pa1

Update: In our box office report below, we mentioned the lack of official sequel plans for Paranormal Activity. Well, Paramount has now released a statement from Chairman Brad Grey via LAT: ”We have the rights on a worldwide basis to do Paranormal 2 and we’re looking to see if that makes some sense.” The word ’some’ has possibly never been needed less in a sentence. Paranormal Activity’s boffo, record-setting box office is discussed below. We’ll update on the sequel when and if more details come in. In the meantime, what direction should a sequel take?

It had to happen later than sooner: this weekend Lionsgate’s Saw franchise took a significant tumble with Saw VI opening to a mere $14.8 million from 3,000 theaters, the lowest opening since 2004’s Saw ($18.2m). The prognosis for the grisly torture series might be gloomier if not for its showdown with Paranormal Activity, the year’s biggest movie phenomenon (no small feat), which haunted the top spot after months of escalating buzz with $22 million. That means it’s up two millie over last weekend, while still playing in less than 2,000 theaters. Not only are number-crunchers getting wet over the idea that this indie pick-up from Paramount, budgeted at $13,000 (yeah, thousand), might gross $100 million domestic, but it’s on track to become the most profitable release in the mountainous studio’s history. Word from the clown is: Executives are filming themselves asleep with permagrins, splayed out on beds covered in dollars gold bars.

All of this PA madness has many thinking that Jigsaw’s fetishistic days are over, with several Saw fans fearing that he’ll hang himself in a nipple contraption so boggling it makes Mousetrap look like Pogs. Makes for good slash fiction. Have no fear, mysterious Saw lovers: the iconic sicko is slipping on the 3D shades for next year’s Saw VII, and as of now, PA doesn’t have an official sequel. Update: see update above. (And the once-planned remake remains scrapped and more pointless than ever). Though I find the film’s pop culture ubiquity more surprising than The Blair Witch Project’s, it’s still worth noting that TBWP grossed $140 million domestic back in 1999 and was budgeted at $60,000. The longterm effects of TBWP can still be seen on television and film—with shows like SyFy’s Ghost Hunters and innovative genre films like District 9 utilizing its intense, handheld sensibility. The impact of PA on Hollywood could be far greater in my eyes.

The patient yet hyped roll-out for the film, which targeted college campuses and relied on an event campaign amongst potential filmgoers not unlike a concert, took advantage of online word-of-mouth, sly press releases, and Twitter. And the shrewd filmmaking skills of new writer/director Oren Peli, currently at work on a similarly-styled, alien-centric project entitled Area 51 ($5m budget), could be a game changer. Peli’s reliance on an intimate setting, a universal, enticing hypothetical (…while you were sleeping), and a homegrown, independent approach that bypassed glossy, corporate trends and CGI all coincide with the rise and mainstreaming of online content.

That the film was at one time scheduled for release as a special feature on a bigger-budgeted remake’s DVD is beyond telling. As is its use of unknown actors Micah Sloat and Katie Featherston at a time when many superstars are less interesting and complex in an accelerated marketplace than the tranny bagger at the local market. The endorsement of Steven Spielberg, who it must be said played a vital role in the film’s trajectory and placed his personal stamp via the ending, is further proof that PA could be a real sign of the future.

In other box office news, Spike Jonze’s Where the Wild Things Are got off to a rocky start this weekend, but experienced a bump on Saturday to finish with $14.4 million; still a 55%+ drop from its debut. The numbers suggest that the film may not recoup its estimated $100 million budget, which ballooned with delays, at the domestic box office, but given the positive reception and possible Oscar nominations, the movie can be called a win without any spin control; DVD sales and international box office will only help. This is one of those films that will be shown in highlight reels for 2009, and solidifies Jonze as an uncompromising, visionary filmmaker, now with added mainstream awareness and cachet.

On Saturday, I received my “Chaos Reigns” t-shirt from Mondo Tees, but Lars von Trier’s Antichrist from IFC Films was only slightly more animated than the infamous fox featured therein, grossing an okay $73,000 on six screens (avg. $12,500) in selected cities. With all the buzz surrounding the film’s enigmatic themes, its title, sexual imagery, Drudge Report headlines, and memes, this doesn’t bode well for a larger roll-out. However, the film will certainly find its way to erudite audiences as a merited and possibly important work in due time.

Bottom of the Box Office Shoe: Finally, Astro Boy was shat out, grossing an estimated and pretty bad $7 million. Not more jpegs and trailers for that piece of garbage, such a relief. I’m not sure who thought John C. Reilly’s face had pull with the nation’s teenagers, but his esoterically titled Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant proves he/she should have waited until T.I. was freed up to cast the film. Based on a popular book series, it grossed a coffin-quiet $6.3 million, but didn’t quite explode in boring, Swank flames like Amelia, with $4 million. Sundays were made for disaster metaphors.

  • greggorybasore
    Sad to hear the drop in box office on Where the Wild Things are. It's such a great movie it really deserves more.

    Oh and what the hell I've wanted to do this for years... FIRST!
  • slumbergod
    Finally watched Paranormal Activity. Sadly, the hype killed it for me. It was an amateur movie in all ways and although it showed promised, a sequel is going to have to be a lot better if they want $10 from me to see it.
  • son_of_el_topo
    What problems in particular did you have with Paranormal Activity? It was pretty solid, and was intended to be "amateur". It was entirely effective for what it was.
  • kdrodawg
    Yea, up until the ending that is
  • ronny
    Blame Spielberg, not the directors.
  • son_of_el_topo
    i watched the original ending and it made me appreciate the theatrical ending a whole lot more. the original ending is just terrible. it completely kills the mood. apparently there is a third ending where she just crawls up to the camera and slits her throat, and i think that would have been a lot more jarring and effective.
  • jkerr
    The original ending to that movie is absolute garbage. I'm so glad they put the ending on there that they did. Completely fits the mood of the rest of the movie, and though a more "hollywood" ending then the others, it completely works, and is what made people leave that movie freaked out. I swear, if people didn't know that Spielberg was the one who suggested using that one, no one would be bitching about it.
  • son_of_el_topo
    so you can actually thank Spielberg, instead of blaming him.
  • candice
    so i'm not trying to ruin the movie for any one but what is the original ending? i dont know if i saw the original or the other one. please email me candiibabii047@aol.com
  • It was poorly acted, horribly improvised, under reasearched, not scary and featured the most annoying and useless characters I've seen in ages. I have not seen a worse movie this year... And I saw GI Joe.
  • son_of_el_topo
    wow, somebody needs to learn how to have a good time with a movie.
  • robo_c
    this should be known as the box office weekend of fail. saw 6000 underpreforms, astro boy, next vampire movie and amelia are all going to take losses
  • zoey
    i will lmfao if paramount uses 20-50 mil to make a paranormal activity sequel that totally tanks.
  • ...this time from the demon's perspective.
  • That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Follow the demon over to a new host and try to build it into a new icon. It would be better than just rehashing from the POV of a new couple
  • lipslikeasukal
    I hope the Saw series dies a pointless, drawn-out, sadistic, porn-gorish, mouse-trapian death.
  • Frankly I'd rather see it just die outright and quickly so we can stop talking about it. Are there plans for another after this one, because I think next year will probably be it.
  • lon111172
    I bet it will be a prequel with the chick from the 1960s that is reference in the movie.
  • VexnadDANGER
    that actually doesn't sound like a bad idea... 16mm film would be fantastic to watch! especially for this type of film!
  • Chris B.
    Yes, this actually sounds like a very good idea.
  • Money_Talks
    CAnt wait to see P.A. It doesnt even have a release date here yet. Oh well....
  • Tetsuo_Man
    Do NOT go in with high expectations... set them as low as you can so you will be pleasantly suprised, otherwise you will end up like I did. Walking out and going... "That's it, THAT was what I HAD to go see!"
  • presto117
    agreed. I get scared VERY easily, but the trailer and the hype were so good, i just had to watch it. i went with my GF, who gets scared pretty easily, but we just sat there. i thought it was pretty creepy, at most, but definitely not scary. I'd say it's worth a watch at least, just to see some of the things in it.
  • When will studios realize that you don't have to make a sequel to every successful film. It's like Blair Witch 2 all over again.
  • jkerr
    Agreed. If they make a sequel to this movie, it's seriously going to tarnish the original for me. Hollywood really needs to leave gems like this alone.
  • jrice73
    Paranormal Activity was extraordinary. The hype did not kill it for me simply because I have friends who were on set with Peli and the two actors two years ago when the thing was being made. My friends even got to spend a nice evening watching the film in the house Peli made it in. And that was two years ago. They told me to look out for this film as it was going to be something special. And it was. My only complaint, it took two damn years to see the thing. Two years. I missed it at a couple of film fests and then Paramount just about buried it. But I and everybody else in the world can now see it and Paramount's talking sequel. A sequel...of course, brilliant idea Paramount. That's just stupid. But that's typical Hollywood. Peli like Duncan Jones and Neil Blomkamp complete something of a triumvirate for me as new filmmakers who have blown my mind this year and whose films will be on my best of the year list in December. Way to go guys!
  • jasonb26
    its so annoying when sequels from these types of films move on without our original protagonists. now, "Open Water & Blair Witch" had the same experience as PA. and with these type of films, sequels do not usually work. IMO, they could if the original cast had survived, because that's who we care about, not the demons or the things that kill/attack them. (obviously this isn't something feasible because of the fate they face)

    so depending on which ending they run with, we could pick up with katie on the loose, but how far can that really go? a PA sequel is a bad idea.
  • sidewalkgod
    A sequel if done by the same director/writer could work. He took a storyline from GhostHunters and made a really good, slow boil horror/thriller. Maybe he already had an idea for another and Paramount is greenlighting it. And if done like PA, it could be as amazing as the first, even more so since we will already have creeps knowing what to look for
  • GreatBigLion
    "The endorsement of Steven Spielberg, who it must be said played a vital role in the film’s trajectory and placed his personal stamp via the ending"

    Spielberg changed the ending? I haven't seen the movie yet, but my friends who have said the ending was the scariest part.
  • GODDAMMIT. LEAVE IT ALONE.

    Why do they have to ruin everything?!
  • i am not sure if i want to see a sequal but then again, if they come up with something clever i wouldn't mind watching it.
  • paranormal activity was a horrible 90 minute movie, so boring

    if it were a youtube video, it'd be amazing
  • ff
    Paranormal Activity is just plain stupid. The acting is atrocious and there's basically zero story. Seriously, it's like they made it in a weekend and made it up as they went along. Go ahead and watch it and waste an hour and a half of your life so you can see what everyone else thinks is amazing. I was fast forwarding through it and I was still bored to tears. It makes Blair Witch look like a 40 million dollar production. And at least Open Water they had to shoot on the ocean. But then those movies were horrible too. This one's even worse. I don't get it. All hype and marketing works yet again...
  • Rob
    I tend to agree; I found it disappointingly dull, very much the Emperor's new clothes.

    However, at least SOME of the reasons for this style of film being popular - outside horror fans, and clearly PA's popularity is not purely down to them - are obvious. Firstly, an awful lot of people still think ghosts, demons, spirits, afterlifes, etc, exist. Secondly, a large crossover section of those people really, REALLY like watching other peoples' lives (cf. the popularity of any and all reality or "real life" TV). Thirdly, plenty of people are intrigued by anything that is described to them as both "different", but also "good" - for reasons both genuine and cynical. Bingo! Instant buzz and popularity (and bums on seats), outside the horror "norm".

    IMHO.
  • at least with SAW i know what I am getting, Paranormal Activity was a major let down. I felt better though after watching The Exorcist and A Nightmare On Elm Street
  • JP7
    Awesome! Just what film fans needed,more pornographic vampires ruining a good thing.Anyone remember Blair Witch 2?I thought so!LOl!
  • Actually, the original ending to the movie was that Katie comes back up to her room and sits in a zombie-like state for the rest of the day. Then, her friend comes and sees the dead body, then leaves. About 20 minutes later, police show up and find her in her room. I guess she wakes up (I couldn't really tell) and runs towards them screaming, "Where's Micah?" Then they shoot her because she still has the knife.
blog comments powered by Disqus