeckis doesn't need publicity. Certainly not 2 years out. The casting call was legit, and best of luck to all.
  • ringojohnpaulgeorge
    He sounds more like us than we do!!!!
  • iencouragewinks
    To: ididn'tencouragethatwink:
    For which role did you audition? Why do you suppose there was a separate, preliminary audition on Oct. 12 for the Lennon role, if indeed that happened? I'd like to agree with you about Victoria Burrows, having been in the same room in which you auditioned, but am bewildered by the Oct. 12 phenomenon.
  • ididntencouragethatwink
    I wouldn't put too much stock in that Oct 12th audition. I auditioned as all four Beatles (which was my way of not eliminating 3/4 of my chances by reading as only one Beatle). Certainly I gave John as much attention as any other of the fabs, reading for each role twice, at Ms. Burrows encouragement. There has also been a more resent "open casting" in another city for the auxiliary roles of The Boob, The Blue Meanies, et al with specifics on what they are looking for from those actors and what to prepare. I have not been a part of those auditions but, point is... it goes on. It's a process. If there was/is any truth to the rumored 10/12 Lennon casting audition, what of it? Best to just do the best you can in any audition and then...trust the process. The idea that the Stamford "open casting call" is all a publicity stunt (without any local media/news cameras converging on the hotel to capture the event)... is just so much sillyness. Hey if it WAS a publicity stunt it sorely misfired, since no media was present in Stamford (other than a live remote classic rock radio station broadcasting from the Beatle convention downstairs, and as a guest at the hotel for two days, I can tell you the station was blissfully unawares or unconcerned with the casting call taking place all day directly above them and vice versa). B & B Casting is not a radio station, they are a highly reputable casting agency with deadlines and financial commitments and obligations at stake (in this case, BIG obligations). Locking up their top casting agents in a Stamford hotel conference room for two days to get a little publicity for a movie TWO YEARS OUT from hitting the screen while simultaneously leading us down the garden path would be a HUGE waste of the agency's resources. It's too legit to quit. It's all in the mind, ye see. Crimble.
  • Dr. Winston O'Boogie
    HAVE FAITH?? Why, why, why, is Hollywood is so effing devoid of original ideas that they repeatedly resort to pilfering the past? They take us for idiots. MONEY, pure and simple. Hollywood is so inept now they are reduced to this in order to survive. I'm waiting for the remake of 'The Maltese Falcon', 'Citizen Kane', and 'A Hard Day's Night'.
  • Name
    Good Dr,
    This idea of "Hollywood remake" isn't some current sign of a trendy new direction. By example, and this is merely one of many: The original Raiders Of The Lost Ark, tho a brilliant adventure flik, was merely a retread of just about every popular Hollywood western, spy flik, and television serial which came before it. Keep in mind what's popular in say 1940's -era film making was being watched by (and influencing) people like George Lucas, Speilberg and, a bit further down the line...Zemeckis. So they grow up as film makers and try to inject the same sort of magic into their films as the ones they saw as a kid. Similar to what musicians do when they first hear that sound that inspired them to take up the instruments. Anyway, we should all get off this "Hollywood has run out of ideas" party line, it's just another way of saying you're old enough to connect the dots of all that came before it, just as the producers of the films we bash are. We have bigger fish to fry, naysayers, and Zemeckis is doing the frying...albeit from a Yellow Submarine parked on a Disney lot. Faith decried? Even the original Yellow Sub had little to do with the Fab Four's actual input. So perhaps let's look at it this way: The current revisionist version in question is fully endorsed by Mssrs McCartney, Starr, and the Harrison and Lennon estates, respectfully. Good enough for them? Works for me. And our friends... are all aboard.
  • Dr. Winston O'Boogie
    Dear Name,
    I would respectfully disagree with you. I for one have had my fill of being deluged with 60's remakes and I dont want to bore you with the fifty million titles that have come out since the 90's. I understand that people like Zemeckis and his kind are free to film what they like and are free to justify it however they wish, however I am free to state that I for one am appalled that Hollywood has decided once again to take a perfectly classic movie and redo it for the sake of redoing it. I'm sure you'll enjoy it and I'm certain all parties involved will be smiling all the way to the bank. It sounds like a fanboys dream. So bring on the remake of 'The Maltese Falcon', 'Citizen Kane' as it can and will be justified in the end. Enjoy.
  • So, maybe the actual audition itself wasn't for publicity. But what of all the audition footage? Everyone was filmed giving it their Beatles best. You don't think that highlights of that footage could be compiled and put into some kind of 'behind-the-scenes' featurette, either to promote the film or to be included as a bonus on the DVD?
  • ididntencouragethatwink
    Well, I 'spose anything's possible, Reverend but I kinda doubt it. The video taping was for Robert Zemeckis to sift through and narrow the casting down to the select top of the pops. From there, more casting calls will be done, and he'll probably arrange to have the cream of the crop fly out and read as Beatles for him, personally. The casting folks are in the process of narrowing..always narrowing.
  • ...unlike Ringo's adventures in the sea of monsters; always 'arrowing.
  • Uh, this just in. Director Robert Zemeckis has recruited the following actors to voice the Beatles’ characters: Cary Elwes (George Harrison), Dean Lennox Kelly (John Lennon), Peter Serafinowicz (Paul McCartney) and Adam Campbell (Ringo Starr). These are all experienced professional actors, and none of them were discovered during the Connecticut casting call.
blog comments powered by Disqus