islam_illustration_3

It’s not every day I get to tag a /Film story with ‘Muhammad’. So I guess I should thank evident crackpot producer Barrie Osborne, one of the men behind The Matrix and Lord of the Rings, because he wants to make a giant film about Muhammad. Yes, that Muhammad — the founder and prophet of Islam. A couple of cartoons depicting his image were once enough to generate a global outcry. (Visual depictions of the prophet are forbidden by Islamic law in some sects.) How will things work out when a producer puts up twenty-four pictures of him every second? Poorly, which is why Muhammad will not be seen in the movie that depicts his life.

In a way, this could be an interesting formal exercise: how do you make a movie about a person without ever putting them on screen? (Answer: get the Coen Brothers to make The Muhammed Who Wasn’t There.)

The Guardian says the film, which will chart the prophet’s life and teachings, is budgeted at $150m and is planned as “an international epic production aimed at bridging cultures. The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam.” The producer plans to feature English-speaking Muslim actors, and has the backing of Qatar-based production company Alnoor Holdings. The latter has retained Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi to “oversee all aspects of the shoot.”

That move pretty much shoots down any possibility of the film promoting a sane depiction of Islam. If you don’t recognize the name Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi you should — he’s the al Jazeera commenter who recently called Jews “the treacherous aggressors…this profligate, cunning, arrogant band of people,” before calling upon Allah to “kill them, down to the very last one.” He’s also called the Holocaust a punishment expressing Allah’s divine will, and hoped that “the next time will be at the hand of the believers.”

Can’t wait for the movie!

  • 24 pictures of him every second. Hahaha, that was funny.
  • Anon
    They should just film him like Dr. Claw from Inspector Gadget.
  • miso_turtle
    Haha, Dr. Claw, thats an awesome Idea.

    Can't they just do it how South Park did it, Just put a big black Censor Bar over him, and its all good.
  • Hahaha! I'll get you next time, Meccans!
  • Larry
    I wonder how they are going to bridge the "great satan" culture gap?
  • Jimmy
    GUESS WHAT: The director of "2012" decided to scrap a scene which showed a Muslim holy site (Kabba) being destroyed because he feared violence against him. But he was okay with showing the Christ statue collapsing in Rio de Janeiro. This proves my point that leftist Hollywood types are fearful of Muslims but not Christians. Read all about it:

    Roland Emmerich has admitted that he feared a fatwa would be placed on him if he filmed a scrapped scene for 2012.

    The filmmaker is well known for decimating famed landmarks on movies including The Day After Tomorrow and Independence Day. He stated that while he decided to destroy the Christ the Redeemer statue in Rio de Janeiro because he is "against organised religion", he was fearful of the Islamic religious decree for a sequence that was planned but not shot.

    The 53-year-old wanted to demolish the Kaaba, which is a cube-shaped building at the heart of Mecca and is the centre of prayers and the Islamic Hajj pilgrimage.

    He told Sci-Fi Wire: "Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit. But my co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right. We have to all in the Western world think about this.

    "You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is.

    "So it's just something which I kind of didn't [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out."
  • Jordan
    I would really like to see a genuine film made about Muhammad. But Hollywood is, unfortunately, too intimidated by Muslims to ever show his persona on the big screen. Personally, if I was a producer, I would show him in warts-and-all. I mean, this country isn't an Islamic nation anyway, and unlike those nations, we believe in freedom of expression. So making a film about Muhammad would test that civil right. But political correctness rules the day in L.A., so I'm sure this will never be done.
  • They already did, but it was from the 1970s and starred Anthony Quinn. I think it was a British production, but I can't be sure.
  • existenz
    You're talking about "The Message" from 1976. Muhammad was not shown in that film either (Anthony Quinn played a character named Hamza). Instead, organ music was used to signify Muhammad's presence.

    However, some people THOUGHT that Muhammad was depicted in that movie, which led to some riots and two deaths in the U.S. I'm sure the reaction to a movie that actually showed Muhammad would be on a whole other scale.
  • samir
    I don't think they should show him, if they want to make a movie seen by Muslims, and being a Muslim, I would like to see this movie. If they show him I'm sure there will be some crazy Muslims who will riot in the middle east, I think it's not worth rioting over if they do show him, just don't watch it if they do.

    By the way, I don't know if you've noticed, but American Muslims have never rioted over anything and that's why you haven't heard about them as much because most of them are smart people and not lunatics.
  • samir
    Also, if anyone wants to see a good movie about the Prophet, see:
    Muhammad: The Legacy of a Prophet
    It's a PBS Documentary, really well made and pretty truthful.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0396743/
  • Dysthymia83
    I think some scenes with Muhammed in that film were shot from his POV. If they tried that today it would look like an Islamic "Cloverfield".
  • craig
    sorry that im reply here but i dont see the reply on the other comment you made to me. anyway its true we dont see many non-Muslim suicide bombers. but remember the media is very selective this is the same media made out most black people are criminals. alot of people forget Oklahoma bombing was done by Christians, school shootings also done by alot of Christians, racist groups uses christianity to hate on others. all religion have a dark history. we all need to clean up all these f-ing wackos thinking harming others is part of their faith
  • Jordan, you're right, but the U.S. has immigrated many from the Islamic world who do NOT share your (or the Constitution's) view on free speech. Just a few hours ago, a young 20-year-old girl died of injuries she sustained when her Iraqi immigrant father ran her down with an SUV; he justified the honor killing by saying she had become too Americanized. The film studios understand that they would be targets, so it's understandable that they want to be cautious. I think the real problem is that we don't demand assimilation of newcomers.

    If you want to read about the tragic death, click on the link in my name.
  • craig
    cause that guy killed his daughter does not mean his a true muslim. even white christain people also have killed their own child.
  • Jimmy G.
    Agreed, Craig, but who's to define what it means to be a "true muslim" as you put it? The father certainly believes HE IS a true muslim. The problem is that these producers who want to "educate people about the true meaning of Islam" are going to piss off some people who believe they are practicing true Islam. And that may result in violence.
  • aggh i accidentally flagged Jimmy G's comment - ignore that moderators, totally did not mean to

    anyways, 'true Muslim' would be someone who at least follows Islam. Killing someone sets you back quite a bit in that dept.
  • craig
    when i mean a true muslim i mean they respect everyone does not matter what faith. my good friends who i raised since i was small is muslim, they aint bad people i even went to a muslim wedding and im a black christian. the fucking media and racist make it out that muslim is a threat. people who do evil things represent themselves they dont represent the race or faith of people. if you look at all the Hollywood movies back in the days ever muslim person is always a terrorist this is way before 9/11 happen.
  • existenz
    I feel for you. Most Muslims in the world, probably 99.9999% are peace-loving people. But you don't see many non-Muslim suicide bombers, and most religious-inspired terrorists these days are Muslim. Until the Muslim world cleans up their wackos, people will continue to have their suspicions.

    That said, there are some pretty nutty Christians and Jews out there as well.
  • greggorybasore
    It's a kinda weak argument to say "oh those extremist aren't representative of the TRUE faith" whether the faith under discussion is Christianity or Islam. The sad fact is that the type of muslim would "honor kill" his daughter is a true part of islam just as the type of christian that believe killing gays and lesbians is a godly act are a true part of christianity. Every religion has it's dark side and the texts for all 3 branches of JudeoChristIslam have enough awful ideas in them that the darker elements of those religions are completely justified by their respective holy books.
  • dude, you're trying to compare freedom of speech with some crazed Iraqi immigrant who killed his daughter...?!?!

    Epic Fail.
  • greggorybasore
    Broomstick, I think Jimmy's point was that the guy who did that to his daughter represents the people that don't support freedom of speech.
  • Jimmy
    Not just that, Broomstick. But also that he represents an individual who BELIEVES he is following "true Islam." No one can define "true Islam" or "true Judaism" or "true Christianity." These directors are going to attempt to do so, but they will alienate some people like this "crazed Iraqi immigrant" who clearly is a violent person. That's all.
  • Moadeeb
    okay, I'm a muslim and I just wanted to tell you that first of all it's not about hollywood being too intimidated by muslims it's about Hollywood or america respecting muslims' beliefs that we dislike the prophet mohamed being shown. Secondly, about the Sheikh, he's an idiot and he does not represent the islamic people he only represents someone from the Al-Qatar based production company who made a very bad decision in picking him. So it's a shame. Also, I'm from egypt and just because we follow islamic law doesn't mean we don't have freedom of expression. Dude, we're not barbarians but I do understand your point to a certain degree.
  • Jimmy G.
    Moadeeb, you sound like a cool person. I think many Americans fail to understand that there are MANY different sects of Islam throughout the planet. We only have a very small population of Muslims in the United States, so the detailed nuances of various sects are difficult to understand. Hopefully, rational and friendly Muslims like yourself will represent all Islamic sects one day.
  • "Hopefully, rational and friendly Muslims like yourself will represent all Islamic sects one day."

    Haha, wow, what a patronizing, rude comment. There are already plenty of "rational" and "friendly" Muslims, honey.
  • Joaquim
    AngryBroomstick has difficulty with reading comprehension; saying that it would be a good thing if people like Moadeeb represented all Muslim sects has NOTHING to do with whether or not "there are already plenty" of like-minded individuals.
  • fanboy_d
    O_O
  • JKW3000
    This film (not the religion or the person depicted) is either going to be like Passion of the Christ or The Triumph of the Will. Take that statement however you wish. Either way, call me when somebody sane decides to tackle the subject.
  • Tercotta
    Triumph is a bad example it was never really all that controversial and won many international awards. Also it's boring as all hell. It's neat for about 45 minutes and then it never ends, ever. It's like boredom torture.
  • Tercotta
    This could go two ways.
    1. It tries to be serious and gets reamed out by America's christians and the world's Islams freak out. The war of words is one for the ages with massive protests on both sides. The film has no one to sell too and loses a small mountain worth of money. (Who is the target audience anyways?)

    2. It ends up being hilariously obtuse and goes down as the worst idea/worst film anyone has ever made.

    Either way us atheists win! If this ever actually happens that is, which is a complete impossibility.
  • Sup. btw we're 'Muslims' not 'Islams'
  • Tercotta
    Wow that's a rookie mistake there. I knew that too. Sorry to you and anyone else irked by my error. I'll leave the mistake up as a testament to my stupidity.
  • IsaacRosales
    This comment just made my day
  • hailstate
    It's amazing how scared Hollywood is to offending muslims. Meanwhile, Larry David is pissing on painting of Jesus Christ.
  • that's not really a fair statement. Hollywood is located where? In Los Angeles, in the United States, where Muslims are a MINORITY group. Of course they're afraid to offend a minority group in the states.

    In Muslim nations, there have been offensive films (made by Muslim filmmakers) that mocked Islamic authorities or poked fun at Muslims. Take Iran, for instance...
  • Dysthymia83
    Maybe because people like William Donahue isn't willing to pull a Theo Van Gogh on Larry David.
  • Tercotta
    Yeah, but christianity has no rules saying you can't pee on Jesus so it's all fine and dandy.
  • well, as a Muslim, I welcome this news, but I'm wary of what'll kind of press the movie will recieve. Like someone here said, some right wing Christians will freak out and accuse the filmmakers of "twisting history..." take KINGDOM OF HEAVEN for instance. or Jewish groups, when the PASSION OF CHRIST came out.

    I don't think this is a good idea.
  • Jimmy G.
    AND some Muslims may "freak out" and burn cars (like the tens of thousands cars Muslim youths burned in Paris after the Mohammed cartoons were published). Or, a muslim like the one who knocked the filmmaker (and grandson of Vincent Van Gogh) off his bike in Amsterdam and proceeded to hack him to death with an axe in broad daylight because he didn't like Van Gogh's film might surface.

    BTW, that murder of Theo van Gogh happened five years ago TODAY.

    Let's not limit the craziness to any one religion.
  • dude, stop generalizing all Muslims based on what you've read on the news. You, quite frankly, sound like an ignorant fuckhead who believes everything he sees on the news.

    yes, the Van Gogh murder was horrible, but this has NOTHING to do with Hollywood making a movie about the Prophet Muhammad.

    Grow up and get a life.
  • greggorybasore
    Since when do the words "some Muslims" suddenly mean all Muslims? By that logic you generalized all right wing Christians when you said "some right wing Christians". If it's okay for you to generalize all right wing Christians then why is it wrong for Jimmy to do the same to Muslims? And if your statement wasn't a generalization of all right wing Christians then why is Jimmy's statement a generalization of all Muslims?
  • shameless
    The whole time i've been reading Jimmy G's comments, i have not felt that he was trying to generalize the whole Islamic culture; rather it seems that he was trying to point out examples of violent reactions by people who THOUGHT they were being good Muslims.

    I also believe that there will be a violent reaction to the making of this movie. I DO NOT however, believe that such a reaction in any way represents Muslims as a whole.

    Furthermore, i can not believe that you didnt get more mad at evilcult down there. sheesh
  • Islam is the world’s second largest religion after Christianity, so, surely the profit potential in a film of this magnitude certainly isn’t lost on the production team putting this together.

    However, as an English-language project? Some will probably be insulted by that!

    I understand the likely reasons for making it so, but even Mel Gibson recognized the value in authenticity, when he made his The Passion Of The Christ in 2004, in Aramaic, Latin, and Hebrew, with subtitles - which became the highest grossing non-English language film, and the most successful R-rated film in the United States of all-time, grossing almost $400 million domestically, despite its paltry $30 million budget!
  • pangloss09
    the story of muhammad is not very controversial and unknown to the majority of the non-muslim world; actually it is a pretty interesting story. however, i have seen the version of this from the 1970s... the inability to show muhammad makes for a pretty boring movie. it is a lot of people standing around, exclaiming "did you see what muhammed did yesterday? that was AMAZING!"
  • i agree. it was boring.
  • true. There are lots of other stories from the last 1400 years of Islamic history that would be culture-bridging and pretty great - an no one would be up in arms about every little detail
  • Aladdin Sane
    It'll be like the Ben-Hur of Islam. Except, in Ben-Hur, we saw Christ a couple times.
  • Tercotta
    Will we get to see Muhammed owning at chariot races? I'd pay to see that.
  • filmkid
    im up for this movie to be made i think its a good idea. i know the backward racist idiots wont watch it all we have to say to them F U.
blog comments powered by Disqus