let me in casting

Overture Films has sent out an official press release announcing that principal photography began today on Let Me InMatt Reeves’ adaptation/remake of Let the Right OnThe press release mentions a few new additions to the cast, which include Elias Koteas (Shutter Island) as the policeman, Cara Buono (Kelli Moltisanti in “The Sopranos”) as Owen’s mother and Sasha Barrese (The Hangover) as Virginia. It was previously announced that Kodi Smit-McPhee and Chloe Moretz would play the leads Owen and Abby and Richard Jenkins (The Visitor) would play the guardian of “Abby”.

The release points out that “while the new film will pay respect to the original Swedish version, [the filmmakers] intend to forge a unique identity for Let Me In, placing it firmly in an American context.” But we already knew this. President and CEO of Hammer Films Simon Oakes provides a quote, saying that the “The brilliance of [the original] story deserves to be seen by audiences on a wide scale and we are excited that the pieces are in place to make that a reality.”

I know a lot of people are violently against this remake, but I am very happy with the talent that has come together to make it happen. And at very least, Let Me In will hopefully help mainstream America find Tomas Alfredson’s 2008 Swedish film. And lets face it, audiences outside of the film geek circles really need to see that film. Read the full press release after the jump.


Let Me In

On behalf of Overture Films, we are excited to announce that principal photography began today on LET ME IN, writer/director Matt Reeves’ adaptation of Let the Right One In, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Reeves (Cloverfield) and young stars Kodi Smit-McPhee (The Road) and Chloe Moretz ((500) Days of Summer) were among those on-set as filming commenced on the Hammer Films production at Albuquerque Studios. Filming will also take place in various other locations in New Mexico before returning to Albuquerque to wrap in January.

In the haunting and provocative LET ME IN, an alienated 12-year-old boy (Smit-McPhee) befriends a mysterious young newcomer (Moretz) in his small New Mexico town and discovers an unconventional path to adulthood. The film is based on the bestselling vampire novel, Lat den Ratte Komma In, by Swedish author John Ajvide Lindqvist, and is an English-language remake of the highly acclaimed Swedish film of the same name.

The filmmakers note that while the new film will pay respect to the original Swedish version, they intend to forge a unique identity for LET ME IN, placing it firmly in an American context.

“This project is very personal to Matt as it is to the many passionate fans of the original story,” said Simon Oakes, President and CEO of Hammer Films. “The brilliance of that story deserves to be seen by audiences on a wide scale and we are excited that the pieces are in place to make that a reality.”

Updates to the cast list include Elias Koteas (Shutter Island) as the policeman, Cara Buono (“The Sopranos”) as Owen’s mother and Sasha Barrese (The Hangover) as “Virginia.” It was previously announced that Smit-McPhee and Moretz would play the leads “Owen” and “Abby” respectively and Oscar®-nominee Richard Jenkins (The Visitor) would play the guardian of “Abby”.

Hammer Films acquired the remake rights to Let the Right One In at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival where the film took home the Founders Award® for Best Narrative Feature. The production is scheduled for a 2010 release in the U.S. by Overture Films. Exclusive Film Distribution is handling worldwide sales and distribution of the film.

Producing the film are Hammer’s Oakes, Guy East and Nigel Sinclair, along with Oscar®-winner Donna Gigliotti (Shakespeare in Love). Hammer’s Alex Brunner and Tobin Armbrust will executive produce along with John Ptak, Philip Elway and Fredrik Malmberg. Overture’s Robert Kessel, EVP Production & Acquisitions, will oversee production for the studio. Swedish producers John Nordling and Carl Molinder, who produced the original film, are also involved as producers on this remake.

LET ME IN is the first film in a two-picture co-production, financing and distribution agreement between Overture Films and Exclusive Media Group, the parent company of Hammer Films and Spitfire Pictures.

Be sure to visit LET ME IN on Facebook and Twitter:

www.twitter.com/letmeinthemovie
www.facebook.com/letmein

ABOUT HAMMER

Hammer is the legendary British film brand, which was originally launched in 1934 and delivered a hugely successful run of films in the 1950s including Gothic classics “Dracula” and “The Curse of Frankenstein” and Sci-Fi picture “The Quatermass Xperiment.” Hammer’s reputation became branded worldwide as ‘Hammer House of Horror.’ In the 1960s Hammer struck distribution deals with Universal, Warner Brothers, Fox and Columbia. Hammer went on to produce a huge volume of films which included such titles as “The Plague of the Zombies,” “The Nanny,” “Quatermass and the Pit,” “The Devil Rides Out” and “One Million Years B.C.”

Not in production since the 1980s, the company’s brand is now being aggressively reinvigorated by Exclusive Media Group through new investment in the development and production of film, television and digital-platform content.

Hammer’s return to horror was heralded by interactive web serial “Beyond the Rave,” which was broadcast by MySpace in 13 territories in 2008. Today, Hammer has an active development slate totaling more than 25 projects across diverse genres sourced out of both Europe and the United States. Hammer recently wrapped production on “The Resident,” which stars two-time Academy Award winner Hilary Swank, Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Hammer legend Sir Christopher Lee and is directed by Antti Jokinen.

ABOUT EXCLUSIVE MEDIA GROUP (EMG)

Formed by strategic investment group Cyrte Investments in May 2008, Exclusive Media Group (EMG) (www.exclusivemedia.com) is the parent company of Spitfire Pictures and the legendary British studio, Hammer, which now has a combined share holder equity and bank facility in excess of $100 million. The company is run by Nigel Sinclair, Guy East and Simon Oakes, with Sinclair and Oakes serving as co-chairmen and co-CEOs (out of Los Angeles and London respectively). East is president of EMG and chairman of Exclusive Film Distribution (EFD).

Under EMG, Spitfire and Hammer operate as two separate production entities with offices both in London and Los Angeles. EMG aims to produce 6-8 films per year and to acquire additional pictures for worldwide distribution through EFD, its London based subsidiary responsible for worldwide sales and distribution. The group also develops projects for television and digital platforms.

EMG has over 300 titles in the combined Hammer and Spitfire libraries and pursues an aggressive library acquisition policy. The Hammer library is noted for its remake potential and the company is in discussions with A-list writers and directors to revive and re-imagine some of its highly touted titles.

Cyrte Investments is part of Delta Lloyd Asset Management, one of the Netherlands major asset managers, which in turn is majority-owned by London Stock Exchange listed Aviva plc, one of the world’s largest insurance companies.

ABOUT OVERTURE FILMS

Overture Films (www.overturefilms.net) develops, produces, acquires, and distributes feature length, theatrical motion pictures worldwide. The studio is a wholly owned unit of Starz Media, a controlled subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation attributed to the Liberty Capital Group. Its affiliated companies, Anchor Bay Entertainment and Starz Entertainment, make the films available domestically to viewers via home video, premium television, Internet and other outlets.

  • freemachine
    This is wrong on so many levels. I hope the remake bombs.
  • agreed
  • Travis McGee
    I loved the original. The American remake is going to butcher the story.
  • I hope the remake is horrendous, crappy, and fails miserably !!!!
  • mudywaters
    Even the original title Let the Right One In sounds and feels so much better than Let Me In.
  • nagroc
    yeah, "let me in" just sounds silly
  • clarencesomerset
    That's the title of the original book ... you guys ....
  • No, it's not. Let The Right One In is the original title. Let Me In is an alternate title they used for it.
  • nagroc
    There's a lot of room to figure out what the proper title is. The original Swedish text, the English translation of said text, or even the morrissey song it apparently was derived from. Regardless, "Let Me in" sounds too aggressive, whereas "Let the Right One In" has a nice hint of mystery to it..
  • Goro
    "Let Me In" recalls "Little Pit Little Pig, Let me In..."
  • You can complain about the film actually happening but you can't complain about how it's shaping up in it's own right. The cast is quite good and the studio has moved it into the heart of awards season. These are two signs that the people involved have confidence in the production thus far. I was initially against this but have actually come around. If this remake gets one more person to discover and treasure the original it's totally worth it.
  • MickJ
    I'll agree with the sentiment that the remake will definitely lead more to the original than otherwise would be the case, whether the remake is any good or not. If it's good, then good, a movie to enjoy. If it's bad, then the original will be treasured even more.
  • chansy
    I'm all aboard this positivity thread; I don't want to praise this remake like I did the first but I don't want to hate it either. In the end, slashfilmers will always have the original.
  • clarencesomerset
    One can tell the difference from the adult posters and the kids. The former write complete sentences and make an argument. The latter just pops in for a 'Fail...' and then vanishes.
  • I will be curious to see how the 180 of a location change affects the story.
  • Rob0729
    The only way this remake has a chance (and I am not betting on it being good) is if they are more faithful to the book than the Swedish version was. The Swedish version did take a lot of different turns than the book did especially on the story of Hakan and Eli's backstory. They basically expunged Hakan's back story and his motives for helping Eli most likely because it deals with pedophilia. It was more hinted at in the Swedish version than as upfront in the book (Hakan was fired from his teaching job because of molesting his students and he offered to kill people for Eli in exchange for basically sex. They also removed the part where he came back as a zombie vampire too.

    At least it would bring something new to the table that the original movie didn't. If they just basically redo the movie and Americanize it, it has no chance of being decent.
  • I actually think that is kinda what Reeves is going for. He said something about this not being a remake of the movie but a readaptation of the book.
  • ScanCase
    What I don't like about this is the fact that they say they want to retell the story for a wider audience. Well why don't that "wider audience" grow some balls and see a film with subtitles.
  • greggorybasore
    Because the term "wider audience" is a euphemism for "dumb ass american movie goers who like actiony simplistic studio crap".
  • Danos
    I guess I'm alone in thinking the original was massively over-rated.
  • nolacuse
    I would say so, yea. Most likely utterly alone in fact.
  • I know I'm going to get raked over the coals for this, but I didn't love Let The Right One In. I thought it was pretty good and that was about it. Perhaps my expectations were set too high, as everyone around me was foaming at the mouth about how good it was. Anyway, It may just be because I don't hold the original up as an untouchable masterpiece but I think this remake is shaping up to be pretty solid in it's own right.

    And I can't say for certain, but I'm pretty sure that a good number of the same people who are busy crying "heresy!" over this remake sight unseen are also Christopher Nolan worshipers. If you'll remember, Nolan did his own Hollywoodized remake of a Scandanavian thriller/art-house hit, "Insomnia", just a few years after its initial release and no one seems too upset about that anymore.

    Now that I have undoubtedly pissed everyone off, I will shut up for a minute. I look forward to all you lovely people telling me what a moron I am.
  • MyDarkGift
    I would love to make an intelligent pro/con to this ritual of Hollywood trying to make money on doing an impression of existing originality but Hollywood's track record speaks volumes for itself. Once in a great while, they strike well enough and make a decent remake. Yet, even then I still only respect the practice as much as say, one painter stealing the style of another to make a profit. It's tragic that something as unique and special as LTROI has to be made a mockery of in a remake to then be able to garner the original amount of attention this Swedish movie should have had for itself in the first place. Which is the only Pro aspect to all of this; once a remake bombs, then and only then will the original receive its just attention, apparently. It's really a shame. I do wish the best for this remake but lightning rarely strikes twice in the same spot.
  • MyDarkGift
    "Insomnia"...in my book, that's an example of a decent "Foreign to USA" remake. I liked the original, I liked the remake. But, you know what, I don't remember the remake being truly different/changed from the original all that much. It certainly did not "intend to forge a unique identity for [Insomnia], placing it firmly in an American context..." Sigh...
  • " It certainly did not "intend to forge a unique identity for [Insomnia], placing it firmly in an American context..." Sigh..."

    I would argue that by placing it in Alaska and castin Pacino and Robin Williams it did just that. I mean, what could place it more firmly in an American context than casting Robin Williams? Setting it in an apple pie factory?
  • Rob0729
    There have been many good to great foreign to US remakes. The Departed (remake of Infernal Affairs done in Hong Kong) is probably the best example. 12 Monkeys was a remake of La Jetee. I actually like Vanilla Sky which was a remake of the Spanish Abre Los Ojos (Open Your Eyes). I even was mildly amused (just mildly) with Point of No Return which is a remake of La Femme Nikita.
  • MyDarkGift
    Well, when a foreign film is remade by Hollywood, I can pretty much expect that the rule is they are going to hire American actors and film somewhere in America. (not always but mostly) So, knowing that "law", I didn't feel like I could put the fact that the "Insomnia" remake was filmed in Alaska with American actors as a minus, it is just how its done, so I accepted it. I'm not actually glorifying hardly any hollywood remakes as even with "Insomnia", the remake wasn't as special to me as the original. I did like it for what it was, a Hollywood remake. Within that mindset, I did enjoy it.
  • MyDarkGift
    What was I specifically thinking when I referenced "American context"? Pretty simple elements;

    - Replacing an experienced, deep character with whatever hot/controversial bimbo/cake boy "actor" that is 10-20 years too young for the part and has a high rating over at Mtv.
    - Taking the value of the "banging" (various artists) soundtrack as high or higher than any other aspect of the movie.
    - Soft drink, snacks and gizmo plugs within the movie. No matter how subtle the studio think they are...
    - The changing of major and/or pervasive elements within the original film.
    (if the "Insomnia" remake had been filmed in the desert vs. a cold environment...THAT would have pissed me off to no end)

    Basically, most things that diverts away from the original film/original idea.

    I just wouldn't put American locations or actors on the list since hey, if the UK did a remake of "Thelma and Louise", they would film in the Uk with UK actors.
  • MyDarkGift
    HEY...Speaking of changing elements; the LTROI remake...to be filmed in Albuquerque, New Mexico?? Is the remake going to have SNOW?? That was a HUGE part for me in help setting the tone of the movie. I know, this may seem inconsequential to some, but what if "The Thing" (yes, a brilliant remake) had taken place on the sunny hillsides of California?! I think/hope you get my point. Anyone know? Snow or no snow for the remake?
  • greggorybasore
    So am I the only one thinking that the americunt version will have more explicit action scenes rather than the subtle hinted at stuff in the original.

    Oh by the way I love how the guys behind this are pulling the same trick as the people behind the americanized Old Boy remake and claiming "we're not remaking a foreign movie, but going back to the source material and readapting that!" as though it will somehow make for a better reaction.
  • Agreed, the film is fundamentally better than the book. I could go into it here but it would take too long and there are better writings on the subject online. The AV Club has a good comparison if I remember correctly. This is the one thing I don't like so far and it may be an achilles heel for the film.
  • 34martin34
    well...I like the poster, maybe this movie won't suck so much after all.

    ...though of course it is similar to the original poster so maybe that's why I like it :P
  • dj.cyrillle
    American don’t like subtitles film, but for me i ready saw the film it was so great that i will love it and the remake wil be very bad like always.American’s truly cannot handle foreign/subtitled films, plain and simple. When Pan’s Labyrinth came out, more than half the audiences left their theater. Let the Right One In is another example of American ignorance.I hate parents that disreguard the rating and bring their children to “R” movies.This is another dumbing down of the original classic Swedish version. Why can’t we let the original speak for itself? I love the Original.
blog comments powered by Disqus