polanski_1

We don’t know a lot about Roman Polanski’s currently unfinished film The Ghost. And though current comments from Ewan McGregor, who stars in the film, don’t do a lot to illuminate the project, they do add some context to the current conversation about Polanski in general. As Polanski faces a denial of bail in Switzerland (and some medical situation that saw him removed from jail for a short time) I enjoy the contrast between positive statements about Polanski the artist and the harsh reality of Polanski the fugitive.Some of McGregor’s praise for Polanski is boilerplate actor/director stuff. (”He pushes you quite hard and always demands that you look for the truth of the scene,” yeah, really?) But then he gets a little closer to the truth of what working with Polanski might be like.

…he’s also got quite a brusque manner, so you have to have a thick skin. That said, I’m very fond of him. He’s one of the very few completely brilliant directors that I’ve worked with. There aren’t really very many, I have to say, or it’s a shame to say.

So he’s brilliant but difficult. Right, we knew that, more or less. Still, good to hear it from McGregor. Read the whole LA Times interview to get some other fun stuff from the actor, like how he enjoyed making out with Jim Carrey. He also says he hasn’t been following the Polanski arrest story, because “I don’t like to think of him sitting in a prison cell. But I wouldn’t comment upon it because it’s a very complicated issue, you know?”

And what of Polanski, who was denied bail this week, and that ‘complicated issue’? (Which really isn’t complicated at all.) For one, the Swiss are in the very odd position of defending their arrest of the director. I find it difficult to believe that officials there have to justify their action. He was a fugitive, and they got word that he’d be in one place at a specific time. You’d think they’d have to justify not arresting him in the years prior. (And they do justify that, to some extent.)

At this point, one of Polanski’s lawyers says he’s considering a voluntary return to the States, to avoid a long extradition process from Swiss jail. Hey, isn’t that exactly what the sensible folks have been hoping he’d do all along? Georges Kiejman, one member of his legal team, says, “If the procedure drags on, it is not impossible that Roman Polanski could choose to go and explain himself in the United States, where there are some arguments in his favor.” But Polanski’s French lawyer Herve Temime says, “There has been no change in strategy at all,” which suggests he’ll make the extradition process go all the way. Stalemate.

  • waqman
    Personal opinion of Polanski aside, I want to see this film. Because I'm both a fan of Polanski's work and McGregor's. He's an extremely underrated actor.
  • freemachine
    McGregor: "But I wouldn’t comment upon it because it’s a very complicated issue, you know?”

    Really? I thought it was pretty straight forward---Polanski drugged, and forcibly sodomized a 13-year old girl.
  • Christina
    The one and only thing Polanski was convicted of was "unlawful sex with a minor." He was not convicted of drugging or forcibly sodomizing the girl. Get your facts straight.
  • clarencesomerset
    There is a difference between what he was convicted for and what he admitted to doing. Big difference there, with the plea bargains and all.
  • freemachine
    Ugh, you're one of those "rape-rape" people. BTW, I only stated the truth behind what HE DID; never once did I state that he was "convicted" of anything, so get YOUR facts straight.
  • Bull
    Actually, he did drug and sodomize a young girl -- it is in the trial transcript. He pled to the crime of "unlawful" sex with a minor." Ironically, you should get your facts straight. Just pathetic.
  • megan
    ... and you get your head out of your self-induced obliviousness. Polanski never contested her testimony, and he could easily have done that if he is/was innocent.
  • eddymovies
    By complicated, he means not PR-friendly.
  • Persilja
    You must be pretty stupid if you can't see why he's avoiding the question.
  • Plan 9
    It's complicated in the sense that any actor in current employ of a director cannot say anything bad about him out of fear of losing said job.
  • freemachine
    Polanski's film,"The Ghost", is in post-production. McGregor can't lose his job at this point no matter what he says about the director. So, it's not complicated in that sense either...try again.
  • for real
    just get him in prison but let him out to direct movies on work release
  • Polanski is a great director. One of the best of his generation. But that doesn't give him license to drug a child and have anal sex with her while she's telling him she doesn't want him to do that to her. Christina, you get your facts straight. Polanski is a child molester who deserves to be in jail. What if it happened to you? Or your sister? Or your daughter?
  • Anal sex? Now that's new to me.
  • freemachine
    That was covered by the "sodomy" indictment, which legally covers a number of sexual acts.
  • Polanski had anal sex with his rape victim. It's in the court record. No one's disputing that. Although people I otherwise admire, like Whoopi Goldberg, have been quoted as saying that's not "rape rape."
  • Oh-kay. To be honest, I don't know how to react to that. This is seriously fucked up.
  • Guest
    that Whoopi Goldberg comment "its not rape rape" is just dumb dumb
  • RJ
    She only said that in context of Sherri "Is the Earth round?" Shepherd saying that he was convicted of rape. She was clarifying that the crime he plead guilty to wasn't "rape," and asked the production team to tell her what the actual charge was. Cause, god-forbid we should use correct facts and terms when engaged in a nationally broadcast discussion.
  • I love you man
    Didn't Mr. Polanski agree to pay the girl some money? And isn't even she saying they should give him his freedom back?

    I think once the plaintiff (I used to watch People's Court) says that he/she's over it- there should be some leaniancy for the defendent, if not dropping the case altogether.

    I'm not trying to say it's acceptable for someone to do what he's being accused of doing...but it's been long enough that she's over it, maybe this should be a reason for giving the elderly gent his freedom back. I mean really what do you think is going to happen to him inside the "big house"? Not trying to talk smack, but, he's elderly...it's not like he's going to he's going to go in and start pumping iron to the point where he's able to defend himself against the bruisers inside...right? I think sending someone of his social stature to prison (especially at this age) is a death sentence. He didn't murder anyone so...potential jurors keep this in mind. Peace in the Middle East.
  • sauce_1
    I'm sorry, I don't have time to explain all the reasons you're an idiot, but you are.

    The man raped a 13 year old girl after he gave he drugs and alcohol. Even if there was some remote way that she's recovered, (rape victims are hardly ever free of that pain and scarring), that doesn't mean we all back away from laws that are in place and just say Meh to the Crime of rape.

    You can't shrug away Rape. It doesn't work that way no matter who or what you are or what you've created. It doesn't pay for RAPE against a THIRTEEN year old Girl.
  • jessi89
    Victims say they forgive them all the time to help them recover emotionally from it. It doesn't mean that murderers, rapists or anyone who abuses children should get away with it just because the victim has forgiven.
  • Marc
    This whole Polanski discussion makes me sick. Even on this discussion we seem to have several eye witnesses of the events 30 years ago.

    99% is from hearsay. There are only two facts right now:

    1. There are some really serious accusations.
    2. There was a plea bargin to a lesser crime: Unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. But all other acusations (including the drugging part) were never brought to an end.

    What about bringing him back to the States first? Put him on trial? Have a close of argument? Have a real sentence?

    Instead people are surpassing each other with what they "know" about the case. And this is the most disrespectful thing you can do towards the victim.
  • megan
    I know he didn't contest any of her testimony. I know he fled. I know he had sex with an underage girl. How do I know this? Because he bragged about it all once he was in safe territory.
    Oh, and this whole thing about bringing him back for a trial: that's kind of what all this argument is about- Not getting away with illegal activity because you had the money to do it.
  • I Love You Man
    Y'listening Saucy? Think before you say things...I'll let it slide, THIS TIME. Peace.
  • I Love You Man
    Another thing for the Sauceless Wanker: Maybe she "got over it" because it wasn't rape? Just sayin', if it is such a horrendous crime- which it is - but if it really did happen the way you're sayin'...why/how could she be over it? THINK.
  • Plan 9
    Ah yes. The "my broken arm healed therefore it was never broken" argument. Or maybe you'd relate better with a head injury metaphor?
  • Thankyou for writing such a non-biased account about the imprisonment of Mr. Roman Polanski.
    Whatever as a director, as a a man he self admittedly is the rapist of a 13yr old girl. And I personally couldn't care less if it happened 30yrs ago or not, he committed the most disturbing & vile crime that could ever be committed against another human being, therefore he should be punished, and not given special treatment because of his wealth & status.
    My friends & I (as admirers), of Ewan McGregor, are disgusted & saddened to hear that he feels sympathy for the fact Mr. Polanski is languishing in prison for a self admitted crime of rape. As a father himself of a 13 yr old girl, and more importantly as a Unicef Children's Ambassador I thought he would have conveyed sympathy for the victim rather than the perpetrator. But I was wrong.
    His comment made me sick and quite angry.
    I'd like to know, considering his comment, does he still view himself a good Unicef Children's Ambassador?
    Thankgod for Jamie Foxx, the only celeb to have the guts to come out and condemn Mr. Polanski and back his incarceration for such a vile crime. I have a new found respect for Mr. Foxx, and a loss of respect for Mr. McGregor.
    Thankyou!
  • Heheh. "Non-biased account"? There's a difference between a non-biased account and a biased account that you happen to agree with. You do know the difference, right?

    You seem to have already brought out the pitchforks, but before you start any riots I should remind you that all McGregor said was that he didn't want to think about how Polanski was sitting in jail. "Sympathy" is this thing that people feel sometimes when they're actually human beings and not working themselves into frenzies of self-righteous sanctimony.

    Read McGregor's comments again and you'll see that he neither approved of nor defended Polanski's crime. Some celebrities embarrassed themselves with their defenses of Polanski; McGregor did not.
  • Jean
    "Read McGregor's comments again and you'll see that he neither approved of nor defended Polanski's crime. Some celebrities embarrassed themselves with their defenses of Polanski; McGregor did not."
    Exactly. I think he does support Polanski but does not want to embarrass himself and receive a public backlash for supporting him. On the other hand he may not support Polanski, but does not want to get a backlash from the Hollywood Polanski supporters.
  • megan
    Nor did he really acknowledge Polanski's crimes. That is what this is about... he can't bear to see him in prison, but hasn't said how he can't bear to imagine a girl being raped by him. The willful ignorance and cowardliness from these people is what everyone is in cahoots about. Until they are affected directly by a crime like this, they will keep inching away from the issue.
  • DeanMoriarty
    Well, Polanski should be tried and punished for what he did, no question (shouldn't be one, I guess). The punishment should also be reasonable (and will be when he gets a fair trial and a judge that isnt completely obsessed with his image in the media). THere are more possibilites to lock someone up than just putting them into gen pop in chino.
    That he doesn't trust the US legal system might be understandable, given his experience not only with his trial and the impact of the media, but also the ongoings when his pregnant wife was slaughtered and at first he was made out as the killer by some papers, since "he sure is a crazy foreign guy, making movies about satan and stuff, speaking funny and sleeping with lots of beautiful women while looking like a rat in a suit".
  • Brently986
    Really good post, Russ. This is the opposite of a "complicated" situation. He committed a crime, and while it might be okay in France to let a child rapist off the hook because he had a hard childhood and then made some good films, the rest of the world doesn't look kindly on jumping ship and living as a fugitive for a crime like this. One of the saddest things I've ever read was the list of Hollywood signatures asking for this guy to be let off the hook.

    Ewan McGregor is in a tough place here. I don't think it's all that difficult to see how he really feels; after all, he signed up to make a film with Polanski. This isn't his problem though, it's Polanski's, and it's also the Swiss government's, which is sad because all Switzerland did was bring a fugitive in.
  • megan
    Here's another thing I'd like to know, Ewan: you have two daughters. As individuals at high risk for sexual assault, they should have the chance to have their own opinion about the man that daddy talks about so glowingly (but did not really touch upon what he finds so "complicated" about.) So, do they know the details of Polanski's case? If not, why not- and do you know your reasons for not telling them? Would you have trusted your cinema god with them, twenty or thirty years ago, in a closed room? Or does Polanski's contribution to your acting resume negate all of that conjecturing?
  • Tom
    Polanski is a little pervert. No better then anyone else who drugs and rapes a child.
  • nano X
    Another 70's washout.

    He might rejuvenate himself by FINALLY breaking ranks
    with his industry and outting the REALITY of their
    decades of collaboration with the most awesomely genocidal
    regime ever seen ---across the Pacific.

    I mean, mentioning those 70 million murders in their
    'fave' creditor's land across the sea would be kinda' nice.

    What do ya' think----?
blog comments powered by Disqus